Canonical issue in open site explorer
-
When I look at my back links in OSE, I see two landing pages on my site that are really the same page. www.mysite.com/ and www.mysite.com/(affiliate code here)
These show different inbound link characteristics and page authority.
The page in question has a rel=canonical tag.
Am I doing something wrong?
-
Thank you. I was concerned I might have split my juice between two versions.
"OSE will also calculate redirected metrics into calculating scores such as MozRank and Domain Authority, and I believe there are plans (if they haven't been implemented already) of including canonical metrics into these calculations."
This is interesting. If I understand this correctly, this tells me that when you have inbound links with affiliate codes and such attached to the URL that MozRank is not calculated correctly; it is split between two "versions" of the same page.
-
Hi Eugene - It sounds like you are doing things right.
Open Site Explorer diplays Link Metrics for every single page in it's index as if it is independent - even if it 301 redirects or points a canonical link towards another page.
For example we can see that the inbound link metrics for the SEOmoz.org/blog differ from the metrics for SEOmoz.org/blog/ (note the extra backslash).
One advantage of this method is that we can see if our external links are pointing to the right page, and correct them if necessary. At this time, OSE will notify you if the URL you are checking 301 redirects to another page, but doesn't tell you if it has a canonical. OSE will also calculate redirected metrics into calculating scores such as MozRank and Domain Authority, and I believe there are plans (if they haven't been implemented already) of including canonical metrics into these calculations.
But back to you - what you really need is a way to make sure you've implemented your canonical tags correctly. You can check the duplicate title/duplicate content and the canonical reports in the SEOmoz PRO platform. You can also use the MozBar to check canonical tags, or a tool like URI valet to make sure your canonical tags are pointed to the right URL.
This is important because you want to avoid canonicalization errors that can lead to a loss of rankings and search engine visibility. That said, from your brief description, it sounds like you're doing everything right.
-
I do have access to the page. I am slightly confused by your reply. I was thinking that this was a reporting issue with the OSE. I shouldn't need to use a 301 when a
rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com" />
is in the header
-
I would contact my server administrator to have them force your 301, and pages www.example.com/(client code)
If that you dont get support from, I will have my Hosting administrator help you further with this question. Cause if you dont have access to the Default home page, all your main pages utilize the code for, it will be over looked.
Let me know
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Solving URL Too Long Issues
Moz.com is reporting that many URL's are to long, these particularly affect Product URL's where the URL is typically https://www.domainname.com/collections/category-name/products/product-name, (You guessed it we're using Shopify). However, we use Canonicals that ignore all most of the URL and are just structured https://www.domainname.com/product-name, so Google should be reading the Canonical and not the long-winded version. However, Moz cannot seem to spot this... does anyone else have this problem and how to solve so that we can satisfy the Moz.com crawl engine?
Moz Pro | | Tildenet0 -
Syntax for canonical tag for a default page in a sub directory (not subdomain) of a web site?
I'm getting two "no canonical tag" errors for the default page of a sub-directory default page (www and root) - again NOT a subdomain. Since the page is not the root of its own site, I tagged it as -- I have tried without the default.asp, but the error remains. Been doing this for 24 years and don't remember running across this before.
Moz Pro | | dcmike0 -
How do I see all links to my site in Web Explore?
It appears that the Web Explore looks for exact matches to a page. I'd like to see all matches to any page. Will regular expressions work?
Moz Pro | | Leverage_Marketing0 -
Opensite explorer not showing facebook/twitter other sites
hello i have had my site live and indexing for 3 months however open site explorer doesn't show the facebook or twitter linkback from my corporate sites. any ideas why this would not show in opesite? it doesn't show in google WMT either. my site: http://cheap-airport-taxis.com/
Moz Pro | | smashseo0 -
Open Site Explorer.. Bit of a let down?
Hi, not too sure if this is a discussion or rant!? I’ve been following SEOMoz for a couple of years now. Testing their tools, reading their blogs, sharing their content, and watching the whiteboard Friday videos (massive thumbs up to that one!). They are at the top of the game, no argument there. Although I should have done so much earlier, I have eventually signed up to the pro version and am about to migrate all my clients over. But there is one major caveat which I’m not sure should exist.. Open Site Explorer. Don’t get me wrong, OSE provides invaluable metrics, some that no other ‘crawler’ provides, but it is far from perfect, there are things that we SEO’s need, and are hoping to get! Some feature SEOMoz could add; Ability to view a chart of ‘link types’ (i.e. blog post, social media, Press Release etc..) – Linkdex do this! Utilise a ‘fresh‘ backlink index as Majestic SEO do. ( we do use majestic alongside SEOMoz) Crawl more frequently – enough said! Index all ‘not so good’ backlinks – this will help identify what backlinks AREN’T helping. I realise this is a lot easier said than done, and I’m sure SEOMoz are working on solutions.. just can’t wait till they launch! What do you think? IS OSE more than it’s cracked up to be? Could it be improved? Let me know 🙂 Lee
Moz Pro | | Webpresence0 -
Yahoo Site Explorer died. Does DA and PA Seomoz parameters have all it takes to replace YSE?
We're trying to simplify our link analysis job when acquiring a new external link. We're wondering to know if Domain Authority Seomoz parameter is all what we need to take a decision. Does DA Seomoz parameter takes into consideration 'domain age', 'alexa ranking', 'dmoz links', indexed pages on google', and 'inbound links vs outbound links'?
Moz Pro | | seoneogames1 -
Why is Open site Explorer showing: No Data Available for this URL
Hi there, Im having a few problems getting my site www.incarmotorfactors.co.uk up and running on SEOMoz and im not sure what im doing wrong.Firstly seomoz shows 2 links for my site... Which is wrong. Google shows alot more. However the most noticable problem so far is Opensite explorer. When i type in the web address it shows "No Data Available for this URL" The site is more then a year old and has a few links, can anybody tell me what the problem may be?
Moz Pro | | Ev840 -
SEOMoz site crawlers created an issue for our servers
I have set up a number of campaigns with your pro tool. Unfortunately we have 7 sites on our server and our IT dept have said that we had an issue when your site crawlers visited for several sites at the same time - is there any way that I can retain the campaigns but have the sites crawled on request rather than automatically?
Moz Pro | | StephenALee0