Damn. I have been proven wrong. Apologies!
![RafalJ RafalJ](https://moz.com/avatar/large/9/r.png)
Posts made by RafalJ
-
RE: New Google Update on 21st April
-
RE: New Google Update on 21st April
In Analytics (Audience/Mobile/Overview) it shows 3 Device Categories: Desktops, Mobile (phones) and Tablets. This is true but when you look at Audience/Mobile/Devices, the column Mobile Device Info shows all tablets and mobile phones grouped together (!)
Also in Adwords - when you write an ad copy for mobile (devices) it will be shown on both mobile phones and tablets, ad copy for desktops will be shown on desktops and laptops.
WMT doesn't distinguish between tablets and mobile phones at all, they are all mobile devices.
This is what I meant by grouping them together, not that you can turn on reporting for each device category separately. You could turn on reporting for pretty much anything you want in Analytics so this is really not an argument.
I'm pretty certain (99.9%) this is the case Andy and you should make sure both mobile phone and tablet versions of your site are prepared before 21st April.
-
RE: New Google Update on 21st April
Monica tablets ARE mobile devices! Tablets and mobile phones use the same mobile operating systems and mobile versions of browsers. Also all their tools including Adwords, Analytics and WMT put tablets and mobile phones in the same group - mobile devices so I can't see any reason why they would treat them differently (and have different sets of search results for each?? perhaps I'm wrong but it makes no sense to me!).
I admit I also believe this update will affect desktop search results to some degree but Google certainly claims otherwise. We will just have to wait and see.
-
RE: New Google Update on 21st April
Tablets and mobile phones are both mobile devices and this update will affect them both. What Rand and Barry are discussing on Twitter is whether it will also affect desktop results, so nothing to do with tablets.
-
RE: Category Page Outranks Homepage
It's because both your homepage and that particular category page are targetting the same keywords and are competing with each other in search results. It's rather rare that category outranks the homepage but it's not impossible. This category page has a lot more text content but also images to sub categories etc Google obviously sees it as more relevant to the search queery/keyword.
I would suggest looking at the homepage if it could be reoptimised for other maybe broader keywords to gain some extra benefits.
-
RE: Has using Moz got me banned from Google search?
Well something is running search queries from your machine or network. Moz does not operate from your computer/network but from their own servers in the US and it will never affect your machine, its physically impossible. You need to find the issue on your machine, and I would start with investigating the browser environment first - plugins, addons, running fresh instances of the browser as Ryan explained above and if it doesn't help moving on to other software you have installed on this machine. You will find it eventually... Good luck
-
RE: Very Disappointed. Finally an Index and No change in my PA or DA
If I was a betting man I would bet £10 you haven't set the campaign correctly. Anyway rather than asking questions here, you should contact the support directly starting here: https://moz.com/help/contact
-
RE: New to Moz, need some probably basic answers about Keywords, Linking, Competitors and General SEO
Max I think you are confusing a lot of things, let me clarify...
1. Moz is a tool that scans internet to give you weekly rankings for the keywords you are interested in. It also gives you valuable tips on how to better optimise your pages according to guidelines. Nothing more!
How these pages will rank is down to a large number of factors and quality of your competition.2. You have to come up with plans and ideas on how to make the most out of the information provided by Moz to your benefit, or hire an SEO specialist to do it for you, because it is nearly always unique to company/niche/industry.
Now to answer some of your questions:
Does is matter how many keywords I am doing research for? No
Does is matter how many keywords I try to optimise for each webpage? Yes. 1 subject per page (but that can and should mean a variation of keywords related to that subject)
Are the amount of branded keywords I am researching skewing my results? As they are all ranked #1, but nearly all of the non branded keywords are much further down the list... Your researching has nothing to do with their rankings.
Once I have decided what keywords are worth trying to ranking for for each page, are the techniques to actually rank more highly for them - Title, H1 Tag, Description, Meta Data, Fresh Content and using the keywords on the page? Or are there more techniques I haven't heard of? There is on page optimisation and there are other seo techniques like link building, you need to read about it.
