Canonical URLs all show trailing slash on main site pages - using Yoast SEO for Wordpress - how to correct
-
We are using Yoast for a number of our sites. We use naked domain as the canonical. I have noticed in the header tags that all our sites show the canonical URLs as having a trailing slash:
Example: http;//foxspizzajc.com, when I look at the source code, it shows the canonical as http;//foxspizzajc.com/
Of course, it is much more likely that all sites that link to us will not use the trailing slash - so preferably we do not want that to be the canonical - among other reasons.
Does this need to be fixed so the trailing slash is removed? I cannot see how to do this in Yoast SEO or in Permalinks structure for Wordpress.
Sorry for my ignorance.
Thanks for any help.
-
As far as I understand this, to your browser and to Google, they're the same page (this really seems to only apply to the homepage, other pages "/" really matters a lot).
I would not worry about changing the canonical, in fact it's technically the 'right" location of the page. When it comes to the HTTP docs, a request to the root needs "/". All modern web browsers add it back in for you even if it's not there. This is I believe why the canonical is set as it is there in yoast.
I covered this in a blog as someone asked this at Pubcon this year in a keynote.
http://www.winstondigitalmarketing.com/yoast-homepage-canonical-correct-include-trailing-slash/
-
I searched high and low for how to pull this off for the Yoast plugin specifically for my homepage. And wa-la, here was the answer in the community forum. Thanks guys! The advanced area in the yoast plugin for the homepage did the track. Just the homepage is set now to mywebsite.com instead of mewebsite.com/ Too me this is cleaner for SEO and local search SEO since all citations and inbound links are pointing to mywebsite.com NOT mywebsite.com/ Maybe Google will shine a bit more SERP love on me.
We shall see - better make an annotation not in Google analytics so I can reference if positive impact occurred.
-
I wrote to Yoast about this issue but they wouldn't respond because I am using the free plugin. I may respond and let them know about this discussion. Seems like a valid legitimate question, no? I would love an official response...
-
Hi Gianluca,
He was talking about a WordPress website which, by default, already has a 301 redirect in place on the homepage URL with the slash to the URL without the slash.
What's strange is that the Yoast SEO plugin points the homepage canonical tag to the URL with the slash - which is 301 redirected to the URL without!
I know search engines handle this very well and probably just ignore the canonical tag, but if you want it to be 100% correct (and why wouldn't you?) adding a the canonical tag in the Advanced tab is a very easy fix.
-
Gianluca - so you believe their is no reason to actually go in and fix this?
-
Hey Dave - great suggestion. I did that and it worked.
Doesn't it seem strange to you that Yoast, the master of SEO - automatically does this?
Kind of makes me think that Google doesn't see the trailing slash as a different URL for the homepage. Wouldn't their team catch this or address it? -
Why nobody is answering that the most normal thing to do should be redirecting via .htaccess the URL with the ending trailing hash to the one without (or viceversa)?
I mean, that's what I would do if it was just the case of the home page.
Said that, I would not worry that much, because that is one of those exact duplication cases that Google understands and solves with no problem.
-
What you could do is set up a filter in your functions.php file to change the URL based on the homepage but that's a bit too much maybe ;-). Next to that I think it's due to the fact that some web servers set up the trailing slash by default.
-
I find it strange that this happens with Yoast as it points the canonical tag for the homepage to a 301 redirect URL. I don't think it's a big problem as search engines seem to handle it well, but it's a problem that I wouldn't expect to see in such a popular and reputable SEO plugin.
If you use the plugin editor to remove the trailing slash you will remove the trailing slash from all pages of your site (something you may not want to do).
If you only want to remove the trailing slash from the homepage the easiest option would be to manually add the canonical URL without the trailing slash in the Advanced tab for Yoast when editing the homepage (as Linda said above). Doing this for one page will take you 2 seconds and fix the problem!
-
Hey Linda - I appreciate that - however when I read that article - its still seemed to open to debate if this is necessary to fix or not. Are you aware of a way to have it autofixed in wordpress? The only solution I read there was either hacking Yoast SEO to remove the trailing slash - or to manually edit every single page.
Am I over thinking this? I agreed with one poster who mentioned that Moz appears to have wanted this issue correct because their homepage shows that moz.com does not have the trailing slash in the canonical tag - nor does yoast.com.
Odd to me then that the Yoast plugin would then add this.
Are you aware of a way to remove it that is more effective?
-
A similar question has been asked here before: http://moz.com/community/q/how-do-i-get-rel-canonical-to-eliminate-the-trailing-slash-on-my-home-page .
"Login to your WordPress backend as an administrator and look for "Plugins" on the left menu and go to "Editor" within the plugins menu."
