Showing Duplicate Content in Webmaster Tools.
-
About 6 weeks ago we completely redid our entire site. The developer put in 302 redirects. We were showing thousands of duplicate meta descriptions and titles. I had the redirects changed to 301. For a few weeks the duplicates slowly went down and now they are right back to where they started. Isn't the point of 301 redirects to show Google that content has permanently been moved? Why is it not picking this up? I knew it would take some time but I am right where I started after a month.
-
The site has been around for over 10 years, and we do not have any noindex. I am starting to see it drop but two months seems like a long time to start seeing changes.
-
It shouldn't be duplicate but for some reason it is. We did entirely new tags and descriptions for everything. It recently dropped a little more so I hope we are moving into the right direction.
-
Yea, 3000 pages will take a while.
The title tags and meta descriptions are all new, does that mean it is different from the old pages? If it is, then it shouldn't be duplicate.
-
Hmm... not totally sure on why only half of your sitemap is being indexed. Likely its a mixture of a number of factors including (but not limited to) site age, NoIndex tags, Google not crawling deep enough, lack of inbound links to deep pages, etc. etc. From what I've seen though, Google will eventually get to all/most of the pages in your sitemap and will eventually swap out your older pages for the 301'd/canonicalized pages that you want showing in the SERPs. Take into account some of the other tips people are sharing here because it may be a mix of our suggestions that will ultimately work for you.
-
We have the sitemap setup ok. For some reason only 50% of my sitemap is being indexed. Any ideas?
-
Okay, in that case I wouldn't suggest manually fetching and submitting 3000 links one by one because that would be a complete waste of time. You could always make sure to update your sitemap and then add that in Optimization>Sitemap or choose to Resubmit the current sitemap (hoping that that will lead to Google re-crawling sooner) and/or fetch some changed pages and submit to index as "URL and all linked pages".
Otherwise I'd say wait... SEO is a long-term job. It's only been 6 weeks since you re-did your site and less than that since you switched everything over from 302s to 301s. Give it some more time and you'll see Google start showing the correct pages and removing any unnecessary duplicate content warnings.
-
There are over 3000 for both meta descriptions and titles so to remove individually could take some time.
The title tag and meta descriptions are all new. We did completely new ones when we redid the site.
We checked and they are all 301's instead of 302s. Originally they were 302s but we changed that. It start dropping steadily and was down to about 1300. But all of a sudden it jumped back up to 3000 some, exactly what I was at before. So I am back to square one.
-
I have over 3000 in both meta descriptions and titles so that might take awhile.
-
I have over 3000 in both meta descriptions and titles so that might take awhile.
-
Hi,
I had a similar problem but i found duplicate title tags through another tool but very similar to Google Webmasters. Although you did 301 redirects to new pages and thats the right thing to do but I believe from that tool, they are still picking up the title tag and meta descriptions from the old pages. I also don't know why. There are two ways to approach this.
-
Go to your old pages and simply remove all the title tags and meta descriptions
-
Go to your new pages and change the title tag and meta description. Optimize it even more than what you used to have on your old pages. Add secondary keywords to the title tag? Change up the meta description with CTA?
Maybe you should also check to make sure that all of them are 301 redirects and not 302. Furthermore, do you have www.yoursite.com and yoursite.com? These are considered two different sites and might be the reason.
Hope this helps.
-
-
Sometimes it can take a while for Google to show things correctly in the SERPs and for a time you may wind up with duplication warnings because there is the older, cached page still showing in the index along with the new page that the older one redirects to. In cases like this I usually jump into webmaster tools, fetch the old page (which I know redirects to the new one) and do a crawl request/submit to index to ensure that Google sees it and indexes it correctly sooner than it may have naturally. Now, I'm not 100% certain that it will fix your issue but I can say that it can potentially help and can't do any harm in this instance.
-
They all render the same page. One goes to the page it is supposed to and the other redirects to the correct page. This is the behavior I want to happen.
-
First you need to check if multiple URLs displayed under each title are working and rendering different pages.
Sometimes redirect may have syntax issues. Post your result to discuss other options.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Http vs. https - duplicate content
Hi I have recently come across a new issue on our site, where https & http titles are showing as duplicate. I read https://moz.com/community/q/duplicate-content-and-http-and-https however, am wondering as https is now a ranking factor, blocked this can't be a good thing? We aren't in a position to roll out https everywhere, so what would be the best thing to do next? I thought about implementing canonicals? Thank you
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BeckyKey0 -
Duplicated content multi language / regional websites
Hi Guys, I know this question has been asked a lot, but I wanted to double check this since I just read a comment of Gianluca Fiorelli (https://moz.com/community/q/can-we-publish-duplicate-content-on-multi-regional-website-blogs) about this topic which made me doubt my research. The case: A Dutch website (.nl) wants a .be version because of conversion reasons. They want to duplicate the Dutch website since they speak Dutch in large parts of both countries. They are willing to implement the following changes: - Href lang tags - Possible a Local Phone number - Possible a Local translation of the menu - Language meta tag (for Bing) Optional they are willing to take the following steps: - Crosslinking every page though a language flag or similar navigation in the header. - Invest in gaining local .be backlinks - Change the server location for both websites so the match there country (Isn't neccessery in my opinion since the ccTLD should make this irrelevant). The content on the website will at least be 95% duplicated. They would like to score with there .be in Belgium and with there .nl in The Netherlands. Are these steps enough to make sure .be gets shown for the quarry’s from Belgium and the .nl for the search quarry’s from the Netherlands? Or would this cause a duplicated content issue resulting in filtering out version? If that’s the case we should use the canonical tag and we can’t rank the .be version of the website. Note: this company is looking for a quick conversion rate win. They won’t invest in rewriting every page and/or blog. The less effort they have to put in this the better (I know it's cursing when talking about SEO). Gaining local backlinks would bring a lot of costs with it for example. I would love to hear from you guys. Best regards, Bob van Biezen
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Bob_van_Biezen0 -
Implications of posting duplicate blog content on external domains?
