Guidance for setting up new 301s after having just done so (
-
Hi
I've recently set up a load of 301 redirects for a clients new site design/structure relaunch
One of the things we have done is take the kw out of the sub-category landing page url's since they now feature in the top level category page urls and don't want to risk over-optimisation by having kw repeats across the full urls. So the urls have changed and the original pages 301'd to the new current pages.
However If rankings start to drop & i decide to change urls again to include kw in final part of url too for the sub category landing pages, whats best way to manage the new redirects ?
-
Do i redirect the current urls (which have only been live for a week and have the original/old urls 301'd to them) to the new url's ? (worried this would create a chain of 301's which ive heard is not ideal)
-
Or just redirect the original urls to the new ones, and can forget about the current pages/url's since only been live for a week ?
(I presume best not since GWT sitemaps area says most new urls indexed now so I presume sees those as the original pages replacement now) -
Or should they all be 301'd (original urls and current urls to the new) ?
-
Or best to just run with current set up and avoid making too many changes again, and setting up even more 301's after having just done so ?
Many Thanks
Dan
-
-
Hi Aleyda
Sorry 1 more question:
Ive noticed that the new pages have started to rank well already.
In this case is it still advisable to 'fetch as google' in GWT the old redirected urls or, since the new pages have been found and ranking well, best to not fetch the old urls ?
Best Rgds
Dan
-
ok great many thanks Aleyda !!
-
You shouldn't remove them. If you implement the 301-redirects and do everything what's described before, although it might take some time, they should be eliminated from the index while referring their value with the redirects.
-
Great thanks Aleyda
I have already done most of those things except for fetching as googlebot in gwt, which ill do next.
Please confirm then that theres no need to remove the old urls in GWT at any point and they should just 'fade away' ?
many thanks
dan
-
Hi Dan,
Despite it's not a domain migration there are a lot of aspects that apply in this situation too! For example:
- You should monitor is that up update your internal (menu, content from your own site) and external links (at least the most important) towards the old URLs and target to the new ones.
- Make sure that the 301-redirects have been correctly implemented (in a URL to URL basis) to the relevant pages and make sure the new ones are still relevant and optimized for the same keywords than the previous ones.
- Generate a new XML sitemap with your new URLs and resubmit them in GWT.
- Resubmit your Old URLs with the fetch as Googlebot option in GWT to make sure Google knows about the update and identifies the 301-redirects.
- Monitor the (organic search and general) traffic and visibility (with GA and GWT) that the old URLs still receive vs. the new ones. If everything has been correctly implemented then there should be a trend that goes down with your old URLs and one that goes up with your new ones. If not, check which ones are still receiving a high amount of traffic and why: if they're still linked from an external source and hasn't been correctly redirected, etc.
Follow the previous recommendations and you should be able to minimize the effects of the changes.
Thanks,
Aleyda
-
Many Thanks Aleyda for your detailed reply
In this case though its not a site migration just a redesign but thanks for your great info ill use for future reference when tackling any migrations
In the case of a redesign where the urls have been changed (and hence why set up the 301's) would you recommend after aproximately 2 weeks that you should 'fetch as google' in GWT the old page urls and then few days after that remove the old urls ? (or should they just disapear eventually ?)
Many Thanks
Dan
-
Hi again Dan,
I would recommend that you first follow this checklist so you make sure your whole migration is SEO friendly and that you're not forgetting anything in the migration process and that you validate everything well.
The best process is the one the most straightforward one: do the migration as simple as possible (from one domain to the other with 301 redirects) and avoid changing many things at the same time. Please keep in mind that redirects will help but is not the only thing you should do, take a look at the checklist and you'll see.
It's actually natural that in the following days after the migration your rankings drop, search engines need time to crawl and index again the URLs in the new site, identify that you have moved your content from the old domain to the new one and with the help of the 301-redirects.
Among the additional things you should do to have an SEO friendly migration that you'll see in the checklist are that you should notify Google that you've moving your domain through Google Webmaster Tools (there's an option for this), create a new profile and generate a sitemap for the new domain, verify that the 301-redirects are all well implemented, that the content relevance is also kept in those pages for the keywords they were ranking with, that external and internal links going to the old urls are updated and now go to the new ones, prioritizing those landing pages that had the most highly relevant traffic, trying to change the minimum from the structure -keep one change at a time to be able to identify any issue-, check and follow-up on crawling errors). If you do everything what is recommended on the checklist little by little you should see how you start regaining your rankings again, but you need to give time (usually at least a couple of months if everything goes right).
So, there are a lot of other factors and I will make sure to follow the recommendations to minimize the negative impact, although is impossible of not having it. What is definitely not recommended is that you are updating many times your URLs or that you redirect many times, this is why this process should be effectively planned and designed validating all the aspects from the beginning and making sure that the more relevance signals you can keep (like the keywords in the appropriate elements of the pages) the best it is and making one change at a time makes things much more simple (first migrate, then one the effects of the migration have gone you can start optimizing and changing the new domain architecture) otherwise it can get really messy and this is what you're already experiencing I'm afraid.
I hope this helps! Aleyda
-
301 chains aren't ideal but, as long as they result in a real page, it's OK. The danger is you get a bad 301 in there which results in an infinite loop (A points to B points to C points to A).
I would avoid changing URLs on a frequent basis. A 301 is chaos for pages and results. Sometimes a page will inherit all of its predecessor's rank in a timely fashion but I've also seen where it takes time. You should expect some rankings drop after a URL structure change. It should recover in time but, again, there's no telling how fast that happens. As long as you can afford a short term drop, I say let it ride.
