SEO Blow-Up After Site Redesign
-
I contracted with a local web design firm - a highly recommended firm - to redo my law practice's Wordpress site. The redesign was done in early April. After the redesign I saw a large drop in rankings across all of my keywords, lost internal page rank, and had a big traffic drop. The site is www.toughtimeslawyer.com. There were a couple of issues that contributed to it; but I'm not sure how to rebuild.
- The internal URL structure changed completely. I wasn't aware of this until the site went live.
- I didn't have a sitemap for about a week, then the sitemap plugin they used was not very good and showing errors in Webmaster tools. Last week, I replaced it with Yoast's SEO plugin.
- The biggest problem is that they setup a subdomain old.toughtimeslawyer.com, without asking me or telling me. The subdomain had all of my content on it. It was not blocked with robots.txt; and it is being cached by Google. I just discovered it today, when I was doing something in my cpanel. I assume that this is creating a duplicate content problem with Google.
I'm not sure what steps to take to recover. I am especially concerned about the subdomain old.toughtimeslawyer.com and the best want to handle it with the search engines.
Thanks in advance, all advice is appreciated. I've been pulling my hair out for the last few weeks over my rankings.
-
That's not too difficult to handle. Here is how I would go about it.
I would first fix the existing website 404s, yes you have some as I checked your website.
next, I will set up the 301s from old website urls to new urls and also install a 404 monitor plugin.
also I woulld suggest that without deleting the copy that we have in old subdmain, if you can 301 everything there to www instead of old.domain.com, that will help.
-
Hi David, I feel your pain. This type of problem is more common than you might think!
Fortunately there are steps we can implement to help curb the effects.
1. You need a copy of the old website. This is probably available at old.toughtimeslawyer.com so that you can revert to the old website, or check for errors. So while they should have noindexed that domain, it is helpful to have it. I would recommend asking them to noindex it now.
2. You will need to map the old pages to the new, and then apply redirection and / or 404, depending on the page in question. For now, I would simply 301 redirect the old pages.
There are two ways to go about this:
A) Ask the developers to match the old urls on the new website. This is preferred, because it then means the same url is being used and no redirection needs to take place. I would ask them this first, but if they are not able to do this then:
B) Apply a 301 redirection schema to redirect old pages to the new corresponding pages on the new, live site:
Depending on how many pages you have on the site (sites over 100 pages you might consider using tools for assistance) you will want to create an excel which maps
Column A - old URL
Column B - new URL which now holds this informationYour job is to match the old content on the old subdomain with the new, live content.
Once this is completed, and triple checked, backup everything and then ask the development company to apply 301 redirection from the OLD urls to the NEW urls. This passes some of the link weight, age and authority over to the new url, and tells the search engines to place emphasis on the new urls for content.
3. Once completed, I would run the following checks (or hire someone to help you with this)
-Redirection check (ensuring those redirects are correct by checking header responses)
-Broken links check on the new website
-Navigation and internal links checkDepending on the gravity of the design change, this might not completely restore rankings. Ranking in Google based upon a myriad of factors, and site quality and layout is one of them. There is much more to the overall process, but the information above should help you resolve the current issue as much as possible.
Changing designs is a complex process and should be always proceeded with caution.
Once you make the changes, I recommend a period of about 2 weeks to monitor changes.
Hope this helps!
-
Ooops - Mark beat me to it. Sounds like he and I are on the same page pretty much. I'd drop that old site entirely though. The CSS is broken and it looks awful. Just make sure those 301s are in place.
-
Well that's too bad. First off I find that very odd he would keep the old site live. I would yank that immediately after I 301'd my link profiles. If you have ANY incoming links that you find relevant or worthwhile you need to have those redirected to the appropriate pages on your new site. Yoast can do that.
Drop that subdomain. The Way-back machine is always there if you need to reference it, but also you should have it backed up locally just in case.
The sitemap isn't a huge issue, Google will crawl your site assuming there are a few links incoming. As for why your SERPs dropped, that could be due to any number of things. You've got some decent links coming in, but of course we could all use more so get to content building and promoting for sure.
You might want to look at what your old sites did differently in terms of keyword placement. Titles, Headers, Ratio, etc are all important. Just keep in mind it needs to stay natural while clearly being about your targeted keyword. This should be easy enough to do. If I'm writing about bankruptcy that word is going to pop up organically plenty of times. Just make sure it's in your URLs, H1s, Titles, etc. The Moz on-page reports can help with this.