Under Keyword Rankings - I noticded that some of my keywords are directing to specific pages, like "Cavity Waxes" is directing to the URL ending in .com/cavity-waxes - How do you assign the keywords im researching to specific URLs? - Or does Moz do it automatically? As most of my keywords seem to be unassigned to any URL, is that because they are not ranking highly enough? Moz only shows you what pages are ranking in the first 5 pages of results in Google for each of your keywords
-
RE: Do I need to actively disavow links to my site?
Yes you do. If there are spammy links built to your site, you are likely to get a Penguin penalty at some point and that is a pain to recover from, so you want to be pro-active and minimise the risk of it happening by disavowing these links and also by removing them altogether if possible.
This is a video where Matt Cutts answers your question - http://youtu.be/eFJZXpnsRsc
-
RE: Massive Google Search Spam
using doorway pages to spam the search results and gain higher rankings is certainly against the rules and google shouldn't have any problems finding it and punishing them.
if you want to take matters in your own hands however, you can report them here: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/spamreportform?hl=en
-
RE: Quotery.com Suggestions?
Jason,
You seem to understand the concepts very well so as Kevin has said, just keep plugin along... use that 5k, or part of it, on your own marketing ideas and eventually you will get there...
You can still promote that video you know? It's a bit depressing for my liking but I see people sharing similar content on social media sites nearly every day.
The spammy example you gave is technically not spammy - it's a website for content publishing, article is in relevant section, fairly well written and is linking to relevant websites (even though it's 3 different businesses) using no-follow links. It certainly isn't spammy but I can see why you would expect more for your 5k.
Good luck!
-
RE: Quotery.com Suggestions?
Without doing a serious analysis of your site, links, stats etc. its like drawing circles on water, but...
Google Page Rank 0 while domain authority is pretty high (38), suggests you have an algorithmic penalty, so:
a) your content is not unique or pages are too similar
b) majority of your links are spammy (and since you have 100k links pointing to your site I would suggest this is the most probable scenario)
c) both a and b are true
To answer your question - gaming the system never really works in the long run Jason.
Also I find it hard to believe a large, well-known agency would be involved in spammy techniques, any examples please?
-
RE: Why are none of the links we've received from press and other sources from the last two months showing on our Inbound Links in OSE???
Moz does not specialise in link scanning and they only display a fraction of your actual links in Open Site Explorer. If you want a complete list of your backlinks use your WMT or Ahrefs.
Domain Authority score has actually been invented by Moz so I believe they know how to count that value properly! You might be confusing domain authority with Google's Page Rank which are two entirely different things, although their values are very often similar or the same.
Check this link on how domain authority works and is measured - http://moz.com/learn/seo/domain-authority
-
RE: Blog Content if Google has stated it doesn't like your blog?
is your blog only available on mobile devices? if so, then there is probably not much point posting anything before fixing the usability, but if its normally accessible on desktops then it will get credit in desktop search results
-
RE: Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
This is pretty disturbing news actually and it doesn't make any sense to me. If Google wants to promote pages with more and better quality content above the fold but also clean pages that users like - the read more buttons were the only functionality to marry both concepts.
At the moment all my pages are still fully indexed but if I see this change come into life I will have to re-think the content and layout of many pages...
-
RE: Duplicate Page content | What to do?
Hi George,
Thanks for this, It's very interesting... the urls do appear in search results but their descriptions are blocked(!)
Did you try configuring URL parameters in WMT as a solution?
-
RE: Duplicate Page content | What to do?
George,
I went to check with Google to make sure I am correct and I am!
"While Google won't crawl or index the content blocked by
robots.txt
, we might still find and index information about disallowed URLs from other places on the web." Source: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6062608?hl=enYes, he can fix these problems on page but disallowing it in robots will work fine too!
-
RE: URL Path. What is better for SEO
There is no golden rule but generally yes, the page higher in a structure would be considered slightly more important, especially if your sitemap indicates page importance automatically, but a proper structure has far more benefits.
As long as you don' overcomplicate your structure it wouldn't make much difference whether your roses are at:
or
domain.com/anniversary-flowers/roses
as for no 4 - could it be that roses would fit many of the categories and therefore have been taken out of the structure to avoid duplicate content issues?
