Unsolved Using Weglot on wordpress (errors)
-
Good day to you all,
Does anyone have experience of the errors being pulled up by Moz about the utility of the weglot plugin on Wordpress?
Moz is pulling up URLs such as:
https://www.ibizacc.com/es/chapparal-2/?wg-choose-original=false
These are classified under "redirect issues" and 99% of the pages are with the ?wg-choose parameter in the URL.
Is this having an actual negative impact on my search or is it something more Moz related being highlighted. Any advice be appreciated and a resolution ..
Im thinking I could exclude this parameter.
-
You're encountering flags from Moz regarding redirect issues on URLs with the ?wg-choose parameter likely related to the Weglot plugin for WordPress. Here's the breakdown:
The Issue: URLs with the ?wg-choose parameter indicate Weglot's involvement in language selection. Moz might be flagging these as redirects because the parameter alters the URL.
Impact on SEO: While these flags might seem concerning, the impact on SEO is likely minimal. The parameter itself doesn't necessarily redirect users, and search engines are increasingly sophisticated at handling dynamic URLs.
Possible Solutions:Exclude the Parameter: You can explore excluding the ?wg-choose parameter in Moz's settings if it's causing clutter in your reports. This wouldn't change the plugin's functionality but would remove those specific flags.
Focus on High-Impact Issues: Moz offers valuable insights, but prioritize addressing critical SEO issues like broken links or slow page speed over these potentially minor flags.
In a nutshell, these Weglot-related flags might be more Moz-related than a critical SEO concern.Chat GPT is a large language model from OpenAI that you can use to find the causses and fixes of your WordPress errors.
-
@skvisaguruku Despite my efforts in Bing Webmaster Tools, the site gets indexed seamlessly on Google, but the Bing.com search engine consistently refuses to index the homepage. I've taken several steps to address this issue, including submitting XML sitemaps, enhancing the homepage copy, optimizing site loading times, disavowing spam and poor-quality backlinks, and repeatedly requesting indexing. I've even installed the IndexNow plugin to improve the chances of getting indexed. Despite investing both time and money into resolving this issue, it persists. This leads me to question whether the domain might be penalized in Bing, prompting me to consider the possibility of starting over with a new domain.
-
Good day!
The errors being flagged by Moz related to the weglot plugin on WordPress, specifically the URLs with the "?wg-choose" parameter, fall under "redirect issues." While Moz identifies these, it's crucial to assess whether they have a tangible negative impact on your search performance.
Considering the nature of the parameter and its prevalence in the flagged URLs, it seems more Moz-related than a direct SEO concern. To potentially address this, you can consider excluding the "?wg-choose" parameter, which might resolve the issue flagged by Moz. However, it's essential to monitor your site's overall performance and search rankings independently to ensure there are no unintended consequences.
.
.
(Canada PR requirements for Indian)( After Biometric how long to get Canada study visa) -
Hello,
The URLs you mentioned with the "?wg-choose" parameter are flagged by Moz as "redirect issues." This may not necessarily have a direct negative impact on your search rankings, but it could be affecting how Moz crawls and analyzes your website.
To address this in Moz, you might consider excluding the "?wg-choose" parameter in your Moz settings. However, it's essential to ensure that this parameter doesn't play a critical role in your website's functionality before making changes.
If these URLs are not causing issues in terms of user experience or search performance, it could be a Moz-specific matter rather than a critical SEO concern. You may want to monitor your website's overall performance and seek assistance from Moz support for a more tailored solution.
Best regards.
.
.
(Canada PR) -
@alwaysbeseen Hello,
Yes, I have experience with Moz reporting issues related to the Weglot plugin on WordPress. The URLs you provided with the "?wg-choose" parameter are being classified under "redirect issues" by Moz. It's crucial to assess whether these issues are impacting your search performance or if they are more specific to Moz's reporting.
Considering that 99% of the pages are flagged with this parameter, it's worth investigating the potential impact on your search visibility. One solution could be excluding this parameter to see if it resolves the reported issues.
I recommend testing the exclusion of the "?wg-choose" parameter and monitoring the impact on your site's performance. Additionally, you may want to reach out to Weglot's support or community forums to see if others have experienced similar issues and if there are specific recommendations for optimizing the plugin's performance.
Best of luck with resolving the issue!
-
@alwaysbeseen Good day! Yes, Moz is highlighting "redirect issues" related to URLs with the "?wg-choose" parameter when using the Weglot plugin on WordPress. While Moz is flagging these as potential problems, it's important to assess whether they are negatively impacting your search performance.
The presence of parameters in URLs can sometimes cause search engines to treat them as separate pages, potentially affecting SEO. In this case, it seems like a parameter related to the Weglot plugin.
To address this, considering excluding the "?wg-choose" parameter could be a viable solution. This can be done through tools like Google Search Console or by configuring your website's robots.txt file. However, it's crucial to monitor your website's performance after making changes to ensure there are no unintended consequences.
