Merged websites issue
-
Hi
Before my time, company big.com took over company small.com.
They decided to replicate big.com web pages onto small.com - so both websites have identical pages and copy, just different domains.
Within the small.com sitmap.xml they list only big.com urls.
They are also using big.com google analytics tracking code on small.com.
I have no idea what happened to the original content on small.com or if they put 301 redirects on.
I am thinking: do a 301 redirect on small domain to big domain. A) Agree?
Small domain is likely to have valuable historic inbound links which are now going to 404 pages.
After I do the 301 should these then appear in big.com SEOMoz campaign and on big.com webmaster tool for me to fix? B) Views?
Or should I get up webmaster tool on small.com and fix that first? C) Views?
Many thanks in advance guys, sorry its a long statement!
Richard
-
Hi Ben & Robert
Many thanks again.
I have now found at least two more websites the big company has done this on ie ditched the original small company web pages and content for a copy of the Big company web pages content.
In each case the small company sitemap.xml lists the big company pages BUT many of those are wrong URLS.
I think I'll take my time on this....
Cheers
Richard
-
Richard,
Remember, first I said wait.
Look at what Ben says here. He is correct (except on domain 301). You have enough weight that you do want to move it if at all possible. If it is a thousand pages, I would at least pick my strongest and get them 301'd.
Be methodical.
Use the correct urls from small to go to large.
Homepage to homepage will only help with homepage.You cannot do domain to domain, even in .htaccess. Here is a source: http://www.seomoz.org/learn-seo/redirection
You have to direct url to url. If you were simply setting the www. to non, etc. yes that can be done.
Hope it helps you out,
-
I would say that redirecting has value with that amount of domain authority. A redirect would make use of the weight acquired, switching it off would lose all of this completely.
If you are worried about the amount of work involved in matching old to new URL then you always have the option to redirect to homepage. This will still pass on the weight to the site although not as effectively.
How many URLs are we talking about?
Also I'm pretty sure you can do a domain replacement via .htaccess without having to do individual 301's - can someone correct me if this isn't the case?
-
Hi Robert, many thanks for taking the time to write a reply (and to Ben to)
Re your points, I have only just started with BIG company.
Your 'before and after' is how I assume it was. They must have done then change about 7 months ago.
I tired Archive.org but nothing much indexed and has redirects on it. Both websites had a legal notice overlay appear that had to be accepted before seeing the content.
On small.com the sitemap.xml is listing all the big URLs, its using 0.9.
OSE has approx 40 inbound links from sites with 20-30 page authority and 30-40 domain authority.
I will try Xenu link sleuth as you mention (I'll dig out my old Windows PC first!)
I suspect as you mentioned in the caveat, might be better to just turn off small!
Many thanks again
Richard
-
Richard,
One question is how long ago was before your time?????
That will be a factor in all of this. Next, Advice:
Do nothing first. Sit for a moment and develop a Plan. Find out where you are on the map before you take off to another direction. Know the variables.
So that we may understand:
Before you had and you hadSitesmall.com/pg1 SITEBIG.com/pgA
Sitesmall.com/pg2 SITEBIG.com/pgB
Sitesmall.com/pg3 SITEBIG.com/płC up until highly successful BIG bought up and comer small.
Each site had separate sitemap, content, urls, GA tracking code.
Then you had:
Sitesmall.com/pgA SITEBIG.com/pgA
Sitesmall.com/pgB SITEBIG.com/pgB
Sitesmall.com/pgC SITEBIG.com/pgC and this was simply because someone changed all on Sitesmall to look and feel identical to SITEBIG?
I cannot understand how you have a SITEBIG.com sitemap for Sitesmall with BIG urls? Are you simply saying the domain is different but url sub directories are the same on sitemap? Are they following 0.9 from Sitemaps.org? Otherwise I cannot see how this is constructed. (Look at Sitemaps info in GWMT)
As to GA code being the same, have you looked at analytics on both and does it make any sense? Have you looked for occurrence of GA code in other places (head and body, etc.) on both sites?
