MOZ vs Ahrefs vs SEMRush vs Spyfu and so on
-
Hello, fellas.
I've been trying to find some type of comparison analysis for online SEO related tools and I couldn't find any, which are fresh and overview more than three.
I'm interested to see if anybody saw good comparison reviews of such tools, as well as your own thoughts (back your thoughts up with more than just "I like it", please
The tools I'm interested in comparing are:
- MOZ
- Ahrefs
- Majestic
- Spyfu
- SEMRush
- Raven
- Wordstream
- whatever else you use or have in mind
-
I've done some research comparing Moz and Spyfu and wrote a post on it here.
I also go over and compare the difficulty to rank according to the two.
Here is an excerpt of the article:
I consider both Moz, Google AdWords, and Spyfu to be excellent tools when I do my research and with most keyword research tools you find online they all have different numbers.
Google AdWords I have always known to wildly inaccurate search volumes and I only use it to get keyword ideas. Rand Fishkin did some tests and wrote about it as well. You can read his post on moz.com “Why Google AdWords’ Keyword Volume Numbers Are Wildly Unreliable – Whiteboard Friday”
I noticed individually the search volume numbers were usually a bit off between Moz and Spyfu so I decided to run a test on some keyword research I did and compared a little over 200 phrases that I would share below.
As I tell my customers I believe Moz to be more accurate for organic search results and I believe Spyfu to be more accurate for pay per click results. Of course, Google AdWords is supposed to be for pay per click results but I never trusted their numbers and only trust them for keyword phrase ideas to add to the list then paste them into Moz’s tool to get volume numbers.
To further complicate things Moz uses ‘Min Volume’ and ‘Max Volume’ while Spyfu uses ‘Local Searches’ and ‘Global Searches’. Can we really compare these two? Did Spyfu use these terms to make their numbers more plausible when compared to other tools like Moz and Google AdWords?
When comparing Moz’s ‘Min Volume’ to Spyfu’s ‘Local Searches’ we find the difference in numbers from 19 to over 49,000. When comparing Moz’s ‘Max Volume’ to Spyfu’s ‘Global Searches’ we find the difference in numbers from 40 to 468,000.
When comparing all of them together in the chart below you would think that the two ‘Difference’ columns would be relatively close from lowest to highest but it isn’t. It jumps around quite a bit.
-
Maybe you should be the one to do so
-
This is a tough question and you will by no means ever find the perfect all in 1 solution. Remember that quite a lot of the date comes from Google Analytics and Webmasters. Some of us are either too lazy or simply dont have the time to sift through all the data, which is why we revert to these tools. I personally use Ahrefs, Monitor Backlinks, Moz and Ranktracr to monitor any spikes in my ranks.
-
Thanks, buddy!
-
Sure:
- The SEMRush blog has a lot of good tutorials.
- There's an ultimate guide written by Refugeeks that is worth reviewing.
- I've written an article on how to use SEMRush's display ad tracking features for non-PPC purposes.
-
Hello, Kane.
I started looking at SEMRush and have several questions about how to get the most out of it. Can you drop some links to articles like guides or something?
-
Thank you all, guys.
I figured I'd need to read reviews for every tool separately and combine them in my head, just was hoping that somebody did that before me and have put it on paper
-
Screaming Frog and Buzzsumo are also some awesome tools to consider.
Screaming Frog is great for crawl/index diagnostics, and much more technical SEO data. Buzzsumo is wonderful for recent content release's social and sharing data.
-
Your best bet would be to read specific reviews of each toolset due to all of the overlap and conflicting focus areas.
If you're just looking for an all around organic toolset, then you're fine with Moz, and you might selectively want to do single paid months on other tools like SEMrush and ahrefs to collect additional data.
But, if you do enough work in a particular function (eg link building, or keyword research, or technical SEO), you'll need more than one of them. I personally use Moz, ahrefs, & SEMRush the most from your current list. Screaming Frog is another one that is a must-have agency side. URLprofiler is a strong choice as well.
Decision should be made on what you're doing most of the time. Doing tons of keyword research and technical SEO? Your best bet would be Moz, Screaming Frog, and SEMRush, in my opinion. Doing tons of content creation and backlink analysis? You'd be best off with access to Moz, Ahrefs, Majestic, Buzzsumo, and SEMRush. So - everyone will be different.
Here are what I would call the "generally accepted best features" of the ones you did provide:
- MOZ - Good balanced toolset covering content, offsite, and technical SEO considerations. Link database is smaller than ahrefs/majestic but getting larger all the time, and focuses on higher quality links and less "noise" from spam and scraper sites.
- Ahrefs - Very thorough link database, and some of their newer tools are strong.
- Majestic - Very thorough link database.
- Spyfu - Strong for keyword research & discovery - both PPC and organic.
