Site rankings steadily decreasing - do I need to remove links?
-
Since mid-April, our ranking have been steadily declining. Our two main keywords are 'nuts and bolts' and 'bolts and nuts'. 'nuts and bolts' dropped from 7th to 46th in May and has recovered slightly to 28th, and 'bolts and nuts' moved from 7th to 16th, and is today 24th.
Ranking on keywords we specialise in have fared better, but they're fairly niche. 'bsw bolts' has moved from 2nd to 4th, and 'imperial bolts' has moved from 1st to 4th.
I think my link profile is the issue. I don't think we've been penalised by Penguin directly (I may be wrong, I don't think we'd be page 2 on such a competitive term as 'bolts and nuts' after Penguin if we had been penalised.), but I think what's happened is that sites that link to us have been penalised, resulting in a knock on effect. Does that sound right?
Here's my link profile:
<a rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.opensiteexplorer.org/links?site=www.thomassmithfasteners.com</a>
I've been slowly building relevant links with prospective customers and kept up a very basic social media profile - just the odd blog post and sharing on Facebook and Twitter.
Do I need to delete all the directory links? We do have links from directories that don't look fantastic, more are shown in Webmaster Tools than are listed here. Some of the directories no longer seem to exist, I take it I don't need to do anything and Google will catch up in those cases. Should I attempt to remove (or disavow) all links with names like best-directory etc? Or should I just concentrate on building better links? I'm not sure where to start!
Any advice is greatly appreciated.
Best Regards,
Stephen
-
OK, it's now a few months later, with nothing linkbuilding-wise except posting blog posts on Facebook, G+ and Twitter.
I've tried to make the site more accessible - we now have a simple, responsive design and I've tried to make the content clear and concise. In short, written for humans rather than search engines.
As of the end of November, 'nuts and bolts' has now disappeared completely, and 'bolts and nuts' is page 8. There are many pages much higher which are not as relevant and have no links. We still rank highly for more specialised terms - ie 'bsw bolts' and 'imperial bolts' are still page 1, but not as high as before.
We get an 'A' grade on the on-page grader for 'nuts and bolts, and most above us get F. I was cautious about removing links as our profile doesn't seem too bad but it does seem as if it's that. There are a fair few questionable directories in there, no doubt about that, but our overall practice in recent years has been natural building and link earning.
So - I've created a spreadsheet and identified the bad links - ie directories with any SEO connotations. I am about to submit removal requests, I thought two polite requests a couple of weeks apart prior to disavowing with Google.
I am also gradually beefing up the content on the shop pages in case of any 'thin content' issues.
I noticed 100s of broken links in webmaster tools due to 2 broken links on our blog and have fixed those. I have also been fixing errors W3C compliance-wise.
Am I right to do all this? Can anyone offer any suggestions? I'm still not 100% sure if this is Panda, Penguin or something else. My guess is Penguin, but the decline started in March 2013, which correlates with Panda.
Best Regards and thanks for any help,
Stephen
-
Can any of you knowledgeable chaps please help with this?
As my last post says, I'm getting an 'A' grade on the Moz on-page grader, but 31 repeats of 'bsf bolts' meaning it's picking up the list from the shop database.
Is there a way around this? In the description of the item, I've changed BSW to 'Whitworth' where possible (means the same), but I'm stuck on 31 repeats, which is obviously too many. I thought Google ignored shop database lists of items, but seemingly not.
Best Regards,
Stephen
-
Hi Cyrus,
Thank you very much for your response.
I have added content related to the bolt threadforms on my page to give more information. However, the ranking on the BSF Bolts page has decreased from 4th to 9th.
http://www.thomassmithfasteners.com/hexagon_bolts_bsf.html
I ran it through the MOZ on-page grader and the thing that jumps out is it says I have 22 repetitions! I think the PHP list of the shop items is being seen as keyword stuffing. Of course, I have to describe the items on each line. Is there a way to combat this?
Many thanks for your assistance.
Best Regards,
Stephen
-
Hi Stephen,
Without doing a full backlink audit, there's a few things I would do first.
Try your site with Panguin Tool to see if you've been hit by a known update: http://www.barracuda-digital.co.uk/panguin-tool/
Also try this over-optimization tool to check your anchor text: http://www.removeem.com/ratios.php
Your theory about the decrease in value of your link profile may be spot on. It never hurts to build more quality links.
On another note, I couldn't help but notice quite a lot of your site is "thin" content. Pages such as this: http://www.thomassmithfasteners.com/full_nuts_bsf.html . While this is common with your competitors as well, beefing these sections up with more descriptive content could never hurt.
Also, you might want to check your title tags. The seem to mostly start with "Thomas Smith Fasterners". Normally, you want to place the keywords you want to rank for towards the begining of the tag, and avoid repeating the same phrases across multiple title tags.
http://moz.com/learn/seo/title-tag
Thomas Smith Fasteners - UNC Full Nuts BS 1768 Online Shop
or
Shop UNC Full Nuts, BS 1768 from Thomas Smith Fasteners -
I would disagree with only one aspect of Kurt's comment, Stephen, and only because I tend to try to err on the safe side. I would remove/disavow any links from questionable directories. There are still a few good ones out there, but I believe the majority carry a nasty connotation.
