Philosophy & Deep Thoughts On Tag/Category URLs
-
Hello, SEO Gurus!
First off, my many thanks to this community for all of your past help and perspective. This is by far the most valuable SEO community on the web, and it is precisely because of all of you being here. Thanks!
I've recently kicked off a robust niche biotech news publishing site for a client, and in the first 6 weeks, we've generated 15K+ views and 9300 visits. The site is built on the WordPress platform.
I'm well aware that a best practice is to noindex tag and category pages, as I've heard SEOs say that they potentially lead to duplicate content issues. We're using tags and categories heavily, and to date, we've had just 282 visits from tag & category pages. So, that's 2.89% of our traffic; the vast majority of traffic has landed on the homepage or article pages (we are using author markup).
Here's my question, though, and it's more philosophical: do these pages really cause a duplicate content issue? Isn't Google able to determine that said page is a tag page, and thus not worthy of duplicate content penalties? If not, then why not?
To me, tag/category pages are sometimes better content pages to have ranked than article pages, since, for news especially, they potentially give searchers a better search result (particularly for short tail keywords). For example, if I write articles all the time about the Mayo Clinic," I'd rather have my evergreen "Mayo Clinic" tag page rank on page one for the keyword "mayo clinic" than just one specific article that very quickly drops out of the news cycle. Know what I mean?
So, to summarize:
1. Are doindexed tag/category pages really a duplicate content problem, and if so, why the heck?
2. Is there a strategy for ranking tag/category pages for news publishing sites ahead of article pages?
Thanks as always for your time and attention.
Kind Regards,
Mike
-
Hey Mike
Great question(s)!
1. Are indexed tag/category pages really a duplicate content problem, and if so, why the heck**?**
Since we are getting philosophical - let's define "what is duplicate content"? in the first place. There's two different types really;
- technical duplicate content - this is the kind we're referring to here. It's not real duplicate content (like you're trying to copy the same article or something over and over, it's not even cross domain). Technical duplicate content is there as a result of a function of the CMS or web development. Like tracking parameters, non-canonical homepages (www, non-www, /index.heml all loading etc), sorting functions on ecommerce sites.
- actual duplicate content - this is more like when someone has scraped an article from one domain to another, or copied an article on purpose - to actually try and pass it off as "unique" when it's totally copied.
Tags & categories sort of cause "technical duplicate content" but not always. It depends how you have WordPress set up. Most commonly, I see them create duplicate content in the sense that a tag archive might look almost exactly the same as the article page its self - or very similar.
OR what a lot of people are referring to and don't even realize it (which is a bit of a pet peeve) is the subpages off of tags and categories. When tag and/or category pages paginate (again, depending on how it's set up) the title tags will look like duplicates.
ie:
/tag/exercise-and-nutrition/ has the title tag: Exercise and Nutrition - Healthblog.com
/tag/exercise-and-nutrition/page/2 etc _still has the title tag: _Exercise and Nutrition - Healthblog.com
So the question really is - if tag/categories are "technical duplicate content" is THAT type of "duplicate content" an issue.
I've heard Google say: NO. John Mueller from Google has said multiple times in Webmaster Central Hangout Help Videos - "Google can distinguish this sort of accidental duplicate from real duplicate content".
BUT - not so fast - tags and categories can still be an issue, just NOT because of "duplicate content."
It really all depends how you have them set up.
1. I first recommend understanding the distinctions between tags and categories (image from my WordPress article)
2. I do recommend indexation in categories by default in most cases. Not sure where you've also heard to noindex categories. That's IF they are used correctly per #1 above. If you use 5-8 well constructed and chosen categories there should not be a problem with indexing categories.
3. Noindex subpages of archives - this kills 95% of what some folks mistakingly call "duplicate content" and is really just duplicate title tags from the pagination of subpages.
4. I highly advocate leaving some tags indexed (using the Yoast SEO plugin) that are bringing traffic - here's how I do that analysis when de-indexing tags.
Here are the REAL issues that tags and subpages CAN create;
- index bloat - lots of pages getting indexed that fill up the index and distract from what you might prefer to rank for instead
- poor user metrics from Google results - users tend to bounce off of tag archives, creatig lower user metrics, which can feed back into rankings
- dilution of content - so while this isn't "duplicate content" is is content dilution: multiple pages that all sort of overlap in topics.
2. Is there a strategy for ranking tag/category pages for news publishing sites ahead of article pages?
Totally! Check out Kane's comment on my WordPress post - essentially he is saying to customize your category archives with some unique content on them, as to distinguish them from being posts. Also, only display excerpts of your posts on archive pages.
We always cite SugarRae's blog as a great example. Check out her category page here. It has totally unique content at the top, and the posts below.
-
- -
To conclude, and keep it philosophical
I think what you're also getting at here, is an important part of SEO (or anything) that people don't talk about as much - but that's the idea of keeping an open mind, analyzing your specific situation, testing, testing the limits of "rules" - and really applying your own brain. Validate things for yourself.
One of the biggest issues, is that most people do not use tags in a deliberate way or really understand how they fully function. They just slap 20 tags on every post (which they think is a magic SEO trick) and end up with thousands of tag pages (I've seen sites with 7,000+ tag archives!) - at the beginning this might not be an issues, but over time if done recklessly like that, it can cause some of the problems noted above.
Great question!
-Dan
-
Well..., since you opened the Philosophy & Deep Thoughts topic, think of it like this: the answer to your question lies in the engagement strategy you develop for those pages. There is no rule here. How can you formulate those pages to effectively entice likes, shares, retweets, comments, +1's?--that's the question.
