Novice Question - Can Browsers realistically distinguish words within concatenated strings e.g. text55fun or should one use text-55-fun? What about foreign languages especially more obscure ones like Finnish which Google Translate often miss-translates?
-
I am attempting to understand what is realistically possible within Google, Yahoo and Bing as they search websites for KeyWords. Technically my understanding is that they should be able to distinguish common words within concatenated strings, although there can be confusion between word boundaries when ambiguity is involved. So in the simple example of text55fun, do search engines actually distinguish text, 55 and fun separately? There are practical processing, databased and algorithm limitations that might turn a technically possible solution into a unrealistic one at a commercial scale.
What about more ambiguous strings like stringsstrummingstrongly would that be parsed as string s strummings trongly or strings strummings trongly or strings strumming strongly? Does one need to use dashes or underscores to make it unambiguous to the search engine? My guess is that the engine would recognize the dash or space and better understand the word boundaries yet ignore the dash or underscore from an overall concatenated string perspective.
Thanks in advance to whoever can provide any insight to an old coder who is new to this field.
-
Omid,
Thanks very much for the fast response.
Totally agree about about Google AI - my objective is completely white hat, original content-rich website which their AI encompasses - Google is attempting to weed out folks who are avoiding the hard work associated with building these types of websites.
Not everything in business has a brand-building goal - only so many brands can rise to the top. I'm looking from a very different perspective in this case and would be very happy to find my 1,000 to 5,000 specific people or so. From that point, I would then have my work cut out from a business standpoint, nothing to do with SEO or anything related to this field. Just simple blocking and tackling - sales,customer service, marketing, delivery etc.
I'm an old-school guy (sell high-value, high-margin products and services to customers who value you and want to stay with you over long periods of time because of great customer service) and this is an experiment for me using a new-school sales tactic. In my experience it does not take a lot of those types of customers to build a very nice small business. The really hard part is actually creating the organization which genuinely delivers on those commitments consistently over long periods of time and retains those customers.
All the best
Newell
-
Paul,
Thanks very much for the prompt response - I love your part of Canada by the way - and have driven through your town on the way to Jasper a number of time. I think that It's the most majestic part of the Rockies one can see without a plane.
Your response is at the heart of my question - the difference between what is possible and practical, particularly at the speed in which response occur. I wasn't aware of the space issue, very good point!
As a variation, were the concatenated string to become part of a URL for an original content-rich website, it sounds as though both the dashed and un-dashed URL would be required to be safe (because people tend not to type dashes or forget). In that event, would it matter to the search engines which URL is 301 redirected?
Again, thanks very much
Newell
-
take this, for random names and brands, they may not even recognize it proper and find the next best guess to it...
ever try googling a brand new online site / brand that is an abstract name? you get corrections and suggestions?
NOT ADVISED to make text sticktogetherlikethis in ANY language. it's just a best practice. across the board, content and url.
As Paul said, I do not like the whole "goofing" around situation with machine learning and Google's current artificial intel. its not nearly perfect technology and you can be its statistical miss...
-
The problem here,. as I see it, NY60, is that there's no way of knowing for sure. The engines are "supposed" to be able to parse the text strings, but there's no way they're infallible and in fact there's no way of knowing if they're even acceptably good at it under the conditions that are important to you.
For that reason, I always opt to make it as hard as possible for the engines to goof. In this case, that means dividing at word boundaries with a hyphen in strings like URLs and other code. Spaces are problematic because they often get encoded into html entity %20 which can cause yet more havoc - though in straight content like meta-titles, meta-descriptions, alt text and page content they are fine.
There's my $0.02. Whattaya think?
Paul
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
How can I avoid duplicate content for a new landing page which is the same as an old one?
