What is the best SEO site structure for multi country targeting?
-
Hi There,
We are an online retailer with four (and soon to be five) distinct geographic target markets (we have physical operations in both the UK and New Zealand). We currently target these markets like this:
- United Kingdom (www.natureshop.co.uk)
- New Zealand (www.natureshop.co.nz)
- Australia (www.natureshop.com/au) - using a google web master tools geo targeted folder
- United States (www.natureshop.com) - using google web master tools geo targeted domain
- Germany (www.natureshop.de) - in german and yet to be launched as full site
We have various issues we want to address. The key one is this: our www.natureshop.co.uk website was adversely affected by the panda update on April 12. We had some external seo firms work on this site for us and unfortunately the links they gained for us were very low quality, from sometimes spammy sites and also "keyword" packed with very littlle anchor text variation. Our other websites (the .co.nz and .com) moved up after the updates so I can only assume our external seo consultants were responsible for this.
I have since managed to get them to remove around 70% of these links and we have bought all seo efforts back in house again. I have also worked to improve the quality of our content on this site and I have 404'ed the six worst affected pages (the ones that had far too many single phrase anchor text links coming into them). We have however not budged much in our rankings (we have made some small gains but not a lot).
Our other weakness's are not the fastest page load times and some "thin" content. We are on the cusp (around 4 weeks away) of deploying a brand new platform using asp.net MVP with N2 and this looks like it will address our page load speed issues. We also have been working hard on our content building and I believe we will address that as well with this release.
Sorry for the long build up, however I felt some background was needed to get to my questions.
My questions are:
- Do you think we are best to proceed with trying to get our www.natureshop.co.uk website out of the panda trap or should we consider deploying a new version of the site on www.natureshop.com/uk/ (geo targeted to the UK)?
- If we are to do this should we do the same for New Zealand and Germany and redirect the existing domains to the new geo targeted folders?
- If we do this should we redirect the natureshop.co.uk pages to the new www.natureshop.com/uk/ pages or will this simply pass on the panda "penalty".
- Will this model build stronger authority on the .com domain that benefit all of the geo targeted sub folders or does it not work this way?
- Finally can we deploy the same pages and content on the different geo targeted sub folders (with some subtle regional variations of spelling and language) or will this result in a duplicate content penalty?
Thank you very much in advance to all of you and I apologise for the length and complexity of the question.
Kind Regards
Conrad Cranfield
Founder: Nature Shop Ltd -
Thanks Kent for your help before - yeah probably just coincidence - we had managed to remove some bad neighbourhood links and rewritten our content before we realised the currency display issue and changed that
-
Hi Conrad,
Glad to hear your rankings have returned.
I agree with Stephanie. It is unlikely the currency change played a significant role in your ranking recovery. There are numerous other factors which likely resolved the issue. The timing just happened to fit with the currency change.
-
Many thanks Stefanie - much appreciated
-
Hi Conrad,
Thank you for contacting Distilled. We really appreciate you reaching out to us. I just confirmed that we did receive your inquiry and one of our sales executives will be contacting you shortly. Please let me know if you have any further questions.
-
Hi Stefanie, That is very true - we managed to get rid of lots of the bad links, we rewrote the content to be of a better quality. However it was when we stopped the currency displaying in USD instead of GBP that literally 2 - 3 days later we jumped right back to where our rankings had been pre panda.
On a side note - I sent you guys at distilled an enquiry regarding our international seo strategy and structure through your website yesterday and I am wanting to employ your services - do you know if someone has received the enquiry as I am kind of hoping to make a bit of an urgent decision
-
Hi Conrad,
Interesting results- however, I think there may be more to that than the currency change. You mentioned previously that the company worked with other external SEO agencies that had garnered only low-quality links to the site with exact match anchor text or little anchor text variation. You also mentioned that you were successfully able to remove around 70% of those links from the link profile.
This could have played a crucial role in your recovery from Panda.
