Does "Disallow: /xmlrpc.php" in robots.txt affect moz tools ability to fetch DA?
-
Just checked a website for Domain Authority using Moz' tool, however it returned 1 for DA, which should be unlikely. I have been trying to find the problem and found "Disallow: /xmlrpc.php" in robots.txt. Could this affect Moz' tools ability to get the required data?
-
I see. Thanks for the info, Tawny.
-
It's not necessarily that those links you're seeing with other tools but not with Moz's tools aren't relevant; it could just be that we haven't crawled and indexed the sites linking back to yours recently enough to include links from them in our index. If you're seeing 0 internal links reported, then that definitely means we haven't fully indexed your site, or if we have it was long enough ago that the linking data is no longer stored in the index, and we'll need to re-crawl and re-index.
The best thing you can do to get your site indexed by our tools is to search for it and the sites linking to it in Open Site Explorer. That should prompt our tools to visit your site and crawl and index it within the next few index updates.
-
Thank you for the breakdown of how the DA calculation works. The dilemma here is that with other tools, such as Raven Tools, it finds almost 300 backlinks for the website where Moz states it found none. Does this imply that none of those backlinks are relevant? The webpage is also linked internally, and moz returns a value of 0 for that also.
-
Hey there, Tawny from Moz's Help Team here.
That Disallow command shouldn't be affecting your DA score; that's calculated based on our own metrics and your backlink profile.
Domain Authority is a score (on a 100-point scale) developed by Moz that predicts how well a website will rank on search engines. It is made up of an aggregate of metrics (MozRank, MozTrust, general link profile, and more) that each have an impact on this score. it can be difficult to directly influence your DA, but one way to move toward increasing it would be to improve your overall SEO. A great place to start with that could be to focus on link building! You can learn more about link building here and get a more detailed explanation of Domain Authority through this resource.
In general, I'd recommend keeping in mind that all of these metrics are relative with respect to the other sites included in our index. The metrics will probably have some additional context when compared to sites similar to your own, including your competitors.
Rand does a great job of breaking down how to interpret DA fluctuations through this post.
I think you've already pinpointed the reason we don't have a DA score of higher than 1 for your site — you're not seeing any link information in our index. If we don't have any linking data for your site, your DA will naturally drop, as a big part of our calculation is unavailable.
Just a few points on how we compile our index:
- We grab the most recent index.
- We take the top 10 billion URLs with the highest MozRank (with a fixed limit on some of the larger domains).
- We start crawling from the top down until we've crawled ~130 billion URLs
The idea here is that we're focusing on the highest-quality links we can find, coming from the most prominent pages of authoritative sites. So, while you may not see every link for a site within our index, we're aiming to report the most valuable ones available!
Most new sites and links will be indexed by our spiders and available in Mozscape and Open Site Explorer within 60 days, but some take even longer for many reasons - including the crawl-ability of sites, the number of inbound links to them, and the depth of pages in subdirectories. This also has the effect of slightly biasing our index in favor of newer links. Links are only cached in the index for around 180 days. After that, unless the tools have a compelling reason to return to your site and the sites linking to yours, re-crawl, and re-index them, those links can fall back out of our index. That doesn't mean they don't exist and aren't out there on the web, just that our tools don't see them anymore.
You can see our most recently updated schedule here as well as some more technical metrics on our Mozscape API Updates page. You can also see when the last and next updates happened on the Open Site Explorer (OSE) homepage at any time.
Since Moz focuses on quality of links over quantity, we are always focused on the most relevant links to display to our users. It's possible that Moz's index will leave out some of the lower-quality (non-link juice providing) links out of our index because of this. So, that might explain why you may see some discrepancies with what other tools may be showing.
You can read more about how we build our index in our guide here.
I know that's a ton of information, so if you've still got questions, feel free to drop us a line at help@moz.com and we'll do our best to sort things out for ya.
-
its a .fi domain. I have tried with many .fi domains and it works. Also Moz shows that it is getting 0 link data from the webpage, which means something might be blocking moz's tool from crawling.
-
What type of TLD is it, i.e. co.uk or .com etc? There are some that aren't supported by Moz and for those you'll see a DA of 1.
-
Hi,
Thanks for your reply.
The website is not new, and the domain was created 4.2014.
I doubted it would be that, but cant figure out what else it could be...Perhaps I have to accept the fate offered by moz tool?...
-
Hi,
I don’t think that’s the reason of a low DA, xmlrpc.php it’s a file that for security lots of websites block even in htaccess for prevent access.
Do you check the domain age? It's a new website?