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Should I set 301 Redirects or keep old permalinks?
I just built a new site for a client and the new site has pretty links like domain.com/about-us. The old site has been around for a VERY long time and had links like domain.com/aboutus. I want to do 301 redirects because from my understanding, it minimizes the negative SEO impact. But the client wants to keep the permalinks without the hyphens to match the old links. What is the best route, considering SEO? BTW, the site is still on the same domain. Thanks in advance for your help! Neik
Technical SEO | | glassh0use0 -
Our client's site was owned by former employee who took over the site. What should be done? Is there a way to preserve all the SEO work?
A client had a member of the team leave on bad terms. This wasn't something that was conveyed to us at all, but recently it came up when the distraught former employee took control of the domain and locked everyone out. At first, this was assumed to be a hack, but eventually it was revealed that one of the company starters who unhappily left the team owned the domain all along and is now holding it hostage. Here's the breakdown: -Every page aside from the homepage is now gone and serving a 404 response code -The site is out of our control -The former employee is asking for a $1 million ransom to sell the domain back -The homepage is a "countdown clock" that isn't actively counting down, but claims that something exciting is happening in 3 days and lists a contact email. The question is how we can save the client's traffic through all this turmoil. Whether buying a similar domain and starting from square one and hoping we can later redirect the old site's pages after getting it back. Or maybe we have a legal claim here that we do not see even though the individual is now the owner of the site. Perhaps there's a way to redirect the now defunct pages to a new site somehow? Any ideas are greatly appreciated.
Technical SEO | | FPD_NYC0 -
How to set up internal linking with subcategories?
I'm building a new website and am setting up internal link structure with subcategories and hoping to do so with best Seo practices in mind. When linking to a subcategory's main page, would I make the internal link www.xxx.com/fishing/ or www.xxx.com/fishing/index.html or does it matter? I'm just trying to avoid duplicate content I guess, if Google saw each page as a separate page. Any other cautions when using subdirectories in my navigation?
Technical SEO | | wplodge0 -
If a permanent redirect is supposed to transfer SEO from the old page to the new page, why has my domain authority been impacted?
For example, we redirected our old domain to a new one (leaving no duplicate content on the old domain) and saw a 40% decrease in domain authority. Isn't a permanent redirect supposed to transfer link authority to the place it is redirecting to? Did I do something wrong?
Technical SEO | | BlueLinkERP0 -
Should this site start again on a new domain
Hi We have not done SEO on this site they have used another company who looks like they outsourced and the links have been built by a third party all blog networks and this company have said they cannot get the links removed. Google flagged artificial links on this web site in February and in April it lost over 10000 visitors in a month and its just free falled ever since. The categories have been recreated and no redirects created due to the amount of backlinks from the blog sites to the original category pages but the site is not recovering its down to 1500 visitors a month and used to get 14000 a month. So should my customer ditch the domain and move this site to fresh domain? http://www.kids-beds-online.com Any answers would really be appreciated. thanks Tracy
Technical SEO | | dashesndots0 -
Mobile website settings - I am doing right?
Hi, http://www.schicksal.com has a "normal" and a "mobile' version. We are using a browser detection routine to redirect the visitor to the "default site" or the "mobile site". The mobile site is here:
Technical SEO | | GeorgFranz
http://www.schicksal.com/m The robots.txt contains these lines: User-agent: *
Allow: / User-agent: Googlebot
Disallow: /m
Allow: / User-agent: Googlebot-Mobile
Disallow: /
Allow: /m Sitemap: http://www.schicksal.com/sitemaps/index So, the idea is: Only allow the Googlebot-Mobile Bot to access the mobile site. We have also separate sitemaps for default and mobile version. One of the mobile sitemap is here My problem: Webmaster tool is saying that Google received 898 urls from the mobile sitemap, but none has been indexed. (Google has indexed 550 from the "web sitemap".) I've checked the webmaster tools - no errors on the sitemap. So, if you are searching at google.com/m - you are getting results from the default web page, but not the mobile version. This is not that bad because you will be redirected to the mobile version. So, my question: Is this the "normal" behaviour? Or is there something wrong with my config? Would it be better to move the mobile site to a subdomain like m.schicksal.com? Best wishes, Georg.0 -
Redirecting a old aged site to a new exact match site?
Hi All, I have a question. I have 2 sites with me in the same sector and want some help. site 1 is a old site started back in 2003 and has some amount of links to it and has a pr 3 with some good links to it but doesn't rank much for any keywords for the timing. site 2 is a aged domain but newly developed with unique content and has a good amount of exact match with a .com version. so will there be any benefit by redirecting site 1 to site 2 to get the seo benefits and a start for link bulding? or is it best to develop and work on each site? the sector is health insurance. Thanks
Technical SEO | | macky71 -
For Google + purposes, should the author's name appear in the Meta description or title tag of my web site just as you would your key search phrase?
Relative to Cyrus Shepard's article on January 4th regarding Google's Superior SEO strategy, if I'm the primary author of all blog articles and web site content, and I have a link showing authorship going back to Google Plus, is a site wide link from the home page enough or should that show up on all blog posts etc and editorial comment pages etc? Conversely, should the author's name appear in the Meta description or title tag of my web site just as you would your key search phrase since Google appears to be trying to make a solid connection with my name, and all content?
Technical SEO | | lwnickens0