Disavow first (and link removal outreach second) as tactic?
-
I need to remove/disavow hundreds of domains due to an algorithmic penalty. Has anyone disavowed first and done the outreach thing second as a tactic?
The reason why I was considering this was as follows:
- Most of the websites are from spammy websites and unlikely to have monitored accounts/available contact details.
- My business is incredibly seasonal, only being easily profitable for half of the year. The season starts from next month so the window of opportunity to get it done is small. If there's a Penguin update before I get it done, then it could be very bad news.
Any thoughts would be much appreciated.
(Incidentally, if you are interested in, I also posted here about it: http://moz.com/community/q/honest-thoughts-needed-about-link-building-removal)
-
Thanks Marie.
Sorry, yes, by "take effect", I meant see better results in the SERPS.
I understand that I have been affected by Penguin (I had an audit carried out by Paul Macnamara, who you referred me onto. He was great, BTW).
So I guess it's just a waiting game. I'm crossing my fingers very tightly!
From Paul's audit, I do have a good base of links, and I am continuing to build them. Also, for many keywords, the site actually ranked higher before any link building was ever done by the bad SEO company. With these things in mind, I'm really, really, really hoping that my fortunes will change on the next Penguin refresh - whenever that might be!! Will be very disappointed if not. SUCH a frustrating thing as it feels very much out of my control.
Thanks for taking the time to reply!
-
It really depends on what you mean by "take effect". As soon as you submit the disavow, Google starts applying an invisible nofollow tag to each link that you have in that file as they crawl the web. However, in some cases, it can take 6 months or more for all of the links to get crawled.
Will you see a change in rankings after you file a disavow? I have seen some sites where within 24-48 hours there is an improvement which is always nice. However, if you were affected by the Penguin algorithm then you won't see any improvement until Google refreshes Penguin which could be any day now or even months from now. AND, in order to see improvement you have to have good links present. If your previous rankings were there because of links that are now deemed unnatural, then there may be no improvement at all either now or when Penguin refreshes.
-
Marie, in your experience, does it take weeks or months or most disavows to take effect? I submitted my disavow file 3 weeks ago and nothing so far...
-
Absolutely do the disavow first. There's no reason not to, especially if you are dealing with an algorithmic issue. (For some sites with manual penalties, I'll submit a disavow as soon as I can and then do the outreach.)
On a side note, if you have an algorithmic issue (i.e. Penguin), no one knows for sure whether you even need to remove links. Of course, there are benefits to removing links. Google will tell you to do so because you don't want people to look at your site's links and see bad ones online. But, I recently asked John Mueller in a hangout whether link removal (as opposed to disavow) was necessary for Penguin and here's what he said:
From a theoretical point of view, using the disavow tool is enough...from a practical point of view it almost always makes sense to still delete those links as much as possible.
You can see the response here at about 41:20: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWYooFjmx5c&list=UUthrUiuJUtFSXBUp48D8bAA&index=2
The main reason why removing may be better than disavowing is because it can take weeks or months for a site on your disavow list to get recrawled and as such be disavowed. However, I have found that in most cases, if you have spammy links, if you don't control the login info you used for link submission (or if there is no way for you to remove the link yourself) the response rate is always very poor (like 10-15% if you're lucky).
If you've been hit by Penguin, there are two things that need to be in place in order to recover:
1. An EXTREMELY thorough link audit and disavow. IMO it's not enough to get 80-90% of the bad links. The only sites I have seen recover had close to 100% disavowed. This means doing a manual review of every single domain linking to you from every source you can find.
2. A site that has a base of good natural links with the ability to attract new links. If you don't have that and you are planning on manufacturing your own links again then you probably will not recover.
-
In light of the all round astonishment I went and checked the actual numbers, rather than off the top of my head - it was 44% removed.
So still way better than I'd expected.
-
Hi Emma
First of all, great news that your penalty was lifted. Are things back to what they were prior to the penalty being imposed?
In terms of my website... As it's an algorithmic penalty, not a manual one, there's no reinclusion request to submit in my case. So, the only way I can show penance is to show that some links have been manually removed - most likely I would only get a very small percentage of these removed, if any, due to the spammy nature of these sites.
I can still go through this outreach process. But, I mainly wondered if there was any disadvantage in doing the disavow first. I am very concerned that there could be a Penguin update before I get chance to outreach then disavow. Due to the seasonality of my market, a few weeks can make a dramatic difference to the chance of survival of the business. The window of opportunity for sales happens in the spring and summer.
I can always do a second round of disavowing afterwards.
Thanks
Coral
-
50% is a shockingly high success rate, way above the norm. I had a 16% success rate on one of our sites and around 35% on one of our much larger sites. I had one of the top names ever in SEO tell us that 5% would be a good success rate, though I think that's lowballing a bit.
-
Interesting video... loving Matt Cutts' T-shirt
There's no reinclusion request to be made as it's just an algorithmic penalty. Not a manual penalty.
