Does Link Detox Boost Work?
-
That is a question I am sure many of your have been asking since they launched the product several weeks ago.
Cemper claims they helped get a penalty removed in 3 days by using this product. Sounds great doesn't it? Maybe even sounds too good to be true. Well, here is my experience with it.
We have been working to get a site's rankings back up for several months now. While it has no penalty, it clearly got hit by the algo change. So we have been very busy creating new content and attempting to remove as much "keyword rich" links as possible.
This really hasn't been working very well at all, so when I heard about link detox boost I thought this was the answer to our prayers. The basic idea is link detox boost forces google to crawl your bad links so it know you no longer have links from those sites or have disavowed them.
So we ran it and it was NOT cheap. Roughly $300. Now, 3 weeks after running it, the report only shows it has actually crawled 25% of our links, but they assure us it is a reporting issue and the full process has ran its course.
The results. No change at all. Some of our rankings are worse, some are better, but nothing worth mentioning.
Many products from Link Research Tools are very good, but i'm afraid this isn't one of them.
Anyone else use this product? What were your results?
-
The question was about if Link Detox Boost works, not about using Link Detox.
I do think Link Detox is a great program. Just Boost isn't.
-
I used it recently and managed to remove a manual penalty removal with the first attempt by using Link Detox. I can say that 80% of the efforts were put into reviewing "moderate" toxic links and manually removing those who we think are bad for our site.
A software tool can be as good as you tbh. I do not think that submitting a disavow file will lift a penalty in 3 days. Manual removal of links on the other hand can help a lot so they need to make clear that part tbh.
A couple of things I did and I think Google liked:
- 20% manual link removal of rich text anchor texts
- Uploaded backlink files from Majestic SEO, Open site Explorer AND Webmaster tools and connected all accounts to link detox. That way you make sure you do not miss anything.
- Built fresh branded and compound links at the same time
Hope this helps
-
Harald,
I need to challenge your response here.
You stated:
"Boost works not only for manual actions but also for algorithmic problems, like Penguin."
That's absolutely not possible. Penguin is not baked into the main algorithmic process. it's a separate entity that only runs a couple times a year. So unless the clean-up was done literally within a few days of the next Penguin update, the magic recovery you claim was NOT due to Penguin related problems.
-
But ... how does it do this? Are LRT saying that if we have disavowed 500 domains (i.e. no actual links, just domains), that their tool will force Google to crawl every one of those domains, every page, to confirm that the link is gone?
And anyway, if it's a site that won't remove the link, and/or demands payment to do so, why would Google need to crawl it? By disavowing the domain, you're simply asking Google to ignore it.
There's nothing more I'd like than to have a tool which speeds up the recovery process. But I can't see that this will do it, and I need more confidence in the logic of what is being claimed before I allocate resources to it. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me and I'll be happy to use the tool and report its success.
-
I do understand the skeptical attitude here. Anyway we have many clients sending us success stories that the Link Detox Boost works, but unfortunately they are afraid of publishing their success of a penalty removal because they don’t want to get into the focus of attention.
Nevertheless we could even confirm that the Link Detox Boost works not only for manual actions but also for algorithmic problems, like Penguin. The client disavowed ~40% of his links on Friday, got the Link Detox Risk down to 207, ran Link Detox Boost on Monday, and had an almost instant jump of 20 positions.
And that just not the only one.
We are working on detailed case study that should go live very soon.
The Link Detox Boost works and speeds up the disavow process significantly, if the users have done everything correctly.
As Marie has pointed out already it is really important to a really good base of good links underneath the low quality link to rank again. So even if you have disavowed a lot of URLs and boosted them (and they have been recrawled), then it can happen that you don’t see a recovery.
While boosting will speed up the whole disavow process for Google, it can still have many reasons why the Link Detox Boost does not work as expected for a penalty in a specific case.
You need to look into your link profile in more detail to find the answers, especially if you work with the Link Research Tools, you can check the link profile with DTOX and CLA easily:
- Do you have disavowed enough bad links? How does your Link Detox Risk score look like?
- Have you disavowed all suspicious and toxic links? Quite often people disavow too few links because they want to hold on to stronger links that cost them a lot in the past… wrong way
- Did you upload your WMT file and other backlink source files in the Link Detox report to be sure that no links get lost?