Kurt is absolutely correct when he says that "recovery" of previous rankings by no more that link removal is a pipe dream... ain't gonna happen! The equity that you lost by any links that were devalued before removal is gone forever and will have to be replaced with new activity.
Since it seems that a major portion of your losses are focused around "nuts and bolts" and "bolts and nuts", you might also try changing your anchor text on a significant portion of the links using that anchor text, at least on any source sites that seem worth hanging onto.
-
Stephen,
Dropping in ranking because you loose links either from them being devalued by Google or the sites shutting down is quite possible. It could also be a combination of lost links and a spammy profile. But you've gleaned onto something a lot of people don't get about Penguin and spammy link. People like to talk about "recovering" from Penguin, but what they often don't understand is that the link authority that was getting them their earlier rankings is gone. There's nothing to recover to. What's really going on is that their site's new authority level is lower and they are going to just have to build their site's authority level up as though they never had a higher authority site before. So, it's not something where they can disavow a few links, get a few links removed and "Alakazam!" rankings have returned...but they seem to expect that.
If you had a lot of links pointing to your site which are now either gone or devalued, then it would make sense that your site lost rankings. You just have to build the site back up with some natural link building.
As to your question about spammy directories, I wouldn't worry about the initially. Focus on putting out great content and sharing it and see how that goes. If, after several months, you find that you aren't getting any movement, then perhaps you go in and have links removed and start disavowing links.
And, yes, Google will eventually remove the old links from your profile. It just takes Google forever and a day to do so. The link list in Google Webmaster Tools is never up to date. It's always months behind.
-Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com -
Hi Kurt,
Many thanks for your response.
The report on links in Google Webmaster Tools shows a lot more links - but the sites no longer exist for a fair amount of them. I'm guessing that they were removed from Google's index and then the webmaster, seeing no benefit, deleted the site. I did see on here that Google delisted 1000s of blogs and directories in March - which ties in with when we started losing rankings. So maybe we haven't been penalised directly but lost ranking due to say, 100 links (just a guess) no longer being active, so we aren't gaining anything from them - which is a lot when we only have 400-500 anyway. Does that sound right?
As an example, one is something like freeseo24x7. something, which is a dead link now.
I presume directories like that are obvious bad news now, I'm going through the Google list to see if there's any more like that. Would you delete / disavow those?
If the sites are no longer accessible for a lot of the 'bad' directories that link to us, will Google update its list for my site over time?
-
Hi Stephen,
A quick review of your link profile didn't actually look too bad, at least I didn't notice anything glaring. You have some keywords that have lots of links, but those appear to all be internal links that are part of the navigation of your site which is normal.
I'd recommend focusing on building links rather than removing links. Your site doesn't have a ton of links pointing to it. According the the Open Site Explorer report you referenced, you have 434 links. Even if there is some issue with an unbalanced link profile, it should take many good, natural links to balance it out.
-Kurt Steinbrueck
OurChurch.Com
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
My wordpress site generating bad links
Hello Everyone, I have wordpress site Which is from last 20 days generating links like For Example http://www.domainname.com/game/965/wiki/キャラクター図鑑_レアリティ(★★★)_【ID:675】ワッツ・ステップニー htttp://www.domainname.com/nkpghfu_13356_gvgjq_tfjhnkt_jsj_296_82566_673_567_245 This is screenshot of webmaster tools http://prnt.sc/ccwh0e can please any expert check & Tell How this Link i am getting, Also What are steps i need take for removing this Errors, As it is harming my sites Flow As well As Rankings. Thanx in Advance
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | innovativekrishna10 -
Link Juice + Site Structure
Hi All, I have attached a simple website model.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Mark_Ch
Page A is the home page attracting 1000 visitors per month.
One click away is Page B with 400 visitors per month, so on and so forth. You get an idea of the flow and clicks required to get to various pages. I have purposely placed Pages E-G to be 3 clicks away as they yield very little traffic. 1] Is this the best way to distribute link juice?
2] Should I point Pages C + D back to page A to influence its Page Rank (PA) Any other useful advice would be appreciated. Thanks Mark vafnchI0 -
Can too many NoFollow links damage your Google rankings?
I've been trying to recover from a Google algorithm change since Sep 2012, so far without success. I'm now wondering if the nofollow on external links in my blog posts are actually doing me damage. http://www.smartdatinguk.com/blog/ Does anyone have any experience of this?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | benners0 -
Unnatural Links From My Site Penalty - Where, exactly?
