Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hoping I can do this, but am not 100% if we can.  Thanks Chris!

We have about 15-20 articles we'll repurpose on a partner domain (think: media outlet).  To avoid duplicate content suspicion, how much exactly do we need to differentiate the content on the second domain?  Yea, this is assuming we can't obtain a canonical for whatever reason.

I've found some good advice here, but am looking for some quantification. Like:  "A sentence/paragraph of introduction at the top of the piece, plus a link back to the original at the end of said introduction ought to do it."

Any help is appreciated.  Thanks!  Tim

Our team is growing and we are running into each others' research on the tool!  Will our users ever be able to use their own instance of Moz?

Also, how about a historical archiving function for research? Would be nice to record past research as similar requests come to us in the future.

Wish list stuff - thx.

Thanks Lantec.

I need to check with the site owner that we aren't blocking javascript files indexing with .robots, just read something about it here.  But I don't think so.

My Art of SEO book is pretty clear about javascript creating indexing issues: "Links in hard to parse JavaScript – If you use JavaScript for link, you may find that search engine either do not crawl or give very little weight to the embedded links. Links embedded inside Java and plus-ins are invisible to search engines."

I just saw a March 2014 video with Matt Cutts saying Google's gotten better at this.  But I suspect that since there are no simple links on the page to this microsite, this is why it's not indexing.  NOT because we haven't submitted the URL on a sitemap or Fetch operation.

We have another microsite that's newer and simply linked, and doing just fine - fully indexed.

Thanks for your help....

can't disclose, sorry

very large...>100,000 pages.  we are frequently crawled...91 DA, big business.

We have a microsite that was created on our domain but is not linked to from ANYwhere EXCEPT within some Javascript elements on pages on our site. The link is in one JQuery slide panel.

The microsite is not being indexed at all - when i do site:(microsite name) on Google, it doesn't return anything. I think it's because the link's only in a Java element, but my client assures me that if I submit to Google for crawling the problem will be solved.

Maybe so, but my point is that if you just create a simple HTML link from at least one of our site pages, it will get indexed no problem.  The microsite has been up for months and it's still not being indexed - another newer microsite that's been up for a few weeks and has simple links to it from our pages is indexing fine.

I have submitted the URL for crawling but had to use the google.com/webmasters/tools/submit-url/ method as I don't have access to the top level domain WMT account.

p.s. when we put the microsite URL into the SEOBook spider-test tool it returns lots of lovely information - but that just tells me the page is findable, does exist, right?  That doesn't mean Google's going to necessarily index it, as I am surmising...Moz hasn't found in the 5 months the microsite has been up and running.  What's going on here?

Awesome - thanks RaymondPP and Who Wudda Thunk...

Now I get to say nana nana booboo to some of the "browser title" stalwarts.  ;>

I have seen much more use of "Page Title" of late....in fact hardly any of "Browser Title" except by some folks who are using a very old CMS.

We need to go with one at my workplace to avoid confusion. My vote is Page Title.  Thoughts?

Thanks, Tim

Awesome - thanks RaymondPP and Who Wudda Thunk...

Now I get to say nana nana booboo to some of the "browser title" stalwarts.  ;>