Side bar menu, good or bad idea.
-
Hi everyone,
I have a little problem.
Not that long ago I launched my new site. Everything seems ok, but I'm not sure if it was clever idea to have additional side bar menu option. I wanted relevant content to be accessible very easy without dropdown in main menu.
It looks ok on desktop, but we have a problem with mobile devices. Even main menu is a bit confusing and sidebar at the moment is at the bottom of each page. When I placed it on top of the page, we had problem with tablet users as it is showing side menu with blank page and content is almost below the fold.
I have a tool installed called usability tools and it shows how visitors are using my site.
The hard bit is that nobody on mobile devices are using sidebar and that means people visit one page and leave without exploring any additional resources.
Me and my developer are discussing that maybe we should have two main menu bars instead of sidebar, but I have no idea how this looks in real life.
What is the best practises for sidebar menus these days? Maybe we have a designer here who can help me with this and do some work?
My site is https://a-fotografy.co.uk/
Thank you for all help in input in advance.
Regards,
Armands
-
The little box you talking about.
Make a small table or div and float it to left.
When you say duplicate menu at the bottom, do you mean main menu or sidebar menu.
You can do either. Anything you want.
-
Ok I will wait to get it through. We can have a chat about this.
Thanks,
A
-
Yup. Phone will be real and have confirmation to avoid incidental clicks.
No - adding subcats into menu will make navigation heavy for mobile users. Click hamburger, click category, click subcategory, click sub-subcategory. No way someone to nagivate there.I sent you mine contacts on your site where we can discuss "boring details".
-
I love idea of including phone as I get mainly people calling me anyway. But if that would be active phone number which dials straight away, that could be cool.
Yes we have hamburger now. Let me get this right as I think we think the same. Are you recommending to add those subcategories ( gallery, prices, partners ) to the main existing hamburger, yes? And then make whole menu sticky, yes?
Thanks for your help.
A
-
Well everything is doable - but remember about users first.
So - lets imagine that i'm looking for someone to be official photograph of mine wedding or engagement or baby photo session. So first if i look is text "i'm photograph that can make your special events memorable...". Ok - you have such text. Second is gallery, 3rd some reviews and pricing. Now in mobile design people just can't reach to them and you get visits with 1 page per session. Right?
That's why i think that "Hamburger Gallery Partners Price" could work. Hamburger is actual menu as now - just need to make it sticky with "Gallery Partners Price". WHY?
Let's assume that i'm on mobile and browsing for "Edinburgh wedding photographer". I see results (term is SERP - search engine result pages) and i click on your site. So i start reading your texts. And as i scroll down to them - sticky menu appear on top. And users can click on them - in result you can have user convinced that "here is the man". So they can give you a call or fill contact form.
2nd Idea - place somewhere in sticky menu "phone" icon that will be linked to your phone using "callto:here-is-your-phone-number". So give user another way to book you.
-
Hi Peter,
Just looked up what means hamburger and I'm good now
So for my mobile site.
Do you think it could make sense to make 3 level menu. So main menu, sub category and then gallery, price etc menu?
Or Make main menu sticky and then hamburger with sub category and gallery, price etc menu?
Here is another thought I had,
What if I could make main menu as hamburger. Like I have now. Main menu and subcategory, but make sticky menu on top for side bar options ( prices, gallery etc?)
Do you think that could be doable?
Thanks Peter.
-
Thanks Peter,
Now you are talking far too clever for me What is hamburger icon?
Also how do you do A/B testing for the site. Do you make two sites?
I'm not a developer, but can pass this onto him. Or maybe I can hire here to get this job done.
Thank you Peter.
-
Hi Egol,
Thanks for reply. I'm trying to link up relevant pages with hypertext.
The little box you talking about. Where ddi you see that? Did you use tablet or phone? I guess it might be that widget box you talking about. I'm taking that away and will place as an image in actual content.
Good advise about menu of related articles.
When you say duplicate menu at the bottom, do you mean main menu or sidebar menu. At the moment I have only sidebar menu at the bottom.
Thank you Egol.
-
Skeleton have JS to NOT include sticky menu on mobile. But was nice example about mine idea and first that i remember quick during writing this comment.
Second idea is sticky menu with "Hamburger_icon Gallery Partners Price" for mobile and normal (just as now) for desktop. This probably can skip confusing users about menu and hierarchical structure of your website.
But as i said - A/B testing is needed.
-
Thank you for advise Peter.
I just looked at the sticky option. The skeleton you mentioned. I opened page on my mobile, but I didn't see the main menu. It was on my desktop, but not on the mobile so I'm not sure how does it work on mobile. Especially with two menus.
Does it mean that I would have two sticky menus on top? Like my main navigation one and one with secondary menu options?
I like idea of sticky, but just need to make sure that I don't confuse user
-
The hard bit is that nobody on mobile devices are using sidebar and that means people visit one page and leave without exploring any additional resources.
Go to a few of your pages and find opportunities to link to your own content.
- As the hypertext that wikipedia overuses in some people's opinion.