- SEMRush - Strong for keyword research & discovery - both PPC and organic. I use this one daily.
- Raven - One of the best options for reporting. I think they focus on being a balanced toolset.
- Wordstream - PPC-only toolset to my knowledge, aside from keyword research that could be used for SEO.
These are all generalizations, however, and you're going to have to have a tool budget discussion with your agency at some point. $99 or 199 per month isn't going to cut it for an agency of any size. $499 would be a more reasonable budget cap.
-
Thanks for response.
Well, my stumbling block is budget for tools At the moment I use MOZ a lot and free version of ahrefs. The execs won't expand budget for tools, so I have to compromise somehow.
I personally focus on organics, but we have another person for PPC. Plus I also do full internet marketing analysis for clients, including all channels, so I need to know everything. Just trying to ease my life a bit and save some money before buying tools by listening to people who have used them already.
You said "Increasing conversion rates by understanding customer behavior/flow? PPC analysis to understand how to maximize your budget to see a larger ROI for your campaigns?" - what's your recommendations? I assume for PPC is SEMrush? what about conversions? I use GA heavily + inspectlet(free version).
-
As far as links analysis tools go I like aHrefs and Moz over Majestic, but if possible I like to use all three. They all have different indexes which in many cases overlap, but you'll see each bot has found different links pointing to you that the other don't report. Moz seems better from a content standpoint than anything on the list. SEMRush is better than SpyFu for PPC analysis/Keyword research, and I haven't used Wordstream or Raven much.
Basically this is a pretty vague question since there isn't a one "master tool" for all digital marketing (yet...). Each of these are used for a different aspect of digital marketing, so what area do you want to focus on? How to improve organic ranking for your website? Increasing conversion rates by understanding customer behavior/flow? PPC analysis to understand how to maximize your budget to see a larger ROI for your campaigns?
-
Thanks for responding. Well, I work for an Internet Marketing company and we do every type of digital marketing.
I understand that different tools are for different needs, however, nowadays most tools have their "strong" part, but the do have most services, at least on basic level. Example: MOZ is strong on analytical part, KW tracking etc, but backlink part is not the best, because MOZscape index is monthly thing. However, Ahrefs, for instance, is kinda of an opposite. They are all about backlinks, but, at the same time, they do have somewhat basic analytical part and KW tracking.
What I'm trying to achieve here is to see what tool is best for what, preferably in one review article, with pricing, cons, pros etc. I have worked with some tools, but far not every one, at the same time we can't spend resources just on trying tools for couple months.
P.S. I'm a big MOZ fan, but execs are demanding to look into other tools.
-
Many of those tools do very different things. For instance, I believe Raven and Wordstream are the only PPC tools on your list. What is your businesses needs?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Moz Competitive Analysis Leaving Me Confused
I'm doing work for https://www.charlestonblackcabcompany.com While I know whey we are only at #2 for Charleston Party Bus as Google treats it as a branded keyword search and I don't know of any ways around that there are other competitors that don't make sense to me. These guys are #1 for Charleston Limo Service and we are further down the list despite having much better numbers across the board for months now with out seeing much gain. https://moz.com/researchtools/ose/links?site=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.charlestonlimo360.com%2F&filter=&source=external&target=page&group=1&page=1&sort=page_authority&anchor_id=&anchor_type=&anchor_text=&from_site= I'm talking over 6 months and still these guys and some others whose competitive analysis shows us beating them across the board still has us further down the rankings for over 6 months. It seems like the competitive analysis doesn't matter at all.
Competitive Research | | mwaters19790 -
Ranking for Competitive Keywords vs. Less Competitive Keyword Variations
I'm curious about situations where a website ranks very well for query variations, but doesn't rank for the query itself (or the reverse of that). For Redfin (where I work), here is the situation with regard to keyword rankings on Google (searched today from USA, incognito)... real estate search - #4 real estate online - #4 real estate site - #5 find real estate - #9 get real estate - #16 real estate - #163 It stands to reason that a site ranking well for a competitive query should also rank well for less competitive query variations - especially query variations that are non-limiting and do not demand a custom landing page (for example, I would consider 'board games' to dramatically limit the query 'games' and be best targeted with a targeted page...not so with 'real estate site' and 'real estate'). So, my question is, what are some theories regarding situations like this? Why do some sites rank so well for competitive queries but not for non-limiting query variations? Why aren't the sites that are crushing us for 'real estate' also crushing us for 'real estate' variations (to be clear...the top sites are crushing us for both)? Is it anchor text? Is it social signals? Is it offline signals, co-occurrence, or citations? What about internal linking and site structure? I realize it's likely a mix of all this, but I'm hoping we can drum up some new ideas here. FYI, on Bing we also rank very well for 'real estate' variations, but leap up to 31st for 'real estate'. Thoughts?
