Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Write new articles or republish old ones?
-
Hi,
we run a tourism information website about a region in italy, and each year, during special occasions such as christmas, easter and so on we publish an article with a "what to do on Christmas / Easter / .... in the Langhe" (collecting events, activities, etc.).Is it better to "reuse" the old articles and change only the year in the title and of course the content (providing that we are gonna keep the URL without year), or to publish a new one?
thanks!
-
Thanks for information
-
@Nomansahil009 said in Write new articles or republish old ones?:
Always write new content or update old content but never republish your old already published and indexed content.
Google knows what you doing it can impacts you site SEO, so better you should write you new content if that not the case you should update you old content.
If we write new content and 301 redirect the old content, will the credit be transferred to the new article?
Are the backlinks received on the previous page directed to the new page? -
I suggest making new articles instead of just updating old ones. Even though it might be easier to reuse what you already have and just change the year, it's important to think about what your readers want. They're likely looking for fresh and exciting content, not just the same thing with a small tweak.
-
Always write new content or update old content but never republish your old already published and indexed content.
Google knows what you doing it can impacts you site SEO, so better you should write you new content if that not the case you should update you old content.
-
@Enrico_Cassinelli said in Write new articles or republish old ones?:
This is a great question, Enrico! Deciding whether to reuse or create a new article for seasonal occasions like Christmas and Easter depends on several factors:Reusing the old article with updates (pros):
SEO benefits: Keeping the same URL can maintain existing backlinks and search engine ranking for that specific keyword ("what to do on Christmas in the Langhe").
Saves time and effort: Updating an existing article is quicker than writing a new one, especially if the core content remains relevant.
Continuity for returning visitors: Familiar format and structure might be beneficial for users who have read previous articles.
Cons of reusing:Stale content: Readers might feel it's repetitive if changes are minimal.
Missing out on trends and updates: New events, activities, or recommendations might be overlooked.
Less engagement: A completely new article can generate more buzz and attract new readers.
Creating a new article (pros):Fresh and exciting content: Showcases your commitment to providing updated information and keeps readers engaged.
Opportunity to expand and improve: Include new recommendations, trends, and insights.
Potentially reach a wider audience: New article can attract new search engine traffic.
Cons of creating a new article:SEO impact: Starting from scratch might take longer to rank in search results for the same keyword.
More time and effort required: Writing a new article takes more time and resources.
Loss of previous backlinks: If you change the URL, existing backlinks might not carry over to the new article.
Recommendation:I suggest a hybrid approach:
Reuse the main structure and relevant evergreen content of the old article.
Update the content significantly: Include new events, activities, recommendations, and insights for the upcoming season.
Highlight the updates in the title and introduction.
Consider adding visuals and multimedia to refresh the presentation.
This balances the SEO benefits of keeping the URL with the freshness and engagement of new content. You can also create a short "What's new this year" section at the top of the article to further emphasize the updates. -
One more thought on this: it is a generally good idea to have MORE valuable pages on your website than LESS pages. If you look at big authority websites. they have millions of pages. On the other hand, small and poor quality websites have a small number of valuable pages. On our sites like RealtyCinema or Bizpages (https://bizpages.org) we are keen to develop a greater number of good quality unique pages. BUT! there is one important thing that I mentioned in my previous post: the pages should focus on different keywords, they should not be just copies. In this case you improve chances that this or that page gets a high ranking in search engines and brings traffic/clients.
-
It also depends on what your goals are. If your current article is on the same topic as the previous one, it is likely that the two articles will compete for the same keywords in search engines and Google will have to choose one of the two to show in its SERPS. On the other hand, it is possible to make variations to the Title/Description and article keywords to try cover more topics with 2 articles.
-
Deciding whether to write new articles or republish old ones depends on various factors. Creating fresh content is ideal for staying relevant, attracting new audiences, and addressing current trends. However, republishing can be beneficial for revisiting evergreen topics, reaching new audiences, and optimizing for search engines. A balanced approach, combining both strategies, allows for a mix of timely, original content and the revitalization of valuable existing articles. Consider audience engagement, SEO goals, and the ever-changing landscape of your niche when determining the most effective content strategy for your platform.
-
I think it completely depends on your situation.
Is the information in your old article still relevant and valuable?
Yes: Republish with updates and optimizations.
No: Write a new article on the same topic with fresh information.
Do you have time and resources to create new content?
Yes: Write new articles on trending topics or to explore new directions.
No: Republish some older articles that are still valuable and relevant. -
I think you have to delete your old pages. Create new ones. Redirect the old URL onto new post.
Waterproof socks for wudu.
-
@Enrico_Cassinelli Both approaches—updating existing articles or creating new ones—have their pros and cons,
Updating Existing Articles: Pros:
Preserving Authority: If your existing articles have gained authority and backlinks, updating them can help maintain that authority. Consistency: Keeping the same URL provides consistency for your audience, and they know where to find the updated information each year. Time-Saving: It can be quicker to update an existing article than to create an entirely new one from scratch.