I often see pages deeper in the category tree ranking just as high if not higher than top categories for their respective keywords. At the end of the day Pete, it's the content that will rank your page not the url.
Using common sense, do you think Google would promote a model of websites where all pages and categories are always in the root? Would you use a library where all books are stuffed into 1 section? I don't think so.
-
RE: Duplicate Page content | What to do?
Add this line to your robots.txt to prevent google from indexing these pages:
Disallow: /*login?
-
RE: URL Path. What is better for SEO
This is very often overlooked but in my opinion the right URL structure is critical for any site, because the on site optimisation and content creation for landing pages will be very much determined by the structure of your URL's. Logical structure also helps users understanding and navigating the site.
I always suggest a "library" approach, so creating a logical structure similar to a library where a book (or a product/service/article etc.) falls under one parent category, which falls under a higher parent category, similar to:
science-books/physics/newton-inventions
entertainment-books/childrens-books/harry-potter
I your case the first example of URL path makes more sense, but the question is - are dozen roses only anniversary flowers? Spend a few hours organising your products into categories that make logical sense and create a URL structure to reflect that but keeping in mind the keywords people are searching for to find your products. It's not easy so don't rush it.
Ah and use hyphes (-) rather than underscores (_) in your urls...
-
RE: Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
Hi Dan,
I have just clicked on the link you provided
Since the new Penguin is still rolling out and most ranking changes are at the moment down to this algo refresh I would suggest looking at your link profile for a start and if there is nothing wrong there, simply wait a couple of weeks until the refresh has officially finished and take it from there...
-
RE: Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
Partial doesn't necesserily means there is a problem. Check this article by Google: https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6066472?hl=en
If that font is the only thing not loading then it's not a problem for crawlers and it wouldn't have affected you rankings.
Btw that link to the font returns 404 error? Why are you loading fonts from a different website in the first place? Have it loaded from your site or from Google.
-
RE: Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
the cache version might still be of the page before they did changes to it Mick
-
RE: Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
click on it and look at the list of issues - are there any javascripts blocked, unreachable etc.? is the preview complete or elements are missing? is render of this particular page (that lost rankings) different to other pages on your website? talk to your web developers about this and get them to fix any issues there. If there are no issues then the reason for your loss of rankings is somewhere else
-
RE: Hiding body copy with a 'read more' drop down option
Collapsible divs use jquery which is a javascript. I don't think the rankings drop has got anything to do with it, unless there is an error which prevents cralwrs to access the text content. Fetch and render the page in WMT to see if there are problems.
-
RE: Site De-Indexed except for Homepage
There is nothing you can do now. You have made a mistake and fixed it. Since then you have submitted a sitemap, "fetched" the site and redirected non-www traffic to www in your htaccess... There are no other ways to speed the process up. Just sit and wait for Google crawler to fully re-crawl the site and the number of indexed pages will come back to what it was.
You said all rankings disappeared in Moz Tracker, but what about the actual rankings in Google search results? Have you checked that? What are WMT and GA saying about your rankings/traffic?
My gut feeling tells me your pages are still ranking as they were, but since your WMT was still set to show data for www domain you weren't seeing any... am I correct?
-
RE: What to do with these toxic links?
Always disavow to show you are being proactive and have good intentions. If you don't you might get a manual penalty that will wipe your site off the index completely.
The problem here is not really what to do with the links but how to stop them appearing as I would imagine every month there will be more of them appearing on similar sites. You have to find hosting companies of these sites and take it with them, reporting violation, asking to take these sites down, tracing the person/company who built them, threatening to sue...
Good luck
-
RE: Make Google reindex the website after on-page optimization
Hi CosminC,
As Linda said, new sitemap + Fetch as Google in WMT. Once you "fetch" it, refresh the page and there should be a new button available Submit to Index. Click this button and choose - Crawl this URL and its direct links.This will effectively ask google crawler to visit and re-crawl your whole site and although Google doesn't guarantee anything, the crawler would normally re-crawl the site in the next few days.
-
RE: Duplicate content on .com .au and .de/europe/en. Would it be wise to move to .com?
You need to mark them up as different languages en-gb, en-us, en-au, and use rel=alternate tag. Everything is explained here:
https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/6059209?hl=en&ref_topic=6059248