Yes will look at the Bing Webmaster tools and work of that finding broken links. Thanks again.
Posts made by tdsnet
-
RE: Something about something not so important!
-
RE: Something about something not so important!
Update on Blog situation:
Thanks
-
RE: Something about something not so important!
Great thanks,
With Wordpress it seems to come up over and over again anytime you research Wordpress - people seme to run into problems with it.
-
RE: Something about something not so important!
Hi Alan,
Thanks for the analysis.
Did you see anything in the index or main structure that caused any issues do you think?
Regards
-
RE: Something about something not so important!
Sure, can I PM you a link if that's ok? Thanks
-
Something about something not so important!
Hi, I wonder if anyone can help…
-
RE: Google's weighting of Page Load speed
Thanks, some interesting stats. Our main pages have a pretty good bounce rate but the blogs are not as good. I think we may find an advantage here.
-
RE: Google's weighting of Page Load speed
Thanks for the reply, sat at position 2 before the change and still sat at position 2 now after the change but hey expect we would be there so no great surprise.
Checked it in Pingdom too as we had researched this before making the changes. Interestingly I ran it 5 mins ago and it said load time 4.3 secs. Ran it again and it comes up as 1.8 secs. Seems a bit buggy today.
My opinion is that it wont make a significant difference on it's own but as part of an overall aim, it makes a slight difference.
Just wondering if anyone has seen significant improvements and can demonstrate them.
-
Google's weighting of Page Load speed
Hey, we recently optimised our website page load speed as part of our overall optimisation.
Page load speed according to the Google Developers Page Speed test was previously 51 out of 100 and is now 92 out of 100 and this was improved within the last seven days gradually, cached half way through the improvement process.
I appreciate this is regarded as only a small part of the whole process, however, I’d be interested to know if anyone has a concrete opinion/proof on whether such a big improvement would actually make a difference to our rankings in the SERPs.
-
RE: 301 for "index.php" in Web.config?
Hi Alan,
Thanks for that, it worked perfectly!
-
RE: 301 for "index.php" in Web.config?
Thanks Yannick,
I'm using the configuration tag and there isn't a CMS being used. The page is accessible via index.php, but I'm currently redirecting it using a PHP script (this is fine but it doesn't provide a 301 redirect).
I'd hopefully like to replace this using the web.config file but it only results in an internal server error or an infinite loop.
Thanks again.
-
301 for "index.php" in Web.config?
Hi there, I'm trying to create a 301 redirect for the file "index.php" but I keep getting a "fail to redirect" message in Firefox whenever I insert it into the Web.config file.
<location path="index.php"></location>
Is there anyway around this? Thanks for any help
According to Open Site Explorer, there are about 500 links to my index file but it only has a 302 status so will not be passing link juice.
-
RE: On-Site Sitemaps - Guidance Required
Thanks, I agree with your thoughts on this but with us we tend to chop and change inner pages and having a good sitemap helps us to make sure the navigation is solid. Or remember to include missing pages more to the point.
I like the example you provided, it does help from a user perspective to see the pages summarised from a branding perspective as much as seo.
-
On-Site Sitemaps - Guidance Required
Hi, I am looking to find good examples of on-site sitemaps.
We already submit our XML sitemap regularly through GWMT but I now wonder if we still need an on-site sitemap, as we have about 30 static pages and 300+ Wordpress blogs which in a sense makes that a spammy page as it has too many links and a higher than average keyword density.
The reason I am looking for good examples is that I want to create a basic on-site sitemap that aids navigation but is styled to look ok as well.
The Solution I have in mind:
mydomain.com/link-example-one.php
mydomain.com/link-example-two.php
mydomain.com/liink-example-ten.phpmydomain.com/blog then links to my 300 WP blogs, broken down into chunks navigated by using breadcrumbs.
Will Google crawl this ok or should I stick to the current format listing ALL posts on one page?
Thanks
-
RE: We dropped from a page rank of 4 to 3
There was an updated Google PR yesterday
http://techwalls.com/blogging/google-pagerank-update-november-2011/
-
RE: Keyword Self-Cannibalization
Great resources, thanks for sharing these and your opinion too.
It certainly seems to be an area of SEO where a period of testing is going to be required to get the best fit for us.
-
Keyword Self-Cannibalization
Hi, Happy Friday!
I was advised to look at the SEO strategy of a UK SEO company and copy a technique they used, however, I have doubts that this technique is any good.
So mydomain.com targets My Domain
For my main keyword phrase, I was told to place a link to a newly created inner page in my footer, targeting the main keyword and on this page, create unique content which points back to my homepage.
Now I also have mydomain.com/my-domain.php which has a link to mydomain.com with anchor text My Domain.
Based on the SEOMoz reports, this now seems to be Keyword Self Cannibalisation and I think that it is diluting link juice and the value of my SEO on my homepage for this term rather than helping.
Can you advise if this technique is wrong?
-
UK website ranking higher in Google.com than Google.co.uk
Hi, I have a UK website which was formerly ranked 1<sup>st</sup> in Google.co.uk and .com for my keyword phrase and has recently slipped to 6<sup>th</sup> in .co.uk but is higher in position 4 in Google.com.
I have conducted a little research and can’t say for certain but I wonder if it is possible that too many of my backlinks are US based and therefore Google thinks my website is also US based.
Checked Google WmT and we the geo-targeted to the UK. Our server is also UK based.
Does anyone have an opinion on this?
Thanks
-
Wordpress SEO Change of Structure
Hi, I have a Wordpress SEO Question.
I ran the SEOMOZ checker on my website and it discovered roughly 70 of my 250 blogs had a URL length problem. I have removed the year and month from the WP structure as I read elsewhere that it is not important.
The blogs displayed as follows:
domain.com/blog/2011/02/contents-of-the-blog
and the new structure is:
domain.com/blog/contents-of-the-blog
I have resubmitted the new structure to Google Webmaster Tools XML and updating the on-page sitemap on my main site.
My blog was cached on 25<sup>th</sup> October and seems to be caching every 7 days, my website cached on the 24th and I wonder if I should do any follow up work to ensure the content gets crawled properly.
a) Individually 301 redirect the old URLs to the new.
b) Individual Canonical links for each.
c) Adding the old pages to the robots file and disallowing.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.