-
Your stats are interesting, and show much better success than anyone else's I've heard. 50% is amazing, but doesn't seem that representative of the general experience (from what I've read). Well done to you though.
Just to clarify, I'm not thinking that there will be a Penguin update in the next three weeks. Rather, if there is an update and I haven't actioned it, that's things looking pretty bleak for me for the entire season. Because, by the time the next one arrives, it could be too late (as things are quiet again).
-
The disavow tool is technically a recommendation to Google to ignore the toxic links, it does not have to disavow any, let alone all of the sites that you suggest. The point of sorting out a penalty is is performing penance and proving you won't do it again. Taking the easiest step first without recording efforts that show that you have tried to resolve it manually won't make you pass the manual review.
I know this for a fact as the agency that got us in a penalty in the first place performed two disavows before I took over and lifted our penalty. I manually checked over 10,000 and recorded my efforts for all, only then was it lifted. I understand that you want to fix it quickly as it is your business, but there is no quick fix other than playing by goggles rules on this one and showing that you understand that spammy links are not good. I recommend email out reach and recording everything on a goggle doc to send through with your re inclusion request. Best of luck
-
Coraltoes,
There isn't any question about whether or not you can go straight to the disavow tool as a first step in cleaning up bad links, as Matt Cutts confirms here. Exactly what the difference is between doing that and first communicating to all spammy link webmasters so that you have that file to include with your reinclusion request isn't so clear cut.
-
Hi,
I think Its a Good idea to disavow first and then Go after the Link removal thing.
I have a domain which got penguin penalty , We have Spent alot of time in removing links and Still have domains where links can not be deleted duw to certain issues So Atlast We have to disavow them.
So I would advise you to Disavow all of the bad backlinks first and then spend time in removing them.
Also, As Matt said above, It is impossible to recover domain from penguin in around 3 weeks Time.
You my better to start a New domain.
Thanks
-
Have to say I haven't done it your way round - we've completed three rounds of email outreach then submitted a disavow file, so I don't want to guess to far on advisability of doing it the other way around. For starters I've no idea how well / quickly Google handles domains removed from a disavow list.
Your first assumption needs comment though - every domain we're removing links from was from a spammy website (zero quality SEO directory), as a result of a submission package they bought years back before I joined.
We managed to get about 50% of the list removed from that email outreach process. Granted one was a directory network with over 100 domains, but even counting their domains as one that we got about 40% success.
Around 10% responded with a demand for a fee - ranging from 99c to $50. Clearly all those were instant place in disavow list
So to summarise I was really surprised how successful the email outreach part was - we'd been expecting next to nothing by way of response rate rather than around 50% success.
Even if you do it disavow first, hoping for a Penguin update in the next three weeks so the file is actioned prior to your season starting is a little optimistic!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Many Links to Disavow at Once When Link Profile is Very Spammy?
We are using link detox (Link Research Tools) to evaluate our domain for bad links. We ran a Domain-wide Link Detox Risk report. The reports showed a "High Domain DETOX RISK" with the following results: -42% (292) of backlinks with a high or above average detox risk
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kingalan1
-8% (52) of backlinks with an average of below above average detox risk
-12% (81) of backlinks with a low or very low detox risk
-38% (264) of backlinks were reported as disavowed. This look like a pretty bad link profile. Additionally, more than 500 of the 689 backlinks are "404 Not Found", "403 Forbidden", "410 Gone", "503 Service Unavailable". Is it safe to disavow these? Could Google be penalizing us for them> I would like to disavow the bad links, however my concern is that there are so few good links that removing bad links will kill link juice and really damage our ranking and traffic. The site still ranks for terms that are not very competitive. We receive about 230 organic visits a week. Assuming we need to disavow about 292 links, would it be safer to disavow 25 per month while we are building new links so we do not radically shift the link profile all at once? Also, many of the bad links are 404 errors or page not found errors. Would it be OK to run a disavow of these all at once? Any risk to that? Would we be better just to build links and leave the bad links ups? Alternatively, would disavowing the bad links potentially help our traffic? It just seems risky because the overwhelming majority of links are bad.0 -
Link Building Strategy?
If I use unique content written from writers & post it to good sites (free blogs, bookmarking, directory, articles sites, etc.) having nice good cache, good PR, different IP's do i still have a chance of get hit by Spam actions of google? Planning to do like just 30-50 a month all with unique content or say 1 unique content then re-written & used not more than 3 times. If not this then What else would you suggest? One more thing to add up, like i have 1000+ pages out of which i have like 80-90 pages that matters to me (important pages) then how do I spin the anchor text between all the pages. Should i spin them between 1000+ pages or use only 80-90 IMP pages. If the content is 300 words let say then how many anchor tags should i have?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | welcomecure0 -
2015 Disavow Links on Bing?
In years past I was told not to disavow links in Bing unless the site had an issue. This was driven home when a site we were working on disavowed the links in google and saw the site recover after a few months, then when they disavowed the same links in Bing and the rankings dropped 20% over the next few months. The reasoning was that Bing was looking more at the qty of links, and didn't analyze links the way Google does. So even though you might disavow links in Google you might not want to disavow those same links in Bing. Does this still hold true in 2015? I want to get the community's opinion on this topic, should the same links be disavowed in Bing that are disavowed in Google? Why or why not?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | K-WINTER1 -
Link building… how to get high rewarding links?
