Our company uses a custom CMS for each of our niche classified websites. Ideally, we would like an online/cloud-based platform that would generate our sitemaps for us. Dyno Mapper looks like a good contender, but the $108 monthly fee seems a bit steep.
Posts made by recbrands
-
RE: Best server-side xml sitemap generator?
-
Best server-side xml sitemap generator?
I have tried xml-sitemaps which tends to crash when spidering my site(s) and requires multiple manual resumes which aren't practical for our businesses. Please let me know if any other server-side generators that could be used on multiple enterprise-sized websites exist that could be a good fit. Image sitemaps would also be helpfu.l
+++One with multiple starting URLs would help spidering/indexing the most important sections of our sites.
Also, has anyone heard of or used Dyno Mapper? This also looks like a good solution for us, but was wondering if anyone has had any experience with this product.
-
Sitemap generator which only includes canonical urls
Does anyone know of a 3rd party sitemap generator that will only include the canonical url's? Creating a sitemap with geo and sorting based parameters isn't the most ideal way to generate sitemaps. Please let me know if anyone has any ideas. Mind you we have hundreds of thousands of indexed url's and this can't be done with a simple text editor.
-
RE: How do I get rid of my errors for Schema.org?
Your Offer needs to update the "price" property to sold. This property field can be either text or number.
http://schema.org/price -
RE: Are clean mobile URL's necessary?
No, we were using them for the proper indexing of our mobile pages.
I've instructed our Dev team to continue using clean mobile URLs. I imagine clean URLs would only increase the likelihood of better ranking since it's indexed sooner than the actual page source. Especially with search engines working towards semantic search, it would be natural to assume URL structure would carry some weight.
Thanks for your input, Kristina!
-
RE: Are clean mobile URL's necessary?
This is what I'm referring to: <link rel="alternate" media="only screen and (max-width: 640px)" whenever="" a="" spider="" visits="" your="" desktop="" site.="" works="" much="" the="" way="" rel="canonical" does="" for="" mobile="" to="" when="" separate="" url's="" are="" used="" websites="" and="" is="" useful="" responsive="" design="" not="" an="" option="" or="" isn't="" ideal="" company's="" site.<="" p=""></link rel="alternate">
Reference:
https://developers.google.com/webmasters/smartphone-sites/feature-phones
Separate URLs > Dedicated URLs configuration
-
Are clean mobile URL's necessary?
Adding code to redirect/clean up ugly URL's slows down mobile site performance, so it is necessary if we are already using rel=alternate tags on our desktop/www pages?
-
API to power all websites
I spoke to one of my lead web developers and we are planning on powering all of our desktop, mobile and tablet sites with our new API. Everything will be populated through javascript and is cloud-based rather than through actual HTML. How do we incorporate all of our SEO?