thanx alot!
- Home
- kynop
Latest posts made by kynop
-
RE: Seo style="display: none;" ?
yes, we have a button with real text layed on it which says more information or so.
the funny thing is google once sayed clearly dont do this and the text is still available. i remeber that this came out something like 5 years ago.
-
Seo style="display: none;" ?
i want to have a funktion which shortens text in categorie view in my shop.
apple is doing this in their product configurator
see the "learn more" button at the right side:
http://store.apple.com/us/configure/MC915LL/A
apple is doing this by adding dynamic content but i want it more seo type by leaving the content indexable by google.
i know from a search that this was used in the past years by black had seos to cover keywordstuffing.
i also read an article at google.
i beleive that this is years ago and keywordstuffing is completly no option anymore.
so i beleive that google just would recognise it like the way its meant to be.
but if i would not be sure i would not ask here
what do you think?
-
RE: Why is here no extra section for Google Shopping
yes i meant more the second part of you answere, but thanx alot for the first one!!!
i think google shopping ownes its own category here, because its so special and for shop owner at least here in germany its the allmost important one. we get only 100 clicks / day we could get probably 1000 whith a extremly high conversion rate.
-
Why is here no extra section for Google Shopping
does really nobody care for the most important search result for shops beside organic result?
google shoping results mostly pop up in organic results on 3rd place.
Vertical SEO Video, Image, Local etc. etc. is not really Shopping Results!
-
RE: 302 vs. a href="nofollow"
Thanx for the great answere, so the best is probably to leave it as it is.
I just found it out because Screaming Frog runs into a loop, because it follows 302s.
So i just put this url string which guides into the 302 into the robots.txt while i scan with seo frog and turn it off afterwards again.
thanx!
-
302 vs. a href="nofollow"
we came across one thing the we did not asked to programm by our intention.
we have a magento shop and on the produktpage we have those "compare" buttons. these link have a session id and the follow a 302 back onto the same page.
so i beleive the idea is that google will just not follow 302s and thats it.
so my questions is:
is this right what we beleive
if so why is a 302 better compared to a a href="nofollow" ???
-
RE: Google base penality?
we know magento in and out. but what does this have to do with the quality of the feed. we did analyse it many times and even compared it with the feeds of our competitors.
our rankings went all up after the switch. we spend 6 month in developing just the onsite site aspects with 2 seo related developer teams.
-
RE: Google base penality?
we analysed our feeds a coupld days, the feeds are perfect. as i sayed we even have more attributes compared to a few competitors. using the magento built in funcionallity would just reduce the attributes. again: we dont have any problems in google base we can find all of our products in the shopping results, but just not on top positions but actually only on last positions.
-
RE: Google base penality?
No, we use a plug-in called psmext v2. Its specialised fo creating files for all kind of product price search machines. we have about 20 diferent here.
Looks like your connection to Moz was lost, please wait while we try to reconnect.