Does Link Detox Boost Work?
-
That is a question I am sure many of your have been asking since they launched the product several weeks ago.
Cemper claims they helped get a penalty removed in 3 days by using this product. Sounds great doesn't it? Maybe even sounds too good to be true. Well, here is my experience with it.
We have been working to get a site's rankings back up for several months now. While it has no penalty, it clearly got hit by the algo change. So we have been very busy creating new content and attempting to remove as much "keyword rich" links as possible.
This really hasn't been working very well at all, so when I heard about link detox boost I thought this was the answer to our prayers. The basic idea is link detox boost forces google to crawl your bad links so it know you no longer have links from those sites or have disavowed them.
So we ran it and it was NOT cheap. Roughly $300. Now, 3 weeks after running it, the report only shows it has actually crawled 25% of our links, but they assure us it is a reporting issue and the full process has ran its course.
The results. No change at all. Some of our rankings are worse, some are better, but nothing worth mentioning.
Many products from Link Research Tools are very good, but i'm afraid this isn't one of them.
Anyone else use this product? What were your results?
-
The question was about if Link Detox Boost works, not about using Link Detox.
I do think Link Detox is a great program. Just Boost isn't.
-
I used it recently and managed to remove a manual penalty removal with the first attempt by using Link Detox. I can say that 80% of the efforts were put into reviewing "moderate" toxic links and manually removing those who we think are bad for our site.
A software tool can be as good as you tbh. I do not think that submitting a disavow file will lift a penalty in 3 days. Manual removal of links on the other hand can help a lot so they need to make clear that part tbh.
A couple of things I did and I think Google liked:
- 20% manual link removal of rich text anchor texts
- Uploaded backlink files from Majestic SEO, Open site Explorer AND Webmaster tools and connected all accounts to link detox. That way you make sure you do not miss anything.
- Built fresh branded and compound links at the same time
Hope this helps
-
Harald,
I need to challenge your response here.
You stated:
"Boost works not only for manual actions but also for algorithmic problems, like Penguin."
That's absolutely not possible. Penguin is not baked into the main algorithmic process. it's a separate entity that only runs a couple times a year. So unless the clean-up was done literally within a few days of the next Penguin update, the magic recovery you claim was NOT due to Penguin related problems.
-
But ... how does it do this? Are LRT saying that if we have disavowed 500 domains (i.e. no actual links, just domains), that their tool will force Google to crawl every one of those domains, every page, to confirm that the link is gone?
And anyway, if it's a site that won't remove the link, and/or demands payment to do so, why would Google need to crawl it? By disavowing the domain, you're simply asking Google to ignore it.
There's nothing more I'd like than to have a tool which speeds up the recovery process. But I can't see that this will do it, and I need more confidence in the logic of what is being claimed before I allocate resources to it. If I'm missing something, please enlighten me and I'll be happy to use the tool and report its success.
-
I do understand the skeptical attitude here. Anyway we have many clients sending us success stories that the Link Detox Boost works, but unfortunately they are afraid of publishing their success of a penalty removal because they don’t want to get into the focus of attention.
Nevertheless we could even confirm that the Link Detox Boost works not only for manual actions but also for algorithmic problems, like Penguin. The client disavowed ~40% of his links on Friday, got the Link Detox Risk down to 207, ran Link Detox Boost on Monday, and had an almost instant jump of 20 positions.
And that just not the only one.
We are working on detailed case study that should go live very soon.
The Link Detox Boost works and speeds up the disavow process significantly, if the users have done everything correctly.
As Marie has pointed out already it is really important to a really good base of good links underneath the low quality link to rank again. So even if you have disavowed a lot of URLs and boosted them (and they have been recrawled), then it can happen that you don’t see a recovery.
While boosting will speed up the whole disavow process for Google, it can still have many reasons why the Link Detox Boost does not work as expected for a penalty in a specific case.
You need to look into your link profile in more detail to find the answers, especially if you work with the Link Research Tools, you can check the link profile with DTOX and CLA easily:
- Do you have disavowed enough bad links? How does your Link Detox Risk score look like?
- Have you disavowed all suspicious and toxic links? Quite often people disavow too few links because they want to hold on to stronger links that cost them a lot in the past… wrong way
- Did you upload your WMT file and other backlink source files in the Link Detox report to be sure that no links get lost?