Creating New Articles: Pros:
Fresh Content: Search engines often favor fresh and new content. Creating a new article signals to search engines that it's current and relevant. Audience Engagement: New content might attract more attention and engagement from your audience. Variety: Having a variety of content can cater to different preferences within your audience.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What Service Page Strategy Should We Use to Target City-Specific Local Intent Service Keywords?
Hey guys! We are targeting a number of cities in the Nassau and Suffolk County areas for foundation repair, insulation, and mold remediation keywords, and we were debating on creating city-specific pages for each location and service, or creating one service page for each type of service that contains all of the services and solutions within that service category for each city. Example: City-Specific Pages for Each Service: One page for say foundation repair, one page for foundation crack repair, one page for foundation problems, etc. (for each target city) Service Category Pages for Each City: One page for foundation contractors that lists all services on one page in sections. Which one do you think is better for local SEO and rankings? Both seem to have their advantages and disadvantages to me. Just to throw a couple out there, the category pages may not rank as high as the city pages for each individual service if our competitors have a whole page designed for that service and we only have a part of a page covering the topic. At the same time, they would save labor hours, technical issues would be less, and they would be condensed, and we would have WAY less mess on the backend. I appreciate your expert opinion on this one. The site is www. zavzaseal.com in case you want to check us out.
Local SEO | | everysecond0 -
Chat GPT
I want to get your thoughts on Chat GPT for creating articles on my site to drive SEO. Does Google approve of this type of content or not? I seems quite good quality - I suppose a key question also is: is it duplicate content? I have used on Propress website and also on blog sites so need to understand if this will reduce my rankings. Thanks
Content Development | | Katie231
Matthew1 -
Best practices for publishing sponsored content
Hello, Our website hosts sponsored content from different brands. Should we be listing the sponsor either on the frontend and/or through markup? - Would either way have any sort of an impact? The content itself is already clearly marked as 'sponsored content' but we were more interested in listing the specific sponsor. Also, we’re assuming the outbound links would need to be marked rel="sponsored" but are there any other best practices we should be implementing? Any insight would be appreciated.
On-Page Optimization | | Ben-R
Thank you in advance.
Best,0 -
What Are The Pros and Cons of Writing About the Same Topic Several Times?
I am working on a website that has been publishing content for years. Some of the content is 6 or 7 years old! Daily, I am re-writing, updating, or deleting old content, and adding new content. We have covered every topic under the sun (within our niche market), and sometimes new content is similar to old content in some way. Or, we are answering the same question a dozen different ways. I have always assumed this was correct for SEO, but I was challenged on this notion today and now I am questioning the practice of writing content that could be the same (or similar) as the old content we have written. What are the pros and content of creating "duplicate" content, provided it is never an exact carbon copy of our older content.
Content Development | | GreatLegalMarketing0 -
Content Writing - it should be for the main corporate site, blog or for social media?
Hi There, I have my main site : example.com and a related blog https://blog.example.com/ My management does not believe frequent content posting on the example.com My Queries 1- Will it help boost ranking of **example.com **if we share frequent content on our blog https://blog.example.com/? How much impact it has? 2- Every body says content is the king, Ok fine, but when you are not allowed to share it on the main corporate site, then where to share it? Blog and social media sites? please help. 3- We are in a business where clients do not bother to go on sites and read, so in this scenario is it correct to say that you hav to create the content for search engine consumption even when your clients dont need it/or have not in the habit of reading it? Hope somebody will enligten me caught in catch 22. Regards Tanveer
Content Development | | Sequelmed1 -
Is it okay to delete old blog posts?
Hi All, I'm doing some SEO work on an entertainment (movies/tv/gaming) blog that started in 2011. Their recent articles have gained some popularity due to improved content and marketing, but there is some old stuff from the early days that was poorly written and gets virtually no traffic. These are mostly old news pieces. Out of approximately 10,000 articles, about 1,000 are receiving the lions share of the traffic. I feel like their good content is getting bogged down in a sea of crap. Would there be any harm in deleting some of those old posts? Is there a best practice for culling content? Thanks!
Content Development | | 74andsunny0 -
Content Writing Service Recommendations
I am looking to hire a content writer for our sites. Anyone familiar with a service where the manage the content on your site? Basically, come up with topics & content ideas, then writing the content. Please give me an idea of the pricing if possible. Greatly appreciate any help.
Content Development | | inhouseseo0 -
Are reciprocal internal links weaker than one way?
Hi guys I have an eCommerce site and a blog. the blog is on a suddomain. I am writing content about our products on the blog, I.e. Full in depth reviews and top 10 lists etc. These blog posts link back to the main product page. It would also be nice for customers on the site to a "blogs about this product" section. However, would a link from the product page to the blog weaken the internal link from the blog to the product? Thanks Paul
Content Development | | TheUniqueSEO0