Welcome to the Q&A Forum

I am not blocking anyone and my pages are all less than 2mb,  considerably.

My site is https://antiquebanknotes.com

Would the 902's affect my rankings?  For example, Moz is telling me that I rank 51+ for "1901 ten dollar bill" but it looks to me like I am 4th

I have two campaigns on Moz and they were doing fine until I made the decision to rewrite my URL to remove www

so, www.thing.com becomes thing.com   Moz sees this as a error it seems and I am now getting error code 902.

I tried to change my campaign setting but it won't let me change the URL because it's got historical information that doesn't pertain I guess.   What should I do?  Was it a mistake to remove the www?

Thanks for any advise,

Greg

HI Martijn,

I used Screaming Frog and it finds the H1.   I tried moving my content around on my page putting the H1 at the very top and the IIS tool found it.  Sadly I can't really do that in production but at least I know what IIS dislikes.

I suspect this is a bug in the IIS tool as it doesn't seem to bother Google.   Its tragedy that the IIS tool seems to be dying on the vine.

I have 4300 pages that the tool claims are missing the H1 value but they are there.

Here is an example: http://antiquebanknotes.com/rare-currency/first-national-bank-atlanta-illinois-2283.aspx/

Has anyone seen this before?

Thank you all for the responses... I found them all helpful.  I will look into creating my own sitemap with the IIS tool.

I can't help the 70k pages but the URLS are totally static.  I guess I can make a site map for all the aspx pages and then other one for all the lowest level .html pages.

Thanks everyone!

I am trying to generate a site map for my site nationalcurrencyvalues.com but all the tools I have tried don't get all my 70000 html pages...   I have found that the one at check-domains.com crawls all my pages but when it writes the xml file most of them are gone... seemingly randomly.

I have used this same site before and it worked without a problem.  Can anyone help me understand why this is or point me to a utility that will map all of the pages?

Kindly,

Greg

Sounds like I need to do some trial and error with the on page utility.  I will add the $ to the body and see where I get too.

Thank you!

I agree re two pages... I can't imagine the overhead that would require.  I grade an A for the spelled out version and an F for the $ version.

Hi Andy,

I am working from New York city but anywhere in the US should hopefully give the same results.  The target is the US.

I sent you the URL privately.

Kind regards,

Greg

I have a page that is tuned for this query:  1886 ten dollar bill and I am happy with my placement.

The same page performs poorly if someone types: 1886 $10 dollar bill

Is there anything I can do short of having another page tuned for the $ rather than 10?

Hi James,

I am not sure why but it seems that my problem was cache related... I went to work and saw that my urls were rewriting just fine.   Sorry I didn't get back to this thread for so long.

Regards,

Greg

First,  I appreciate all the responses and I will certainly take something from each of them.  Vahe touched on something that I thought I should do and now it's confirmed.   My national currency page sits on top of several sub pages but I don't have links to the sub pages from within that page.  I figured it was enough to have them on the menu.  But in the back of my mind I wondered if there was some SEO type reason to use a bunch of internal links to make the site more navigable and to pass link juice around.

Thanks everyone who answered!

For the past 3 or so months Webmaster tools has been reporting 404 errors on my pages... The odd thing is that I can't figure out what they are seeing.

Here is an example of a link they claim is a 404

antiquebanknotes/nationalcurrency/rare/1895-Ten-Dollar-Bill.aspx

This is strange because it's a malformed URL.   It says it's linked from this page:

http://www.antiquebanknotes.com/antiquebanknotes/rare/1882-twenty-dollar-bill.aspx

Which is a URL that doesn't exist.  The bolded portion of this URRL shouldn't be there.

Can anyone give me an idea what is happening here?

Kind regards,

Greg