Status Code 404: But why?
-
Google Web Master Tool reported me that I have several 404 staus code.,
First they were 2, after 4..6 and 10, right now. Every time I add a new page.
I've got a no CMS managed website. After old website was been deleted, I installed Wordpress, created new page and deleted and blocked (robots.txt) old page.
Infact all page not found don't exist!!! (Pic: Page not found).
The strange thing is that no pages link to those 404 pages (All Wordpress Created page are new!!!). Seomoz doesn't report me any 404 error (Pic 3)
I controlled all my pages:
- No "strange" link in any pages
- No link reported by Seomoz tool
Bu why GWMT reports me that one? How can I risolve that problem?
I'm going crazy!!!Regards
Antonio -
Antonio,
Ryan has explained this perfectly.
For a more detailed explanation of methods for controlling page indexing, you could read this post on Restricting Robot Access for Improved SEO
It seems from your comments and questions about 301 redirects, that there is some confusion on how they work and why we use them.
A 301 redirect is an instruction to the server which is most commonly done by adding a .htaccess file (if you are using an Apache server).
The .htaccess file is read by the server when it receives a request to serve any page on the site. The server reads each rule in the file and checks to see if the rule matches the existing situation. When a rule matches, the server carries out the action required. If no rule matches, then the server proceeds to serve the reqested page.
So, in Ryan's first example above, there would be a line of code in the .htaccess file that basically says to the server IF the page requested is /apples, send the request to /granny-smith-apples using a 301 (Permanent) Redirect.
The intent of using a 301 Redirect is to achieve two things:
- To prevent loss of traffic and offer the visitor an alternative landing page.
- To send a signal to Search Engines that the old page should be removed from the index and replaced with the new page.
The 301 Redirect is referred to as Permanent for this reason. Once the 301 Redirect is recognized and acted upon by the search engine, the page will be permanently removed from the index.
In contrast, the request to remove a page via Google WMT is a "moment in time" option. The page can possibly be re-indexed because it is accessible to crawlers via an external link from another site (unless you use the noindex meta tag instead of robots.txt). Then you would need to resubmit a removal request.
I hope this makes clearer the reasons for my response - basically, the methods you have used are not "closing the door" on the issue, but leaving the possibility open for it to occur again.
Sha
-
But I think, tell me I'm right, that robots.txt is better than noindex tag.
Definitely not. The opposite is true.
A no-index tag tells search engines not to index the page. The content will not be considered as duplicate anymore. But the search engines can still crawl the page and follow all the links. This allows your PR to flow naturally throughout your site. This also allows search engines to naturally read any changes in meta tags. A robots.txt disallow prevents the search engine from looking at any of the page's code. Think of it as a locked door. The crawler cannot read any meta tags and any PR from your site that flows to the page simply dies.
Do I need "real" page to create a 301 redirect?
No. Let's look at a redirect from both ends.
Example 1 - you delete the /apples page from your site. The /apples page no longer exists. After reviewing your site you decide the best replacement page would be the /granny-smith-apples page. Solution: a 301 redirect from the non-existent /apples page to the /granny-smith-apples page.
Example 2 - you delete the /apples page from your site. You no longer carry any form of apples but you do carry other fruit. After some thought you decide to redirect to the /fruit/ category page. Solution: a 301 redirect from the non-existent /apples page to the /fruit/ category page.
Example 3 - you delete the /apples page from your site but you no longer carry anything similar. You can decide to let the page 404. A 404 error is a natural part of the internet. Examine your 404 page to ensure it is helpful. Ideally it should contain your normal site navigation, a site search field and a friendly "sorry the page you are looking for is no longer available" message.
Since you asked about existence of redirected pages, you can actually redirect to a page that does not exist. You could perform a 301 from /apples to a non-existent /apples2 page. When this happens it is almost always due to user error by the person who added the redirect. When that happens anyone who tries to reach the /apples page will be redirected to the non-existent /apples2 page and therefore receive a 404 error.
-
Ryan,
what you say is right: The best robots.txt file is a blank one. But I think, tell me I'm right, that robots.txt is better than noindex tag.
You have presented 404 errors. Those errors are links TO pages which don't exist, correct? Yes.If so, I believe Sha was recommending you can create a 301 redirect from the page which does not exist...
**Ok. But Do I need "real" page to create a 301 redirect?
I deleted those one.So, to resolve my problem must i redirect old page to most relevant page?**
-
Greenman,
I have a simple rule I learned over time. NEVER EVER EVER EVER use robots.txt unless there is absolutely no other method possible to achieve the required result. It is simply bad SEO and will cause problems. The best robots.txt file is a blank one.
When you use CMS software like WP, then it is required for some areas but it's use should be minimized.
How can I add a 301 redirect to a page that doesn't exit?
You have presented 404 errors. Those errors are links TO pages which don't exist, correct? If so, I believe Sha was recommending you can create a 301 redirect from the page which does not exist, to the most relevant page that does exist.
It's a bit of semantics but if you chose to do such, you can create 301s from or to pages that don't exist.
