Rel = Canonical in Blog Posting
-
Hello,
I keep coming back to rel=canonical issues!
I noticed when I "view pagesource" that my drupal blog posting automatically creates
link rel="canonical" href="/sample-blog-title" /< pattern (with the > reversed) in the source code.
I'm getting a lot of Rel=Canonical warnings and double content warnings from Seomoz so I've been trying to insert
link rel="canonical" href="http://www.example.com/blog/my-awesome-blog-post"<
but the page won't retain the code for some reason. I'm entering the code in Plain Text, but saving the document as Full HTML.
Is there a better piece of code I can put in to demonstrate that the original blog page is the original source?
Thanks!
-
Hi Ayaz,
Wow, thanks for the heads up. I've been trying to put the rel=canonical code into the wysisyg editor this whole time.
So where should the code be placed? It's drupal, so should I make a block on the page where the rel=canonical text is supposed to be placed? what's the best way to put the code into the head of the source code?
Thanks?
-
take a look at this, it will help you activate automatic canonical hopefully : http://drupal.org/project/canonical_url
-
Hello again, you are missing the point this code is needed to be added in the head area of your source code, what is your html like
It is not a part of content/text etc.
-
Hi Ayaz,
I'm adding it near the bottom of the text. Does it need to be the first line of text in the blog post?
Thanks!
-
Hello,
are you adding it in the head area of your html right ?
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is having the same title tag on a blog listing page and blog date archives an SEO issue?
Hi there, Can anyone answer whether having duplicate title tags on the blog listing page (e.g.https://blog.companyname.com/) and the blog date archive pages (e.g.https://blog.companyname.com/archive/2017/10) is an issue? If so why is it an issue and what are the best practices of dealing with this? Thanks! John
Technical SEO | | SEOCT1 -
Turn multiple Wordpress posts in to a PDF?
Has anyone any experience with creating a PDF from a bunch of posts from a wordpress site? I want to send some people a PDF of the latest posts within one of my blog categories. There is around 20 I want to pull in to a PDF Any ideas how to do this?
Technical SEO | | JohnPeters0 -
Rel = prev next AND canonical?
I have product category pages that correctly have the prev next but the moz crawl is giving me duplicate content errors. I would not think I also need to have canonical - but do I ?
Technical SEO | | JohnBerger0 -
Canonicals for Real Estate
A real estate site has a landing page for a particular zip code: site.com/zip/99999 On this page, there are links which add arguments to the URL, resulting in structures like this: site.com/zip/99999?maxprice=1000000&maxbeds=3 My question is on using a canonical URL for the pages with arguments. These pages may have lots of duplicate content, so should I direct search engines back to the base URL for the search? (site.com/zip/99999) A side note is that these pages with arguments could have no listings returned (no listings found) or could come back with listings (then it wouldn't be duplicate), but that can change on a day to day basis.
Technical SEO | | SteveCastaneda0 -
Canonical URLs and screen scraping
So a little question here. I was looking into a module to help implement canonical URLs on a certain CMS and I came a cross a snarky comment about relative vs. absolute URLs being used. This person was insistent that relative URLs are fine and absolute URLs are only for people who don't know what they are doing. My question is, if using relative URLs, doesn't it make it easier to have your content scraped? After all, if you do get your content scraped at least it would point back to your site if using absolute URLs, right? Am I missing something or is my thinking OK on this? Any feedback is much appreciated!
Technical SEO | | friendlymachine0 -
REL = cannonical and web app
I started a web app campaign for a site that I recently finished. It had no errors or warnings, but issued rel=cannonical notices for every page on the site. What does this mean?
Technical SEO | | waynekolenchuk0 -
Blank Canonical URL
So my devs have the canonical URL loaded up on pages automatically, and in most cases this gets done correctly. However we ran across a bug that left some of these blank like so: Does anyone know what effect that would have? I am trying to provide a priority for this so I can say "FIX IT NOW" or "Fix it after the other 'FIX IT NOW' type of items". Let me know if you have any ideas. I just want to be sure I am not telling google that all of these pages are like the home page. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | SL_SEM0