Getting indexed in Google Scholar
-
Hi all! We have a client who publishes scholarly research as a highly regarded non-profit. Their Publications aren't being indexed in Google Scholar 50% of the time and when they are, Google is pulling random stuff from a PDF vs. from the html page. Any advice on best practices is enormously appreciated
-
@SimpleSearch I understand your client's frustration with Google Scholar not indexing their research consistently and accurately. Here are some steps you can take to improve their visibility:
- Optimize content for Google Scholar:
Structured data: Implement schema.org markup for scholarly articles. This helps Google Scholar understand the content and context of the research.
Metadata accuracy: Ensure all metadata (title, authors, keywords, publication date, etc.) is accurate and consistent across all platforms where the research is published.
Open access: Consider publishing research openly whenever possible. Google Scholar favors open access publications.
Backlinks: Encourage citations from other reputable research publications.
Internal linking: Link to the research from other relevant pages on the client's website.
2. Troubleshoot indexing issues:Check for technical errors: Use Google Search Console to identify any technical issues that might prevent indexing.
Use the "Fetch as Google" tool: Submit the research page to Google to expedite indexing.
Check Google Scholar's guidelines: Review Google Scholar's guidelines for publishers to ensure compliance.
Contact Google Scholar support: If the issue persists, contact Google Scholar support for further assistance.
3. Address content issues:PDF vs. HTML: Ensure the HTML version of the research is high quality, well-formatted, and text-based. Google Scholar prioritizes HTML over PDF content.
Avoid irrelevant content: Remove any irrelevant content from the PDF that might confuse Google Scholar.
4. Additional resources:Google Scholar Publisher Guidelines: https://scholar.google.com/intl/en/scholar/publishers.html
Google Search Console: https://search.google.com/search-console/about
Schema.org: https://schema.org/
Remember: Getting indexed in Google Scholar takes time and effort. Implement these best practices consistently and be patient. -
I understand your concern about inconsistent indexing on Google Scholar. Let's address the issues step by step:
Issue 1: Publications not being indexed in Google Scholar 50% of the time
Solution:
-
Ensure Proper Metadata: Check if your client's publications have accurate and comprehensive metadata. This includes title, author(s), abstract, keywords, publication date, and references. Metadata helps Google Scholar understand the content and index it correctly.
-
Consistent Citation Format: Ensure that the citation format used in the publications is consistent and follows standard academic conventions. This helps Google Scholar accurately identify and index the content.
-
Robots.txt File: Make sure the website's robots.txt file allows Google Scholar's bots to crawl and index the publications. Check for any disallow rules that might be preventing indexing.
-
Sitemap Submission: Submit a sitemap to Google Search Console containing URLs of the publications. This helps Google Scholar discover and index the content more efficiently.
-
Canonical URLs: Ensure that canonical URLs are implemented correctly for each publication. This helps Google understand the preferred version of the content and avoid duplicate indexing issues.
-
Quality Content: Ensure that the content of the publications is of high quality and relevance. Google Scholar prioritizes scholarly and authoritative content.
-
Indexing Frequency: Understand that Google Scholar's indexing process may not be immediate. It may take some time for new publications to be indexed. Patience is key.
Issue 2: Google pulling random content from PDF instead of HTML page
Solution:
-
Structured HTML: Ensure that the HTML version of the publications is properly structured using semantic markup. This helps Google Scholar understand the hierarchy and content of the page more accurately.
-
Text Accessibility: Make sure the text content of the publications is accessible within the HTML page and not embedded within images or other non-text formats. Google Scholar primarily indexes text-based content.
-
Metadata Alignment: Check if the metadata provided in the HTML version aligns with the content of the publication. Discrepancies between metadata and actual content may confuse Google Scholar's indexing process.
-
PDF Optimization: If the publications are available in both HTML and PDF formats, optimize the PDFs for indexing by adding proper metadata, text layer, and bookmarks. This can improve the chances of Google Scholar correctly extracting content from PDFs.
-
PDF-to-HTML Conversion: Consider converting PDF publications to HTML format using tools or services that preserve the structure and formatting. This ensures better compatibility with Google Scholar's indexing algorithms.
-
Reporting Issues: If the problem persists despite following these steps, consider reporting the issue to Google Scholar through their support channels or forums. Provide detailed information about the specific publications and indexing issues encountered.