-
Greenman,
As I suspected many of the dates of the bad URLs are old, some even being from 2010. I took a look at your home page specifically checking for the URL you highlighted in red on the 4th image. It is not present.
My belief is your issue has been resolved by the changes you made. I recommend you continue to monitor WMT for any NEW errors. If you see any fresh dates with 404, that would be a concern which should be investigated. Otherwise the problem appears to be resolved.
I also very much support Sha's reply above.
-
Hi Sha, thanks for your answer.
1.** robots.txt is not the most reliable method of ensuring that pages are not indexed**
If you use tag noindex, spider will acces to your page but it will not get enough information. So, page will be semi-indexed.
My old pages ware been removed, no indexed (by robots) and I sent remove request to Google. No problem with that, no result on the SERP.
2. So, the simple answer is that there are links out there which still point to your old pages...does not mean that they don't exist.
You can see by screenshot the link's source: just my old "ghost" pages. No other sources.
3. If you know that you have removed pages you should add 301 redirects to send any traffic to another relevant page.
How can I add a 301 redirect to a page that doesn't exit?
Old page -> 301 -> New page (Home?). But Old page doesn't exit in Wordpress!!!**I don't want stop 404, I want remove link that bring to deleted pages. **
-
-
My gut feeling is that a catch al 301, is not a good thing, I cant give you any evidence, just a bit of reasoning and gut feeling.
I always try to put myself in the SE shoes, would i think a lot of 301's pointing to one not relavant page is natual? and would it be hard to detect? I would answer No and No. Although i used to do it to my home page a while ago, I guess i had a different gut feeling back then
-
Hi Greenman,
I would guess that your problem is most likely caused by the fact that you have used the robots.txt method to block the pages you removed.
robots.txt is not the most reliable method of ensuring that pages are not indexed. Even though robots.txt tells bots not to crawl a page, Google has openly stated that if a page is found through an external link from another site, they can be crawled and indexed.
The most effective way to block pages is to use the noindex meta tag.
So, the simple answer is that there are links out there which still point to your old pages. Just because links are not highlighted in OSE or even Google WMT, does not mean that they don't exist. WMT should provide you with the most accurate link information, but even that is not necessarily complete according to Google.
Don't forget that there may also be "links" out there in the form of bookmarks or favorites that people keep in their browsers. When clicked these will also generate a 404 response from your server.
If you know that you have removed pages you should add 301 redirects to send any traffic to another relevant page. If you do not know the URL's of the pages that have been removed the best way to stop them from returning 404's is to add a catch-all 301 redirect so that any request for a page that does not exist is redirected to a single page. Some people send all of this traffic to the home page, but my preference would be to send it to a custom designed 404 or a relevant category page.
Hope that helps,
Sha
-
When did you change over to the WP site?
Today is October 1st and the most recent 404 error shared in your image is from 9/27. If you have made the changes after 9/27, then no new errors have been found since you made the change.
Since the moz report shows no crawl errors, your current site is clean assuming your site navigation allowed your website to be fully crawled.
The Google errors can be from any website. The next step is to determine the source of the link causing the 404 error. Using the 2nd image you shared, click on each link in the left column of your WMT report. For example, http://www.mangotano.eu/ge/doc/tryit.php shows 3 pages. Click on it and you should see a list of those 3 pages so you can further troubleshoot.
-
I dont think they are, i thing they found them long ago, and no matterr if you block them, remove them of whatever, google take for ever to sort itsself out
-
Sorry Alan,
but I think that Google can looking for old page yet. This is the reason:I deleted old page form index by GMWT "remove url request"
I dissalowed old page by robots.txtThe problem is why Google find in NEW page links to OLD page.
-
The 404's are from pages that used to be linked in your old site correct?, if so I suggest that google is still looking for them. Unless you changed your domain name this would be the reason
-
Yes, link come from my page. Bu I created new page by Wordpress (and deleted OLD website). So, there are NO link beetwen OLD and NEW pages. How GWMT can find a connection? Webpage Source Code HTML doesn't show any link to those page.
-
From you own web page i would asume.
i would suuggest that even that they are not in index, google is till trying, and that WMT is a bit behind. i have simular for links that i took down moths ago.
-
Hi Alan,
404 not found pages are not indexed. My big problem is that I don't now where (and How) GWMT found source link (pages that link to not found page)
-
If they were in a SE index, they will try them for some time before removing from index., i would not worry
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Indexed Answer Box Result Leads to a 404 page?
Hey everyone, One of my clients is currently getting an answer box (people also ask) result for a page that is no longer live. They migrated their site approximately 6 months ago, and the old page is for some reason still indexed in the (people also asked) results. Weird thing is that this page leads to a 404 error. Why the heck is Google showing this? Are there separate indexes for "people also asked" results, and regular organic listings? Has anyone ever seen/experienced something like this before? Any insight would is much appreciated
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HSawhney0 -
I have a lot of spammy links coming to my 404 page (the URLs have been removed now). Should i re-direct to Home?