Hello mozers! I have a question about duplicate content for you... One on my clients pages have been dropping in search volume for a while now, and I've discovered it's because the search term isn't as popular as it used to be. So... we need to create a new landing page using a more popular search term. The page which is losing traffic is based on the search query "Can I put a solid roof on my conservatory" this only gets 0-10 searches per month according to the keyword explorer tool. However, if we changed this to "replacing conservatory roof with solid roof" this gets up to 500 searches per month. Muuuuch better! The issue is, I don't want to close down and re-direct the old page because it's got a featured snippet and sits in position 1. So I'd like to create another page instead... however, as the two are effectively the same content, I would then land myself in a duplicate content issue. If I were to put a rel="canonical" tag in the original "can I put a solid roof...." page but say the master page is now the new one, would that get around the issue?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Virginia-Girtz0 -
Can I cover any topic(s) or are they some required ones
Can you talk about anything (any topics) when you write about something or is google expecting to see certain topics ? Let me clarify, let's say I do "bike tours on the island of Corsica"and bike through villages that none of the companies ranking on the 1 st page ride thru. Can I still rank as long as I write good content or do I need to cover at least some of the topics covered by the companies ranking on the 1 st page ? Thank you,
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoanalytics0 -
Www PA is 29\. Http version is PA of 21\. Should I start using the WWW one?
I think I know the answer but i need to ask anyway in case i am wrong. The www PA is 29. Http version is PA of 21. Should I start using the WWW one? A number of years ago, they hired an agency that built a ton of links to the WWW version. I should also point out that most of the site urls are for the http, so i would have to redirect all the other pages. Advice? Thanks, Nails
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | matt.nails0 -
Can 301 redirects that are inaccurate cause Google suppressions on rankings?
In an interesting study by DeganSEO titled 'Negative Impact of 301 Redirects - A Case Study' a drop of rankings was observed when popular blog posts were redirected to product pages. One hypothesis is that the suppression is due to topical difference between the redirected pages (blog posts) and the target page. The topical difference issue is an interesting one when you consider it in the context of website migrations. We always recommend that 301 redirects are done at a page level and that if an equivalent page doesn't exist to just 301 anyway but to the most logical page. If you think about it Google are likely to frown on this because a) it's not a good experience for the user - 404 would be more accurate for them
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | QubaSEO
b) it's lazy - if you have good content that has gained authority/trust then create the same content on the new site don't trytp pass that to an entirely different page. Thoughts? Experiences?0 -
No Index Question
Hello, We are attempting to have the following page removed from Google search results: view-source:http://www.mndaily.com/1998/04/08/missing-student-has-disappeared A noindex tag was added but we aren't sure if it was done correctly. I'm wondering if there are any experts here that might be able to confirm that this was added correctly and will result in the removal of the page from search results. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jasonMPLS0 -
Consensus on disavowing low-quality auto-generated links (e.g. webstatsdomain.org etc) ?
Is there a consensus in the SEO world around the best practice on how to treat the multiple auto-generated links for a domain? With a lot of the link profiles we have been analyzing nearly 70% volume of the backlinks relate to these auto generated links (e.g. similarweb.com, informer.com, webstatsdomain.org etc) I can see arguments for disavowing them (low-quality links) as well as keeping them (skew anchor text distribution towards URL mentions, natural link profile) but would be interested if people have run experiments or prefer strongly one way or the other.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | petersocapro1 -
Disavowal & Reconsideration request - Can I do one without the other?
I submitted a link disavowal file for a client a few weeks ago and before doing that I read up on how to properly use the tool. My understanding is that if you received a manual penalty then you need to submit a reconsideration request after cleaning up links. We didn't receive a penalty so I didn't submit one. I'm wondering if anyone has used the tool (not stemming from a penalty) and if you did or didn't submit a recon. request, and what the results were. I've read that if a site is hit algorithmically, then filing a recon request won't help. Should I just do it anyway? Would be great to hear from anyone who has gone through a similar situation.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Vanessa120 -
Company name often shows in anchor text (important keyword phrase within), can this impact ranking?
Hi everyone, My company is called "Hawaii Job Engine" - www.hawaiijobengine.com - and many sites that link to my site use my company name as anchor text "Hawaii Job Engine". I have heard Google may devalue a certain keyword phrase if used too often in anchor text. Does this mean I may, over time, get a poor ranking for the term "Hawaii Job" since that phrase is part of my company's name. Or, will search engines easily notice it is my company name and therefore it will not have a negative impact on rankings? Example: if the anchor text leading to my company's homepage is company's name 95% of the time (on authoritative sites) could this be an issue? I don't know the %, but just to establish if there may be in % levels to keep in mind. thank you, Kristian
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | knielsen1