Hi David
Thanks for your response, much appreciated.
My query was does tag manager replace all other code or does it go in as well?
I'll explain more.
I have this code from analytics put in the site:
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Job Title: Freelance Web Specialist
Company: Eminent
Website Description
My blog on things that interest me and for testing
Favorite Thing about SEO
The challenge of getting a top spot where others can't with unlimited budgets
Hi David
Thanks for your response, much appreciated.
My query was does tag manager replace all other code or does it go in as well?
I'll explain more.
I have this code from analytics put in the site:
After doing more research, it appears 'Tag Manager' replaces adwords and analytics code old or new.
Can anyone comfirm this is the correct way to go about this, as it doesn't seem obvious from the google documentation.
i.e. why do google promotoe a new analytics code rather than push people towards tag manager is it does everything?
Hi,
I may be going mad, but i can't find the code to activate demographics and interest reports if you are using the new analytics code. I can only find the code adjust for the old code.
Any one know where to find this?
Thanks
Paul
Hi Kevin/Steve
Having a whole https sites tend to take longer to respond to the first byte and load i've found, which seem to be increasingly important in rankings.
I believe this can have an effect if the competition have faster more established sites and you are trying to get above them.
But another train of thought is that google may also trust you more if its a whole https site, so following Kevin's advice and having a https may be the most effective long term, unfortunately clients don't tend to like to wait.
Regards
Paul
Hi
do you know how google treats the content?
I assume the test page would need:
robots noindex
meta no index
Rel=canonical
or am i missing something?
Thanks
Paul
Thanks for the responses, a 410 is a lot of work for probably little gain, so i think i'll run with just leaving the 404.
I have done an analytic's check on the url's in question and 10 had a tiny bit of traffic, so for these only i'll 301 to one relevant page.
Thanks again.
Hi
I'm currently working on a project to correct some really bad practices from years of different SEO's.
Basically they had made around 1500 pages of delivery counties and town, only change 3 words on every page.
Now apart from duplicate content issues, this has really hammered the site with the latest round of Panda updates.
I've pulled the pages, but i'm in several frames of mind on how to best fix this.
The pages won't ever be used again, so i'm thinking a 410 code would be best, but reading another post: http://moz.com/community/q/server-redirect-query i'm not sure if i should just let them go to 404's if anyone ever finds them.
Incidentally i'm Disavowing over 1100 root domains, so extremely unlikely to find links out there.
Hi,
Should the 301 redirects appear in the sitemap.xml as this could get pretty big over the years?
Hi
I'm currently working on a project to correct some really bad practices from years of different SEO's.
Basically they had made around 1500 pages of delivery counties and town, only change 3 words on every page.
Now apart from duplicate content issues, this has really hammered the site with the latest round of Panda updates.
I've pulled the pages, but i'm in several frames of mind on how to best fix this.
The pages won't ever be used again, so i'm thinking a 410 code would be best, but reading another post: http://moz.com/community/q/server-redirect-query i'm not sure if i should just let them go to 404's if anyone ever finds them.
Incidentally i'm Disavowing over 1100 root domains, so extremely unlikely to find links out there.
Paul Edwards is a freelance web specialist, with in depth knowledge of the Fenestration industry. As well as designing, manufacturing and installing window and door products, he is also a qualified HGV mechanic and quality Avionics Technician.
He has achieved success online with a market leading UK website for composite doors which has since been sold. This site has cemented a number 1 position in Google even more so after all the Panda and penguin updates demonstrating sound SEO practices.
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.