Site stuck on 2nd page on Google - how can it improve?
-
Hi
I am working on a site http://www.harrisbassett.co.uk that for search terms such as 'Chartered Accountants Swansea' appears near the top of the 2nd page of Google.
When looking at what is listed on the 1st page for 'Chartered Accountants Swansea' I would appreciate any advice/guidance on what else could be done to give the site a final push to get on the 1st page of search results.
Over the past 2 weeks I have been building inbound links from local citation sites yelp, qype etc along with sites from competitor analysis via opensiteexplorer.
Looking at the sites that are on the 1st page I cant understand why many of them are ranking higher than me?
Any insight and plan of attack would be most appreciated from any search experts on the forum.
Many Thanks
-
Hi Dan
Ran the report and its as I thought
My site has better rankings across the board than 6 of the top 10 results?
- For example on page optimisation analysis is graded A and there is only one other A grade in the top 10
- FB shares - we have none but only 3 of the top 10 have 1 FB share each, while we are the only one with a Google Buzz share.
- We have the 4th best domain authority and mozrank, 3rd best moztrust
- Linking c and root domains we are 5th best and 4th best page authority
We have been building links the past 2 weeks but these dont seem to be showing in the report as on exact anchor text links we have 0 when we should have several. BTW out of the top 10 8 out of the 10 have 0 for this metric
Does it take time for the links we have built to show in this report?
-
Correct.
I hate to offer any "wait" type of answer, but that is the next step. The first opportunity for a change is when Google crawls your page again. Your Google page cache is from October 8th. Since this issue is from your home page which is crawled more frequently, I estimate it will be updated this week.
Please check your site and ensure there are no other similar issues on other pages with respect to black hat technique usage. If a site is penalized, it can be the entire site regardless or which page the issue is discovered upon. Sometimes it is only the page, depending on the issue.
The rankings could be resolved right away. Your site may have also been given a "time out" form of penalty where it can take 30 days for the rankings to improve. To be sure, I would wait 30 days after the cache has been updated. I suggest marking the date on your calendar as a reminder.
-
Thanks
Is it best to canonicalise the URL via webmaster tools to point to the www version of the site.
I have added some content on the site before they was very little - how much content is enough - looking at some of the top 10 sites in the SERPS their content leaves a lot to be desired.
I am using ALT tags on images on the homepage already for the target search phrase - have I missed any opportunities?
Good idea with google map and images I can see where you are coming from- thanks
-
Hi
I have removed the hidden h1 behind the graphic on the homepage and included the targetted search phrase on the body copy of the homepage which I have also made bold. So time will tell if it makes a difference to the ranking?
-
canonicalise your urls
more content on the homepage
Get rid of crappy stock photography, makes you look spammy. Have large, quality images
Id add an image with keyword relevant alt attribs
Add a google map with your location
-
Hi
Use the Keyword Difficulty and SERP Analysis tool - run a full report. It will give you all the ranking factor metrics of the top 10 results (plus an 11th site you can add). The major things I always check first are;
- Linking root domains
- Linking C Blocks (there should not be a giant difference between root domains and C blocks)
- Exact and Partial match anchor text
- Facebook Shares
- On Page Optimization Grade
Chances are you may need to beat some people in the top 10 in any of these metrics.
-Dan
-
The resources it takes to improve your site are relatively low. Your site is not an e-commerce site. You don't accept online payments. It is a relatively simple site. With the proper knowledge, you can build it yourself. Alternatively, you can hire someone else to build the site for you.
Many companies offer to create basic word press sites for $500+. Personally, I don't like the quality of those sites at all. For between $1000 -$2000 you can build a very high quality, professional WP site including any extensions you need, a graphics layout, and everything you need to succeed from a SEO perspective. There are major corporations who spend hundreds of thousands of dollars to build their website. A small business should be able to afford a simple site as described.
With respect to the time, I noticed from your About page your company has at least 3 employees: Nick, David and Sharon. Is it possible each employee could write one helpful article each month? They could talk about a current situation they face, or a current hot topic in the industry. If one outstanding article can be written per month by each employee, your content will steadily grow over time. Additionally, you content may draw in new clients. The content will certainly offer new opportunities to rank for additional keywords.
Would the creation of a twitter account and feed on the homepage help with SEO to get us on the 1st page?
The creation of a twitter account in and of itself will not offer any tangible benefit. You need to actually use the account for it to have value. Tips, links to articles, helpful reminders, etc. can all make great tweets.
if you look at the other sites in the top 10 list they are very weak, I cant understand how my site has not overtaken them already.
As I shared, your site has at least two major problems with respect to ranking for the key term. You are using a black hat technique which alone can knock you off the first page. Additionally, you do not use the target phrase a single time in content. Both of these points are major SEO issues. At the very least, fix these two issues today.
-
With proper SEO I take it you mean build inbound links as there is not much more SEO or technical side SEO left to do?
What I was trying to achieve with the accountant-swansea page was to capture the traffic and ranking for this search phrase - which way would you recommend that I achieve this with supporting internal links?
I totally understand what you mean but the no1 site are a large firm and have the resources to do this - many small businesses do not have the time to run a blog or write financial articles - if you look at the other sites in the top 10 list they are very weak, I cant understand how my site has not overtaken them already.
Would the creation of a twitter account and feed on the homepage help with SEO to get us on the 1st page?
-
None of the results on the first page are particularly strong. With proper SEO, you should be able to not only reach the first page but climb to the top over time.