You can also edit the canonicals of individual pages and posts under the "Advanced" tab on the individual page or post editing page.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Filter Pages
Howdy Moz Forum!! I have a headache of a job over here in the UK and I'd welcome any advice! - It's sunny today, only 1 of 5 days in a year and i'm stuck on this! I have a client that currently has 22,000 pages indexed to Google with almost 4000 showing as duplicate content. The site has a "jobs" and "candidates" list. This can cause all sorts of variations such as job title, language, location etc. The filter pages all seem to be indexed. Plus the static pages are indexed. For example if there were 100 jobs at Moz being advertised, it is displaying the jobs on the following URL structure - /moz
Moz Pro | | Slumberjac
/moz/moz-jobs
/moz/moz-jobs/page/2
/moz/moz-jobs/page/3
/moz/moz-jobs/page/4
/moz/moz-jobs/page/5 ETC ETC Imagine this with some going up to page/250 I have checked GA data and can see that although there are tons of pages indexed this way, non of them past the "/moz/moz-jobs" URL get any sort of organic traffic. So, my first question! - Should I use rel-canonical tags on all the /page/2 & /page/3 etc results and point them all at the /moz/moz-jobs parent page?? The reason for this is these pages have the same title and content and fall very close to "duplicate" content even though it does pull in different jobs... I hope i'm making sense? There is also a lot of pages indexed in a way such as- https://www.examplesite.co.uk/moz-jobs/search/page/9/?candidate_search_type=seo-consulant&candidate_search_language=blank-language These are filter pages... and as far as I'm concerned shouldn't really be indexed? Second question! - Should I "no follow" everything after /page in this instance? To keep things tidy? I don't want all the variations indexed! Any help or general thoughts would be much appreciated! Thanks.0 -
Magento: Moz finding URL and URL?p=1 as duplicate. Solution?
Good day Mozzers! Moz bot is finding URL's in the Catalogue pages with the format www.example.com/something and www.example.com/something?p=1 as duplicate (since they are the same page) Whats the best solution to implement here? Canonical? Any other? Cheers! MozAddict
Moz Pro | | MozAddict0 -
Using seomoz.
Hi, I'm scouring the web for new links, and am taking a closer look at OSE; I'm trying to gauge whether the PA & DA rating(s) in the results page for a domain search takes into account any penalty signals the site may be showing, and whether there is a 'real' way to identify how much value links from the source will give you (if for example, there's already x10 other links away from that page or x100 links away from that domain). Basically - what else needs to be taken into account when using this app to identify link sources, etc. Thanks, David
Moz Pro | | newstd1000 -
What tools can I use to crawl a site which uses #! hasbhang?
I have a site which was created in a way that it uses hasbang #!. I am using 3 different SEO tools and they can't seem to crawl the website. Or what suggestion can you give me in dealing with hasbang. Any ideas please. Thanks a lot for your help. Allan
Moz Pro | | AllanDuncan0 -
Can I base a SEO campaign on a specific MLS listing inteads of full broker web site?
I have been ask to do a SEO campaign for one MLS listing: house for sale in the rosedale area in Toronto, and I am having difficulty to target one specific MLS listing . I don't want to do the SEO campaign on http://jimmymolloy.com but rather one specific listing http://jimmymolloy.com/feature/?mls=A_C2337646&listing=for-sale Google Analytic does not allow me to have a URL with a query.
Moz Pro | | pd20120 -
'Appropriate Use of Rel Canonical', Critical Factor but appears correct on page
Hi, Trying to get the following page ranked unsuccessfully.... http://www.joules.com/en-GB/2/Collections-Quilted-Jackets/c01c02.r16.1 Instead a product page is being ranked, shown below.... http://www.joules.com/en-GB/Womens-Quilted-Jacket/Navy/M_HAMPTON/ProductDetail.raction When I run the on page report card it advises that the Rel Canonical tag needs to point to that page, but we have checked and it looks to be doing that already. Has anyone else had an issue like this? Thanks, Martin
Moz Pro | | rockethot0 -
Open Site explorer (last 1-3 updates) shows new and wierd results
Hi Moz'ers! I have a questions for you guys. Can you explain why the website "Netspiren" has a lower "domain Authority" than "Duft og Natur"? See screenshot. I know it's a tough question without a detailed analysis, but looking at OSE's data, does the mozrank,moztrust, C-block don't reflect the power of the Domain Authority. What's you take? BTW: "Netspiren" has always had more and better links, and also had a higher Domain Authority. Something about the Domain Authority changed since the past 1-3 OXE updates. Looking forward for your take on this! Have a good weekend! mnRPI.png
Moz Pro | | FrederikTrovatten220 -
HTTPS site in Open Site Explorer
I'm looking at a site for which the https URL currently ranks in Google. Using a header checker on the http URL I see that it is being 302 redirected to the https version (I have no control or input on this site). In OSE there's no option to specify an https URL as the http part is pre-populated and uneditable. My question is: does OSE treat the https and http version as the same URL? I'm guessing so as the http URL has a lot of domain authority despite not being the "default" URL.
Moz Pro | | Equatorites0