Welcome to the Q&A Forum

So you're saying I should not have someone re-write it because I should do it myself? Or you're saying I should certainly have someone re-write as opposed to using the duplicate content?

"I personally think you can keep the PHP.  The only reason I can see changing to HTML site is if you don't have a CMS system running"

The new site is already coded in HTML though - Is there just some code I can add to .htaccess to tell spiders that all PHP are not HTML?

Obviously I will need to change any internal/external links to the new extension. I want to make sure I cover all my bases and do this properly.

It's quite a bit and I don't have the time to re-write everything.

It's certainly worth the cost to pay someone to re-write all of it though?

There is a particular product/service that I resell through an API. There are quite a few of them and each one requires a lot of content. The company provides web content for each product but I'm wondering about the SEO implications of using it?

Obviously using the content, it will not be unique so I won't be able to rank (easily at least) for these products. Are there any _negative_results that I can get from using this content though? If I simply won't rank for those products it's not an issue since I get traffic elsewhere.

Thanks!

I have a website fully coded in PHP and I am doing a re-design over to an HTML site. I searched through the Q&A and there were some conflicting answers. Some said you will need to 301 all the pages. Others said to use the .htaccess to parse all the files as html.

What is the correct way I should go about this?

Thanks in advance!