Estimating the number of LRD I need to outrank competitor
-
I just ran a SERP/keyword diffculty report for a keyword I want one of my pages to rank
Also, I just conducted the on-the-page-optimization and now I am going to start buidling links.
=> I would like to estimate how many linking root domains I need to overrank one of my competitor. These are the MOZ data:
1. My page:
Page Linking Root domains: 0
Root Domain Linking Root Domains: 1512. Competitor:
Page linking root domains: 1
Root Domain Linking Root Domains: 5,786I don't really know on which metric (Page or domain LRD) to rely on in order to make an estimation and I would be glad for some help!
To simplyfy the problem, assume that all toher factors (code, on-the-page keyword use., social etc.) are equal for both sites. Can I just get 2LRD to that page in order to likely outrank my competitor or do I need around 5000 more links poiting to my site?
I think an answer to this question could help a lot of users here, since I saw similar questions/difficulties regarding the use of page LRD vs. root domain LRD
P.S. Non of the pages of my website do currently rank in the top 100 for that keyword.
-
**I am trying to get an rough estimation anyway.... **
That's good. Lots of people are selling the $1000/month package to people who need $5000/month to be effective and don't know it. You are trying to figure it out and that is very important.
Economists call this "ceteris paribus" analysis.
There's an awful lot of variables here. That's what makes it interesting.
-
Thanks EGOL for the detailed answer and sorry for my late reply- just coming back from vacation
It is clear to me that the question cannot just be easily answered by a number. I understand this and I wish my clients/supervisors would do that too - but that's a different story...
I am trying to get an rough estimation anyway, assuming that all other factors (on-the-page factors, words on page, quality of the content, social signals, age of the domian etc.) of the competitor's page/site are exactly the same as on my page/site and these factors would not move. Economists call this "ceteris paribus" analysis.
P.S. I've been in the business now for a while, but just starting to use SEOMoz (we used other tools before) - the ressources on this website and especially this question section is just simply awesome!!
-
Thank you Robert. I put a little extra effort into it because I figured that you would like it.
-
Ayup - and to accomplish that means being willing/able to do some business analysis, not just site analysis. Which moves into the realm of web marketing optimization, not just SEO. Which is where the real value in this whole process lies IMO
-
EGOL
This may be the best answer I have seen to any question. The beauty of it goes on and on in that anyone in SEO dealing with clients must always ask themselves: Can the client handle the truth and/or understand the explanation?
The explanation is what you just gave and the truth is that no one knows for sure and it will often cost you a lot to get there. The other difficulty for SEO clients is that we live in a world of instant gratification. I have clients who spend a lot with me and regularly ask what they are getting (yes, they get reports, etc.). Interestingly, these same clients will mention they have just authorized a $250,000 TV ad campaign. (Trust me we are a bit cheaper.)
They understand the tv ad no matter what the results; even with excellent results (more and more customers) they have a hard time understanding the SEO.
Egol,
Thanks a bunch for a truly excellent, thought provoking answer.
Robert
-
We compete against pages on about.com and amazon.com that are thin content and have zero off-page assets. About.com has skimpy information about our topic and nothing to sell. Amazon has a couple things to sell an zero informative information.
They outrank us for the short tail.
We have the best and deepest informative content on the web in our niche, informative video, youtube channel, lots of articles, printable resources, one of the best selections of products on the web, an email address that answers questions almost 24/7/365 and a phone where you can talk to someone who uses and tests most of the products regularly and has handled, inspected, photographed, described, every product that we sell.
This is one of the problems with google giving huge authority to the brands. Mom and pop know an awful lot more and give immediate, helpful, informative, caring service... but they get no respect in the SERPs.
I understand our position in the rankings. Praise be that I don't have to explain it to a client!
-
Or to determine whether the costs of attempting success are just too high to be worth it.
I would really respect an SEO who told me something like this.
-
Egol's explained the true scope of what you're asking, but to give a specific response to your specific question:
No, just having one more incoming link to your page than your competitor has to his will never guarantee you'll outrank him.
Search engine algorithms use hundreds of signals when ranking a page, and the number of incoming links to that page is only one measure.(And it's more than just wht else is on the page, like code, keyword use etc)
Even if we just restrict ourselves to considering the links to a single page, additional issues like the authority of the sources of the incoming links plays a huge part. Not all links are of equal value.
