Welcome to the Q&A Forum

301 redirects should do the trick but you need to figure out how this happened to begin with and make sure to squash the bug to fix the issue.

You can upload them to Google search console but you will not be given the option to specify which location the sub-folders should target. But you should still do that as It is still helpful to segment them in search console for better search data, broken links etc. Especially if you have dedicated webmasters for each locale. Good luck.

Guess not, as long as the links do not have over-optimized anchor text and do not come from sites with high spam score. Also of course as long ad they´re not paid links.

Yes, open site explorer by Moz

We have products in the that go into mulitiple categories on our e-commerce site. But of course, each product is only canonicalized to one category.

My question is: what should the breadcrumbs look like when users access a product from a non-canonicalized/primary category ?Should we apply canonicalized links in breadcrumbs or entry folders?

For example:

Let´s say we have product called "glacier hiking in the alps". It is in two categories; 1) glacier hiking 2) mountain tours. And is canonicalized to the glacier hiking category.

If a user accesses it from the mountain tours category, should the url/breadcrumbs look like this:

www.example.com/glacier-hiking/glacier-hiking-in-the-alps (because that is the canonicalized version)

Or should it look like like this:

www.example.com/mountain-tours/glacier-hiking-in-the-alps (because that is where the user came from)

Thanks in advance!

Hi Bridget, AMP pages seem to be back. Thanks for asking and hope you have a nice day.

Hi,

We amplified our site the other day and Google was quick to find our AMP pages. Today, we can´t seem to find any AMP pages on Chrome and it looks like we can´t find any other pages from sites like Wapo and so forth. They´re still visible on Safari.

We are searching from Iceland. Is anyone experiencing this and if so, could you please share a link to the news? Thanks and have a nice day!

Hi, we are amplifying our site, but one of the things we can´t include on our AMP version is the Facebook comment box.

Some of our articles have hundreds of comments on them and we noticed that Google was crawling those comments and using them as a ranking signal (the more comments the better we discovered).

Now we are wondering if these articles would drop if we launch the AMP version without the comment box. As this would reduce the written content on those pages a lot.

Anybody tested this before or has an idea on that would work out? Thanks for your help!

Why is it such a hassle to access Moz campaigns from the frontpage of Moz? How can MOZ be so awesome and at the same time be so annoying? Does Moz have UX designer working with them?

Thanks Mike,

I´m thinking if a no index would be more appropriate...?

Some links with filtering parameters are also appearing, even though they were canonicals too. I´m guessing a 301 would make sense there...?

Yes, open site explorer by Moz

Hi Bridget, AMP pages seem to be back. Thanks for asking and hope you have a nice day.

Guess not, as long as the links do not have over-optimized anchor text and do not come from sites with high spam score. Also of course as long ad they´re not paid links.

Hi, we are amplifying our site, but one of the things we can´t include on our AMP version is the Facebook comment box.

Some of our articles have hundreds of comments on them and we noticed that Google was crawling those comments and using them as a ranking signal (the more comments the better we discovered).

Now we are wondering if these articles would drop if we launch the AMP version without the comment box. As this would reduce the written content on those pages a lot.

Anybody tested this before or has an idea on that would work out? Thanks for your help!