Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
How does the background on my product photos impact SEO - step and repeat vs. plain background
-
I have a new e-commerce site and I'm focused on optimizing it for SEO. If I am taking product photos, will having a step-and-repeat (background with our logo repeated) in the background of the product impact how the images are scanned by Google? In other words, would I benefit from having a plain background behind my item shots vs. a backdrop with our logos all across it? I don't want Google to think I'm spamming my logo across all our items, but also want our photos to be recognized as ours.
I want to gain SEO from my effort and definitely not hurt it!
Thanks!
-
The Impact of Background on Product Photos for SEO
When it comes to product photography, the choice of background can significantly impact not only the visual appeal but also the SEO performance of your online store. Here’s how:
Plain Backgrounds: Using a plain background allows the product to stand out, making it the focal point of the image. This clarity can enhance user experience, leading to lower bounce rates and longer time spent on your site—factors that search engines consider for ranking. Plain backgrounds also make it easier for search engines to crawl your images, which can help improve your visibility in image search results.
Step and Repeat Backgrounds: While these backgrounds can add a creative touch and brand consistency, they may distract from the product itself. If the background is too busy or complex, it can confuse both users and search engines, potentially impacting the image's SEO. It’s essential to strike a balance between aesthetics and clarity to ensure your products are the center of attention.
In conclusion, while both background styles have their merits, a plain background is often more effective for SEO, enhancing user experience and visibility.
If you’re looking to boost your website's SEO through quality Blog Commenting and digital marketing strategies, check out my Fiverr gig for SEO blog commenting services: SEO Blog Commenting Services. Let’s work together to elevate your online presence!
-
For product photos, background choice affects SEO, particularly in image search optimization and user experience. Here’s how each type can impact it:
-
Plain Background
- Load Speed & Optimization: Plain backgrounds (like white or neutral) typically have smaller file sizes, which aids in faster load times—a ranking factor for search engines.
- User Focus: Plain backgrounds keep focus on the product, improving user experience and potentially reducing bounce rates, which can benefit SEO.
- Image Indexing: Simple, clear backgrounds help Google categorize images, enhancing potential search results.
-
Step-and-Repeat Background
- Brand Visibility: Using a background with your logo reinforces brand identity but may detract from product focus.
- File Size & Complexity: Patterned or logo-based backgrounds usually mean larger files, impacting load speeds unless optimized.
- Alt Text: Be sure to use alt text focused on the product.
Best practice: use plain backgrounds for eCommerce, with step-and-repeat for brand-centered campaigns.
-
-
@Friday Night Funkin said in How does the background on my product photos impact SEO - step and repeat vs. plain background:
@pix1234 Here's the link of the Photo Editing app I suggested: https://airbrush.com/
This is a very good article!
-
As a freelance digital marketing consultant, I'd say the background of your product photos impacts SEO indirectly. A step-and-repeat background enhances brand recognition but can distract from the product. A plain background keeps the focus on the product, ensuring clarity and professionalism, which can improve user engagement and thus, indirectly boost SEO.
-
@pix1234 Here's the link of the Photo Editing app I suggested: https://airbrush.com/
-
@pix1234 Here's the link of the App that I use: https://airbrush.com/
-
Hey! SEO is a maze, right? For product photos, a plain background might keep things clean for Google's scanners. But if you're all about branding, a subtle logo backdrop could work too. Just make sure it's not too in-your-face. I usually use an app called AirBrush to quickly remove and change the background. There are plenty of other ai photo editors too, get one and Good luck!
-
I actually wrote something relatively recently which might be of interest to you:
The conclusion I basically came to was:
"If I were working on an eCommerce store selling rolls of fabric, I’d say that an image of a rolled up bit of fabric would be good for a mechanical mind to interpret. A zoomed in image of just the fabric’s texture, would also be pretty good! A lady standing by a fireplace with a wine-glass in one hand and a fabric-roll in the other? That would be very difficult for a mechanical mind to interpret."
Play with Google images. Type in your product (or competing products) and see which types of image gain the most prominent positions. That will give you an idea on, how advanced Google is in terms of interpreting certain objects. Do the images need to be super obvious with cut-outs against a blank background? Can you be more adventurous?
Also look at the image thumbnails for your products (or competing ones) on Google Shopping. See what's doing well there
IMO obvious is better for search algorithms, but then again may not have such good conversion rates as more adventurous creative
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Negative Keywords for SEO
Hi Mozzers, I have a client that has a totally legit retail business and they are getting lots of traffic organically that is adult in nature and totally off subject. The reason for this is their domain name contains keywords which while work well for their brand, when reordered and couple with a another keyword (such as picture or image) they get traffic for searches that have nothing to do with them and are pretty awful in nature. If this was Adwords I'd add a negative in of course but how can I stop bad traffic coming to the site organically? Any ideas? Cheers B 🙂
Branding | | Bush_JSM0 -
Is .com.sg or .sg a better for SEO?