This is all I got right now.. Hope it's at least a tiny help.
-
Ok - so a few things - I'm not worried about the sitemaps - those aren't a big deal (should be fixed, but not first priority).
In my eyes, you need to do 2 things pronto:
1 - remove the old.toughtimeslawyer subdomain - do this by blocking the subdomain via the subdomain's robots.txt - do a disallow: / in the robots file, and then go into the webmaster tools for the subdomain (which you should set up if you haven't already), and use the URL removal tool to remove the subdomain from Google. Once this is done, and the subdomain is no longer indexed, add a noindex meta tag to all pages and remove the robots.txt block - this should get rid of the subdomain permanently from the index.
2 - you need to get a handle on the 301 redirects - crawl your current site structure, and redirect any old URLs to the new URLs - you should keep a close eye on the 404 errors and soft 404 errors sections in Google Webmaster Tools, and make sure to fix those errors as they pop up. This can be time consuming, but it's key. Set up a redirection plugin for your wordpress - the redirection plugin can also track 404 errors and then you can tell them where they should redirect. While this should have been done in advance and is key to any properly planned and organized site migration, you can do this after the fact and try to catch as many of these 404s as well. I'd also look at your inbound links from OSE or some other tool, and make sure those pages are redirected to their proper location, so you preserve the inbound link juice.
These are the key things in my mind you should do according to your post. Good luck!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
What is the best SEO way to categorize products on an ecommerce site
What is the best way for SEO to set up categories for an ecommerce site selling beauty products. I have currently built my product categories so that if a person looks under the hydration category they find our body lotion, but also if they look under the body section of products they also will find the same body lotion. Is this a problem for SEO? I think it helps the customer find the product.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Kuhliff0 -
HTTPS during or after redesign
Performing a website redesign and with that we are going to be deindexing a lot of pages and make big changes to the site architecture. With all of these big changes happening with the redesign, should we include the change to https during the redesign or about 4-6 months after? If we do it after we will have time to diagnose any shortcomings of the redesign. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Trent.Warner0 -
Launching a new website. Old inherited site cannot be saved after lifted penalty. When should we kill the old site and how?
Background Information A website that we inherited was severely penalized and after the penalty was revoked the site still never resurfaced in rankings or traffic. Although a dramatic action, we have decided to launch a completely new version of the website. Everything will be new including the imagery, branding, content, domain name, hosting company, registrar account, google analytics account, etc. Our question is when do we pull the plug on the old site and how do we go about doing it? We had heard advice that we should make sure we run both sites at the same time for 3 months, then deindex the old site using a noindex meta robots tag.We are cautious because we don't want the old website to be associated in any way, shape or form with the new website. We will purposely not be 301 redirecting any URLs from the old website to the new. What would you do if you were in this situation?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | peteboyd0 -
Site Redesign Inconsistent Trailing Slash Issue
I'm looking at a site that has implemented trailing slashes inconsistently across multiple pages. For instance:
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | GrouchyKids
http://www.examplesite.co.uk/ (WITH)
http://www.examplesite.co.uk/product-range (WITHOUT)
http://www.examplesite.co.uk/product (WITHOUT)
http://www.examplesite.co.uk/blog/ (WITH)
http://www.examplesite.co.uk/blog/blog-article/ (WITH) The blog was created later in Wordpress which is one of the reasons why this issue exists. Looking at the inbound links unsurprisingly the lions share go to the home page but lots of other pages have links as well, particularly the product pages, no to many to the blog pages. This pattern is similar in terms of which pages rank, the home page ranks well for a variety of phrases, the product pages also do quite well. I know that ideally the URL's should be identical to the existing site, or if you have to you should 301 redirect old to new. The client wants to switch the whole site over to Wordpress which will be default implement a consistent URL structure across the board, thereby changing at least some of the URL's no matter what I do. I remember a Matt Cutts video that stated that even a 301 redirect will loose a clicks worth of link juice see: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Filv4pP-1nw The existing site has a poor UX compared to the new proposed design so this should help us. Has anyone got any experience with a similar issue or any advice about how best to proceed?0 -
Best way to SEO crowdsourcing site
What is the best way to SEO a crowdsourcing site? The websites content is entirely propagated by the user
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | StreetwiseReports0 -
Is this Negative SEO?