The next most important item is to clarify within your site which page should rank for each term. I have a concern because your site is so small and you are trying to rank your home page for "Chartered Accountants Swansea" yet you have another page which targets "Accountants Swansea": http://www.harrisbassett.co.uk/accountant-swansea.html
You can certainly provide two separate pages on your site which target similar phrases. It should be done in a very careful manner with supporting internal links.
Additionally, while your site appears professional, it is a very basic html site. Notice the #1 rank site has a "search" function which is generally part of a CMS. It also offers social engagement, blog, rss feed, etc. If this site belonged to my client, I would recommend moving to a WordPress or Joomla CMS and increasing their web presence.
-
Great thanks - will make those changes - anything else that I should be looking at?
-
First and foremost, ensure you are not using any blackhat techniques on your site's home page. I found a problem within 2 minutes on your site. It is highly likely Google noticed as well.
Your home page's header tag is not visible on the page. It is hidden behind the graphics at the top of your page.
<h1 class="HomeTitle">Chartered Accountants Swansea | Harris Bassett h1>
I would also suggest using your target phrase at least once on your page in content. You do use the words on the page, but not together as a single phrase.
Once making these changes, it may take a full month to see the changes in search results.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I remove backlink from templated page?
Hi, I manage 2 websites; website A and website B. Both websites are hosted on the same webserver. Website A is significantly more established than Website B with a better domain authority and much netter keyword rankings. I have a backlink from website A to Website B. The link is do-follow and is in a sidebar template that appears on just about every page of website A. Also, this template is used in nearly all of the subdomains of website A for a total of 1,362 pages. It occurs to me that Google might see this as unnatural. I am considering removing this link from the template and adding it to the content of the landing page so that we have only one link from Website A to Website B. It seems rational to me but I'd like a second opinion, please. Thanks in advance.
Link Building | | McCaldin0 -
Can you duplicate on site Blog Posts to Google Plus
I have read from an authorative source that you can duplicate your blog posts on your google plus account without issues as google knows that this is your 'property'. is this correct and what would be the value in doing so? until we have need sign posting new blog posts with a link. Ash
Link Building | | AshShep10 -
Does Google drop links from page rank N/A sources?
Hi Everyone,
Link Building | | AMA-DataSet
I've started doing some link analysis on one of my site that has over nearly 800 links in total (which I got from the webmaster tools downloading the latest links). When I go on to Google and use the "link:www.mysite.com" directive it will only display 12 links. Does this mean Google is only counting 12 links from the link profile? Iv checked the freshness of some the links it wasn't displaying within Google to check they hadn't all expired. Links from march 2013 still don't appear. This sites link profile has been untouched for at least a year now and is full of directories many of which have a page rank of N/A hence my question. (I'm surprised it hasn't been hit by penguin!) Thanks in advance.0 -
Reassessing site achitecture
Firstly I'm only a recently new member but am already a big fan and rely on the tools a lot. For the sake of context, our site is www.cleancruising.com.au which we've steadily built into one of Australia's top cruise sites. We've focussed on building unique content including a mapping engine to show over 10,000 cruise routes, 3D ship models for virtual tour simulations and over 350,000 words of unique descriptive content. So we think we've got some good content which we currently rank quite well for, but think there's a lot of room for improvement with the links, both internal and inbound. Looking at the internal links, I thought the site architecture was pretty good but now I'm not so sure. The site hierarchy is like this: home > cruiseline (20) > ship (200) > itinerary page (12000) > enquiry form and home > region (25) > port (1400) > itinerary page (12000) > enquiry form My question is, am I wasting link juice by doing the following? A sample itinerary page shows lots of links through to the enquiry form (with different parameters). However years ago we added the enquiry form to be blocked via robots.txt and none of these page variations are indexed by google. Is this stuffing up the link flow, and should I allow the forms to be indexed so their links can add value back through the site? Are there any tools for visualizing a site link structure? Lots of questions and hope this is appropriate. 1am in Australia so may take a few hours before any follow up posts, cheers
Link Building | | cruiserDan0 -
Ranking strategy -which pages to rank?
Hi, I hope you can help. I am looking to rank for 10 keywords. My homepage has some authority. On what pages should I focus my optimisation on? Should I create a new page for each keyword and build links to these pages or try and optimise my home page for a number of keywords? If so how many keywords should you optimise for from your home page to get the most clout? Im a little confused about which strategy would be the most effective. Many thanks.
Link Building | | rpoon0 -
Finding pages with a high Page Authority
Hi, Whats the quickest way to find pages with a high authority using SEOMoz? Cheers Mik
Link Building | | increation0 -
Linkbuilding to development site
We're creating a new website for a client, and we have already started link building to the pages, including some deep landing pages. Currently the site is blocked from being indexed - we're just concerned that there may be issues when we launch the site as there will be a lot of links pointing towards the pages from day 1. Are we ok to continue link building?
Link Building | | aarondicks1 -
Can PR0 backlinks be harmful?
Having a discussion on someone with whether or not PR0 backlinks can be harmful. Managed to find these blog posts that support my argument; http://geoland.org/2011/02/can-bad-links-hurt-your-google-rankings/ http://www.johnmcelborough.com/bad-links-good-site My argument: Things like article spinning and distribution are pretty much pointless. I used UniqueArticleWizard for a while when I first started out with SEO. It gave me around 1000 PR0 backlinks. A few weeks later my site was penalised from PR5 to PR2. Thanks
Link Building | | craven220