- Have you used the DTOX tool correctly (including the MUST DO steps)? http://help.linkdetox.com/m/link-detox-step-by-step-guide - Have you received more bad backlinks in the last days or weeks? Please re-run your Link Detox to be sure or start a Link Alert. Could be a negative SEO issue or simply forgotten to upload GWT link data
- Have you disavowed domains or pages? It is recommended to disavow the domains.
- Have you boosted all URLs which you have disavowed?
- Have all links been re-crawled already? You can check this by using the reprocessing button in your report. This is free.
- Do you have enough good backlinks to rank again?
- Do you have any unnatural tops in your link profile, even when you clean up your report? Start a CLA report for checking it.
TL:DR – Link Detox Boost speeds up the recovery process and working in Disavows faster, but if it’s not enough disavowed, it’s not enough.
However we are working ongoing to improve the tools and we also want to publish more success stories in the future for proofing that it works.
-
I have been doing exactly what you have. Rmoov, link detox reports, manual review etc.
I think the link detox boost was 12 credits.. or around $300.
You have to decide if that is wroth it for you or your clients. For me, after this experience, I wouldn't use it again.
-
Dave,
Thanks for asking this question....we have been waiting for some positive review on this tool to pull the trigger for a while.
I would say that even a small recovery would make us more than happy to use the tool. No need for major changes.
For now we have been using RMOOV to manage the manual removal requests to webmasters and Link Detox to identify and classify our incoming links.
I agree with Marie that only time and hard work will get us there. But, again...if Link Detox Boost is capable of expediting the recovery even just a bit...I am in.
Luciano
-
It's not possible to remove a Penguin issue in 3 days even if you have managed to get Google to crawl and disavow all of the links on your disavow file. This is because you won't be able to escape Penguin until Google refreshes the Penguin algorithm. AND...in order to see a dramatic recovery like the Link Detox graph shows, you'd have to have a site that has a really good base of good links underneath the low quality links. Most sites with Penguin issues will not see a dramatic recovery...and if they do, again, it would almost always be on the date of a Penguin refresh.
However, the Link Detox tool is describing a manual penalty, not Penguin. (However, they're a bit misleading saying it "speeds up recovery from a Google Penalty". Officially Google will tell you that Penguin is not a penalty, but simply an algorithmic change, but most webmasters would tell you that Penguin is a penalty.)
If it's a manual penalty, then you don't need to have the links in your disavow file crawled in order to lift your penalty and if this is the case then the "boost" that they are talking about won't really help get a penalty lifted. Within 24 hours of filing your disavow, the webspam team is able to see what is in the file. When they review your request for reconsideration, they check to see if you have disavowed the right links. It doesn't matter if those links have not been visited and thus disavowed yet.
Is it possible to lift a manual penalty in 3 days like Link Detox's website suggests? Yes. I've had it done. We once filed for reconsideration and three days later we had a response saying that our penalty was revoked. But, out of the hundreds of requests that I have filed, I've only ever once had Google respond that quickly. Most requests are taking 4 weeks to get a response back right now. Is it possible to have such a dramatic recovery as the graph shows? Yes, if you have a sitewide manual penalty and your penalty gets lifted, AND you have a good base of natural links then some sites can show a dramatic improvement. But, again, it has nothing to do with getting your disavowed links crawled faster.
I think that tools like Link Detox can have some value in helping site owners (but as I have always said, they don't replace the need for a manual audit.) But, I have to say that I am concerned about the way that they're marketing this tool. I think there could be some value, if you have a Penguin hit site, in getting your disavowed links crawled faster. It's conceivably possible that if you didn't, then Penguin could refresh and your disavowed urls have not been visited and therefore are not disavowed. But, the way that they've marketed it it sounds like any site that uses this tool can have top rankings again within 3 days of using it and that's quite misleading.
-
Nothing attracts a spider like new pages and new links, especially if there's a new page saying; "Woohoo, I'm over hEEeeeeAaaaRRrrrrr!" I would imagine the 'boost' is a sophisticated way of doing just that. But if it works something like that, it works counter to what Google is trying to accomplish. I would imagine the system was bound for breakdown at some point.
However, let's say the boost works just fine. That means there's definitely something else going on. I've seen rankings loses due to scrapers employing rel=canonical along with a ton of links (all bad links, of course). It's not supposed to work, but it does happen. Have you ran the hardest hit pages through plagiarism checkers?
-
Nobody knows. I have heard some different theory's involving the "fetch as google bot" tools.
-
Too bad that "Boost" didn't work for you. It is an interesting concept...
