Google: How to See URLs Blocked by Robots?
-
Google Webmaster Tools says we have 17K out of 34K URLs that are blocked by our Robots.txt file.
How can I see the URLs that are being blocked?
Here's our Robots.txt file.
User-agent: * Disallow: /swish.cgi Disallow: /demo Disallow: /reviews/review.php/new/ Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/order.cgi Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/productsearch.cgi Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/billing.cgi Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/inv.cgi Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/new_options.cgi Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/registration.cgi Disallow: /cgi-audiobooksonline/sb/tellfriend.cgi Disallow: /*?gdftrk
-
It seems you might be asking two different questions here, Larry.
You ask which URLs are blocked by your robots file. You then answered your own question by listing the entries in your robots file which are the actual URLs that it is blocking.
If in fact what you want to know is which pages exist on your website but are not currently indexed, that's a much bigger question and requires a lot more work to answer.
There is no way Webmaster Tools can give you that answer, because if it was aware of the URL it would already be indexing it.
HOWEVER! It is possible to do it if you are willing to do some of the work on your own to collect and manipulate data using several tools. Essentially, you have to do it in three steps:
- create a list of all the URLs that Google says are indexed. (This info comes from Google's SERPs.)
- then create a separate list of all of the URLs that actually exist on your website. (This must come from a 3rd-party tool you run against your site yourself.)
- From there, you will use Excel to subtract the indexed URLs from the known URLs, leaving a list of non-indexed URLS, which is what you asked for.
I actually laid out this process step-by-step in response to an earlier question, so you can read the process there http://www.seomoz.org/q/how-to-determine-which-pages-are-not-indexed
Is that what you were looking for?
Paul
-
Okay, well the robots.txt will only be excluding robots from the folders and URLs specified and as I say, there's no way to download a list of all the URLs that Google is not indexing from webmaster tools.
If you have exact URLs in mind which you think might be getting excluded, you can test individual URLs in Google Webmaster Tools in:
Health > Blocked URLs > URLs Specify the URLs and user-agents to test against.
Beyond this, if you want to know if there are URLs that shouldn't be excluded in the folders you have specified, I would run a crawl of your website using SEOMoz' crawl test or Screaming Frog. Then sort the URLs alphabetically and make sure that all of the URLs in the folders you have excluded via robots.txt are ones that you want to exclude.
-
I want to make sure that Google is indexing all of our pages we want them to. I.E. That all of the NOT indexed URLs are valid.
-
Hi Larry
Why do you want to find those URLs out for my understanding? Are you concerned that the robots.txt is blocking URLs it shouldn't be?
As for downloading a list of URLs which aren't indexed from Google Webmaster Tools, which is what I think you would really like, this isn't possible at the moment.
-
Liz; Perhaps my post was unclear or I am misunderstanding your answer.
I want to find out the specific URLs that Google says it isn't indexing because of our Robots.txt file.
-
If you want to see if Google has indexed individual pages which are supposed to be excluded, you can check the URLs in your robots.txt using the site: command.
E.g. type the following into Google:
site:http://www.audiobooksonline.com/swish.cgi
site:http://www.audiobooksonline.com/reviews/review.php/new/
...continue for all the URLs in your robots.txtJust from searching on the last example above (site:http://www.audiobooksonline.com/reviews/review.php/new/) I can see that you have results indexed. This is probably because you added the robots.txt after it was already indexed.
To get rid of these results you need to take the culprit line out of the robots.txt, add the robots meta tag set to noindex to all pages you want removed, submit a URL removal request via webmaster tools, check it has been nonidexed then you can add the line back into the robots.txt.
This is the tag:
I hope that makes sense and is useful!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
URL Parameters
Hi Moz Community, I'm working on a website that has URL parameters. After crawling the site, I've implemented canonical tags to all these URLs to prevent them from getting indexed by Google. However, today I've found out that Google has indexed plenty of URL parameters.. 1-Some of these URLs has canonical tags yet they are still indexed and live. 2- Some can't be discovered through site crawling and they are result in 5xx server error. Is there anything else that I can do (other than adding canonical tags) + how can I discover URL parameters indexed but not visible through site crawling? Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | bbop330 -
Is Google ignoring my canonicals?
