Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Accuracy of search volume for keyword planner v old keyword tool?
-
Hi there,
I'm (logged into Google Adwords) and researching search volume for keywords but I'm seeing weird results.
I know that the term "outage notification" had between 1000 and 5000 monthly global searches when I last looked (I know this because I add a search volume tag to the keywords I track ranking of via Moz). Yet, now when I check global search volume via keyword planner I'm seeing only 70 global searches per month (AND low competition which I know is not true). Is this perhaps because only the exact match is reported or is something else going on?
Very frustrated as I have now lost faith in the keyword research process via Google keyword planner....not sure where to go from here!!
Thanks very much
-
You're welcome Dan! I just noticed there is also a post in YouMoz on the subject:
http://moz.com/ugc/the-new-adwords-keyword-planner-your-keyword-research-process
-
Wow Dana - super helpful thanks so much for chiming in!
-
Hi all,
Because I needed to educate myself on how to get the most out of the new Keyword Planner versus the old Keyword Tool, I wrote a blog post last week on the subject located here:
http://www.danatanseo.com/2013/07/google-keyword-planner-vs-keyword-tool.html
Dan, you are correct the new default is exact match, while the old was broad, and yes, now you can toggle between "exact" "phrase" and "broad" with one major caveat, these are based on your specific Adwords account targeting settings. So for example, in my case, we target only the USA, so now my results when researching are only the USA....which may not be appropriate at all if I am doing research for a client that targets more that just the US. I'm sure you can see how that could pose some significant problems for accurately targeting high-opportunity keywords for other countries.
As Jeff says below, yes, you can still get global monthly search volume by targeting all locations. For me, the only way to reasonably do this without fear of totally screwing up the settings on my existing Adwords campaigns is to open a completely separate Adwords account just so I can do research. Yuck!
Fortunately, there are some alternatives to the old Google Keywords Tool: Wordstream's Keyword Tool, UberSuggest, SEMRush, SEOBook's Keyword Tool
Larry Kim has also written a good post on the differences between the old and new Keywords Tool/Planner....but it's a little daunting (IMHO), so read it first thing in the morning when you are wide awake with a fresh coffee at your side.
Hope this helps guys!
P.S. The other thing that really sucks is you can no longer check a box next to specific keywords and export just those. You now have to export the entire list and filter through them in Excel. This drives me nuts!
-
I am honestly not 100% sure at this point. I see the option to select broad, phrase or exact via a tiny little icon in the top right, however I am not convinced as to how well this is working. But the option is there, so you must be able to choose still. The default may be exact match, but you can still switch (whereas before default was broad match).
-
And more...
If you hover over the ? icon next to the results for average monthly search volume you see this text: "The average number of times people have searched for this exact keyword based on the targeting settings that you've selected. "
The keyword here is "exact" - Does this mean the default is exact match and we no longer have control over this?
-
Nope - just checked that - not it
-
Hi all,
Thanks for all the responses. I'm wondering whether adwords used to default to showing Google + Search partner results before where as now you have to select this option (otherwise the default is just Google). It could account for the differences perhaps?
Sarah
-
Thanks so much for that link Jeff!! Had no idea it was there. Will definitely be sharing.
-
I'm seeing the same thing.
From what I see in the Google Blog, that sends you to here: https://support.google.com/adwords/answer/3141229
Local monthly searches and global monthly searches: These two columns have been replaced by the "Average monthly searches" column, simplifying the search volume data you can get. The average monthly search volume is specific to your targeting settings, and you can get data for an entire country or individual cities and regions within a country. Note that you can still get global monthly search data by targeting all locations.
But based on past numbers, this is not an average at all. "Flooring London Ontario" should have the same local and global searches... Yet, it went from 1300 (Keyword Tool) to 210 (Keyword Planner) local monthly searches.
Keep us updated on anything you find! This would make a great Blog Post for someone who has the time to do a proper investigation
-
Cool, will do. Thanks Dan!