Hi all, Is .com.sg or .sg a better option?
Branding | | chanel27
And also which can have a better advantage in terms of SEO ranking?0 -
Rebranding & Minimizing SEO impact
Hello everyone, One of my clients is undergoing a major rebrand, which will require some substantial changes to their domain / URL structure. Primarily, we're going to: Move from a high-ish DA site to a low DA site Change the subdomain URL structure (more on that below) Update the content (copy, design, structure) on www. site to match the new brand The content on the subdomains should remain the same 301 redirect all pages from old site to new site where applicable The current site architecture makes great use of subdomains, which are also going to be changing in terms of name. So, we're moving from oldsubdomain.olddomain.com to newsubdomain.newdomain.com (and not oldsubdomian.olddomain.com to oldsubdomain.olddomain.com). The content / structure of these pages is going to change minimally. We understand that we're going to take an SEO hit overall, but are there things we can do to minimize this hit? Anyway we can 'estimate' the hit? Anyway we can educate our client to as to what to expect beyond (it is going to be bad…). Please let me know. Thanks!
Branding | | 10SL0 -
Case Study Formats - On-page vs. PDF
Hey all, I've been thinking about the pros and cons of case study formats (On-page vs. PDF), and was curious to see what you all think. An on-page case study is crawled by search engines and has fewer barriers in terms of visibility. The only pros I can think of for a downloadable case study (with no opt-in) is that it's less likely to be plagiarised (generally a low priority) and can have a custom design that may not fit with your website's look and feel without clashing. Also, I suppose it makes it easier for visitors to save the PDF for future reference. Have I missed anything? Do you have a preference? Keen to hear which you prefer, and why. Let's brainstorm! Cheers,
Branding | | carlod
Carlo1 -
Social Sharing Buttons: SEO friendly ?
Any recommendations for an SEO friendly social sharing button company? Or ones that provide a good service and also actually helps your brand name in SEO? I think it is important for others to be able to share my pages with colleagues and others. Thank you, UtahTiger
Branding | | Boodreaux0 -
Looking for examples of a B2B brand spinning off B2C products on to separate websites
Does anyone have any good examples or case studies? Right now I'm working on a site with both B2B and B2C products crowded onto one site. I'd love to find some examples of companies that have built their online B2B brand separately from their consumer products. I found the Constructive Playthings case study on Marketing Sherpa but nothing else.
Branding | | TexaSEO0 -
Video's Pros and Cons - YouTube vs My website or both?
This isn't really a question per say, but more of a request for advise. We are in the process of creating videos for our travel website. They are more informational and do not promote any products as such. I am aware of the options, and I am leaning towards creating a pro account with Vimeo so that the videos are available only on our website. The reason for this is so that we can at least get credit for our work, as when they are on you tube, anybody can syndicate the video without linking to our website. I am also aware that there are allot of searches happening on YouTube, and it may be worse if we choose not to upload our videos there as we would loose out on a big audience. it would be GREAT if we had the best of both options. And i had an idea i want to get your opinions on. Create the video and upload onto our website with "lower competitive" title / meta / body. Submit the video on YouTube with a "Higher competitive" keyword / title /meta and description. When someone finds our video, they might search YouTube to avoid linking back and wont find it, (although it is there getting traffic from a similar keyword) Branding is the number 1 objective for these videos, so you tube + many other video sites would be the way to go. However, i would also like our own "private" video blog on our site so that if web masters like the video, we can give them the option of embedding it on there site (like SEOMOZ do it on there whiteboard Fridays) Your comments and suggestions will be muchly appreciated. Greg
Branding | | AndreVanKets0 -
One big site or lots of little sites? Which is better for SEO and my business in general?
I realize there are some aspects of what I'm asking that only I can answer. With that said, I'm looking for some discussion about the pros / cons of each, and what are the most important factors that will push me one way or another. Let's say I have a company that has three products. One big brand, three little brands. Each of the little brands is focused on a particular sub-niche, all of which are in the general health & wellness niche. Either, I could create a large site for the big brand, with subsections for each product, and work hard on turning that domain into a goto site, with lots of articles, etc. The domain name for this one would be a made up word so I can fully control the search results. Or, another strategy would be to create smaller, "sniper" sites for each product, maybe even sites for each major search term that is interested in that product. These sites would have fewer articles. Descriptive, exact match domain names. Which is the best strategy? #1, #2, or a mixture of both? #1 seems legitimate, #2 seems a bit spammy. What are the pros and cons to each? Can anyone speak from experience about both these practices?
Branding | | monetize-2660060