Regards
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links and images in custom css are not recognised by Moz Toolbar or Yoast plugin
Hi, I am building a website in Wordpress and when checking the pages through Moz toolbar or Yoast plugin, I notice that these don't recognise the internal links in custom CSS and the images neither. Here some code to clarify how it is built: [vc_row][vc_column width="1/2"][ultimate_heading main_heading="Veldrijden" alignment="left" main_heading_margin="margin-bottom:20px;"][/ultimate_heading][vc_single_image image="6497" img_size="full" onclick="custom_link" link="http://k488239.hosting.kinamo.be/activiteiten/veldrijden/"][vc_btn title="Meer info" color="mulled-wine" align="left" link="url:http%3A%2F%2Fk488239.hosting.kinamo.be%2Factiviteiten%2Fveldrijden%2F|||"][/vc_column] The links are embedded in images and in 'More info' buttons. Also the internal links in the main website navigation are not recognised, but the normal a href links are recognised. For the images it is a little different: the alt text from the images gets recognised by Moz, but Yoast says there are no images on the page. The only thing I can think of that there is no 'a href' in the links and for the images that it has something to do with the page builder. Can this effect my SEO results? Thanks.
Moz Bar | | Mat_C0 -
Related topics / content suggestion
Hello, In the related topic feature now called content suggestions https://moz.com/blog/related-topics-in-moz-pro. Are the words indicated words to include in my content or are they "topics" to talk about using words that would describe those words turning these words into concepts ? Thank you,
Moz Bar | | seoanalytics0 -
Moz can't crawl my new website?
We had a new website go live at the end of April - I keep requesting crawl tests but I get this in the excel copy... URL Title Tag
Moz Bar | | RayflexGroup
http://www.pvc-strip.co.uk 602 : Page redirects to a URL outside the scope of this campaign. I always list the website as https://... but the crawl always returns the http:// version. Not sure what I can do to make sure the website can be crawled?0 -
Hald the keywords in my keyword list say "Gethering Metrics". How do I get that to complete?
I'vwe waited about three hours, with no change. Why does this happen — is it something I did? Will those metrics ever be gathered? Or do I need to re-do buildingthe list all over again? And how can I be sure it will be any dirfferent?
Moz Bar | | btreloar0 -
Moz Trust do not display
Hello, I just see there is some problem in seo moz even pro membership. I can not see Moz Trust to check trust ratio.How I can do it if it is blank. I also do not find a Single Question example for Example Trust Link profile I see there is a similar post by majestic but not in Seo moz. I would like to know similar details like majestic showing the example good site or bad site.Example reference below.
Moz Bar | | rarcntv
https://blog.majestic.com/general/using-majestic-citation-flow-trust-flow-check-quality-link-prospects/ So I see similar example post that is atleast help me to understand the depth of quality link profile and bad link profile point of view from seo moz. Thanks0 -
URLS appearing twice in Moz crawl
I have asked this question before and got a Moz response to which i replied but no reply after that. Hi, We have noticed in our moz crawl that urls are appearing twice so urls like this - http://www.recyclingbins.co.uk/about/ www.recyclingbins.co.uk/about/ Thought it may be possible rel=canonical issue as can find URL's but no linking URL's to the pages. Does anyone have any ideas? Thank you Jon I did the crawl test and they were not there
Moz Bar | | imrubbish0 -
Duplicate Page Title query in the PRO Campaign tool
Can someone help me on this. I am seeing duplicate page titles on the PRO Campaign Crawl tool on an ecommerce site for example MOZ is saying that these two pages have a duplicate page title: http://www.cheapsnapframes.co.uk/colour-25mm-snap-frames/25mm-green-snap-frame/a0-traffic-green-snap-frame-25mm/prod_1730.html http://www.cheapsnapframes.co.uk/snap-picture-poster-frames/colour-25mm-snap-frames/green-25mm-snap-frame/a0-traffic-green-snap-frame-25mm/prod_1730.html They are the the same product in two categories. When I view the source of both pages the this link is the same in the meta: <link rel="<a class="attribute-value">canonical</a>" href="[http://www.cheapsnapframes.co.uk/colour-25mm-snap-frames/25mm-green-snap-frame/a0-traffic-green-snap-frame-25mm/prod_1730.html](view-source:http://www.cheapsnapframes.co.uk/colour-25mm-snap-frames/25mm-green-snap-frame/a0-traffic-green-snap-frame-25mm/prod_1730.html)" /> So is there something else I need to have done to erradicate this or is it not an issue? Thanks in advance Tracy
Moz Bar | | dashesndots0 -
Why do my top linking domains according to Webmaster tools, not even appear in my OSE report?
I know the Google index is obviously a lot larger than the MOZ index...but.... I have 8,000 links from blogspot.com according to Webmaster tools, and just one link according to OSE I have 600 links from an online dictionary according to Webmaster tools, not one is mentioned in my OSE report. I'd go so far as to say most of my top 10 linking domains according to Webmaster Tools, don't even have a single mention in my OSE report. We've been hit hard by Penguin 2.0 and I want to look at our link profile.....it seems OSE may be great for looking at my competitors link profiles, but for my own site it seems to be, well, not very accurate at all! So from a trying to do undo the damage caused by Penguin 2.0 point of view, should I just use webmaster tools and forget about OSE? Thanks!
Moz Bar | | MarbellaSurferDude0