But more importantly, things like the authority of the whole domain have huge impact as well. That's why SEOMoz goes out of it's way to compute scores for domain authority as well as page authority. A weak page on a strong site will frequently outrank a strong page on a weaker site. That's one of the big frustrations/challenges of nearly all small site owners.
Bottom line, neither Page nor Domain LRD metrics are sufficient in themselves for assessing the work ahead of you.
Make sense?
Paul
-
What Egol has just described is why SEO is only part science and the rest - a significant portion - is still an art. It's also why automated implementation tools have never been successful.
It takes juggling a wide range of constantly changing factors, many with very subjective values, to deliver success. Or to determine whether the costs of attempting success are just too high to be worth it.
Website owners always HATE to hear the accurate response, but the honest response to so many (most?) SEO questions is:
It Depends.
And the good, ethical SEOs will tell you that right up front, as Egol has done. It would be so much easier if SEO, Conversion Rate Optimization etc were linear pursuits - do X and the result will be Y. But they're not, which is why good SEOs will beat those who simply follow (and promise results from ) formulas.
Frustrating huh?
Paul
-
Anyone who gives you a number for this question is full of beans.
This is one of the most difficult questions in SEO and most of the people who are charging clients for SEO can not answer it.
Lots of SEOs have clients on a $500/month plan when the target that they are attacking needs many times that much to become competitive.
Let me give just a couple reasons why this question is so difficult and why nobody here can give you an answer with the information that you provided.
====================
Your question is making a straight comparison.... it assumes that you are racing a stationary target. The target is not stationary. This question is really like this...
Two cars are driving on a road.... Car B leaves when Car A is already 100 miles down the road and traveling at a rate of 50 miles per hour. How fast will Car B have to drive to overtake Car A?
The answer is a velocity AND a time. And the question as I stated it assumes no acceleration.
If Car B drives 51 miles per hour... will you have the patience and budget for that long of a wait? Do you have the resources needed to drive 70 and not be stopped by Google?
=====================
Another example...
George Pickett was a southern general at the Battle of Gettysburg who was ordered by Robert E. Lee to run the Union Army off of Cemetery Ridge. To do that Pickett's troops would need to cross a mile-wide open field in broad daylight under an absolute hail of enemy fire.
The field was one mile wide, it was up a slight incline - if they were slow in crossing they would be mowed down...
The Union had hundreds of troops dug in and positioned on the ridge and ready to open fire - if Pickett had only a few troops they would be mowed down....
So Pickett needed to order an enormous number of troops across that field and order them to run their asses off to engage the Union Army quickly - or die in the middle of the field.
If they failed in getting a enough troops... if they failed in getting enough speed... if they failed in getting enough determination and courage... then they would be mowed down.
Your job is similar to Pickett's... you must get an enormous number of links... you must get them quickly... and you must get them before your budget runs out... and you better hope that your budget is big enough.
Pickett knew that his field was a mile wide.. he knew how many troops that he had. He could see Union troops on the other side of the field at the top of the ridge.
Pickett's generals complained when they were told the battle plan... but Pickett pointed at the Ridge.
This battle was lost on bad math.
But your problem is even more difficult... the field is getting wider as you cross it because the target is moving away from you.
==================
And your problem is also more difficult because links have different values. One link from the Pope's site is worth a thousand from pedestrian sites.
Furthermore... different pages compete with different amounts of vigor. I might have a fifty word page but my competitor might have 2000 words, ten images, a video, and tables of data. Big difference.
===================
So, how is an SEO to know what is needed?
-
You run the keyword difficulty tool and get a feel for the numbers (which contain much confusion).
-
You go out to those SERPs and visit the sites and get a feel for their authority and content quality.
-
Then you use open site explorer to see if the Pope is on their side.
-
Then you decide if you are up to beating their content, beating their numbers, beating their quality.... and if you can do that quickly enough before the conditions of engagement change or your budget runs out.
After all of that you decide on taking the gamble or not.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
I am having a duplicate title -pagination issue Need Help
In WordPress I added %%page%% saved changes and ran a test in Moz and screaming frog, it doesn't show any duplicates. But when I open the site up in a new browser the duplicate titles are still there. No access to the PHP file due to the theme the client chose also. Any suggestions anyone?