- Have you used the DTOX tool correctly (including the MUST DO steps)? http://help.linkdetox.com/m/link-detox-step-by-step-guide - Have you received more bad backlinks in the last days or weeks? Please re-run your Link Detox to be sure or start a Link Alert. Could be a negative SEO issue or simply forgotten to upload GWT link data
- Have you disavowed domains or pages? It is recommended to disavow the domains.
- Have you boosted all URLs which you have disavowed?
- Have all links been re-crawled already? You can check this by using the reprocessing button in your report. This is free.
- Do you have enough good backlinks to rank again?
- Do you have any unnatural tops in your link profile, even when you clean up your report? Start a CLA report for checking it.
TL:DR – Link Detox Boost speeds up the recovery process and working in Disavows faster, but if it’s not enough disavowed, it’s not enough.
However we are working ongoing to improve the tools and we also want to publish more success stories in the future for proofing that it works.
-
I have been doing exactly what you have. Rmoov, link detox reports, manual review etc.
I think the link detox boost was 12 credits.. or around $300.
You have to decide if that is wroth it for you or your clients. For me, after this experience, I wouldn't use it again.
-
Dave,
Thanks for asking this question....we have been waiting for some positive review on this tool to pull the trigger for a while.
I would say that even a small recovery would make us more than happy to use the tool. No need for major changes.
For now we have been using RMOOV to manage the manual removal requests to webmasters and Link Detox to identify and classify our incoming links.
I agree with Marie that only time and hard work will get us there. But, again...if Link Detox Boost is capable of expediting the recovery even just a bit...I am in.
Luciano
-
It's not possible to remove a Penguin issue in 3 days even if you have managed to get Google to crawl and disavow all of the links on your disavow file. This is because you won't be able to escape Penguin until Google refreshes the Penguin algorithm. AND...in order to see a dramatic recovery like the Link Detox graph shows, you'd have to have a site that has a really good base of good links underneath the low quality links. Most sites with Penguin issues will not see a dramatic recovery...and if they do, again, it would almost always be on the date of a Penguin refresh.
However, the Link Detox tool is describing a manual penalty, not Penguin. (However, they're a bit misleading saying it "speeds up recovery from a Google Penalty". Officially Google will tell you that Penguin is not a penalty, but simply an algorithmic change, but most webmasters would tell you that Penguin is a penalty.)
If it's a manual penalty, then you don't need to have the links in your disavow file crawled in order to lift your penalty and if this is the case then the "boost" that they are talking about won't really help get a penalty lifted. Within 24 hours of filing your disavow, the webspam team is able to see what is in the file. When they review your request for reconsideration, they check to see if you have disavowed the right links. It doesn't matter if those links have not been visited and thus disavowed yet.
Is it possible to lift a manual penalty in 3 days like Link Detox's website suggests? Yes. I've had it done. We once filed for reconsideration and three days later we had a response saying that our penalty was revoked. But, out of the hundreds of requests that I have filed, I've only ever once had Google respond that quickly. Most requests are taking 4 weeks to get a response back right now. Is it possible to have such a dramatic recovery as the graph shows? Yes, if you have a sitewide manual penalty and your penalty gets lifted, AND you have a good base of natural links then some sites can show a dramatic improvement. But, again, it has nothing to do with getting your disavowed links crawled faster.
I think that tools like Link Detox can have some value in helping site owners (but as I have always said, they don't replace the need for a manual audit.) But, I have to say that I am concerned about the way that they're marketing this tool. I think there could be some value, if you have a Penguin hit site, in getting your disavowed links crawled faster. It's conceivably possible that if you didn't, then Penguin could refresh and your disavowed urls have not been visited and therefore are not disavowed. But, the way that they've marketed it it sounds like any site that uses this tool can have top rankings again within 3 days of using it and that's quite misleading.
-
Nothing attracts a spider like new pages and new links, especially if there's a new page saying; "Woohoo, I'm over hEEeeeeAaaaRRrrrrr!" I would imagine the 'boost' is a sophisticated way of doing just that. But if it works something like that, it works counter to what Google is trying to accomplish. I would imagine the system was bound for breakdown at some point.
However, let's say the boost works just fine. That means there's definitely something else going on. I've seen rankings loses due to scrapers employing rel=canonical along with a ton of links (all bad links, of course). It's not supposed to work, but it does happen. Have you ran the hardest hit pages through plagiarism checkers?
-
Nobody knows. I have heard some different theory's involving the "fetch as google bot" tools.
-
Too bad that "Boost" didn't work for you. It is an interesting concept...
