Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Hi @Red_educativa S.L.,

I would suggest using rel="prev/next" in this situation, yes.

When you are specifying a "rel" attribute you are specifying a relationship between the current document and the linked one. The value "prev" and "next" is specifying the relationship to be "The next [previous] document in a selection".

If you instead would use nofollow, google's spiders will not crawl the page. A nofollow value is "Links to an unendorsed document, like a paid link.".

However, this being said, it would be good for SEO to include a "view all" page. This will include all the content on a single page.  You should then use rel="canonical" on the link to the view-all page (this will send users from search results to your view-all page. If you instead wish to use your first page in the series, you should only use rel next and prev (not rel canonical).

Have a look at this video from google for more information: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njn8uXTWiGg

I hope this helps.

--
Jørgen Juel

Hello,

Using "span" inside "anchor" is perfectly valid to use in your code, it should not affect SEO in any way.

A similar question has been posted before: http://moz.com/community/q/span-tags-inside-a-tags-is-this-bad

--
Jørgen Juel

My clients have never complained about the reports, in fact they think it is too much if anything.

it is also really customizable in your settings, you can choose what to include and what it should say.

i would not recommend giving your clients access to your account as they then also are able to view your other clients stats.

--

Jørgen Juel

Hello Eduardo!

When I tried your URL and keyword in the On-Page analysis at moz analytics I got back a completely normal result.
Are you sure you are using the correct URLs? (I used https://www.joomlashack.com/ )

You can try to restart your browser to see if there is an issue with the javascript handling or something.

Anyway, I've attached a ranking report of your home page for your convenience.

--
Jørgen Juel

C1KPG65.png

Hi,

Doing a 301 permanent redirect sends 90 - 99% of the link juice to the new domain. This is by far the most recommended approach when changing domain name.

Below is a URL to a MOZ article regarding redirection.
http://moz.com/learn/seo/redirection

I hope this helps

--
Jørgen Juel

Yes, if you prefer the www prefix, that is what should should do.

If you put this in a dynamic header (like one in a theme) it will appear on every page, yes.

however, on your site it looks like it has been properly implemented already (at least last time I checked)

On you health page it has the canonical URL of http://in2town.co.uk/health-magazine (I don't remember wether it was with or without www) - and this is the proper way to do it.

Hi @tim ellis,

I've had a look at your site and it looks like you don't have any meta description or keywords tags.

The code for your description and keywords tags are as follows

The other question you had, regarding canonical links; you have two links to canonical - one on line 14 and 63.

I hope this helps

--
Jørgen Juel