Moz Pro | | Strateguyz0 -
Need Help with www and non-www redirect
Hi everyone, I've been looking around the forum and found some similar topics but none of them have solved my problem. Anyway, I'm new to SEO and found that when I use Open Site Explorer for the www version of my site I see the links directed to my page, but none of my twitter stats show up. When I do the same for my non-www version. I see my twitter stats, but no links. Facebook seems unchanged. Also, the Page Authority is much higher for the www (I assume because of the links) It is my understanding that it doesn't matter which version of the domain is used, I just need to pick one and stick with it (on Google Webmaster Tools, etc.). And that I also need to do a 301 redirect for the version that I'm not using. The issue now is that I have a 301 redirect, and when I type in my url in any version (http, https, www, non-www) it all redirects in the browser without issue. So i know users are getting to the right page, but the Open Site Explorer still sees them as 2 different sites. My concern is that if Open Site Explorer sees it this way then Google may see it this way as well and I could be missing out on potential rankings. I'm currently doing the redirect in the .htaccess file. The redirect looks like this: RewriteEngine On
Moz Pro | | opstart
RewriteCond %{SERVER_PORT} 80
RewriteRule ^(.*)$ https://mydomain.com/$1 [R=301,L] Any Ideas on what I need to do to properly 301 redirect the site so that my preferred version can get credited with the links,twitter, and Page Authority stats? Also, I'm using wordpress and it has the URL set to the non-www version of the site. However, I think I would like to change this to the www version because most of the links are directing to www, and I also think people are more familiar with that format. Anyway, sorry for the long post. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks.0 -
Our main competitor is/was doing some Black Hat tactics....
Our main competitor Royal Cases, a custom case manufacturer and designer, has some really shady links and some dummy domains with duplicate content, yet they are ranking #1 organically for some of the industry's top search terms. Let me give you some examples. First off, they have multiple dummy domains with the same exact same content as their main website. One of these is casescasescases.net. They have a couple more that are just as bad. Secondly, their link profile is so shockingly black hat, I can't figure out why/how they haven't been deindexed or hit with a filter. I'll give you some examples. I ran a link analysis through Moz, and found multiple links from many websites that have absolutely NOTHING to do with custom cases. Here are a few of the linking domains: http://moneysourceonline.com/ ; www.lemons2lemonade.com/ ; http://jenaesboutique.com/ ; These are just a few. Now here is what I don't understand, when I go to explore the individual inbound links, I can't find the links to Royal anywhere on the pages. They have dozens from different pages on these obviously completely unrelated websites, but when you go to those pages, the links themselves are nowhere to be found. Yet, they are showing up as inbound links....I am lost. Does anyone have any idea what in the world is going on here? Is there a way to report this to Google? Normally I wouldn't resort to this sort of "tattle-tailing" but this company has a history of scheming and just horrendous business practices, and they recently had to pay a large settlement for pirating software for their company.
Moz Pro | | Sean_Gutermuth0 -
How Can I see my competitors rankings?
Hi, I can see my ranking details but I can not see my competitors rankings. Seomoz is not updating their ranking and there is some problem in rank tracker as I refresh the ranking, but it says it doesn't update it. Why? Regards, Zeeshan
Moz Pro | | Shehryar0 -
Why do the competitive link analysis numbers not match the domain analysis?
There is only one area that our competitor out ranks us and that is in the total links on the root domain. But when i go to competitive link analysis we have more links then they do. Any ideas?
Moz Pro | | d_friess0 -
Number of links shown in history report are going down?
I'm looking at the link history for my site and 3 competitors I am tracking and for all sites External followed links have dropped by about 40% over the last 2 months. Has anyone else seen this with their sites? What would be possible reasons for this? Thanks,
Moz Pro | | MarkTik
Markus0 -
Need help with Opensite explorer
Hi, Every time i try to create an advanced report with Opensite it will get to around 4-6k links and then start to finalize the report, however it says i have 750k links aiming at my root domain. I have not used any of the page/domain authority filters, any ideas on why this could be cutting me off? Kyle
Moz Pro | | kyleNeedham0 -
Any plans to allow direct comparison between a selected website (client) and top competitors?
Hi, I really like the SEOMoz keyword difficulty tool. It currently reports metrics between the top 10 positions. Is there any plan to introduce the facility to directly compare metrics between a selected website and that of other competing websites. For example, a clients' website compared to the top 10 results, or compared to a number of other selected competiors websites? Best wishes, David
Moz Pro | | Hallam0