Shopping Carts & Sub Domains
-
I was hoping someone could guide me in making the correct decision regarding integrating my existing domain with a hosted shopping cart.
I have an existing website to promote my bricks and mortar retail operation and am expanding into web retailing. I will be using one of the major hosted shopping carts. What is the best way to join the two components from an SEO perspective? Have the cart as a sub domain of my main site, or move my existing domain name to be hosted by the cart provider and have both components operate under the same general domain?
I have read arguments that putting your cart within a sub domain is not a good idea because any clout of the pre-existing domain will not be shared with the sub domain; that they will be treated as two separate sites.
I have also read that using a sub domain is a good idea being that the content focus of the main domain (marketing and blogs) is different form the focus of the sub domain (product sales), and that the two components would benefit form earning their own rankings undiluted by the other.
And, I have also read that search engines are getting good at being able to deduce that an eCommerce sub domain is legitimate extension of a content intensive main domain, and that they treat the two components as a combined whole.
What is the truth? Which is the better way to go?
Any guidance would be appreciated.
-
I don't want to misrepresent what Mr. Cutts had to say on this subject as I don't yet understand all the nuances of the topic.
Here is the link to Matt's comments: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=_MswMYk05tk
Thanks for patiently entertaining my questioning.
-
The way that search engines have treated subdomains has changed repeatedly over time. The way that they treat a folder has been much more consistent.
Also, in that video did Matt Cutts specifically state that if you divide your site between a subdomain and a root domain will the power of your site be the same as if they were united?
There are a lot of domains on the web that have many subdomains that are owned by various people. The ranking power of subdomain A does not influence the ranking of subdomain B on these sites.
-
I just did some more digging around on the web and stumbled on a video from 10/2012 of Matt Cutts essentially saying to do whatever you want; Sub domain vs sub folder, there is not much difference in the way google treats them now.
I wish I could latch onto a definitive position. I don't want to shoot myself in the foot!
I will still research the cart pointed to a sub-folder scenario as you guys recommend.
-
pointing a folder would involve some DNS changes (to the CNAME record) - i think.
You would be best asking BC - it would be a similar process to pointing a subdomain to BC.
If you host a solution you are not always stuck in time, for example I use things like WooCommerce which is always being updated with new features and gives you great controls.
And just to clarify I am not saying that you cannot do the things YOU may want to do, but there are things that unless you've controls within the server you can't do - like implement GZIP for instance which can be a big deal on big sites.
-
My understanding is that, unlike licensed cart solutions, if you use a hosted cart like BC, it resides on their server and cannot be moved elsewhere, .
As for the BC templates being limiting, this is not the case for anything at the product level. My designers have been able to greatly modify our BC pages. We have been able to do anything we wanted so far. I have no issues with BC. They are adding new functionality at a startling pace. If we were using a licensed cart, we would be frozen in time, or have to keep pace with evolving web functionality ourselves.
I agree that we would not want to use BC as the front pages of our site. For this, it would be too limiting, which is exactly why I am in the situation I am. We want the best of both worlds without sacrificing on SEO.
I am not sure how you would "point BC to a folder on our site." I just don't know; I am not a web guy.(trying to learn, though)
-
moving the info site to BC is ok in general.
The reason both EGOL and I recommend having them together and on your own server is that you can control everything (see EGOL's list) and you aren't second guessing the settings on another server which you have no control over. It also means that things like templates can be made much more flexible to meet your exact needs and not just a few of your requirements.
If you can't some how point BC to a folder on your site then moving everything to BC is ok - the other option of course is to set up a new domain and let it exist in it's own right but you wouldn't get any benefit from that just as you wouldn't from a subdomain.
-
First off, I have to admit to EGOL I was wrong when I said I read “ that search engines are getting good at being able to deduce that an eCommerce sub domain is legitimate extension of a content intensive main domain, and that they treat the two components as a combined whole. This was a false recollection of an article about search engines being more lenient in assessing duplicate content in the form of product descriptions on retail sites that sell many variations of the same basic item. I apologize for including BS in my original post.
That being said, I would like to clarify my situation in hopes that advice can be offered.
I have an informational site that is produced with a CMS. It uses a domain I bought through Godaddy. The sight resides on another hosting service (not Godaddy). I am setting up my shopping cart with BigCommerce. How do I best integrate the two components? It sounds like the cart in a subdomain option is out. An option might be to move the informational site to be hosted on Bigcommerce and have it, and the cart, within the same domain? It sounds like EGOL recommends against this.