I've had a few questions around the blog content on our site. Some of our vendors and partners have expressed interest in posting some of that content on their domains. What are the implications if we were to post copies of our blog posts on other domains? Should this be avoided or are there circumstances that this type of program would make sense?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Visier1 -
Penalized for Duplicate Page Content?
I have some high priority notices regarding duplicate page content on my website www.3000doorhangers.com Most of the pages listed here are on our sample pages: http://www.3000doorhangers.com/home/door-hanger-pricing/door-hanger-design-samples/ On the left side of our page you can go through the different categories. Most of the category pages have similar text. We mainly just changed the industry on each page. Is this something that google would penalize us for? Should I go through all the pages and use completely unique text for each page? Any suggestions would be helpful Thanks! Andrea
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JimDirectMailCoach0 -
Duplicate Content Question
My understanding of duplicate content is that if two pages are identical, Google selects one for it's results... I have a client that is literally sharing content real-time with a partner...the page content is identical for both sites, and if you update one page, teh otehr is updated automatically. Obviously this is a clear cut case for canonical link tags, but I'm cuious about something: Both sites seem to show up in search results but for different keywords...I would think one domain would simply win out over the other, but Google seems to show both sites in results. Any idea why? Also, could this duplicate content issue be hurting visibility for both sites? In other words, can I expect a boost in rankings with the canonical tags in place? Or will rankings remain the same?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | AmyLB0 -
Advice needed on how to handle alleged duplicate content and titles
Hi I wonder if anyone can advise on something that's got me scratching my head. The following are examples of urls which are deemed to have duplicate content and title tags. This causes around 8000 errors, which (for the most part) are valid urls because they provide different views on market data. e.g. #1 is the summary, while #2 is 'Holdings and Sector weightings'. #3 is odd because it's crawling the anchored link. I didn't think hashes were crawled? I'd like some advice on how best to handle these, because, really they're just queries against a master url and I'd like to remove the noise around duplicate errors so that I can focus on some other true duplicate url issues we have. Here's some example urls on the same page which are deemed as duplicates. 1) http://markets.ft.com/Research/Markets/Tearsheets/Summary?s=IVPM:LSE http://markets.ft.com/Research/Markets/Tearsheets/Holdings-and-sectors-weighting?s=IVPM:LSE http://markets.ft.com/Research/Markets/Tearsheets/Summary?s=IVPM:LSE&widgets=1 What's the best way to handle this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | SearchPM0 -
Fixing Duplicate Content Errors
SEOMOZ Pro is showing some duplicate content errors and wondered the best way to fix them other than re-writing the content. Should I just remove the pages found or should I set up permanent re-directs through to the home page in case there is any link value or visitors on these duplicate pages? Thanks.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | benners0 -
Two Brands One Site (Duplicate Content Issues)
Say your client has a national product, that's known by different brand names in different parts of the country. Unilever owns a mayonnaise sold East of the Rockies as "Hellmanns" and West of the Rockies as "Best Foods". It's marketed the same way, same slogan, graphics, etc... only the logo/brand is different. The websites are near identical with different logos, especially the interior pages. The Hellmanns version of the site has earned slightly more domain authority. Here is an example recipe page for some "WALDORF SALAD WRAPS by Bobby Flay Recipe" http://www.bestfoods.com/recipe_detail.aspx?RecipeID=12497&version=1 http://www.hellmanns.us/recipe_detail.aspx?RecipeID=12497&version=1 Both recipie pages are identical except for one logo. Neither pages ranks very well, neither has earned any backlinks, etc... Oddly the bestfood version does rank better (even though everything is the same, same backlinks, and hellmanns.us having more authority). If you were advising the client, what would you do. You would ideally like the Hellmann version to rank well for East Coast searches, and the Best Foods version for West Coast searches. So do you: Keep both versions with duplicate content, and focus on earning location relevant links. I.E. Earn Yelp reviews from east coast users for Hellmanns and West Coast users for Best foods? Cross Domain Canonical to give more of the link juice to only one brand so that only one of the pages ranks well for non-branded keywords? (but both sites would still rank for their branded keyworkds). No Index one of the brands so that only one version gets in the index and ranks at all. The other brand wouldn't even rank for it's branded keywords. Assume it's not practical to create unique content for each brand (the obvious answer). Note: I don't work for Unilver, but I have a client in a similar position. I lean towards #2, but the social media firm on the account wants to do #1. (obviously some functionally based bias in both our opinions, but we both just want to do what will work best for client). Any thoughts?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | crvw0