FIRST THE BIG CAVEAT: you may save yourself a ton of work, trouble, and time... by turning off sitesmall.com and going to work on SITEBIG.com....... get it SEO perfect using all the time this will take.
On the historic, I would go to archive.org and see what is there using wayback machine. Look at what was there - when. So if the old site was six months ago, you at least know where you are reaching to and can look at old urls.
On the, did they 301? I would first for ease of looking put current homepage url in OSE and see if it says anything about redirecting. Then I would run the whole thing through Xenu link sleuth to see what is/ is not there. So Sitesmall.com then SITEBIG.com run both and see what you will see. Lot of answers there. Response codes, etc. I do not think you will find 301's as the way they changed the urls would not seem to make sense for same.
You can look to see if they used 301's in the .htaccess file, but I do not believe you will find them.
Once I knew what I was dealing with only then would I develop a plan.
Assuming SiteSmall had some Auth, PR, links, etc. and some of that still existed, I would begin the redirect plan. In the SEOmoz search bar I would place the query How to use 301 redirect? You will find a wealth of information. There are also numerous sites with code laid out, etc. in a simple search query online.
Note, I would not be using 301 of current to current as that is without value. You have to try and reconstruct old to new. Real Sitesmall.com to SITEBIG.com as it is now. Remember this is not a .com to .com redirect as that does not work. 301's are url to url. You need to know what the url was with the juice and use it.
For GA code, I would definitely change it prior to 301 if you can get it to old that might help.
This is the way to clean up the site duplication, capture a bit of juice, and possibly correct a mistake.
Hopefully, given there are some unanswered questions from what you stated, this is still helpful.
For your A. As per above.
B. Read above
C. Read above
Best
-
Hi Richard,
My thoughts would initially be:
a) yes a 301 redirect is probably the best way to avoid the duplicated pages and pass the weight on
b) if you have 301 redirected them they won't be 404 errors, the weight of the previous URLs will be passed on (although there is a slight decay factor involved with redirects so you won't get 100% of the weight)
c) I can't see how there will be too many errors as long as you 301 small.com to big.com sitewide. If anything big.com should get a boost from any links that the small.com pages had. Also this should help clear up the duplicate content issues.
Hope that helps,
Ben
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
New Website & DA Score
We are preparing to build a new website for a branch of our company. According to Neil Patel (whom I highly respect) our DA should come in around 30 (categorizing us as a startup, see chart below). So I ask: Why do our current sites DA Score below 30? (20 & 29 respectively) Our sites were redesigned in 2013 and are responsive, pass the Google Mobile Friendly test and I've improved load speed by over 25% by compressing images. I have used Moz as guidance for 10 months on both 7 + yo sites, HP.com is 14 yo, our pages score in the high 90's and I have disavowed bad backlinks for 6 months (now only every other month). I thought we would be in or close to the 50 range by 2017 after a solid year of improvements, but I don't see that happening. Our scores go up a point or two, then back down, we have floundered 2 points either way for 10 months. Most important question: What do I do now to raise our DA? Lastly, my plan is to take all the lessons learned from the past years and apply it to the new site, measure the success and then redesign the other two sites in accordance to the new model. But that may be a year away. KJr www.heritageprinting.com www.heritageprintingcharlotte.com | DA | Rating |
Moz Pro | | KevnJr
| 1-10 | Poor – Your site is young and weak. You have a lot of growing to do. |
| 11-20 | Decent. Your site isn’t stellar, but you’re doing better. It would be good to grow. |
| 21-30 | Fair. Your site shows signs of SEO, but there are many things you can and should do to improve. |
| 31-40 | Competitive. A lot of startups find themselves in this DA range. It’s not bad, and you’re beginning to get close to the sweet spot. |
| 41-50 | Good. Now, you’re getting somewhere. This is a nice place to be, and many good e-commerce sites find themselves squarely in this category. |
| 51-60 | Strong. As you swing out of the lower half of the scale, you’re beginning to get much healthier. This is a good place to be. |