I have a lot of spammy links pointing at my website according to MOZ. Thankfully all of them were for some URLs that we've long since removed so they're hitting my 404. Should i change the 404 with a 301 and Re-Direct that Juice to my home page or some other page or will that hurt my ranking?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jagdecat0 -
When should you 410 pages instead of 404
Hi All, We have approx 6,000 - 404 pages. These are for categories etc we don't do anymore and there is not near replacement etc so basically no reason or benefit to have them at all. I can see in GWT , these are still being crawled/found and therefore taking up crawler bandwidth. Our SEO agency said we should 410 these pages?.. I am wondering what the difference is and how google treats them differently ?. Do anyone know When should you 410 pages instead of 404 ? thanks Pete
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | PeteC120 -
OSE link report showing links to 404 pages on my site
I did a link analysis on this site mormonwiki.com. And many of the pages shown to be linked to were pages like these http://www.mormonwiki.com/wiki/index.php?title=Planning_a_trip_to_Rome_By_using_Movie_theatre_-_Your_five_Fun_Shows2052752 There happens to be thousands of them and these pages actually no longer exist but the links to them obviously still do. I am planning to proceed by disavowing these links to the pages that don't exist. Does anyone see any reason to not do this, or that doing this would be unnecessary? Another issue is that Google is not really crawling this site, in WMT they are reporting to have not crawled a single URL on the site. Does anyone think the above issue would have something to do with this? And/or would you have any insight on how to remedy it?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ThridHour0 -
301 page into a 404
Hi I have a job board site and the way the site is built means that I cant 404 job pages once they have expired. To combat this Im looking to 301 the pages into a 404 page.Do any of you have any experience with this? Are there any potential pitfalls to doing a 404 this way? Thanks
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AndrewAkesson0 -
How do I best deal with pages returning 404 errors as they contain links from other sites?
I have over 750 URL's returning 404 errors. The majority of these pages have back links from sites, however the credibility of these pages from what I can see is somewhat dubious, mainly forums and sites with low DA & PA. It has been suggested placing 301 redirects from these pages, a nice easy solution, however I am concerned that we could do more harm than good to our sites credibility and link building strategy going into 2013. I don't want to redirect these pages if its going to cause a panda/penguin problem. Could I request manual removal or something of this nature? Thoughts appreciated.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Towelsrus0 -
redirect 404 pages to homepage
Hello, I'm puting a new website on a existing domain. In order to not loose the links that point to the varios old url I would like to redirect them to homepage. The old website was a mess as there was no seo and the pages didn't target any keywords. Thats why I would like to redirect all links to home. What do you think is the best way to do this ? I tried to ad this in the .htaccess but it's not working; ErrorDocument 404 /index.php Con you tell me how it exacly look? Now the hole file is like this: @package Joomla @copyright Copyright (C) 2005 - 2012 Open Source Matters. All rights reserved. @license GNU General Public License version 2 or later; see LICENSE.txt READ THIS COMPLETELY IF YOU CHOOSE TO USE THIS FILE! The line just below this section: 'Options +FollowSymLinks' may cause problems with some server configurations. It is required for use of mod_rewrite, but may already be set by your server administrator in a way that dissallows changing it in your .htaccess file. If using it causes your server to error out, comment it out (add # to beginning of line), reload your site in your browser and test your sef url's. If they work, it has been set by your server administrator and you do not need it set here. Can be commented out if causes errors, see notes above. Options +FollowSymLinks Mod_rewrite in use. RewriteEngine On Begin - Rewrite rules to block out some common exploits. If you experience problems on your site block out the operations listed below This attempts to block the most common type of exploit attempts to Joomla! Block out any script trying to base64_encode data within the URL. RewriteCond %{QUERY_STRING} base64_encode[^(]([^)]) [OR] Block out any script that includes a
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | igrizo0 -
New web site - 404 and 301
Hello, I have spent a lot of times on the forum trying to make sure how to deal with my client situation. I will tell you my understanding of the strategy to apply and I would appreciate if you could tell me if the strategy will be okay. CONTEXT I am working on a project where our client wants to replace its current web site with a new one. The current web site has at least 100 000 pages. The new web site will replace all the existing pages of the current site. What I have heard for the strategy the client wants to adopt is to 404 each pages and to 301 redirect each page. Every page would be redirect to a page that make sense in the new web site. But after reading other answers and reading the following comment, I am starting to be concerned: '(4) Be careful with a massive number of 301s. I would not 301 100s of pages at once. There's some evidence Google may view this as aggressive PR sculpting and devalue those 301s. In that case, I'd 301 selectively (based on page authority and back-links) and 404 the rest.' I have also read about performance issue ... QUESTION So, if we suppose that we can manage to map each of the old site pages to a page in the new web site, is a problem to do it? Do you see a performance issue or devaluation potential issue? If it is a problem, please comment the strategy I might considere to suggest: Identify the pages for which I gain links From that group, identify the pages, that gives me most of my juice 301 redirect them and for the other, create a real great 404 ... Thanks ! Nancy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | EnigmaSolution0