Welcome to the Q&A Forum

Thanks David! That definitely makes sense. We claimed photos.tagible.com in GSC, so hopefully that does it.

And yes, they are, but in an unusual way: http://tagible.com/project/denver-colorado/

Thanks Donna! I could see the 403 errors being an issue, as well as the robots.txt file not including the sitemap. I hadn't thought of that.

We're working on making sure the https issue is fixed.

Hi,

One of my clients submitted an image sitemap with 465 images. It was submitted on July 20 2017 to Google Search Console.

None of the submitted images have been indexed.

I'm wondering why?

Here's the image sitemap: http://www.tagible.com/images_sitemap.xml We do use a CDN for the images, and the images are hosted on a subdomain of the client's site: ex. https://photos.tagible.com/images/Les_Invalides_Court_Of_Honor.jpg

Thanks in advance!

Cheers,
Julian

If there is a local business that thrives on ranking nationally for people searching for their services in that location, do you target the business's actual service areas or target nationally?

For instance, a hotel in Denver, Colorado.  Would the areaserved markup be:

"areaServed":[{"@type":"State","name":"Colorado"},{"@type":"City","name":"Denver"}]

Or

"areaserved":"USA"

The "geographic area where a service or offered item is provided" would be denver, colorado. But we would be looking to target all people nationally looking to travel to denver, colorado.

Or would it be best to target it all, like:

"areaServed":[{"@type":"State","name":"Colorado"},{"@type":"City","name":"Denver"},"USA"]

Hi,

I'm integrating with a service that adds 3rd-party images/videos (owned by them, hosted on their server) to my site. For instance, the service might have tons of pictures/videos of cars; and then when I integrate, I can show my users these pictures/videos about cars I might be selling.

But I'm wondering how to build out the sitemap--I would like to include reference to these images/videos, so Google knows I'm using lots of multimedia. How's the most white-hat way to do that? Can I add external links to my sitemap pointing to these images/videos hosted on a different server, or is that frowned upon?

Thanks in advance.

No, this is an algorithmic penalty.  Wish it was manual, would be easier to figure out.

The problem is that despite the algorithmic penalty site A appears to be pushing heavy authority to site B and keeping decent rankings for some very competitive terms that we otherwise would not rank for with site B.  If I remove the 301 I fully expect all current rankings to drop, I am trying to avoid this.

Were doing link removal now, but plan on having to use the disavow tool once we have a few removal requests out to webmasters.  I actually got an answer on this from John Mueller at Google in the technical SEO community on G+.

John Mueller
"I would think about the final state you want to be in and just do that. If you want to do a domain move, then 301 and keep them. If you do a domain move + disavow links, then submit the file for both domains. This process will take quite some time (maybe even a year), so you don't want to play with it incrementally: just find out what you want in the end and set that up."

So we are performing link removal for a client on his old website (A), which is being 301 redirected to his new website (B).  We have identified toxic links on site A and are removing, once complete we will undo the current 301, confirm a new GWT account for website A, and then submit the disavow report.

We would then like to reapply the 301 redirect to site B while we are waiting for Google to process the disavow report, the logic being we can retain some current rankings on site B while waiting for the disavow to process on site A.

Has anyone had experience with this method?  I foresee some potential issues here but am interested to here from others on this.  Thanks!

Thinking about undoing the 301, confirming a new GWT account, submitting disavow, then reapplying 301 back to new site to avoid disrupting rankings.  Any thoughts?  I haven't heard of this being done before in this way..

Thanks for your help, hard to find resources on things this specific.

Thanks!

Is it safe to go ahead and go through the link removal process first, then remove the 301 and disavow?  I would prefer to wait as undoing the 301 will most likely cause a drop in other pages on Site B not affected by the penalty.  So we would do all the link removal attempts, remove the 301, claim the new GWT account, and then lastly disavow.

I'm hearing of reports from a couple weeks to a couple months to wait for dissavow to be processed once submitted, any personal experience with this?

So we are performing link removal for a client on his old website (A), which is being 301 redirected to his new website (B).  We have identified toxic links on site A and are removing, once complete we will undo the current 301, confirm a new GWT account for website A, and then submit the disavow report.

We would then like to reapply the 301 redirect to site B while we are waiting for Google to process the disavow report, the logic being we can retain some current rankings on site B while waiting for the disavow to process on site A.

Has anyone had experience with this method?  I foresee some potential issues here but am interested to here from others on this.  Thanks!

Hi SamuEU,

In general it is not good to have your home page be redirecting anywhere else on your website, often times spammy websites use re-directs to take users to a different page they may be hiding from search bots.  I would suggest creating the new keyword-relevant URL, but also creating an entirely new keyword-relevant page to gain traffic directly from the search-engines, then link to it in a way that makes sense from your home page.  This is a more natural way to use a keyword-relevant URL to gain search traffic.

Good Luck!