For the category pages, formulate and execute a strategy that will leverage the philosophy of your product mix/editorial calendar (the two should mesh). (You have formulated those two things based on business objectives and target audience, right?) There is a reason you sell the specific products that you sell, right?---make that a fundamentally obvious part of your category page content and provide an rss feed specific to the audience of that philosophy--even if it's a small target audience. Produce content for that feed on a regular basis.
If you structure the content of your category pages around a curation philosophy there will be a fundamental difference between those pages and the content on your product pages. At that point, your duplicate content will disappear.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Something happened within the last 2 weeks on our WordPress-hosted site that created "duplicates" by counting www.company.com/example and company.com/example (without the 'www.') as separate pages. Any idea what could have happened, and how to fix it?
Our website is running through WordPress. We've been running Moz for over a month now. Only recently, within the past 2 weeks, have we been alerted to over 100 duplicate pages. It appears something happened that created a duplicate of every single page on our site; "www.company.com/example" and "company.com/example." Again, according to our MOZ, this is a recent issue. I'm almost certain that prior to a couple of weeks ago, there existed both forms of the URL that directed to the same page without be counting as a duplicate. Thanks for you help!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wzimmer0 -
Should I use **tags or h1/h2 tags for article titles on my homepage**
I recently had an seo consultant recommend using tags instead of h1/h2 tags for article titles on the homepage of my news website and category landing pages. I've only seen this done a handful of times on news/editorial websites. For example: http://www.muscleandfitness.com/ Can anyone weigh in on this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | blankslatedumbo0 -
Case Sensitive URLs, Duplicate Content & Link Rel Canonical
I have a site where URLs are case sensitive. In some cases the lowercase URL is being indexed and in others the mixed case URL is being indexed. This is leading to duplicate content issues on the site. The site is using link rel canonical to specify a preferred URL in some cases however there is no consistency whether the URLs are lowercase or mixed case. On some pages the link rel canonical tag points to the lowercase URL, on others it points to the mixed case URL. Ideally I'd like to update all link rel canonical tags and internal links throughout the site to use the lowercase URL however I'm apprehensive! My question is as follows: If I where to specify the lowercase URL across the site in addition to updating internal links to use lowercase URLs, could this have a negative impact where the mixed case URL is the one currently indexed? Hope this makes sense! Dave
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | allianzireland0 -
Which is better /section/ or section/index.php?
I have noticed that Google has started to simply link to /section/ as opposed to /section/index.php and I haven't changed any canonical tags etc. I have looked at my pages moz authority for the two /section/ = 28/100
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | TimHolmes
/section/index.php = 42/100 How would I go about transferring the authority to /section/ from /section/index.php to hopefully help me in my organic serp positions etc. Any insight would be great 🐵0 -
What is the best URL structure for categories?
A client's site currently uses the URL structure: www.website.com/�tegory%/%postname% Which I think is optimised fairly well, as the categories are keywords being targeted. However, as they are using a category hierarchy, often times the URL looks like this: www.website.com/parent-category/child-category/some-post-titles-are-quite-long-as-they-are-long-tail-terms Best practise often dictates (such as point 3 in this Moz article) that shorter URLs are better for several reasons. So I'm left with a few options: Remove the category from the URL Flatten the category hierarchy Shorten post titles two a word or two - which would hurt my long tail search term traffic. Leave it as it is What do we think is the best route to take? Thanks in advance!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | underscorelive0 -
Thoughts on LemonStand App
I'm considering moving two niche ecommerce sites over to LemonStand, but wanted to see if the SEOMoz community had any opinion of it before forking out several grand getting the sites moved over. Both of my websites were based off of an SEO driven ecommerce strategy, so it's really important to me that the platform will perform well in organic rankings. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | CobraJones950 -
Panda/Penguin & more than one services site in niche
Hello, My friend has a personal development training site. I have been advised not to make separate personal coaching sites for the owners of the training sites. Do you have experience that Panda/Penguin could penalize for separate sites in a similar niche? Do you need any more info to give a good response? Thank you.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | BobGW0 -
Multiple stores & domains vs. One unified store (SEO pros / cons for E-Commerce)
Our company runs a number of individual online shops, specialised in particular products but all in the same genre of goods overall, with a specific and relevant domain name for each shop. At the moment the sites are separate, and not interlinked, i.e. Completely separate brands. An analogy could be something like clothing accessories (we are not in the clothing business): scarves.com, and silkties.com (our field is more niche than this) We are about to launch a related site, (e.g. handbags.com), in the same field again but without precisely overlapping products. We will produce this site on a newer, more flexible e-commerce platform, so now is a good time to consider whether we want to place all our sites together with one e-commerce system on the backend. Essentially, we need to know what the pros and cons would be of the various options facing us and how the SEO ranking is affected by the three possibilities. Option 1: continue with separate sites each with its own domains. Option 2: have multiple sites, each on their own domain, but on the same ecommerce system and visible linked together for the customer (with unified checkout) – on the top of each site could be a menu bar linking to each site: [Scarves.com] – [SilkTies.com] – [Handbags.com] The main question here is whether the multiple domains are mutually beneficial, particularly considerding how close to target keywords the individual domains are. If mutually benefitial, how does it compare to option 3: Option 3: Having recently acquired a domain name (e.g. accessories.com) which would cover the whole category together, we are presented with a third option: making one site selling all of these products in different categories. Our main concern here would be losing the ability to specifically target marketing, and losing the benefit of the domains with the key words in for what people are more likely to be searching for (e.g. 'silk tie') rather than 'accessories.' Is it worth taking the hit on losing these specific targeted domain names for the advantage of increased combined inbound links?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Colage0