FYI, this may help filter out some of those inaccurate results:
http://adwords.blogspot.com/2011/03/location-targeting-on-adwords-now-with.html
Welcome to the Q&A Forum
Browse the forum for helpful insights and fresh discussions about all things SEO.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
FYI, this may help filter out some of those inaccurate results:
http://adwords.blogspot.com/2011/03/location-targeting-on-adwords-now-with.html
Although the hiding of those headers is a little odd, I doubt you'd get hit for it as the hidden h2's are all consistent with the displayed content - it doesn't look (to me, at least) like anything's being done in a spammy manner. H2's are a very weak ranking factor to begin with, and It's not like you're keyword stuffing or trying to rank for irrellevant keywords. Of course, if you can find someone who can tweak things and treat those elements appropriately, all the better.
Off topic, but you may also suggest to your friend that they optimize their images. Those image files on the first page you mentioned are very large for the sizes at which they are being displayed and needlessly add to the page load times.