-
Hi Ryan - sorry I never answered your post - it was much appreciated. BTW - we came out of the google panda update on our .co.uk website. Turns out that we were using geo-ip software to set the shopping currency (and product mix) and as all google crawlers are US based all the pages on our .co.uk were displaying USD$ instead of GBP£. We put some code in to identify when a web spider was the visitor and set the currency to GBP£. As a result we popped right out of the poor rankings for almost all pages.
-
Hi Conrad.
I have researched this topic quite a bit recently. The consensus for the best approach is:
-
Use www.natureshop.com as your main site
-
Use geo-targeted folders for your country-based sites such as www.natureshop.com/au
-
Treat the folder pages as home pages for each country. Each of those pages should receive local links from their respective countries.
-
Re-direct traffic from the old sites to the same pages on the new sites. Do not take the easy way out and simply 301 all pages to the home page for their country.
-
Build your site for each COUNTRY, not language. For example, the US pages should use American spellings such as "center", and American measurements such as Dollars.
-
Use the meta language tag to indicate the language used on each page. EN = US, GB = England, etc.
-
Use country flags in a prominent location to allow users to find their country's pages. The flags are much more identifiable then letters.
can we deploy the same pages and content on the different geo targeted sub folders (with some subtle regional variations of spelling and language) or will this result in a duplicate content penalty?
You should not have any issues with duplicate content by following the above process. Google will understand your pages are specific to languages and countries based on your meta tags, folder structure, and Google WMT settings.
For the UK site, I would work to resolve all Panda issues and confirm the penalty is gone prior to moving that site. I would be interested to hear from others on this topic as I lack experience in this area. If the UK site was merged into the main site, would the Panda penalty only apply from Google.co.uk? Or could Google.com apply the penalty as well?
PS. I really love your business model. Free shipping, 1 year return policy, etc. shows a tremendous amount of confidence in your products. I would recommend adding some trust symbols. The BBB symbol, TrustE and Verisign or McAfee are the ones I prefer.
-
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Multi National Company that Doesn't Want to Implement International SEO
I have got an interesting situation where I have a client who wants to merge two ccTLD's into one. They currently have .fi and .com and they want to merge both sites to .com .fi is for finland and .com for USA. They want to merge the sites and the original plan was to use subfolders for each country and pair with hreflang. However the team now wants to merge both sites with NO subfolders differentiating between finland or the US. My understanding of International SEO that this is the most opposite from best practices, but is there any specific reasons why they wouldn't want to do this? I'm struggling to find any specific reasons that I can cite to the client that would argue why we should at least do a subfolder or some sort of international seo strategy.
International SEO | | JKhoo1 -
Best way to interlink 25 different language versions of a website?
I have a website which has 25 different language versions on 16 different domains. Hreflan are setup to point to different language versions. In the footer we have deeplinks to the 25 language versions. Site is not spammy but in small niche and many language versions have very few other external links. For some time this site had lost rankings for reasons that are unclear till now. I see that large international sites such as booking.com, tripadvisor, apple all use different approaches to interlink their language versions. Interestingly Tripadvisor is nowadays loading the links to their other language versions dynamically only upon click so that these links do not show up in source code, deviating from their former implementation of static deeplinks to all language versions. Matt Cutts mentioned back in 2013 “If you have 50 different sites, I wouldn’t link to all 50 sites down in the footer of your website, because that can start to look pretty spammy to users. Instead you might just link to no more than three or four or five down in the footer, that sort of thing, or have a link to a global page, and the global page can talk about all the different verions and country versions of your website.” But in their webmaster guidelines google recommends: "Consider cross-linking each language version of a page. That way, a French user who lands on the German version of your page can get to the right language version with a single click." I assume for SEO anyway these links have no value, but for user experience it would certainly be better to provide somewhere deeplinks to other language versions. Also the fact that language versions are on different domains and have few external backlinks may increase a bit the risk in our case. I guess in doubt I would prefer to be safe and load deeplinks only upon click same as tripadvisor. Any thoughts/suggestions on best interlinking in our specific case?
