Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks for your response Federico.

It is responsive in that it is only 1 single design but it is 3 different groups of navigational links all pointing to exactly the same urls. So 3 links pointing to each category and product page. Essentially it's navigation x3. As the responsive design shifts to accommodate tablets/mobiles the desktop navigation hides and is replaced by the previously hidden mobile or tablet navigation. So there are necessarily 3 lots of on page links. I'm hoping there's either a tag that can cater for this to append to the extra links OR perhaps someone will suggest that 'too many' is OK if they're legitimate, non spammy and user essential links. Hope that makes sense!

Hi guys,

We have a site about to launch with a responsive design to suit desktop, tablet and mobile. Each design carries it's own navigation as one primary set of navigational links won't suit all versions of the design. So as desktop resizes to mobile (or tablet) the desktop navigation is hidden (css) and replaced by the nav more suited to the mobile experience (hope I've explained that ok!).

Problem is that if the primary navigation carries 50 links then all 3 designs together carry 150 links which is too many on page links. Is that going to be a problem? Is there a tag that can be applied to the mobile/tablet nav links? Like a canonical tag but for links??

Cheers in advance of your ideas
James

Hi Guys,

I'm wondering about the exact match bing data in the Moz KWD & SERP analysis tool. We're looking at the ranking difficulty for given terms in Google but getting exact match bing numbers. Is the tool estimating Google searches from the bing data (perhaps a simple formula assuming maybe 10% search totals for Bing, 60% for Google or whatever is closest these days) or is it just raw bing numbers that we then have to upsize in order to estimate search numbers in Google?

Hope that makes some kind of sense! In other words - how are you guys using that Bing data when considering terms to target using this tool?

Look forward to hearing your thoughts.
Cheers
James

Hi Jon - great discussion and was my question exactly (albeit Germany, Spain & France). This was over a year ago now and I'm wondering what sort of solution you settled on or found to be most effective. I think my difficulty is finding a solution that doesn't force the client's budget beyond their expectations in terms of engaging native speakers to create language specific content and the requisite research and outreach to get links hosted on country specific TLDs. Any good outcomes so far?

Cheers in advance of any advice!

James

Hi Guys,

Looking for thoughts on press release websites in terms of link value.  Recent press releases on both these sites have recently appeared in OSE with DA's of 93/98 and PA's of 47/48 - great stuff.

Given we can control anchor text and include links these are great opportunities to combine anchor text vs branded links, include citation and co-citations all from within the main body of the release too depending on the PR package you subscribe to.

So are these link opps as valuable as they appear or could they be devalued based on the fact they are sat on these PR sites? Might Google view them as no more important than links from ezinearticles? Are they frowned on even more as they might be considered paid links?

Further to this, if they aren't as high value as their DA/PA suggests then might an extra filter in OSE to account for this be useful?

Interested to hear your thoughts
Cheers
James

Thanks John! It was doing it yesterday so thought I should see if it was universal. Fingers crossed!

Just a quicky: Tried to run keyword difficulty tool reports last couple of days but keep getting error messages regardless of how many words/phrases I request.

Is this a general outage or just me?

Cheers
James

Agreed. I've passed this to the devs.

You've been most helpful today - Thanks for your time, very much appreciated.

J

Interesting. Do you think that could be it? Googlebot seems to find it's way around it though. I'd have thought if G could do it then SEOmoz tools would, otherwise I imagined getting an inaccessibility error or similar from moz.

I'll get that changed and see if it makes a difference..

Thanks again for looking at it!

Any ideas? got a report due on the 19th and the next crawl is due on the 17th. Would be great to remove any blockers before then if poss. thanks!

Definately. Cheers.

Thanks Tom, but no, it's setup as www.brammer.co.uk so it's not that.

Hi Guys,

Any advice much appreciated on this!

Recently set up a new campaign on my dashboard with just 5 keywords. The domain is brammer.co.uk and a quick Google site:brammer.co.uk shows a good amount of indexed pages.

However - first seomoz tool crawl has only crawled 1 url!!

"Last Crawl Completed: Apr. 12th, 2011 Next Crawl Starts: Apr. 17th, 2011"

Any ideas what's stopping the tool crawl anymore of the site??

Cheers in advance..

J

That's amazing feedback guys, very much appreciated! I'm going to see how far I get with your idea Ryan and I'll feedback to you any success. Cheers James

Hi All,

I know there was a recent post on this subject but I'm wondering if someone could take a look at these links and tell me if there is any SEO value in them at all and if not, what would be a way to improve them that might not be too much trouble for the affiliate?

This URL: http://www.premiermodelskin.com/the-products/blemish-treatment

has a Purchase button that passes product data (price, quantity, etc) directly to the basket of the host site (the site we want SEO benefit to).

Using a form method to this URL:

<form method="GET" action="<strong>http://www.monushop.co.uk/products/premier/blemish-treatment.html</strong>">                                                                                        Qty <select id="add" name="add">                          <option value="1" selected="selected">1</option>                          <option value="2">2</option>                          <option value="3">3</option>                          <option value="4">4</option>                          <option value="5">5</option>                          <option value="6">6</option>                          <option value="7">7</option>                         <option value="8">8</option>                         <option value="9">9</option>                         <option value="10">10</option>                      </select>                    15ml                    £16.25                                                                                       </form>

My question is, does G see that form GET action as a followable link? If not what would be a better method?

Any feedback much appreciated.
Cheers
J