| 61-70 | Excellent. A DA at this level represents a great site with a lot of recognition, a lot of link backs, and a considerable authority in its niche. Many .edus are in this space. |
| 71-80 | Outstanding. You’re dominating in the SERPs and owning your niche. Quick Sprout is a 73. |
| 81-90 | Very outstanding. You’re in the upper echelons of authority. You can consider yourself to have arrived. |
| 91-100 | Rare. These sites are household names — Wikipedia, Facebook, New York Times, etc. Your site will probably never attain this level. Only a miniscule fraction of a percentage of sites on the Internet ever get this high. | https://www.quicksprout.com/2014/04/09/how-to-score-your-websites-seo-in-10-minutes-or-less/0 -
Crawl Diagnostics 2261 Issues with Our Blog
I just recently signed up for MOZ, so much information. I've done the walk through and will continue learning how to us the tools. But I need your help. Our first moz crawl indicated 2261 issues (447 404's, 803 duplicate content, 11 502's, etc). I've reviewed all of the crawls issues and they are linked to our Yahoo hosted WordPress blog. Our blog is over 9 years old. The only issue that I'm able to find is our categories are not set up correctly. I've searched for WordPress assistance on this topic and cant find any issues with our current category set up. Every category link that I click returns Nothing Found Apologies, but no results were found for the requested archive. Perhaps searching will help find a related post. http://site.labellaflorachildrensboutique.com/blog/ Any assistance is greatly appreciated.
Moz Pro | | Girlstuff0 -
Whether or not to remove a link from a website with high spam score on Open Site Explorer
Hello Moz! I just subscribed for your Moz Pro program. Amazing stuff! On open site explorer, I found a number of links to my site from a page called with a very high page authority and high domain authority, but also a high spam score (8 or 9, one with a 10). I say multiple spam scores, because it's strange, there are what appears variations of the same url, and each one is considered a link. For instance, there's an abc.linkstomysite.com and xyz.linktomysite.com, and 123.linktomysite.com... there are about 15 of these (all with the spam scores mentioned above)! This must have been some old SEO work done I payed for back in the prehistoric SEO days. However, my fear is the following: Removing these links, and then losing some potentially strong link juice. I don't have many high DA or PA links to my site, and these are some major ones. The domain in question "linktomysite.com", when entered into OSE, only has a spam score of 4, and it has a domain authority of 45 and page authority of 37. My site has a spam score of 2 and no messages from google regarding a penalty, but an overall reduction in google traffic over the years (just keeps slowly dropping... as if a weight is pulling me down?) What do you think, should I leave, or remove? The linkstomysite page is just a LONG page full of links, with short descriptions, nothing of value, but with a an old domain age (relatively). Most important for me is keeping at least some ranking/visibility, while I personally work on building quality links and helpful content. thanks!
Moz Pro | | DavidC.0 -
Website disappeared from Google :(
Dear all, I've a 5 years old website, which was in top rank for a particular keyword. It's been a couple of months that the site suddenly disappeared from Google.com.au search. However, the site is number one on Bing and Yahoo.
Moz Pro | | jarrodb
I've tried almost everything in my limited knowledge but it doesn't seem to come back. Can you please suggest if something can be done. Google.com.au
website: http://partysuppliesnow.com.au/
keyword: "party supplies" Your help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks in advance 🙂
Jarrod0 -
Can you change the websites in your PRO Dashboard?
Hello, I set a client's website in one of my 5 campaigns in my Pro Dashboard. But my client changed his domain. I don't see an option to change the domain server in the Campaign settings. Is it possible?
Moz Pro | | Eblan0 -
Issue with Data Updates on Campaign
I'm reviewing a campaign I am running for a client, the Keywords data has not updated yet even though it's supposed to update every monday. The competitive analysis shows a date of August 14, which is odd becuase I'm on a trial account?
Moz Pro | | amerihope0 -
The mozrank of my website turn to zero,why?
Hi, I don't know why the mozrank of my website turn to zero suddenly.After that night,the mozrank is 0 for months and never change. What happen? I hope can find the answer here. My website is goodbuycn
Moz Pro | | buycn0