-
I think what EGOL means is that switching the domain to your hosting provider means you loose control of certain things within that domain which can be very important to seo. What could be a good compromise here is that you look at putting the shopping cart within a folder on the domain...
That is it. Some shopping systems require you to place all of your content into their system - your articles, your homepage, everything.
Then they can charge you high fees on all of your bandwidth, limit your ability to install software such as wordpress, use htaccess, have full and complete control over the format of your pages, have formats that require a lot more time to manage, not allow you to run scripts in the cgi-bin, not allow chron jobs.
They all do not have all of these problems. But some are really limiting and I would not want to marry into something that will limit my options.
I would look for a very flexible cart that allows you to have full control over the entire domain. Confining cart activities in a single folder would not be bad, but I still think that is limiting because I would like to have the ability to place "buy buttons" on any page anywhere within the site - even on pdfs if I want them there.
Lots of people come to these forums saying that they can't do one thing or another because of their shopping cart.
-
I think what EGOL means is that switching the domain to your hosting provider means you loose control of certain things within that domain which can be very important to seo. What could be a good compromise here is that you look at putting the shopping cart within a folder on the domain (not a subdomain as this would be a bad move), this means the work you've done on the domain would continue to effect the static info on there and the shop within the folder.
it may not be possible, it depends on your shopping cart provider - if it can't be done then move the domain across and ensure you have redirects in place from old domain links to new ones (eg your about pages redirect).
Hope that helps clear things up
-
I'm sorry, perhaps I am misunderstanding, but these answers seem totally contradictory to me. One the one hand EGOL said that he agrees that "**putting your cart within a sub domain is not a good idea because any clout of the pre-existing domain will not be shared with the sub domain" **
yet he also writes "The day that my sites get hosted by a shopping cart provider is a day that you can bet big money that I am dead and under."
I am sure they weren't intended to be contradictory and that I am simply misunderstanding. EGOL, would you mind elaborating or clarifying please?
-
I have read arguments that putting your cart within a sub domain is not a good idea because any clout of the pre-existing domain will not be shared with the sub domain; that they will be treated as two separate sites.
I agree with this. All of my sites are done this way.
I have also read that using a sub domain is a good idea being that the content focus of the main domain (marketing and blogs) is different form the focus of the sub domain (product sales), and that the two components would benefit form earning their own rankings undiluted by the other.
This is BS from an SEO viewpoint. Although some snooty marketing people might recommend it.
You can have unique banners for the store and promote it in tasteful ways that make this distinction for your visitors.
It's not about how it is hosted (subdomain vs folders)... it's how your navigation presents it to visitors and search engines.
And, I have also read that search engines are getting good at being able to deduce that an eCommerce sub domain is legitimate extension of a content intensive main domain, and that they treat the two components as a combined whole.
Where are you reading this stuff?
Have the cart as a sub domain of my main site, or move my existing domain name to be hosted by the cart provider...
The day that my sites get hosted by a shopping cart provider is a day that you can bet big money that I am dead and under.
I want my pages to be finely crafted arrows. I don't know if I am going to get that from a shopping cart system.
Someday you will probably decide to leave that shopping cart provider... it will be a lot easier to make that decision if you are not completely married to them.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Using one domain for email and another domain for your website, but redirects...
Hello - We are rebranding and our new name is fairly lengthy. We own all main domain versions of our brand name - .com, .new and .org - There is a very high search volume for the new brand name as it is a merger of 2 popular existing brands so want to take advantage of that and use our full name within our website domain name. However, since the name is a little long as mentioned - 25 characters - we also own the 3 character acronym of the new brand so we are debating on using the acronym for our new email addresses. ie name@abc.com so it is user friendly. We would obviously redirect the acronym email domain to point to the longer website domain. Are there any negative SEO effects if we do that? Use the longer domain for the website and shorter acronym for our email? Thank you
Technical SEO | | KRBishopBh1 -
Moving my domain to weebly
I am thinking of moving my html website to weebly. They offer a 301 redirect for my domain name. Is that ok for SEO?
