Only One Canonical URL Tag
-
HI, I'm an SEO novice - company owner with no money so doing it all myself with help from my web designer using wordpress. Ive just completed some seo and done the moz page scoring analysis for optimisation and gained 92% - however - there is one outstanding issue on canonical url tags - i.e.
recommened fix = The canonical URL tag is intended to refer duplicate pages to a single canonical URL. To ensure the search engines properly parse the canonical source, your page should use only one version of this tag in the header. See Canonical URL Tag - the Most Important Advancement in SEO Practices Since Sitemaps
Ive gone through the page code and can see I have 2 rel=canonical references - am I able to simply delete one - how do I do this if its been created by the yoast/wordpress plug-in?
Many thanks in advance for any help!
-
Smart move. Let me know if I can be of any more help then does this answer your question?
-
hi thomas, yes - we are keeping the yoast plug-in but switching the rss feed plug-in to a different one that will enable us to switch off the canonical ref.
-
You have an RSS feed that is adding a canonical to your own site?
RSS normally can add canonical's to third-party sites I don't think that the issue is Yoast I believe it is with the RSS post importer.
this is the second best SEO plugin you can use
https://wordpress.org/plugins/all-in-one-seo-pack/
every decent word press seo plugin will add canonical's you can choose to turn off canonical's on Yoast however I would do this using the RSS post importer
In case your are using WordPress SEO plugin, you’ll have to add a filter in the functions.php file just before the closing of PHP as shown in the screenshot below.
See
http://i.imgur.com/cr7IU4W.jpg
Here is the exact code:
add_filter( 'wpseo_canonical', '__return_false' );
It will disable canonical tags across the site and no page, no post and no archive will show this tag. But if you want to disable tagging function on certain posts, pages or category archives, you’ll have to use this code instead of the code mentioned above.
function wpseo_canonical_exclude( $canonical ) {global $post;if (is_single( '348' )) {$canonical = false;}return $canonical;}
As you know every post, page, category or any another archive has its own unique ID in the wordpress. So in the above example we used 348 which is the post ID for a specific post where the canonical tag will not show. If you don’t know how to find the ID, here is a good article for you. To hide this tag from multiple posts, use this code.
function wpseo_canonical_exclude( $canonical ) {global $post;is_single( array( 17, 19, 1, 11 ) ) {$canonical = false;}return $canonical;}
I still strongly recommend that you keep the canonical on via plug-in and not via RSS there are too many things that it could miss and cause problems for you.
I hope this helps,
Tom
-
HI Tom, thankyou very much for your help and information on this. We have now investigated where the second canonical url was coming from and we found that the plugin we use to import the daily feed (RRS Post Importer) is also adding in it’s own canonical URL (as well as the yoast seo). We are now going to look at switching in a different plug-in for this which will give us functionality to delete the rel-canonical reference, as the one we have doesn't enable you to do this.
Again, thanks for your help.
Kind regards
Matthew
-
here is a CSV file showing the pages with more than one canonical you must make it so there's only one canonical per a page
here is the CSV
Bigger photo http://i.imgur.com/cqcTN0h.png
<colgroup><col width="420"> <col width="184"> <col span="3" width="87"> <col width="199"> <col width="304"> <col span="3" width="87"></colgroup>
| Directives - Canonical | | | | | | | | | |
| Address | Occurrences | Meta Robots 1 | X-Robots-Tag 1 | Meta Refresh 1 | Canonical Link Element 1 | Canonical Link Element 2 | HTTP Canonical | rel=“next†| rel=“prev†|
| http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/ | 3 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/ | http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/ | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/ | 2 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/ | | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/services/tendering-process/ | 3 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tendering-process/ | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tendering-process/ | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/services/tender-writing/ | 3 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tender-writing/ | http://www.completetenders.com/services/tender-writing/ | | | |
| http://www.completetenders.com/open-tenders/ | 2 | noodp | | | http://www.completetenders.com/open-tenders/ | | | | |all the best,
Tom
-
I just checked the URL you referenced you have duplicate canonical tags I checked it using screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/
please look at the data below.
You need to remove one of them you should only have one.
so instead of this
- Canonical Link Element 1 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
- Canonical Link Element 2 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
you get
- Canonical Link Element 1 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
See
URL Encoded Address http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
Content text/html; charset=UTF-8
Status Code 200
Status OK
Size 150645
Title 1 Bid Management / End-to-end Tendering Support
Meta Description 1 Professional Bid Management Consultants / Bid Solutions to Win Contracts / Everything You Need / Expert Advice on 07429 191305
H1-1 Bid Management
H2-1 Bid Management
H2-2 View More
Meta Robots 1 noodp
Canonical Link Element 1 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
Canonical Link Element 2 http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/
Word Count 723
Level 0
Inlinks 14
Outlinks 23 -
Look at your source code on these pages use command-F (on Mac) or control F (on PC) to search for the term "canonical" if you do not see it more than once on the page it should be no issue.
"the only difference I can see is the first one uses '...' and the second one uses "..."
The canonical link? If there are two canonical bags on the same page make sure to remove the one that is not pointing to your preferred page or make sure the canonical is self-referencing. But make certain there are no more than one canonical tag like this below
Look for
Also, I would use
- https://www.deepcrawl.com/ allowing free site crawls right now
- and/or
- https://www.screamingfrog.co.uk/seo-spider/ free up to 500 pages.
Just to confirm you do not have duplicate canonical's both tools will let you know for sure is will checking the source code of the page that is flagged. if it does not have duplicates I would report it to The Moz they are awesome at getting back to you and answering these types of issues if there is in fact only one canonical per a page.
