Why are inbound links not showing up?
-
I'm new to SEOmoz but have a question regarding inbound links that I don't see posted in the forum.
In order to become more familiar with SEOmoz tools, I've been checking out sites that friends and family members have created as practice. Things have been going really smooth until I came across a 2+ year old page that should have included an inbound link from wsj.com but said link is not appearing in OSE for this page.
Background: A friend of mine has a (basically) defunct blog that had a pretty well trafficked posting in 2009. However, when I use OSE to check out both the domain and page inbound links, I don't see the aforementioned inbound link from wsj.com.
Why is that? Or, it's insanely late - am I missing something?
Friend's blog posting:
http://bcclist.com/2009/04/21/craigslist-killer-megan-philipcom-removed/
WSJ posting with a link to my friend's blog (4th paragraph...anchor text = "taken down"):
http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2009/04/21/who-is-megan-mcallister/
No rush. Again, I'm doing this as practice and being new to the site, I figure I'm overlooking something. Any feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
-
Should I suggest my friend build a few links on his blog to the WSJ posting in question?
No. If he did then it becomes more of a link exchange which is not the desired outcome.
Or, does building links to the page mean that he needs to create a blog elsewhere, make content relevant to Megan McAllister, and build links to the WSJ posting?
Most of the time you want all the links you build to be pointed at your site. An undiscovered link from the WSJ is a reason for an exception. You don't want to build a new blog for this purpose as that would be manipulative. Instead, locate other sites which may be interested in this article and let them know about it so they may link to it.
One final note. Performing these steps will help the SEOmoz crawler locate the article, but Google already has the page indexed. If you search Google.com for "who is megan mcallister" you will notice the page is the second result.
-
That (act like a web crawler and see if you can get to the link) is great advice. Thank you!
I may need to apologize in advance for this question but...
- Should I suggest my friend build a few links on his blog to the WSJ posting in question?
- Or, does building links to the page mean that he needs to create a blog elsewhere, make content relevant to Megan McAllister, and build links to the WSJ posting?
-
Hi ICM,
Your question is quite logical. There are two possibilities:
1. (Less Likely) There is an issue with the Linkscape Index where it missed this record. You can submit this example to help@seomoz.org and request the issue be investigated.
2. (More Likely) The link is buried too deep. The WSJ is an outstanding site from which to earn a link. Even the top ranked sites have a limit to how deep you can travel before running out of juice. There are links on DMOZ, for example, which are not indexed because they are simply buried too deep.
Question for you - If you go to the main page wsj.com, how many clicks would it take you to open the page? Don't use the site's search function, but instead move through the site the way a web crawler would, by clicking links.
From the home page I went to the blog page. From there I am stuck. I tried the sitemap but could not locate a link to the archives. There is a section at the bottom of the blog page titled WSJ Blog Archive but I was unable to locate any helpful link. There is an alphabetical index on the page and I tried "W" for the article title as well as "M" for Megan McAllister. Neither were helpful.
I am not a savvy user of the WSJ site so perhaps I am missing something. Otherwise it is possible the archive section from 2009 is not reachable via links in which case that would be the problem. If that is the case, you can help resolve the issue by building links to the page which could then be discovered on a future crawl.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How Long Do The Link Tracking Lists Take To Update?
Hi, How long do the link tracking lists take to update? It's been over a week and each is still showing a red cross. The reason I created it was because I migrated to a new domain name and Moz is still showing the backlinks on the old property and not the new (the domain swap happened in December 2020). I can see that Ahrefs has picked up all of the links - Both new and redirected - but Moz has not. When will this be reflected in Moz as it has already been over three months? Is there a reason for the above questions? I appreciate any response here. 🙂
Moz Pro | | Smarter_Finances3 -
Rel=canonical "redirects" to double links
Our devs have set up rel=canonical on our website. First they used relative links href="/dir1/dir2/dir3" for the page http://www.mysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3/?detail1=1?detail2=2 meaning that it will redirect to http://www.mysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3, but no luck, the MOZ dashboard showed the tag value to be http://www.mysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3/dir1/dir2/dir3, then we have decided to rewrite the code, and now the canonical to http://wwwmysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3/?detail1=1?detail2=2 looks like href="http://www.mysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3/" but the tag on MOZ looks like http://www.mysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3http://www.mysite.com/dir1/dir2/dir3. So what is the problem? I really got a problem or MOZ does? The code on website looks exactly like href="http://www.aaa.com/en/bbb/ccc/vvv/nnn/" rel="canonical" /> for the page http://www.aaa.com/en/bbb/ccc/vvv/nnn/
Moz Pro | | apartmentGin0 -
SEOmoz Not Picking Up Links
I'm finding that SEOmoz often doesn't pick up on many of the links my client's websites are attaining. The links do appear in search engine and often have a high domain authority (often PR links, which I why I follow up to see if they've been picked up). I do tend to see many of the links appear in webmaster tools, so it's a little frustrating that they don't appear, even after months of pages being live. Thoughts?
Moz Pro | | SebastianDyer0 -
Magento, SEOMOZ Toolbar not showing my HTML text, just shows CData code...
When I use the Mozbar on my homepage http://bootsjeansandleathers.com it just shows: // where it should show the HTML text of the page....anyone any ideas? Does this mean Google doesn't read my HTML text on the page!? Many thanks! mozbar.png
Moz Pro | | ebowdublin0 -
Tool bar - Analyse page - Link data
Hi all, Need a little help to understand this link information, if you go to our toolbar it show 1.6 million links on 224 root domains. when you analyse the page using the Tool bar. the link data show the page as having over 3000 internal links but when you go page attributes it shows a more complementary 92 page links we have a menu to all our pages and I am wondering if this is being registered in its entirety
Moz Pro | | LocksOnline0 -
No data showing in SiteExplorer
For this site: www.cooperator.biz/ I see no backlinks in SEO Moz Open SiteExplorer but Majestic SEO is showing 13 unique domains linking to it. I regularly encounter zero data for sites that I know have backlinks, why is this? If it's a problem with crawling them, why would I continue to use SEO Moz when other SEO services are showing me links? Kind regards, Rich
Moz Pro | | Boogaloodoood0 -
Difference between Webmaster and SEOMoz back-link stats?
Hi there, I just noticed that there are differences between the links to my site showing on my Google Webmaster account and what is showing on my link analysis on SEOMoz. Has anyone noticed this? In webmaster I am showing 857 links to my site from 92 different domains. In SEOMoz I am showing 816 links to my site from 53 total linking root domains and only 39 followed domains? Does anyone know why this there is a difference? Are the links showing in Webmaster all indexed and followed links? Thanks in advance 🙂 Karl
Moz Pro | | onlineexpression0 -
How do I get a list of my non-followed links
Our site has a lot of non-followed links showing up on the latest SEOMoz Competitive Link Analysis update and I would like to know how to get a list of the sites that aresettin no-follow.
Moz Pro | | oznappies0