Hi Guys, I have a few people whom I have built relationships up in my industry with that would like to link to my site. Is there any particular things I need to be mindful of before having them link to me? I'm just mindful of the unknown. Also, which links to use etc? Thanks in advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | edward-may0 -
How to remove seemingly untouchable link spam
Hey Mozzers, I have been struggling with this issue, and I am hoping someone can help. I have a number of bad/spammy links to my site. We have never engaged in "bad SEO", but an old subdomain received a number of spammy blog comments, and everything seemed to escalate from there. We have removed a subdomain that received all of the bad links from our DNS settings (about a year ago), but these links are still there when using Ahrefs or MajesticSEO. I don't think we have been penalized for these links, but I would just like to clean them up because, well, it's the right thing to do. How does one do this when these sites seem so untouchable. Either they are from China, Russia, Denmark, abandoned in 2009, etc. If I look for someone to contact, I can't seem to find anyone to even email. Suggestions?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | evan890 -
Internal links to preferential pages
Hi all, I have question about internal linking and canonical tags. I'm working on an ecommerce website which has migrated platform (shopify to magento) and the website design has been updated to a whole new look. Due to the switch to magento, the developers have managed to change the internal linking structure to product pages. The old set up was that category pages (on urls domain.com/collections/brand-name) for each brand would link to products via the following url format: domain.com/products/product-name . This product url was the preferential version that duplicate product pages generated by shopify would have their canonical tags pointing to. This set up was working fine. Now what's happened is that the category pages have been changed to link to products via dynamically generated urls based on the user journey. So products are now linked to via the following urls: domain.com/collection/brand-name/product-name . These new product pages have canonical tags pointing back to the original preferential urls (domain.com/products/product-name). But this means that the preferential URLs for products are now NOT linked to anywhere on the website apart from within canonical tags and within the website's sitemap. I'm correct in thinking that this definitely isn't a good thing, right? I've actually noticed Google starting to index the non-preferential versions of the product pages in addition to the preferential versions, so it looks like Google perhaps is ignoring the canonical tags as there are so many internal links pointing to non-preferential pages, and no on-site links to the actual preferential pages? I've recommended to the developers that they change this back to how it was, where the preferential product pages (domain.com/products/product-name) were linked to from collection pages. I just would like clarification from the Moz community that this is the right call to make? Since the migration to the new website & platform we've seen a decrease in search traffic, despite all redirects being set up. So I feel that technical issues like this can't be doing the website any favours at all. If anyone could help out and let me know if what I suggested is correct then that would be excellent. Thank you!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Guy_OTS0 -
Site rankings steadily decreasing - do I need to remove links?
Since mid-April, our ranking have been steadily declining. Our two main keywords are 'nuts and bolts' and 'bolts and nuts'. 'nuts and bolts' dropped from 7th to 46th in May and has recovered slightly to 28th, and 'bolts and nuts' moved from 7th to 16th, and is today 24th. Ranking on keywords we specialise in have fared better, but they're fairly niche. 'bsw bolts' has moved from 2nd to 4th, and 'imperial bolts' has moved from 1st to 4th. I think my link profile is the issue. I don't think we've been penalised by Penguin directly (I may be wrong, I don't think we'd be page 2 on such a competitive term as 'bolts and nuts' after Penguin if we had been penalised.), but I think what's happened is that sites that link to us have been penalised, resulting in a knock on effect. Does that sound right? Here's my link profile: <a rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.thomassmithfasteners.com</a> I've been slowly building relevant links with prospective customers and kept up a very basic social media profile - just the odd blog post and sharing on Facebook and Twitter. Do I need to delete all the directory links? We do have links from directories that don't look fantastic, more are shown in Webmaster Tools than are listed here. Some of the directories no longer seem to exist, I take it I don't need to do anything and Google will catch up in those cases. Should I attempt to remove (or disavow) all links with names like best-directory etc? Or should I just concentrate on building better links? I'm not sure where to start! Any advice is greatly appreciated. Best Regards, Stephen
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | stephenshone0 -
First link importance in the content
Hi, have you guys an opinion on this point, mentioned by Matt Cutts in 2010 : Matt made a point to mention that users are more likely to click on the first link in an article as opposed to a link at the bottom of the article. He said put your most important links at the top of the article. I believe it was Matt hinting to SEOs about this. http://searchengineland.com/key-takeaways-from-googles-matt-cutts-talk-at-pubcon-55457 I've asked this in private and Michael Cottam told me he read a study a year ago that indicated that the link juice passed to other pages diminished the further down the page you go. But he can't find it anymore ! Do you remember this study and have the link ? What is your opinion on Matt's point ?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | baptisteplace0