Remember, Moz is a tool that provides insights, and while it's a valuable resource, the actual impact on search results may vary. Regularly monitoring your website's performance and staying informed about SEO best practices will help ensure a positive online presence. If you have further questions or concerns, consulting with a professional SEO expert could provide tailored advice for your specific situation.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Rel canonical tag from shopify page to wordpress site page
We have pages on our shopify site example - https://shop.example.com/collections/cast-aluminum-plaques/products/cast-aluminum-address-plaque That we want to put a rel canonical tag on to direct to our wordpress site page - https://www.example.com/aluminum-plaques/ We have links form the wordpress page to the shop page, and over time ahve found that google has ranked the shop pages over the wp pages, which we do not want. So we want to put rel canonical tags on the shop pages to say the wp page is the authority. I hope that makes sense, and I would appreciate your feeback and best solution. Thanks! Is that possible?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | shabbirmoosa0 -
How to Boost Your WordPress Website Speed to 95+ (Without Premium Plugins)
I'm reaching out for some advice on improving my WordPress website's speed. I'm currently using a free theme for this fusion magazine and aiming for a score of 95+ on Google PageSpeed Insights. I'm aware that premium plugins can significantly enhance performance, but I'm hoping to achieve similar results using primarily free solutions and manual optimizations.
Technical SEO | | mohammadrehanseo0 -
18 404 errors on pages that are actually fine.
Hi, I just used the compain tool to look for errors on my site and it appears that seomoz crawler finds 18 404 errors on pages that are fine in my good. I do proceed with a URL rewritting on those pages, but navigation is fine. Some of the pages are: http://cassplumbingtampabay.com/about-us http://cassplumbingtampabay.com/commercial-services http://cassplumbingtampabay.com/drain-cleaning-repair ... Does anybody know what's going on?
Moz Pro | | acas110 -
Why does SEOmoz assign such a high Domain Authority to subdomains on blogspot, typepad, wordpress.com, etc.?
I thought it was generally accepted that the search engines treat joesmith.wordpress.com and www.wordpress.com as completely different domains. In which case, a cute but obscure blog like http://monkeysalwayslook.typepad.com/ has no business having a DA of 95.
Moz Pro | | CMC-SD0 -
Very confused on site.com/ or not using a /
I'm wanting to put the rel="canonical" tag on my homepage but I'm not sure which to use? How would you know what to use and always links to, http://www.site.com or http://www.site.com**/** Personally I never knew there was a difference until I used the seomoz tool and I wasn't using the tag.
Moz Pro | | GYMSN0 -
SEOMoz says i have errors but goole webmaster doesnt show them - which one is right ?
I have about 350 websites all created in farcry 4.0 cms platform. When i do a site crawl using any seo tool ( seomoz, raven, screaming frog) it comes back telling me I have duplicate titles, description and content for a bunch of my pages. The pages are the same page its just that the crawl is showing the object Id and the friendly URL which is autocreated in the CMS as different pages. EXAMPLE these are the samge page but are recognised as different in SEOMOZ crawl test and therefore flagged as having duplicate title tags and content ... <colgroup span="1"><col style="width: 488pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 23771;" span="1" width="650"></colgroup>
Moz Pro | | cassi
| www.westendautos.com.au/go/latest-news-and-specials <colgroup span="1"><col style="width: 488pt; mso-width-source: userset; mso-width-alt: 23771;" span="1" width="650"></colgroup>
| www.westendautos.com.au/index.cfm?objectid=9CF82BBD-9B98-B545-33BC644C0FA74C8E | | GOOGLE WEBMASTER however does not show me these errors ? It shows no errors at all. Now i believe i can fix this by chucking in a rel=canonical at the top of each page ? (a big job over 350 sites) But even so - my problem is that the website developers are telling me that SEOMOZ and all the other tools are wrong - that google will see these the way it should, that the object ID's would not get indexed ( although i have seen at least one object id show up in the serps.) Do i believe the developers and trust that google has it sorted or go through the process of hassling the developers to get a rel=canonical added to all the pages? (the issue sees my homepage as about 4 different pages www.domain.com/ www.domain.com/home /index AND object id.0 -
Dismiss crawl diagnostics error
Hello everyone, Is there a way to dismiss some errors in the Crawl Diagnostics tool so they don't appear again? It happens so that some of the errors are never going to be fixed because of their nature. For example, 'Title too long' errors that point to some of the threads on my forum - it doesn't make sense to change the title of a thread posted by user just for the sake of the error disappearing from the 'Crawl Diagnostics' tool. 🙂 Otherwise the CD interface gets a little bit cluttered with errors which I will never fix anyway. I wonder how others deal with this problem. Thanks.
Moz Pro | | MaratM0 -
What causes Crawl Diagnostics Processing Errors in seomoz campaign?
I'm getting the following error when seomoz tries to spider my site: First Crawl in Progress! Processing Issues for 671 pages Started: Apr. 23rd, 2011 Here is the robots.txt data from the site: Disallow ALL BOTS for image directories and JPEG files. User-agent: * Disallow: /stats/ Disallow: /images/ Disallow: /newspictures/ Disallow: /pdfs/ Disallow: /propbig/ Disallow: /propsmall/ Disallow: /*.jpg$ Any ideas on how to get around this would be appreciated 🙂
Moz Pro | | cmaddison0