Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Hi Satish,
Google will treat your title and description as suggestions. The reason they do this is because they want to provide the best possible description to their users. In such case they may generate their own description based off words, alt text, your description or combinations of all three.
This is nothing new, Google does this to everybody. You can view a video by Matt Cutts on this exact situation here.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L3HX_8BAhB4
Hope this helps,
Don
Hi Satish,
Then my first response is appropriate. Google will use whatever "title / Description" it feels is best, again I recommend you watch the YouTube video from Matt Cutts (former Google SEO guy) about why that is.
In your particular case it could be the Doctor Deepu Chandru is driving more traffic to the site then your focused keywords, so as long as people keep engaging with Google's suggestion they will keep using it. Or perhaps you have made changes and not allowed Google enough time to re-index the site.
My suggestion remove the H1 tags from the docotor's names you are using multiple h1 tags there, this could be a bit of confusion for Google, change them to H2 tags. Then under your Logo write in H1 the Page title "Liposuction Surgery and Laser Hair Removal". This will tell Google the most important thing on this page is those specific keywords. Give it 1-3 weeks to get re-crawled and Google to get its indexes changed and you should see the difference.
Hope this helps,
Don
I really appreciate all of you taking the time to tell me about your experiences.
I am only sorry I could only mark 3 of you as good answers. All your input was welcomed and helpful to me in one way or another.
I hope to continue to see you on the boards, maybe just not as much.
Don
To follow up on what Keszi has said, it is not uncommon for this value to fluctuate from update to update. The reason is because there are so many things that factor into this score. This is further complicated by the fact that the crawl will not crawl every domain every time. This means you may see less / more "linking domains", and "linking c-blocks" which are factors in DA and PA.
I know when you see a 10% fluctuation you may get a little worried. However, when DA is in the 20's the fluctuation will be more prominent than if you were up in the 40's. Reason being is it is exponentially harder to reach higher domain authorities, which means that there will be a larger swab of linking domains and less likely to change much if a few are missed on each crawl.
Hope this helps,
Don
Hi Will,
I'm of 2 minds when it comes to directories. My general advice would be to ignore them all together, unless there are some very industry specific ones that make sense. I say general advice because the vast majority of industries I have researched have only 1 known good directory (Dmoz.org), the rest are at best, relic sites that have basically run their course in usefulness and give little to no value in terms of traffic or link juice. Why? because it is atypical for somebody to use anything other then Google / Yahoo / Bing / Baidu to find anything on the internet.
That being said, I do place some value on directories for some specific industries and lead generation. For example, in my current industry there is a site that has been around since the 90's and many people before the rise of search engine dominance found it as a great resource for finding business to business partnerships. Many of those people who got acclimated to the site are still working today and use it as their go to source for specific project requirements. In other words they have used it for so long and it has worked for so long they never found the need to branch out and rely on search engines. And in all honesty even Google would have a hard time returning pertinent results for lets say a rubber manufacturer who has experience with over molding fda approved buna-n rubber to an aluminum substrate. But the good directory sites can list those sorts of capabilities.
Because this is a public question I had to give both my opinions on directory sites. Again I wouldn't seek them out as any form of link building, but I also wouldn't ignore ones that seem capable of delivering either traffic or leads, I will say with the exception of Dmoz.org any of the good directories sites I have run across are very industry specific and they are certainly not free.
Hope that helps
Don
Yep,
This code inside your .htaccess file should fix that.
``RewriteEngine On
RewriteBase /` RewriteRule ^(.*)index\.(html|php)$ http://%{HTTP_HOST}/$1 [R=301,L]`
Hope it helps,
Don
Hi Jonathan,
Didn't realize this was possible now. For the reasons you stated it still would be advised to get a dedicated IP. The last time I looked at prices they were relatively in-expensive.
Hello Again,
Okay so it looks like what is happening is:
the http www version is 302 to the https.www version and the https.www version is 301 to the non-www. So what you have is one redirect pointing to another redirect.
This is likely confusing Moz, or Moz has in the past crawled a different version and has more data for that so it wants to show you it instead.
The headers are:
302 Found
Status: 302 Found
Code: 302
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:08 GMT
Server: Apache
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: DENY
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Location: https://www.a-fotografy.co.uk/
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Expires: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:08 GMT
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 214
Keep-Alive: timeout=10, max=200
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Connection: close
301 Moved Permanently
Status: 301 Moved Permanently
Code: 301
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:08 GMT
Server: Apache
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: DENY
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Location: https://a-fotografy.co.uk/
Cache-Control: max-age=0
Expires: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:08 GMT
Vary: Accept-Encoding
Content-Length: 234
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
200 OK
Status: 200 OK
Code: 200
Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:08 GMT
Server: Apache
X-FRAME-OPTIONS: DENY
X-XSS-Protection: 1; mode=block
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Length: 21886
Cache-Control: max-age=0, public
Expires: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 12:43:08 GMT
Vary: Accept-Encoding,User-Agent
X-Powered-By: WP Rocket/2.6.15
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
What you want to do is get all your redirects to 301 to the correct version.
This should cover it in your .htaccess file
EDIT 01/07/2016: Please see the below responses for corrected code.
#If http is requested (ie https off) then redirect to https none www
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} off
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.(.)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.)$ http://%1/$1 [R=301,L]
#If https is requested (ie https on) then redirect to https none www
RewriteCond %{HTTPS} on
RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^www.(.)$ [NC]
RewriteRule ^(.)$ https://%1/$1 [R=301,L]
Hope this helps,
Don