I wonder how they "force Google to crawl your bad links"? Does Google provide some sort of form that URL's can be submitted to for spidering? Or is there some other way to quickly bring individual URL's to their attention?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Links from a penalised site.
Hey Mozzers, Recently we have had a series of agencies in to pitch for work, one group mentioned that due to our association with a possibly penalised product review website, any links and activity associated with the brand would hinder our SEO. We currently have a good rating, but we are now no longer pushing our customers to the site as we move to a new platform. The current link back from this website is also no-followed. Any thoughts on how this could impact us? And how the agencies determined the site was penalised and causing us problems. Cheers Tim
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TimHolmes0 -
Any idea why Google Search Console stopped showing "Internal Links" and "Links to your site"
Our default eCommerce property (https://www.pure-elegance.com) used to show several dozen External Links and several thousand Internal Links on Google Search Console. As of this Friday both those links are showing "No Data Available". I checked other related properties (https://pure-elegance.com, http:pure-elegance.com and http://www.pure-elegance.com) and all of them are showing the same. Our other statistics (like Search Analytics etc.) remain unchanged. Any idea what might have caused this and how to resolve this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SudipG0 -
Same page Anchor Links vs Internal Link (Cannibalisation)
Hey Mozzers, I have a very long article page that supports several of my sub-category pages. It has sub-headings that link out to the relevant pages. However the article is very long and to make it easier to find the relevant section I was debating adding inpage anchor links in a bullet list at the top of the page for quick navigation. PAGE TITLE Keyword 1 Keyword 2 etc <a name="'Keyword1"></a> Keyword 1 Content
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ATP
<a name="'Keyword2"></a> Keyword 2 Content Because of the way my predecessor wrote this article, its section headings are the same as the sub-categories they link out to and boost (not ideal but an issue I will address later). What I wondered is if having the inpage achor would confuse the SERPS because they would be linking with the same keyword. My worry is that by increasing userbility of the article by doing this I also confuse them SERPS First I tell them that this section on my page talk about keyword 1. Then from in that article i tell them that a different page entirely is about the same keyword. Would linking like this confuse SERPS or are inpage anchor links looked upon and dealt with differently?0 -
Footer link - Created by
Hi everyone We created a website for our customer, and we wanted to have a footer link: "Created by WebPerfection.biz" Some Marketing company advised our customer, that it will hurt their SEO if they have that link for us in footer Would you guys advice on this please? Thank you P.S. site for our customer: www.azsedans.com
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | DavidIRC0 -
Link from archived article.
A strong news site has an "archived.domainname" folder, where they have older articles listed. I can get a link on a page where there is a 4 year old article, which will be in this archived sub-domain. My questions: Will Google view a link from a 4 year old article as less valuable. Will Google notice the article is 4 years old and find it odd why the page all of a sudden has a link to my site, and thus devalue such link the sub-domain "archived" does that tell Google it is old and a link will be less valuable thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen0 -
Internal Javascript Links
Hi, We have a client who has internal links pointing to some relatively new pages that we asked them to implement. The problem is that instead of using standard HTML links, their developers have used javascript - e.g. javascript:GoTo... The new pages have links from the homepage (among others) and have been live for about 3-4 weeks now - yet are still to be indexed by Google, Bing & Yahoo. Is it possibe that Javascript links are making them difficult to be found? Thanks in advance for any tips.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jasarrow0 -
Toxic Links; Their Existence and Their Impact..
We are constantly being asked about the existence of “toxic Links” and that they are damaging the sites of our clients. Apparently, this definition is being pushed down the throats of clients by other “Seo experts” trying to hijack our business. At this point in time, clients can easily be swayed as a reflex reaction to a drop in rankings. These so called “Seo experts” are clearly scaremongering for their own gain but I would be grateful for your opinion about whether automated, spun content from Seolinkvine and the like, where the English may not be perfect (I assume this is what is meant by “toxic Links”) can actually damage a client’s site. Is it not more constructive to concentrate resources on dilution of keywords from the anchor text rather than waste time on links that may no longer be as powerful, or do they actually have a negative effect?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Dexter-2455780 -
Natural Link Profile, low and high value links, really?
I cant really get my head around this one. I've read a few times when building links make sure you pick up so low value links as well. So here is an example (and lets say each link takes half hour to get): I got 5 hours of link building and this is what I have managed to get with the time. 1. 10 high value links all with PA/DA 50-60+ 2. 5 high value links with PA/DA 50-60+ AND another 5 low value links with PA/DA 10-. Surely #1 beats #2 hands down?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | activitysuper0