Hi, We have rel=canonical set up on our ecommerce site but Google is still indexing pages that have rel=canonical. For example, http://www.britishbraces.co.uk/braces/novelty.html?colour=7883&p=3&size=599 http://www.britishbraces.co.uk/braces/novelty.html?p=4&size=599 http://www.britishbraces.co.uk/braces/children.html?colour=7886&mode=list These are all indexed but all have rel=canonical implemented. Can anyone explain why this has happened?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HappyJackJr0 -
Is google seeing "all" my homepage?
Hello All 🙂 Since launching my new website design - www.advanced-driving.co.uk I am not convinced Google is seeing all the content on the page. I took a long extract of text and did a search on Google and nothing was found. Also although in the search results for "advanced driving course" I can see the new title tag, the snippet isn't showing.. Is there anyway I can check this? As a scroll down I can see the URL changes ie: www.advanced-driving.co.uk
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | robert78
then:
http://www.advanced-driving.co.uk/#da-page_in_widget-3
then:
http://www.advanced-driving.co.uk/#da-page_in_widget-4
then:
http://www.advanced-driving.co.uk/#da-page_in_widget-5 Is this right? Thanks in advance..0 -
URL Structure Question
Am starting to work with a new site that has a domain name contrived to help it with a certain kind of long tail search. Just for fictional example sake, let's call it WhatAreTheBestRestaurantsIn.com. The idea is that people might do searches for "what are the best restaurants in seattle" and over time they would make some organic search progress. Again, fictional top level domain example, but the real thing is just like that and designed to be cities in all states. Here's the question, if you were targeting searches like the above and had that domain to work with, would you go with... whatarethebestrestaurantsin.com/seattle-washington whatarethebestrestaurantsin.com/washington/seattle whatarethebestrestaurantsin.com/wa/seattle whatarethebestrestaurantsin.com/what-are-the-best-restaurants-in-seattle-wa ... or what and why? Separate question (still need the above answered), would you rather go with a super short (4 letter), but meaningless domain name, and stick the longtail part after that? I doubt I can win the argument the new domain name, so still need the first question answered. The good news is it's pretty good content. Thanks... Darcy
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 945010 -
Confused: Url Restructure
Hello, We're giving our website a bit of a spring clean in terms of SEO. The site is doing ok, but after the time invested in SEO, content and last year's migration of multiple sites into one, we're not seeing the increase in traffic we had hoped. Our current urls look something like this: /a-cake-company/cup-cakes/strawberry We have the company name as the first level as we with the migration we migrated many companies into one site. What we're considering is testing some pages with a structure like this: /cup-cakes/cup-cake-company-strawberry So we'll lose a level and we'll focus more on the category of the product rather than the brand. What's your thoughts on this? We weren't going to do a mass change yet, just a test, but is this something we should be focusing on? In terms of organisation our current url structure is perfect, but what about from an SEO point of view? In terms of keywords customers are looking for both options. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | HB170 -
Will Google recognize a canonical to a re-directed URL works?
A third party canonicalizes to our content, and we've recently needed to re-direct that content to a new URL. The third party is going to take some time updating their canonicals, and I am wondering if search engines will still recognize the canonical even though there is a re-direct in place?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nicole.healthline0 -
International URL Puzzle
Hello, I have 4 different URL's going to 4 different countries that all contain the same content and Google is seeing them as duplicate pages. For ecommerce reasons I have to have these 4 pages separated. Here is a example of the pages below so you can see the URL structure: www.example/com/canada www.example.com/australia www.example.com/usa www.example.com/UK How do I fix this duplicate content problem? Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | digitalops0 -
URL for offline purposes
Hi there, We are going to be promoting one of our products offline, however I do not want to use the original URL for this product page as it's long for the user to type in, so I thought it would be best practice in using a URL that would be short, easier for the consumer to remember. My plan: Replicate the product page and put it on this new short URL, however this would mean I have a duplicate content issue, would It be best practice to use a canonical on the new short URL pointing to the original URL? or use a 301? Thanks for any help
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Paul780