I hope that helps,
Tom
-
Hi Gents, thanks for your replies.
Tom - Ive looked in detail at both the canonical references in the header on my page at they both look the same -
Line 23 -
href='http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/' />
Line 133 –
href="http://www.completetenders.com/services/bid-management/" />
the only difference I can see is the first one uses '...' and the second one uses "..."
can you confirm if I should amend this in yoast or whether this is something that only moz is picking up as two different canonicals?
-
you are correct you should only have one canonical tag on a page Max
Because you're using WordPress Yoast SEO plug-in I can tell you that it automatically adds canonical URL for you when you are modifying thing that should be pointing somewhere else you have to go into the advanced area in the photo below.
So all of these URLs would show the same content:
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/ you would want to point them all to the first URL via canonical
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/?isnt=it-awesome
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/?cmpgn=twitter
- http://example.com/wordpress/seo-plugin/?cmpgn=facebook
for more information on how to use that plug-in and remember only one per page and if the page is duplicate content pointed to the page that you want Google to assume is the owner of that content.
If you get stuck ask me or reference this below.
https://yoast.com/rel-canonical/
All the best,
Tom
-
Hi,
You could, but I would try to find out where the other one is coming from. Basically the second rel canonical tag will overwrite the first in most cases. So trying to find out how you delete one with keeping the right one would make most sense. You're at least on the right path!
Martijn.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
80% Spam Score!! Can Any One Help?
I have a question about the Spam Score for my website .
Moz Bar | | PoppyP
I have run a Spam Score for https://www.poppyporter.co.uk
It has come back with an 80% score because there are 4 links that are apparently from my poppyporter.com domain each with a 69% spam score.
This poppyporter.com domain is parked and I have no idea why there are links from it. There are no pages there and there never have been, I've never used the poppyporter.com domain only poppyporter.co.uk.
I don't understand why there are links there and why they are making my Spam Score so high.
Will they affect my site's SEO? Do I need to worry about them? If so how do I get rid of them?
Can you help?
Thanks very much Poppy1 -
4XX client error with email address in URL
I have an unusual situation I have never seen before and I did not set up the server for this client. The 4XX error is a string of about 74 URLs similar to this: http://www.websitename.com/about-us/info@websitename.com I will be contacting the server host as well to troubleshoot this issue. Any ideas? Thanks
Moz Bar | | EliteVenu0 -
Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible?
Hi, I am trying to grade some pages and keywords using the "On-page grader" tool but for each URL that I try, the tool returns me a "Sorry, but that URL is inaccessible". The thing is that I have already used previously and without any problem some of these URLs. In fact, I have just realized that, while the same URL (for example: www.lacasadelaaldea.com) works in the "On-page optimization tool", it doesn't in the "On-page grader" right now. I have looked if someone could have experienced the same issue and I have found some other threads talking about it... so I have checked with my hosting provider that there is no firewall or any other thing causing this problem but they can't find anything. How do you make the call to the server? What could be happening? Thanks in advance, Juan
Moz Bar | | lcdla0 -
Missing Title tags
My crawl diagnostics shows roughly 20+ pages with missing or empty title tags, however, the titles are viewable through the source code and there is only one instance of it on the page. This is not a wordpress site nor are the titles extremely long. Would there be any other reason for the crawl tool to not pick up these titles? An example page is: http://www.bestblanks.com/heatpresscomparison.html
Moz Bar | | miamiman1000 -
Why is the exact same URL being seen as duplicate and showing an error in my SEO reports
Well, I am still having duplicate page issues. I have a question about one of the errors SEO is giving me when I download a crawl report. I am going to attach a screen shot of part of the report so you can see for yourself, along with explaining it here. SEO shows the list of URL's that it crawled in the report. In this(see attachment) portion of the report it has 321 results for the exact same URL. It also says all of these exact same URL's have received a 404 error. What I want to know is how does it make 321 results for the same URL? And with this error that I don't see when I look at the page? 0hkRDST
Moz Bar | | JoshMaxAmps0 -
Rank Tracker - URLs are Different when Exporting to CSV
When exporting to CSV in Rank Tracker, many of the URLs are reduced to the root domain instead of the full, ranking URL as seen within the tool. Right now the URLs must be copied/pasted or manually edited afterwards in the CSV. However, it doesn't happen to every item. A few of them do show the correct URL after being exported. Any idea if this is a bug or just an odd thing the export does?
Moz Bar | | AlfredGoldberg1 -
Suggestion for Improving the Crawl Report on Canonicals
This came up in the answer to a question I gave here http://moz.com/community/q/canonicals-in-crawling-reports#reply_222623 Wanted to post here to put it in as a suggestion on how to improve the Moz Crawl reports Currently, the report shows FALSE if there is no canonical link on a page and TRUE if there is. IF you get a TRUE response, this shows up as a warning in your report. I currently use Canonical to Self on almost all my pages to help with some indexing issues. I currently use the EXACT function in excel to create a formula to see if my canonical link matches the URL of the page (as this is what I want it to do). I can then know that the canonical is implemented properly, or if I need to manually check pages to make sure the canonical that points to another page is correct. I would like to suggest that the Moz crawl tool does this. It can show FALSE is the canonical is missing, TRUE if the canonical is present and SELF if the canonical points to the URL of the page it is on. I think for the most part this would be much more actionable information. I would even suggest that TRUE would need to be more of a high priority alert, and SELF can't do any damage, so I would leave that info in the CSV but not have that as a warning in the web interface. Thanks for listening!
Moz Bar | | CleverPhD0