- In little boxes that float to the left side of your mobile pages (use images and text that elicit clicks)
- As a large menu of related articles at the bottom of your page (look at the provocative images presented in the Outbrain, Taboola, and similar widgets - you don't have to be nasty or naughty like some of them - there are many other ways to earn a click)
- in a search box at the bottom of your article and invite readers to use it
- you don't need a sidebar to entice people to visit another page... just show them what you have that is relevant, what is popular, what is new, what is outrageous - depending upon your audience.
- duplicate your menu at bottom of the page
-
And this is the point where you clearly can see that RWD (responsive web design) isn't "one-size-fit-all" solution.
You have few choices but all are weird - double menu, hamburger + kebap menu, sticky menu on left, etc. But as i said this is weird. And only A/B test can show how they works.
I think that best in your case is to try sticky menu on top. One of best example is here:
http://getskeleton.com/
but you need to watch this on desktop. When you scroll down you can see that "Intro Code Examples More" is sticky on top. In your site you need to make changes to "Gallery Partners Pricing". This menu can be sticky even for desktop. This will bring more size in width for main content.As i said - only A/B test can show who's right. Because all double menus have better navigation but in reality confuses user with "paradox of choice".
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Are provincial third-level domains bad for SEO?
My prospect's domain ends in ".on.ca" (Ontario, Canada). The structure of their site is companyname.on.ca (main page) and all other pages are sub-folders (companyname.on.ca/page-name-1 All pages are no more than two levels deep. I'm wondering if anyone knows if the provincial sub-domain (.on.ca) presents an SEO challenge?
Web Design | | 22Eighteen1 -
Should a menu work when JS is disabled? Is that best practice
When I am working on a new website I usually spec that the main navigation should work whether JS is on, or off. I always assumed everyone did that - until today - spent a couple of hours analysing menus on websites and noticed many didn't function when JS was disabled - particularly the menus designed for mobile devices. Any thoughts on this from fellow Mozzers would be welcome.
Web Design | | McTaggart0 -
How we can check whether website design is good for SEO or not?
Is there any tool available to check website design whether it is good for SEO or not?
Web Design | | ross254sidney0 -
Using a query string for linked, static landing pages - is this good practice?
My company has a page with links for each of our dozen office locations as well as a clickable map. These offices are also linked in the footer of every page along with their phone number. When one of these links is clicked, the visitor is directed to a static page with a picture of the office, contact information, a short description, and some other information. The URL for these pages is displayed as something like http:/example.com/offices.htm?office_id=123456, with seemingly random ID numbers at the end depending on the office that remain static. I know first off that this is probably bad SEO practice, as the URL should be something like htttp://example.com/offices/springfield/ My question is, why is there a question mark in the page URL? I understand that it represents a query string, but I'm not sure why it's there to begin with. A search query should not required if they are just static landing pages, correct?. Is there any reason at all why they would be queries? Is this an issue that needs to be addressed or does it have little to no impact on SEO?
Web Design | | BD690 -
Can external links in a menu attract a penalty?
We have some instances of external links (i.e. pointing to another domain) in site menus. Although there are legitimate reasons (e.g. linking to a news archive kept on a separate domain) I understand this can be considered bad from a usability perspective. This begs the question - is this bad for SEO? With the recent panda changes we've seen certain issues which were previously "only" about usability attract SEO penalties, but I can't find any references to this example. Anyone have thoughts / experience?
Web Design | | SOS_Children0 -
Does my font look good in this?
Apologies for the title, but a serious point here.... We (like a lot of people) spend time on almost mechanical on-page optimisation. However, we are finally moving our thinking to our visitors and what works for them - not the search engines. I know, about time. With that in mind we have de-cluttered our content pages and increased font sizes - focussing on usability more. This is an example of a tweaked page - http://www.compactlaw.co.uk/free-legal-information/employment-law/exceptions-for-unfair-dismissal.html This is an un-tweaked page - http://www.compactlaw.co.uk/agency-agreement.html Which do you prefer to read/look at??
Web Design | | dexm100 -
Footer Links For Web Design Agencies - Bad?
So today Google have updated their Webmaster Guidelines and they have drawn particular attention to their update relating to Link Schemes. http://support.google.com/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=66356 Unless you have had your eyes closed and your fingers in your ears since February then most people are aware of the types of link schemes that the updated is refering to but there is one area that isn't so black and white for me. "Here are a few common examples of unnatural links that violate our guidelines: Widely distributed links in the footers of various sites" We are a design agency and we design and build lots of websites for our clients. It is pretty standard practice for agencies to add a credit to the footer of websites and we pick up a lot of work from people that see a site that they like and click through the footer link to our site. Our footer credit is standard on all of the websites that we create:- Website by Teapot Creative Only the 'Teapot Creative' part of the credit is anchor text so we are only linking using our brand name with no intention of manipulating search results. Is this going to hurt us? or will the fact that we are only linking using our branded term and without any SEO intent keep us in the clear? Thanks.
Web Design | | AdeLewis
Ade.0 -
I know frames aren't good, but are they bad?
About 3/4 of my website includes frames from the Amazon aStore, but the pages also have at least 500 words of content on them each. I understand that spiders aren't too good with frames but will search engines punish my site for having them or just disregard them? Thanks in advance.
Web Design | | Max_powers0