-
I saw the AdWords help tab had a email address and phone number. I bet if you or someone payone for AdWords contacted (and asked like you're a paying AdWords customer) you could get an answer.
You could also submit a question in the Google Webmaster Help forum, or their Google Plus Group - or join a hangout they hold every Friday.
-Dan
-
Right? And when googling this it feels like I'm the only one...
In my experience contacting google has usually been a waste of time.. Is there any place you would recommend submitting this?
-
Wow that's crazy! The only thing I can think to suggest is submitting a help request or contacting them.
-
In my case, the new kw-tool always shows the same numbers for broad, phrase and exact match, no matter what option I chose. Also, these numbers are completely different from what the old kw-tools displays. look here: http://imgur.com/tpAXwVN
For languages that are less used than english, the new kw-tool often displays no traffic at all and becomes virtually useless.
-
Thanks Dan. I was using broad match which is why it's so odd. I'll go back to the old tool (thanks for the tip) and will compare. Sarah
-
First thing I want to check;
- Are you using exact match consistently or broad match? Check out the differences.
Next, you may be wondering how i got back to the old tool;
- you can do so temporarily - I would do that to check your numbers in the meantime too.
-Dan
-
Hi Sarah
I'm stumbling into the same problems as you - search volumes of the old Keyword Tool and the Keyword Planner vary massively. And for terms that shouldn't have much fluctuation in search volume. Stuff that shows volume in the thousands in the old tool, just indicates search volumes around 50 in the new one.
This looks pretty crappy to me considering that soon this will be my only kw-tool available...
-
Here's an update on broad matches for various terms:
Desktop alert - on keyword tool, global volume showed as 20,000+ searches (sorry don't have exact number), it is now showing search volume as 390 on the keyword planner...
Corporate screensaver - was showing 1001 to 5000 searches, it is now showing 320.
Desktop messaging - was showing 10001 to 15000 searches, it is now showing 140.
Something fishy is going on...
Sarah
-
Thanks Dana,
This is a term used by IT folk a lot. When I last checked I was not aware of any global events. I'm not sure that this would be the reason (although it is of course possible!). Have there been any other observations of changes to keyword volume reported by users after Google's transition to keyword planner?
I'll also check other search phrases less likely to be volatile and get back to you (thanks for the tip).
Sarah
-
Search volume can be incredibly volatile from one region to another. I would imagine that "outage notification" as a term could be incredibly volatile, because it's really pretty vague. If there was a major earthquake, I would think that colume for that term would soar...or any natural disaster really. On the other hand, if things had been relatively quiet and there hand't been any major seismic or weather events, then that might mean something else. but that all depends on where you are, and where you are trying to sell.
If search volume in a remote area of Pakistan increases by 5,000 percent, and it's only temporary because of a weird event.....is that something you can build a business on here in the States? Of course not
There are many factors to consider. Search volume is one tiny piece of the puzzle.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Keyword Planner not showing exact match
hi guys I'm currently trying to optimize a site for 'Recruitment Agency North West' when I enter his term into keyword planner it gives me no results for the exact match, but offers me figures for 'Recruitment Agencies North West' Am I to assume that nobody has ever searched 'Recruitment Agency North West'?!!! and that I should be focusing on 'Recruitment Agencies North West' as my main key phrase? Is there another site other than keyword planner that will give me results for 'Recruitment Agency North West'? cheers M
Keyword Research | | Staunton_Rook0 -
How granular should I get with Keyword research?
