SEOMoz API not working for Scrapebox
-
I want to import SEOMoz data to list of URLs I have using scrapbox.
I added in my credentials according to the API but am getting error 401 as the status of all my links.
Any idea why and what I should be doing?
-
Thanks!
Figured out the problem was on my end
-
Hey Sara,
Thanks for the question. Unfortunately this is something you'd need to take up with Scrapebox. Your API key is setup just fine with the Pro rate limit of 1 request every 5 second. So these authentication issues are going to be due to improperly formed requests by the software.
I also see that you've getting heavily throttled, so you may want to check and see if you have any control over how fast it makes your requests.
I hope that helps. It looks like Scrapebox just has a form to fill out for their support here: http://www.scrapebox.com/contact-us
Cheers,
Joel.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is it possible to re-run crawl in seomoz pro campaign?
Hello, for my campaign designzzz.com the crawl ran today, and next crawl is after a week. but unfortunately when the crawling was in progress i had a little issue on site which added lots of 500 server errors and other notifications. So is it possible to re-run the crawl ?
Moz Pro | | wickedsunny10 -
Not able to find Do follow Link as shown in Seomoz Toolbar
SEO Moz Toolbar showing 1 do follow link in every forum question page Have checked source twice thoroughly - not able to trace that do follow link - to which site is that do follow link going to Some sample links - http://www.mycarhelpline.com/index.php?option=com_easydiscuss&view=post&id=426&Itemid=78 - http://www.mycarhelpline.com/index.php?option=com_easydiscuss&view=post&id=63&Itemid=78 Facebook & Google plus - both are no follow can some one help please so as to know this mysterious do follow link as shown in as letted know by SEOMOZ Toolbar
Moz Pro | | Modi0 -
Do you miss SEOmoz's Term Extractor Tool?
Do you miss SEOmoz's Term Extractor Tool and want them to bring it back? If you do, please go to this link and submit a feature request form. Here is a brief description for those that are not familiar with what the SEOmoz Term Extractor Tool is;This tool analyzes the content of a given page and extracts the terms that appear to be targeted at search engines. It applies certain weights to HTML elements and other on-page factors to determine what it thinks is a targeted term.
Moz Pro | | brianhughes1 -
How can i get seomoz to crawl a campaign on demand
hi how can i get seomoz to crawl a campaign on demand instead of on a weekly basis? For example i have corrected some error warnings and on page elements and would like it to re crawl the site sooner to see how the corrections have worked? thanks
Moz Pro | | Bristolweb0 -
SEOmoz crawler and duplicate content
Does anybody know if the SEOmoz crawler picks up canonical tags when its looking for duplicate content? I've got a ton of errors in one of my projects even though they all have canonical tags. Thanks!
Moz Pro | | neooptic0 -
Duplicate page error from SEOmoz
SEOmoz's Crawl Diagnostics is complaining about a duplicate page error. I'm trying to use a rel=canonical but maybe I'm not doing it right. This page is the original, definitive version of the content: https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/sent-2011-10-01 This page is an alias that points to it (each month the alias is changed to point to the then current issue): https://www.borntosell.com/covered-call-newsletter/latest-issue The alias page above contains this tag (which is also updated each month when a new issue comes out) in the section: Is that not correct? Is the https (vs http) messing something up? Thanks!
Moz Pro | | scanlin0 -
SEOmoz vs Google Webmaster Tools on incoming links
I'm working on basic SEO for http://queueassoc.com. Google has indexed the non-www verions of the pages and these are what the SERPS return SEOmoz toolbar shows that all of the incoming links juice goes to the www. versions of the pages, none to the non-www version. Yesterday I set up GWMT for the site, submitted a sitemap with the www version of the pages and set the default address to the www version. I had to verify both versions of the site in order to do this and in looking at the non-www version I saw that Google had all the incoming links there and none in the www.version, the opposite of what SEOmoz shows. Is this just because Google only has the non-www versions in its index? Will they show the links to the www version once they get them in the index? I'm worried about losing Google Page Rank value or SEOmoz DA by making this switch.
Moz Pro | | bvalentine0 -
Discrepancies in PA and LRDs reported in different SEOmoz tools
I've noticed a difference in the reported PA and LRD numbers for URLs depending on whether you use Open Site Explorer, or look at the same metrics from within the rankings history (in your campaign set up). I've checked this for a few URLs and what I'm seeing is the reported scores for PA and LRDs is different 9 times out of ten. The PA is sometiomes higher on one report, lower on another, or vice versa. Same for LRDs. I thought it might be because one report was lagging behind and using old data, but that would only make sense if I was seeing an increase in reported LRDs, but it just as often shows a decrease ! Is this just a bug in the campaign>rankings history report or is there a reason for the discrepancies?
Moz Pro | | Websensejim0