Hello Everyone, I have just spent the past 9 months designing, engineering, and manufacturing our first product. We just opened our web store and started selling product. http://miveu.com. I have spent zero time doing any kind of SEO. We haven't even put up a sitemap yet or any redirects. I'm just now starting to take a look at things. As soon as I start digging, I find that it appears that someone is at least attempting to do some kind of negative SEO against us. It seems to have started about a month ago. Check this out. https://www.google.com/search?q=miveu&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-beta#q=miveu&hl=en&client=firefox-beta&hs=bo2&tbo=1&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=imvns&source=lnt&tbs=qdr:d&sa=X&psj=1&ei=AGgBUJfJNK650QHW8YW-Bw&ved=0CE0QpwUoAg&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=335379d2f3ac2208&biw=993&bih=637 At first I was thinking this isn't so good, but it seems they are just trying to build crap content about our keywords and make it relevant to us. After taking a closer look, I'm thinking maybe this isn't all bad. They have targeted all of our exiting YouTube videos and created new videos that use all of our keywords, titles, people, etc in an effort to make our existing videos irrelevant. They have have also done the same thing with articles that were written about us, awards we have won as well as started negative campaigns about us and people who have said good things about us. Here are my thoughts. While the content is really crappy, it seems like they are actually building keyword relevance to us and our products. They have all the right keywords, the content is just crappy. "There is no such thing as bad press". I don't know if anyone has ever said this before, but I'm going to refer to their effort as "White-Hate SEO" because it doesn't appear to be a real dark effort. Am I missing something here, am I way off base? My bigger worry is that their campaign may include some much darker efforts that I just haven't found yet. I'm pretty sure I know who is responsible for this. They have made it clear that they really do hate us. Frankly, I'm not interested in retaliation, I just want to get my own house in order with some good old-school whit-hat SEO. I'm really curious to hear your thoughts on this. Thanks!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | dmac
David0 -
Site #2 beats site #1 in every aspect?
Hey guys, loving SEOMoz so far and will definitely continue my subscription after the free trial. I have a question however, which I am really confused about. When researching my primary keyword, I have found that the second ranked site beats the top site in every single aspect, apart from domain age, which is almost 6 years for the top one and 6 months for the second. When I say every single aspect, I mean everything. More authority for the page and domain, more links, more anchor text links, more authoritive links, more social signals, more relevant links, better domain (although second ranked site is a .net), better MozRank, better MozTrust etc.... I have noticed though, that in the UK SERPs, those sites are switched, so #2 is actually #1. Could it be that the US SERPs just haven't updated yet, or am I missing something completely different.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | darrenspeed1 -
One site or five sites for geo targeted industry
OK I'm looking to try and generate traffic for people looking for accommodation. I'm a big believer in the quality of the domain being used for SEO both in terms of the direct benefit of it having KW in it but also the effect on CTR a good domain can have. So I'm considering these options: Build a single site using the best, broad KW-rich domain I can get within my budget. This might be something like CheapestHotelsOnline.com Advantages: Just one site to manage/design One site to SEO/market Better potential to resell the site for a few million bucks Build 5 sites, each catering to a different region using 5 matching domains within my budget. These might be domains like CheapHotelsEurope.com, CheapHotelsAsia.com etc Advantages: Can use domains that are many times 'better' by adding a geo-qualifier. This should help with CTR and search Can be more targeted with SEO & Marketing So hopefully you see the point. Is it worth the dilution of SEO & marketing activities to get the better domain names? I'm chasing the longtail searchs whetever I do. So I'll be creating 5K+ pages each targeting a specific area. These would be pages like CheapestHotelsOnline.com/Europe/France/Paris or CheapHoteslEurope.com/France/Paris to target search terms targeting hotels in Paris So with that thought, is SEO even 100% diluted? Say, a link to the homepage of the first option would end up passing 1/5000th of value through to the Paris page. However a link to the second option would pass 1/1000th of the link juice through to the Paris page. So by thet logic, one only needs to do 1/5th of the work for each of the 5 sites ... that implies total SEO work would be the same? Thanks as always for any help! David
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | OzDave0