I'm doing KW research for a new business. My understanding from KW research guides: Use tools to create a list of thousands of keywords Analyze difficulty and search volume Reduce your list and do on page optimization for your select KWs My dilemma with this approach is that it seems "keyword based" rather than "intent" or "category" based. e.g. Let's say I have a grocery store. Ignoring SEO, I know that these are my main categories: Produce Meat Dairy Canned Goods Baked Goods In other words, the above categories are the general "intents" and "categories" that I'd really want to rank for. Keyword tool shows that they have high volume and high difficulty. Let's say that after doing keyword research, I discover "Low Fat Chicken Breasts" and "Turkey Sausage" and "Cheap Meat Wholesale" have decent search volume and low competition. I don't quite understand how I'm supposed to utilize these fringe keywords in my on page SEO plan because it doesn't make sense as a human to categorize my site that way. Not sure if this is clear. Basically I'm trying to figure out if I should really be getting this granular on keywords to help guide my store categories or if I should just be picking broader terms.
Keyword Research | | clarasboutiqueusa0 -
The same keyword on multiple pages, but not all (combined with other relevant keywords) for products.
Hi Guys, I want to get an opinion/advice on this. My client has a site that have all their products (I am working on expanding the product descriptions, benefits and how they differ from each other) listed and I just want to know if I can use the term 'gear oil' for example on multiple pages as one of the keywords. The product range (among others like transmission fluid and anti-freeze) is gear oil (with the different types of gear oils available described) and I can't really change what the product is. I do have different variations (such as gear lubricant, automotive gear lubricant, car gear oil etc.) but will it do damage if I use the same keyword (like gear oil) on multiple pages (along with another relevant keyword that does not involve the words gear oil)? Any help on this will be greatly appreciated!
Keyword Research | | annabel.schoeman0 -
Price Comparison Website And Keywords
I run a price comparison website for a small niche at http://cdkeyprices.com I am targeting keywords for the specific products I am comparing the price/merchants on. On a typical page I would have a price column, product name, the merchant and a buy button. Buy button is affiliate linked to the merchant. The product name in the product column is the name from the actual website I am tracking. As such, my keyword was appearing sometimes up the 30 times. I've took it down some months ago but was wondering if this was a bad move. I was concerned Google would think I was stuffing the keyword. I've only just gotten into SEO the past few months so was not able to see any changes. Should i put the product column back up or would it be considered over optimization?
Keyword Research | | MrPenguin0 -
Include Location in Keywords?
I understand Google's local search automatically searches keywords with the location you are searching from. For example if I'm searching from Calgary and query "best shoe repair", Google knows I'm searching from Calgary and presents Calgary based results. I'm using Google's new Keyword Planner tool which allows for city based search results, meaning I don't have to include "Calgary" in the keywords I submit. The question I have is should I be attaching "Calgary" to my keywords for on-page optimization, and why or why not? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Keyword Research | | reidsteven750 -
Search Volume vs. CTR
Is it better to optimize based on search volume or click through rate? For example: If a keyword has a CTR of 19% and only 3,000 monthly searches, while another keyword that is relevant to that page has a CTR of 0.7% and 20,000 monthly searches, which keyword should that page be optimized for for better natural results and the bottom line?
Keyword Research | | Motivators0 -
Is "in" a keyword differentiator?
Does google view phrases with "in" in then as different keywords than the same phrase without an "in"? For example: is "great restaurants in chicago" the same keyword as "great restaurants chicago"? Whenever I do research on two phrases like this, they always come up with the same search volume.
Keyword Research | | TheSquareFoot0 -
Keyword Research (dash or no dash)
I have a client that has been optimizing for "print and apply" for the past 5 months. Yesterday they decided it was more grammatically correct to use "print-and-apply." There question to me was "is this going to effect our SEO?" So... I checked the difficulty using the keyword analysis tool, both keywords had the same broad/exact adwords traffic as well as difficulty percentage. When reviewing the top 25 listings for each keyword it looks like the same sites rank in the SERPs between 1-8 and then after that it is completely different. So, is there a better keyword to target? Are these two keywords different enough to truly have separate search results?
Keyword Research | | kchandler
The top 8 results didn't even target "print-and-apply" in there content or title tags... Thanks for the input/discussion - Kyle0