International SEO | | lcourse0 -
An International SEO Conundrum
Hello all, I'm looking for opinions on this. Imagine there is a website example.com in English and the company 'Example' wanted to translate some of the pages (not not all) in to Russian. So they set up example.com/ru and translate the key pages into Russian. But half of the pages on.com/ru are left in English and there are no plans to translate them. How would you handle the pages in Engish on .com/ru? My thoughts are that they should: Canonicalise to the same versions on .com, and... Remove RU hreflang tags from the pages on .com/ru which are in English Otherwise, users searching in English with Russian browser settings could land on a page in English but then navigate to a translated page in Russian (+the menu navigation items will be in Russian) = bad UX. Not to mention they would be telling Google a page is in Russain but Google would be crawling English. So IMO, the best option is to use canonicals for this so that the .com version of the page is indexed. Then when a user lands after searching in English they will always be served English pages within that session. If English speakers/searchers land on the .com/ru page that would lead to a website half in one lang and half in another. I'm aware that Google recommends not using rel="canonical" across country or language versions of your site, but I believe they are making that recommendation based on an assumption that all pages are going to be translated to another language. In this case, there is no intention to do that, ever. Thanks for your thoughts and opinions. Cheers, Gill.
International SEO | | Cannetastic0 -
Geo-Targeting separate TLD's where both are .com domains
Hi I have a client who owns two separate TLDs for the same brand (for the sake of this post, we'll call the two sites www.site-a.com and www.site-b.com). For site www.site-a.com the website has been around for a while and is their primary site for their US operations which is their heartland, is well established in the SERPS and is where they make most of their money. As they looked to expand to the UK, they then created www.site-b.com and added the UK as a subfolder (so www.site-b.com/uk) and geo-targeted it towards the UK in Webmaster tools . The site has recently launched but they now find that, when a customer searches for their brand in the UK, they find www.site-a.com in position 1 (which, given it's tailored for a primary US audience, has a significantly lower conversion rate for UK traffic) and www.site-b.com in position 2. However, the client doesn't want to specifically geo target www.site-a.com to the USA as they feel it might affect where they appear for other international markets aside from the UK. So the question is, how can they, with the existing infrastructure, help remove www.site-a.com from the UK SERPs without adversely affecting their rank elsewhere? Hope this makes sense and thanks in advance for your help. James
International SEO | | jimmygs19820 -
Targeting International Markets on the Web
Hello Moz community, I have a popular news website that we are looking to target multiple countries (all English first). So I know (1) a hosting provided (ip address) in that country and (2) a target extension (.co.uk) will help us. Am I missing anything else that can help when targeting international markets? What I'm struggling with is the duplicate content. I can't copy the content over to the extension because of the bad practice of duplicate content. Is it possible to have the same content on both websites and let Google know that it lives at the .com extension? If so, would those websites containing duplicate content still rank? And we would want to target different languages later (for example Spanish). This would be different content because it is in a different language, correct? Thanks for your help Moz community! Cole
International SEO | | ColeLusby0 -
Huge increase in US direct visits to a UK site, why?
Hi all, My UK website usually gets around 10,000 direct (Direct in Analytics) visits per month however for August this has shot up to 24,000! However the majority of these direct visits seem to be coming from the US and as a result the bounce rate is through the roof, 84%! Why would my UK based site suddenly be receiving huge amounts of US visits? Any ideas?
International SEO | | MarkHincks0 -
Impact of Japanese .jp site duplicate content?
Our main website is at http://www.traxnyc.com and we just launched a Japanese version of the site at http://www.traxnyc.jp domain. However all the images used on the .jp site are linked from the .com site. Would this hurt me in Google at all for hotlinking images? Also there is quite a bit of duplicate content on the .jp site at the moment: only a few things have been translated to Japanese and for the most part the layouts and words are exactly the same (in English). Would this hurt my Google rankings in the US at all? Thanks for all your help.
International SEO | | DiamondJewelryEmpire0 -
Subdomains vs ccTLD in International SEO
I'm interested to see if anyone has any additional thoughts or recent experience on subdomains vs ccTLD for International SEO. An article I found on this site is from March 2011, so just wanted to check if this is still relevant? http://www.seomoz.org/ugc/folders-vs-subdomains-vs-cctld-in-international-seo-an-overview
International SEO | | edwardlewis0