Welcome to the Q&A Forum

The main thing to know is that EAT is only confirmed to be a rubric for the human quality raters, which means this only matter significantly if you are penalized or as a preventative measure for sites in those niches. Speaking of preventative measure - while it’s good to educate clients on this and get them oriented towards it for the future, probably not the necessary to go crazy with reactive changes.Where this actually gets into advanced SEO territory is determining how EAT might scale algorithmically. What computational factors and inputs might the algorithm use to judge this in the future? That’s still predictive and proactive, but it will become the future of SEO once Google figures that out.

Spam score is not equals poor rankings or better rankings. It just tells you a link from a prospect with high spam score won’t do much good for your site. I only use it to filter link prospects not analyzing competition.

In this case I'll choose Hreflang because work in differents languages.

If able check ahrefs to see if there are any clicks at all. Also if these are branded kwds the brand itaelf might get 90%+ of the clicks so normal ratios don't apply. And another tip for raising ctr... check (and keep checking) Google ads, since the people doing them test 1001 variation and usually use the most clickable/buyer focused keywords use those as well.

Create a guide about how to implement the Privacy Policy the right way. Hide the link of your domain on the common anchors from Google, Firefox and enjoy your free backlinks.

I’d suggest looking at the following:1) Review the site architecture, are all of the URL’s that aren’t indexed easily accessible?2) have you correctly configured your sitemaps.3) is your robots.txt file blocking any pages or category of pages.4) Have utilised internal linking where possible to help search engines index your pages?

Build informative content which help your customers to solve their problem. Do Proper on page. That's it.

After many years in the industry, you come to realize a few things.  One of of the biggest pain points for us   at web daytona  was being able to give clients a quick keyword ranking cost estimation. After multiple trial and error and relying on API data from one of the most reliable SEO softwares in our industry, we were able to develop an SEO tool that allows us to quickly and accurately get the estimated cost for a given keyword (s) using multiple variables.

Most agencies can relate to that story. It’s something my colleagues and I at Web Daytona have been through before.

Finding the cost and amount of time needed to rank for a keyword is a time consuming process. That’s why it’s a common practice to sell SEO packages of 5-10 keywords for about $1000-2000 / month.

The problem is not all keywords are equally valuable, and most clients know this. We constantly get questions from clients asking: “how much to rank for this specific keyword?” It’s difficult to answer that question with a pricing model that treats the cost of ranking every keyword equally.

So is the answer to spend a lot more time doing tedious in-depth keyword research? If we did we could give our clients more precise estimates. But being that a decent proposal can take as long as 2-5 hours to make, and agency life isn’t exactly full of free time, that wouldn’t be ideal.

That’s when we asked a question. What if we could automate the research needed to find the cost of ranking keywords? We looked around for a tool that did, but we couldn’t find it.

Then we decided to make it ourselves. It wasn’t going to be easy. But after running an SEO agency for over a decade, we knew we had the expertise to create a tool that wouldn’t just be fast and reliable, it would also be precise.

Fast forward to today and we’re proud to announce that The Keyword Cost Estimator is finally done. Now we’re releasing it to the public so other agencies and businesses can use it too.

You can see it for yourself here.

Keyword-Rank-Cost-Ectimator-Tool-by-Web-Daytona-Agency.png

Would you mind providing screen shots or URLs?

Use this instead: https://moz.com/learn/seo/domain-authority

Keep it.

I watched this video over the weekend. If you haven't yet, this is a great documentary every SEO client should watch.

watch?v=tFq6Q_muwG0

What's the ETA on the release date?

Interesting...  Could it be because or your URL structure?

Financial Advisers> Birmingham > Harborne

Try:

Birmingham > Harborne > Financial Advisers

Birmingham > Harborne > Accountants

What is the world... I think your cat stepped on your keyboard.

Cool.

No it doesn't. Go for it.

Article

I see. You can only have one or the other. If you are trying to create scheme for a How-to, I would create a page and structure it as such. We use https://technicalseo.com/tools/schema-markup-generator/ - same goes for the Article Scheme. I hope that helps.

What's your URL? Perhaps we can look into it and try to give you a more technical answer.

The decision to kill [/daytona-beach-web-design/] was rather simple. Even though both pages were created at the same time.  After looking at Google Search Console, only one URL got indexed. So we deleted one and expanded our content on the the other.

Three months ago we had our team create local pages for some of the services we render -- _i.e., _web design. As we reviewed the pages, they created two pages with similar content; one with URL:

1. /daytona-beach-web-design/
2. & /daytona-web-design/

We knew we had to kill one of them to avoid duplicate content. Here is where the hard decision came and hence the question.

We though about keeping the '/daytona-beach-web-design/ ' URL but for some reason, Google had already crawled the shorter version of the URL '/daytona-web-design/'

So we ended up deleting the long tail URL and kept Daytona Web Design instead.

Which one would you keep and have you experienced similar issues?

This is rather interesting... none of my tools are able to pull data also. I did notice there is a pop up that got blocked on the site (screen shot) could that be the issue?

8FmkoG5