Penguin or paid link penalty, or both?
-
Hello,
I have a site, macpokeronline.com, that has seen dramatic decrease in visitors in the last few months, it has went down from 800 per day to 200 per day. It is a pretty complex situation.
The site owner purchased paid links from reputable mac sites for years (they were more of followed advertisements, but were only there for SEO Purposes), now that i'm going through the link profligate ins OSE, I can see that a majority of their links come from these sites.
There is also a branding issue, there are almost 15,000 links with the anchor text of "macpokeronline.com" These are obviously branded links, I don't know the best way to deal with them (though the majority are coming from the paid link sites)
We have just sent the request in to remove the paid links from the sites, and i'm guessing since he is paying over $1000 a month for the links, they will be removed quickly.
The site has been receiving significantly less traffic since penguin (apr 24-25)
We received a message on July 19th which was the generic unnatural link warning, saying that once we remove links make a reconsideration request. Then on July 23rd, we received another message that says they are taking a "very targeted action on the unnatural links instead of your site as a whole" which I have never seen before.
This damage was done before I was hired by this client, I just want to get his traffic back up so I can help him even further, I want to know more about the steps I should take.
1. I will definitely remove the paid ads
What else should I do,
thanks
Zach
-
Good stuff, let me know how you get on.
Have you done any analysis on which anchors are causing the problems? That is, which keywords has the site lost traffic for?
If you do a compare between the two weeks before and the two weeks after the penalty and look at the organic keywords in traffic sources you can see the specific ones that have dropped in traffic. This will give you more input into which anchor texts are problematic so you can dig further into the link profile.
Anyhow, do let us know how you get on.
Cheers
Marcus
-
Just as an update,
I turned the paid links off, they will be removed eventually (contract issues), but they are at least nofollowed right now, sot they are out of the SEO way.
-
If the client has a generally healthy link profile, with just some crap, then removing that will see you bounce back. This really becomes problematic when a large percentage (if not all) of the link profile is just pure dirge and then... it can be time to start over.
Keep us posted, would love to hear about it when you get this site to bounce back and updating this ticket would make it a better resource for all.
All the best
Marcus
-
Thank you for your response. My client has invested a lot of time and money into this site and understands that we have to fix the penalties before we can go acquire more links etc..
I got entered into this mess post penguin, and my all of my clients besides him were not penalized so this is kind of new territory for me. Overall, besides these paid links, his site is pretty healty link wise, and I think once these are removed he will be up and running in no time.
thanks again
Zach
-
Thank you for the response. I actually was abbreviating OSE, meaning open site explorer. I'm currently cleaning up the site itself in test mode, then making it live afterwards. I am also working on the links.
-
Hey Zach
The penalty issues in 2012 have become a nightmare to deal with in some ways as the messages from Google are unclear and there are just so many potential issues. So, to deal with it properly we have to diagnose what the issues are and then make sure that we show what we have done that was wrong and that we have made efforts to have it removed.
Looking at your case from like 10,000 feet it we can discern the following.
1. you lost traffic on the 24th of April so you were seemingly hit by penguin. We know penguin is going after certain types of links so a quick look at your link profile in open site explorer shows us that the most popular keyword used by a site to link to you is 'poker on line' and not a branded term as would be expected - this is used by 74 sites.
You also have 15,000 links with the URL as the anchor so a branded and safe anchor, but, these 15,000 links come from only 19 sites so you have another penguin favourite in masses of footer links.
These two points represent a large chunk of your links so cleaning these up may see you bounce back if this is purely an algorithmic penalty.
2. July 19th Message - if this is the standard message it would indicate you also have a manual penalty as well now and need to take further action. This is now more difficult as you need to ensure your link profile is squeaky clean as it will be reviewed by a member of the web spam team.
3. This further email lets you know that google are distrusting some links to your site rather than your site as a whole. Quite how this fits into your penguin and manual penalty situation is unclear but I would say that the action points you need to take for points 1 & 2 will cover this anyway.
Action Points
A. Contact the 74 sites and where they are not spammy links ask them to change the anchor on these links to something branded.
B. Contact the 19 sites with the sitewide footer links and have them removed OR no followed. If they are paid, then just get rid of them.
C. Review the entire link profile and contact the sites to have any dodgy links removed. You would do well to keep a spreadsheet and date the requests and if you do three attempts log the dates. If you want to go further, you can have a legal letter drafted and send it to the site owners and again detail this in your spreadsheet.
Reconsideration Request
Once you have cleaned up everything as best as possible you can then submit a reconsideration request. You will want to link to your spreadsheet and detail everything you have done to remove the dodgy links. Remember you seemingly have a penguin penalty and a manual penalty so you will want to ensure you have done a thorough job that will solve the anchor and footer links problem and resolve any problems that human eyes will spot on a review.
--
Best of luck, your site is in a hole and has picked up every link penalty going so... as the old song says, things can only get better! I would certainly indicate to your client just how bad the situation is and that your job, before you can do any 'SEO' and improve his traffic, is to remove his problems.
All the best
Marcus -
Zach this is something I have already dealt with...
