Is there benefit to having longer article headlines?
-
I am seeing a trend in digital publishing on sites like HuffPo and others where they are increasing the length of article headlines to 3-4 rows of large type, often containing multiple sentences. Other publishers like CNN.com still have shorter headlines and character counts. Perhaps this is just a design aesthetic, but I am curious if there is any SEO value to having longer headlines assuming you are able to fit your targeted keywords/terms and message in something shorter?
-
I don't think there's a clear answer. Longer headlines are harder to share on some social media sites (especially twitter) and Google won't display much past 55-75 characters in search results.
But from a user engagement perspective, I bet Huffington post is finding some success with the longer headlines. This probably has as much to do with how they display the headlines on their site, and also how they distribute the content and share, so it doesn't mean this is a system that would work for everyone.
Best practice remains writing headlines between 55-75 characters.
But best practices were made to be broken
-
I guess this is less of a question about SEO for HuffPost and others than about reader engagement - I'd be fascinated to see whether anybody who runs a news site or blog with a large number of page views (cough Moz cough) has data on this.
Going with my gut, I would say that longer headlines give the reader more of an idea about exactly what they're going to read, so they are probably more likely to engage with the post than if you used a shorter of headline. Of course, with bounces and other engagement metrics potentially being part of the search engine algorithms that might give you a bit of an SEO boost.
-
Great question, and I'm mostly responding to be included in other replies. When approaching longer titles for articles, we have used an H1 tag for a succinct 1-line title, followed by an H2 for the rest of the title. Regarding your design aesthetic note, I agree on two levels: 1) short titles look better and 2) are better for the visitor because they are easier to read. Also, stuffing lots of words into a title might look spammy.
I ran out to HuffingtonPost to see how they do it - their articles run 3 lines probably because of large font size which seems to be the trend these days, and also a fairly narrow site design with limited horizontal space. I think it works, but does make titles a bit rough on the eyes.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
IMG TITLE no longer used in Wordpress?
Err, when did this happen? Although you can still enter a Title in the WP image library, when inserting into a post the Title tag is not implemented. Alt text is there OK but not Title. There was a plugin around that restored this basic seo functionality but it's no longer available. I mean - honestly!
On-Page Optimization | | robandsarahgillespie0 -
Favicons - favicon.ico having any SEO Benefits?
Hi all, I was wondering about favicon.ico and it's presence on the website. Is it important to have favicon.ico and there any SEO benefit of it? Thanks in advance!
On-Page Optimization | | vendrocks0 -
Auto loading articles ?- best practices
Hi all! In the past months I see more and more website that doing 'auto loading articles in scrolling' - can you tell me if it's okay for SEO and what are the best practices for this? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | JohnPalmer1 -
Transferring old articles to new site even if they are written horribly
OK my question for today is... If you currently have 300 articles on your current site but are building a new site would you transfer all of the articles over to the new site or focus on quality and rewrite the articles that had traffic? For example we have about 300 articles currently on our website 60 of which actually get traffic, We rewrote those articles to make sure they were written well. Someone thought that it would be best to simply transfer the other 240 articles over and rewrite them at another time to avoid 404 redirects. I would like your feedback on how you would approach this. Please be as detailed as possible explaining your thought process. Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | PrintPlace.com0 -
Does the link title attribute benefit seo?
Hello, Anyone could tell me the benefit SEO of link title attribute. Is **Link Title **ranking factor? Thanks
On-Page Optimization | | JohnHuynh0 -
UGC News articles
Hi! Quick question regarding UGC... On our site - http://designrfix.com - we have a /news section (which contains about 40 000 news items) - shown in the right sidebar at the bottom I recently changed the /news (and all subpages) section to noindex and asked a removal on Google Webmaster Tools... was this a good idea? Those pages are low content pages and the bounce rate is really high since all articles are external sites.
On-Page Optimization | | designrfix0 -
Is Article Length A Factor For Keyword Stuffing?
I've noticed that the SEOmoz On Page analysis tool sets a limit of 15 occurrences for a keyword on a page. It seems this is not dependent on the page length? Is that not relevant? Thanks!
On-Page Optimization | | andersvin0 -
Studies about the importance of headlines?
Everyone knows headlines are important, but data speaks louder than opinion. Does anyone know of some studies about engagement metrics & headlines?
On-Page Optimization | | nicole.healthline0