Technical SEO | | bhsiao0 -
Parked Domains
I have a client who has a somewhat odd situation for their domains. They've been really inconsistent with how they've used them over the years, which makes for a slightly sticky situation. The client has two domains: compname.com and fullcompanyname.com. Right now, their website is just HTML (no CMS) and all of the URLs are relative, so both domains work. Since the new website will be in WordPress, they need to commit to one domain as the primary. Right now, it looks like compname.com is the one they've used the most in ads and such, so I'm going to recommend they go with that. However, the client has also used fullcompanyname.com a lot. They don't want to have to setup individual 301 redirects for everything. I think it's ridiculous, but you can lead a horse to water... Our developer has done some research and he may have found a solution that will satisfy the client. I just want to find out if there are any SEO implications. The possible plan is to us compname.com as the primary domain and to park fullcompanyname.com. That way, if someone visits fullcompanyname.com/products/my-favorite-product, it will still work without having to setup 301 redirects. Since the domain is parked, Google won't recognize it as duplicate content, correct? Just to be clear on the whole situation, I'm insisting that all of the website URLs need 301 redirects, regardless of the domain. The primary concern is with a lot of other stuff on the server that isn't related to the site (email campaign landing pages, image files, assets that are pulled in by the client's software, etc.). The client's concern is about redirecting all that other stuff (and there is a lot of it--thousands of files). The parked domain would seem to fix that, but I want to make sure that the client won't get Google slapped.
Technical SEO | | BopDesign0 -
Mobile & desktop pages
I have a mobile site (m.example.com) and a desktop site (example.com). I want search engines to know that for every desktop page there is a mobile equivalent. To do this I insert a rel=alternate on the desktop pages to the mobile equivalent. On the mobile pages I insert a rel=canonical to it's equivalent desktop page. So far so good BUT: Almost every desktop page has 4 or 5 copies (duplicate content). I get rid of this issue by using the rel=canonical to the source page. Still no problem here. But what happens if I insert a rel=alternate to the mobile equivalent on every copy of the source page? I know it sounds stupid but the system doesn't allow me to insert a rel=alternate on just one page. It's all or nothing! My question: Does Google ignore the rel=alternate on the duplicate pages but keeps understanding the link between the desktop source page & mobile page ? Or should I avoid this scenario? Many Thanks Pieter
Technical SEO | | Humix0 -
Should a 301 from a penalised domain to a new domain be removed?
A business traded on a domain let's say example.COM which was heavily penalised due to non-removable spammy back links. Their previous SEO advised them to set up on example.CO.UK but redirected example.COM to example.CO.UK. Example.CO.UK ranks very poorly, presumably due to being 'tarred with the same brush' i.e. attributed with the ills of example.COM. Will it do any good to remove the redirect or is example.CO.UK now doomed as well?
Technical SEO | | Ewan.Kennedy1 -
Webshop migration & SEO
Hi there I am migrating all products from my current trade website http://shop.snowbusiness.com/ to another platform. Whilst both are live, would i have to worry too much about duplicate content and no-follow the pages or is this overkill? Cheers, Ben
Technical SEO | | SnowFX0 -
Sub-domain dilema - variations
Hi All, We're creating a sub-domain for a new program launch on a client site and we need to choose the "right" sub-domain name that properly reflects the offering and hopefully keyword driven. The client is already using the preferred sub-domain name but until we get clarification that we can take it over, I'm doing my due diligence and expecting a worst case scenario in that we cannot use it. The current preferred sub-domain is only a landing page (not a full site) and it does NOT rank for anything and it's not being built out further. My question: Would pluralizing our preferred keyword have any effect in the way SEs see the two sub-domains as they're very closely related? hardcandy.sitename.com or hardcandies.sitename.com The new sub-domain would be a fully-functional-SEO-friendly site (well that's the plan anyway). Thanks for all your help.
Technical SEO | | Bragg0 -
Redirect Multiple Domains
This is a follow-up question from one posted earlier this month. I can't linked to that because it's a private question so I'm trying to summarize it below. We have a number of domains – about 20 - (e.g. www.propertysharp.com) that point to our main domain ip adress (www.propertyshark.com) and share the same content. This is no black-hat strategy whatsoever, the domains were acquired several years ago in order to help people who mistyped the websites url to reach their desired destination. The question was whether to redirect them to our main domain or not. Pros were the reportedly millions of incoming links from these domains - cons was the fact that lots of issues regarding duplicate content could arise and we actually saw lots of some pages from these domains ranking in the search engines. We were recommended to redirect them, but to take it gradually. I have a simple question - what does gradually mean - one domain per week, per month?
Technical SEO | | propertyshark0