- OSE will never show you all the links I would highly recommend you using Open Site Explorer as it will give you the detail link of back links...
- Using Network of site is a BIG no... Try to remove as many links as possible and submit the reconsideration request to Google.
- Build quality links to the website... as many as possible
- I have witnessed the limited penalty due to unnatural links because you are overlooking the links that are not shown in OSE.
Try the suggestions above and you will be get some traffic back and this is the time when you should submit your reconsideration request again!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
INTERNAL LINKS strategy on our website
Hi Moz-ers, Currently doing an audit of our website. I have two questions on links. How can I see the current state of my internal links? Also, how can I improve our internal links on the website? what is a good framework to follow what should I avoid Thanks, looking forward to learning more on Moz!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Eric_S
Eric0 -
Should I remove all vendor links (link farm concerns)?
I have a web site that has been around for a long time. The industry we serve includes many, many small vendors and - back in the day - we decided to allow those vendors to submit their details, including a link to their own web site, for inclusion on our pages. These vendor listings were presented in location (state) pages as well as more granular pages within our industry (we called them "topics). I don't think it's important any more but 100% of the vendors listed were submitted by the vendors themselves, rather than us "hunting down" links for inclusion or automating this in any way. Some of the vendors (I'd guess maybe 10-15%) link back to us but many of these sites are mom-and-pop sites and would have extremely low authority. Today the list of vendors is in the thousands (US only). But the database is old and not maintained in any meaningful way. We have many broken links and I believe, rightly or wrongly, we are considered a link farm by the search engines. The pages on which these vendors are listed use dynamic URLs of the form: \vendors<state>-<topic>. The combination of states and topics means we have hundreds of these pages and they thus form a significant percentage of our pages. And they are garbage 🙂 So, not good.</topic></state> We understand that this model is broken. Our plan is to simply remove these pages (with the list of vendors) from our site. That's a simple fix but I want to be sure we're not doing anything wring here, from an SEO perspective. Is this as simple as that - just removing these page? How much effort should I put into redirecting (301) these removed URLs? For example, I could spend effort making sure that \vendors\California- <topic>(and for all states) goes to a general "topic" page (which still has relevance, but won't have any vendors listed)</topic> I know there is no distinct answer to this, but what expectation should I have about the impact of removing these pages? Would the removal of a large percentage of garbage pages (leaving much better content) be expected to be a major factor in SEO? Anyway, before I go down this path I thought I'd check here in case I miss something. Thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | MarkWill0 -
My Website Has a Google Penalty, But I Can't Disavow Links
I have a client who has definitely been penalized, rankings dropped for all keywords and hundreds of malicious backlinks when checked with WebMeUp....However, when I run the backlink portfolio on Moz, or any other tool, they don't appear anyone, and all the links are dead when I click on the actual URL. That being said, I can't disavow links that don't exist, and they don't show up in Webmaster Tools, but I KNOW this site has been penalized. Also- I noticed this today (attached). Any suggestions? I've never come across this issue before. xT6JNJC.png
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 01023450 -
Are footer links important?
We currently display a list of links in the footer of our site to help boost SEO. They were put in place years ago and in a recent discuss with our UX team they requested we remove them from the site. Do footer links have any value? Or is this an old dated practice that no longer works? If we remove the footer links should we expect to see if have an impact on our SEO traffic?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mivito0 -
Can you recover from "Unnatural links to your site—impacts links" if you remove them or have they already been discounted?
If Google has already discounted the value of the links and my rankings dropped because in the past these links passed value and now they don't. Is there any reason to remove them? If I do remove them, is there a chance of "recovery" or should I just move forward with my 8 month old blogging/content marketing campaign.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Beastrip0 -
Penguin Update Issues.. What would you recommend?
Hi, We've been pretty badly hit by this penguin Update. Site traffic is down 40-50%. We suspect it's for a couple of reasons 1)Google is saying we have duplicate content. e.g. for a given category we will have 4-5 pages of content (products). So it's saying pagenum=2 , pagenum=3 etc are duplicate pages. We've implemented rel=canonical so that pagenum=2 point to the original category e.g. http://mydomain/widgets.aspx We've even specified pagenum as a url parameter that pagniates. Google still hasn't picked up these changes. How long does it take - it's been about a week 2)They've saying we have soft 404 errors. e.g. we remove a category or product we point users to a category or page not found. is it best to block googlebot from crawling these page by specifying in robots.txt. because we really don't care about these categories or product pages. How best to handle? 3)There are some bad directory and crawlers that have crawled our website but have put incorrect links . So we've got like 1700 product not found. I'm sure that's taking up a lot of crawling time. So how do we tell Google not to bother with these link coming from specific sources e.g. ignore all links coming from xxx.com. Any help will be much appreciated as this is Killing our business. Jay
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | ConservationM0 -
My site links have gone from a mega site links to several small links under my SERP results in Google. Any ideas why?
A site I have currently had the mega site links on the SERP results. Recently they have updated the mega links to the smaller 4 inline links under my SERP result. Any idea what happened or how do I correct this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | POSSIBLE0