In this case I'll choose Hreflang because work in differents languages.
Moz Q&A is closed.
After more than 13 years, and tens of thousands of questions, Moz Q&A closed on 12th December 2024. Whilst we’re not completely removing the content - many posts will still be possible to view - we have locked both new posts and new replies. More details here.
Posts made by WebDaytona
-
RE: Canonical or hreflang?
-
RE: How to index backlinks fast
I’d suggest looking at the following:1) Review the site architecture, are all of the URL’s that aren’t indexed easily accessible?2) have you correctly configured your sitemaps.3) is your robots.txt file blocking any pages or category of pages.4) Have utilised internal linking where possible to help search engines index your pages?
-
RE: How can i increase DA of my website?
Build informative content which help your customers to solve their problem. Do Proper on page. That's it.
-
What's your proudest accomplishment in regards to SEO?
After many years in the industry, you come to realize a few things. One of of the biggest pain points for us at web daytona was being able to give clients a quick keyword ranking cost estimation. After multiple trial and error and relying on API data from one of the most reliable SEO softwares in our industry, we were able to develop an SEO tool that allows us to quickly and accurately get the estimated cost for a given keyword (s) using multiple variables.
Most agencies can relate to that story. It’s something my colleagues and I at Web Daytona have been through before.
Finding the cost and amount of time needed to rank for a keyword is a time consuming process. That’s why it’s a common practice to sell SEO packages of 5-10 keywords for about $1000-2000 / month.
The problem is not all keywords are equally valuable, and most clients know this. We constantly get questions from clients asking: “how much to rank for this specific keyword?” It’s difficult to answer that question with a pricing model that treats the cost of ranking every keyword equally.
So is the answer to spend a lot more time doing tedious in-depth keyword research? If we did we could give our clients more precise estimates. But being that a decent proposal can take as long as 2-5 hours to make, and agency life isn’t exactly full of free time, that wouldn’t be ideal.
That’s when we asked a question. What if we could automate the research needed to find the cost of ranking keywords? We looked around for a tool that did, but we couldn’t find it.
Then we decided to make it ourselves. It wasn’t going to be easy. But after running an SEO agency for over a decade, we knew we had the expertise to create a tool that wouldn’t just be fast and reliable, it would also be precise.
Fast forward to today and we’re proud to announce that The Keyword Cost Estimator is finally done. Now we’re releasing it to the public so other agencies and businesses can use it too.
You can see it for yourself here.
-
RE: Moz trust
Use this instead: https://moz.com/learn/seo/domain-authority
-
RE: Multiple Markups on The Same Page - Best Solution?
I see. You can only have one or the other. If you are trying to create scheme for a How-to, I would create a page and structure it as such. We use https://technicalseo.com/tools/schema-markup-generator/ - same goes for the Article Scheme. I hope that helps.
-
RE: Multiple Markups on The Same Page - Best Solution?
What's your URL? Perhaps we can look into it and try to give you a more technical answer.
-
RE: Redirect Issue - Drop in ranking after CMS change
This is rather interesting... none of my tools are able to pull data also. I did notice there is a pop up that got blocked on the site (screen shot) could that be the issue?