By implementing these best practices and troubleshooting steps, your client can improve the indexing and visibility of their scholarly publications on Google Scholar. Regularly monitor indexing status and make necessary adjustments to ensure ongoing visibility.
Visit our webpage lydiadigitalacademy and stay connected!
-
-
@SimpleSearch This happens sometimes if following are not done properly.
- Ensure Structured Data: Implement Schema.org markup for scholarly articles including title, author names and affiliations, publication date, keywords, and abstract. This provides clear and consistent information for Google Scholar bots to understand.
- Format Author Names Consistently: Use the same format (e.g., first name, last name) across all publications and platforms. Consider using ORCID identifiers for authors.
- Use High-Quality PDFs: Create searchable PDFs with full text and avoid image-based PDFs. Embed metadata within the PDF document properties.
- Optimize HTML Pages: Make sure the HTML pages for each publication are well-structured with clear titles, headings, and body content. Include the full text of the research and relevant keywords naturally throughout the text.
- Link to Related Publications: Use internal links to connect related research on your website. This helps Google Scholar understand the context and subject matter of your publications.
This comes is with experience, working for exam guide about nursing licensing related content on a website.
Hope this helps you out.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Why rich snippets have disappeared in Google search results ?
Hello, Few weeks ago, we have implemented a snippets strategy in order to increase our ranking for our blog posts. That was successful and our results were showing up in Google. But today, every single snippet has disappeared. We go back to a simple search result, without snippets for us or for our competitors. It seems that Google has delete rich snippet for specific keywords because for the generic keywords (for exemple "inbound marketing definition" in our case), there is still a snippet result. Do you know if Google has changed snippets parameters for keywords with low search volume ? Thank you !
SERP Trends | | Laure-Nile0 -
Search results vary in chrome vs other browsers even in Incognito mode: Google's stand?
Hi all, We use incognito mode or private browsing to check the Actual results which are not impacted by previous history, location (sometimes), etc. Even we browse this way, we can see the different search results. Why would this happen? What's Google's stand on this? What is the actual way to browse to get the unbiased results for certain search queries? I have experienced that Chrome will rank our own websites bit higher compared to the other browsers even in incognito mode. Thanks
SERP Trends | | vtmoz1 -
Ways to fetch search analytics - historical search query data from Google Search Console
Is there any way to fetch all historical search query data from Google Search Console ? Google allows us to view only 90 days report at the maximum. Does integrating google search console with google analytics tool solve this problem ?
SERP Trends | | NortonSupportSEO0 -
Why Google shows site's in serp coming with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
Hi Mozzers & Moz Team, Let's know how actually this happens to come in Google SERPs with wikipedia link as of its brand name?
SERP Trends | | Futura
It is great to show, but i really want how this comes with brand associated link of wikipedia. Some sources also come wtih DMOZ if ones don't find in wikipedia. Please find the snapshot, where i borderd in red color , may show you clear in it. Waiting the responses. ujknjVr.jpg0 -
How google identify that web page was updated and want to index again?
How Google robot identify that these many pages were updated on particular web site?
SERP Trends | | ankit.rahevar0 -
Deleting a duplicate google places listing
Hi i currently have duplicate Google places listings for a store. One of the Google Places listings is mine (which is correct) and the other is a listing which someone else put up (which is wrong). Which is currently sending customers to the wrong location. I tried to claim the listing by clicking: If you own this place, claim it and edit it directly Which takes me to this page: This Listing Is Unavailable You may only access listings that you own. If you created this listing with a different Google Account, please log in to that account and try again. If you've deleted this listing, you may create it again in Google Places. Is my own option at this stage to leave a comment with additional details use: IMAGE ATTACHED And select 'this is a duplicate listing'? I would imagine this would take sometime, and i need it changed as soon as possible. Any suggestions? screenshot_133.jpg
SERP Trends | | MBASydney0 -
Client is being approached by company claiming to get lots of video views
It sounds like a scam to me, especially since they are getting 12,000 hits in the first week and no comments! https://www.youtube.com/user/FollowMediaVideos?feature=watch Thoughts from my SEO community, please?
SERP Trends | | Laurean0 -
Getting rid of negative websites/reviews
I have a client who is semi-famous and has some negative press that is appearing at the top of search engines. What is the best way to get rid of these?
SERP Trends | | StreetwiseReports0