Competitive Research | | RyanOD0 -
Link vs Subdomain Language redirect
Hi all, I'm managing a website that uses a redirect to show different languages to the users. I mean when a user access the site from any country it sees the full domain but when it access it from Italy, France or Germany it goes to domain.com/lang=FR or IT. I see that other sites use a technique to redirect to it.domain.com or fr.domain.com but I have doubts about which one is better. We do an aggressive link building strategy and we have a lot of links to the root domain across the various languages. Is it better to do the link building to the it.domain.com and fr.domain.com, depending on the language source of the link instead of the root? I'm seeing that some of our competitors are doing this but I'm afraid is going to spread the link juice across many subdomains and lose power to the root. Thanks in advance
Competitive Research | | nunob.staredition0 -
Moz metrics / PageRank Incoherence
I'm checking some domains/pages where I could acquire some links, but I'm seeing huge differences between Moz metrics and PageRank and I'm hesitant about the meaning of it.. Given that PR was updated recently, is it safe to assume tons of crappy inbound links or a penalization by Google? Here is an example: Page Authority: 60
Competitive Research | | Branagan
Page MozRank: 6.0
Page MozTrust: 6.0
Domain Authority: 50
Domain MozRank: 4.0
Domain MozTrust: 4.0 Google PageRank: 1 Any clues?
Cheers!1 -
Absolute vs Relative URL Interlinking Observation & Question
So I've read a few articles about this here on SEOMOZ and other sites. I understand the benefit of relative url linking from a developer's point view. I've also read that using either internal linking methods doesn't really have any real SEO benefits or cons that would impact your rankings greatly. (Except with the slight chance of getting traffic and backlinks from a scraper site.) But I'm seeing examples where this may not be true. I did a search for 5 star hotels in Vegas in google. Some of the top results were Hotels.com and Expedia.com Priceline.com was on the second page. I used the search operator link: to Hotels.com, Expedia.com and Priceline.com vegas hotel pages respectively: Hotels.com: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbo=d&site=webhp&q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.hotels.com%2Fde1504033-st5%2Ffive-star-hotels-las-vegas-nevada%2F&oq=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.hotels.com%2Fde1504033-st5%2Ffive-star-hotels-las-vegas-nevada%2F&gs_l=serp.3...3650.7043.0.7972.8.7.1.0.0.0.90.363.7.7.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1j2.4kALxt0jpxI Expedia.com: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbo=d&site=webhp&q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.expedia.com%2F5Star-Las-Vegas-Hotels.s50-0-d178276.Travel-Guide-Filter-Hotels&oq=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.expedia.com%2F5Star-Las-Vegas-Hotels.s50-0-d178276.Travel-Guide-Filter-Hotels&gs_l=serp.3...1681.3746.0.4076.6.6.0.0.0.0.100.348.5j1.6.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1j2.KxqwbH-YFV0 Priceline: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&tbo=d&site=webhp&q=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.priceline.com%2F5-star-hotels-las-vegas-nevada-NV-filter-tk-s5-c291680-hl.hotel-reviews-hotel-guides&oq=link%3Ahttp%3A%2F%2Fwww.priceline.com%2F5-star-hotels-las-vegas-nevada-NV-filter-tk-s5-c291680-hl.hotel-reviews-hotel-guides&gs_l=serp.3...11265.12321.0.12767.5.5.0.0.0.0.0.0..0.0.les%3B..0.0...1c.1.HYtfct4MS7M The results were that priceline had no backlinks internally or externally to their vegas page. Whereas their competitors did, most of which were from their own internal pages. Looking at priceline's linking structure and architecture, they use a relative url structure and sessions ids to link to various pages. Their competitors don't. Wouldn't you argue that this may be adversely affecting their rankings. I know other things are to be factored in if you dig deeper. But that seems to be a major difference. It just seems that their content management system or how their site is coded isn't really passing link juice.
Competitive Research | | workathomecareers0 -
Ahrefs or Majestic SEO
Hi Guys, I'm looking to purchase 1 of the above services and I'm just wondering which one you guys think is best? Looking a ahrefs they seem to update there index more often. Thanks, Scott
Competitive Research | | ScottBaxterWW0 -
.biz vs .com
searching for a domain for a new branch of business, the original .com domain was no longer available yet the same domain with a .biz was. Question, how does google treat and rank .biz vs .com, same? less?
Competitive Research | | AmazingUniverse560 -
Backlinks: Majestic SEO vs. OSE
My apologies if this noob question has already been answered somewhere, but what's the difference between the backlinks reported by Majestic SEO vs. the links reported by OSE. Just curious why the former might report 2,360 external backlinks to a page and the latter might report 949 total links to the same page. Just curious. Thanks!
Competitive Research | | SmartDraw0