I wonder how they "force Google to crawl your bad links"? Does Google provide some sort of form that URL's can be submitted to for spidering? Or is there some other way to quickly bring individual URL's to their attention?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is a page with links to all posts okay?
Hi folks. Instead of an archive page template in my theme (I have my reasons), I am thinking of simply typing the post title as and when I publish a post, and linking to the post from there. Any SEO issues that you can think of? Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Nobody16165422281340 -
Working on new link structure
Hello Mozzzzzzzzzzz I'm currently working on the new link structure for our website. We currently organize our content in sub folder =Main category
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | floaumet
= = Sub category
= = =Specialty
= = = Product main name
= = = ==Product specific name
= = = == =Manufacturer Each of them has some potential strong KW and I will be happy to use it on the URL. URL are more than 50 kw long when I use all This are very niche item for which people may refer to them through different names (potential folders) My current concerns will be Should we make long url respecting the structure (Main category)/(Sub category)/(Specialty)/(Product main name)/(Product specific name)/(maufacturer) Should I combine some like (Main category)/(Sub category)/(Specialty)/(Product main name)/(Product specific name)-(maufacturer) Should I keep them simple /(product_main name) Should I keep the main folders just to display the articles belonging to this category (Main category)/(Sub category)/(Specialty)/(Product main name) and then keep the product under a sub folder only? Any other idea?0 -
Slideshare - Links within
Hi Guys I am going to be putting some powerpoint presentations up over time. I have a couple of questions regarding slideshare. If I add links to the slideshare are these crawl able by Google etc...? If I places the powepoint presentation on our website and slideshare would this be counter productive i.e duplicate content? Love to here your suggestions.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Cocoonfxmedia0 -
Linking from purchased businesses to my own
Hi All, An SEO and Google guidelines question. We've recently purchased several local businesses that have websites. Legally, we've put a disclaimer saying we've purchased those businesses, the question is whether we should link from those sites to our main site. Will this bring a manual action from Google? It's legitimate that we'd like the visitors from those websites come to our main site because those business no longer named the way they were. So, is it OK to link from these sites to ours? Will this violate Google's guidelines regarding backlinking? Should we even link and if so add the rel:nofollow tag? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OrendaLtd2 -
301 Externally Linked, But Non-Producing Pages, To Productive Pages Needing Links?
I'm working on a site that has some non-productive pages without much of an upside potential, but that are linked-to externally. The site also has some productive pages, light in external links, in a somewhat related topic. What do you think of 301ing the non-productive pages with links to the productive pages without links in order to give them more external link love? Would it make much of a difference? Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Should We Link To Our News?
We just started an "In the News" section on our webpage. We are not sure what would be the best for SEO purposes. Should we link to the news websites that have the stories about our company, even if they have no link bank? Or should we just take screenshots of the news article and only link to articles that link back to us (this is what we a currently doing)? Here is our news page, http://www.buyautoparts.com/News/
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | joebuilder0 -
Are Navigation links different to static links
We are trying to reduce the number of links on our homepage. We could remove some fly out navigation links, We rank 1st on Google for some of these links. Would removing these hurt our SEO. The links are accessible 1 level down if we remove the homepage.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Archers0 -
Site wide footer links vs. single link for websites we design
I’ve been running a web design business for the past 5 years, 90% or more of the websites we build have a “web design by” link in the footer which links back to us using just our brand name or the full “web design by brand name” anchor text. I’m fully aware that site-wide footer links arent doing me much good in terms of SEO, but what Im curious to know is could they be hurting me? More specifically I’m wondering if I should do anything about the existing links or change my ways for all new projects, currently we’re still rolling them out with the site-wide footer links. I know that all other things being equal (1 link from 10 domains > 10 links from 1 domain) but is (1 link from 10 domains > 100 links from 10 domains)? I’ve got a lot of branded anchor text, which balances out my exact match and partial match keyword anchors from other link building nicely. Another thing to consider is that we host many of our clients which means there are quite a few on the same server with a shared IP. Should I? 1.) Go back into as many of the sites as I can and remove the link from all pages except the home page or a decent PA sub page- keeping a single link from the domain. 2.) Leave all the old stuff alone but start using the single link method on new sites. 3.) Scratch the site credit and just insert an exact-match anchor link in the body of the home page and hide with with CSS like my top competitor seems to be doing quite successfully. (kidding of course.... but my competitor really is doing this.)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nbeske0