So I was just surprised by officially being one of the very few to be hit with the manual penalty from Google "unnatural links from your site." We run a clean ship or try to. Of all the possible penalties, this is the one most unlikely by far to occur. Well, it explains some issues we've had that have been impossible to overcome. We don't have a link exchange. Our entire directory has been deindexed from Google for almost 2 years because of Panda/Penguin - just to be 100% sure this didn't happen. We removed even links that went even to my own personal websites - which were a literal handful. We have 3 partners - who have nofollow links and are listed on a single page. So I'm wondering... does anyone have any reason to understand why we'd have this penalty and it would linger for such a long period of time? If you want to see strange things, try to look up our page rank on virtually any page, especially in the /gui de/ directory. Now the bizarre results of many months make sense. Hopefully one of my fellow SEOs with a fresh pair of eyes can take a look at this one. http://legal.nu/kc68
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | seoagnostic0 -
Site wide footer links vs. single link for websites we design
I’ve been running a web design business for the past 5 years, 90% or more of the websites we build have a “web design by” link in the footer which links back to us using just our brand name or the full “web design by brand name” anchor text. I’m fully aware that site-wide footer links arent doing me much good in terms of SEO, but what Im curious to know is could they be hurting me? More specifically I’m wondering if I should do anything about the existing links or change my ways for all new projects, currently we’re still rolling them out with the site-wide footer links. I know that all other things being equal (1 link from 10 domains > 10 links from 1 domain) but is (1 link from 10 domains > 100 links from 10 domains)? I’ve got a lot of branded anchor text, which balances out my exact match and partial match keyword anchors from other link building nicely. Another thing to consider is that we host many of our clients which means there are quite a few on the same server with a shared IP. Should I? 1.) Go back into as many of the sites as I can and remove the link from all pages except the home page or a decent PA sub page- keeping a single link from the domain. 2.) Leave all the old stuff alone but start using the single link method on new sites. 3.) Scratch the site credit and just insert an exact-match anchor link in the body of the home page and hide with with CSS like my top competitor seems to be doing quite successfully. (kidding of course.... but my competitor really is doing this.)
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | nbeske0 -
Migrating a site from a standalone site to a subdivision of large .gov.uk site
The scenario We’ve been asked by a client, a Non-Government Organisation who are being absorbed by a larger government ministry, for help with the SEO of their site. They will be going from a reasonably large standalone site to a small sub-directory on a high authority government site and they want some input on how best to maintain their rankings. They will be going from the Number 1 ranked site in their niche (current site domainRank 59) to being a sub directory on a domainRank 100 site). The current site will remain, but as a members only resource, behind a paywall. I’ve been checking to see the impact that it had on a related site, but that one has put a catch all 302 redirect on it’s pages so is losing the benefit of a it’s historical authority. My thoughts Robust 301 redirect set up to pass as much benefit as possible to the new pages. Focus on rewriting content to promote most effective keywords – would suggest testing of titles, meta descriptions etc but not sure how often they will be able to edit the new site. ‘We have moved’ messaging going out to webmasters of existing linking sites to try to encourage as much revision of linking as possible. Development of link-bait to try and get the new pages seen. Am I going about this the right way? Thanks in advance. Phil
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | smrs-digital0 -
How can someone not call B.S. on this site ranking 4th.
We manage a lot of sites that are around pharmaceuticals and lawsuits. I was checking a couple of the sites around the keyword: Actos Lawsuit using the keyword difficulty with serp analysis. Our sites have done very little Adwords except for first month about a year ago and we have always ranked well and the client is very happy with the results. Tonight I notice a site that is http://wikilawsuit.org/drug-recalls/actos-side-effects-bladder-cancer-actos-lawsuit/ They are ranked fourth on Google. Our url which is http://actos-lawsuit.org/ is ranked 9th?? Frankly there are several sites ranked ahead and when you look at the parameters all the way across some we are killing. But Wiki, everyone is killing and it is still fourth. I ran it in OSE and the metrics came back better, but there is at best 3 to 4 real links out of 30 domains. This is a commercial site with a contact form in right sidebar and my guess is they are selling leads to lawyers. So they are about as Wiki as Hooters. That said, we see all the talk about quality links and I am seeing a lot of sites with few quality links and lots of junk links. Should we still believe it matters? Or, is it that it matters when the sites are huge (JC Penny), etc. but not if the site is under some critical number of poor links? Looking forward to a moz Fest on this.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | RobertFisher0 -
Migrating multiple sites and trying to save link juice
I have an interesting problem SEOmozers and wanted to see if I could get some good ideas as to what I should to for the greatest benefit. I have an ecommerce website that sells tire sensors. We just converted the old site to a new platform and payment processor, so the site has changed completely from the original, just offering virtually the same products as before. You can find it at www.tire-sensors.com We're ranked #1 for the keyword "tire sensors" in Google. We sell sensors for ford, honda, toyota, etc -- and tire-sensors.com has all of those listed. Before I came along, the company I'm working for also had individual "mini ecommerce" sites created with only 1 brand of sensors and the URL to match that maker. Example : www.fordtiresensors.com is our site, only sells the Ford parts from our main site, and ranks #1 in Google for "ford tire sensors" I don't have analytics on these old sites but Google Keyword Tool is saying "ford tire sensors" gets 880 local searches a month, and other brand-specific tire sensors are receiving traffic as well. We have many other sites that are doing the same thing. www.suzukitiresensors.com (ranked #2 for "suzuki tire sensors") Only sells our Suzuki collection from the main site's inventory etc We need to get rid of the old sites because we want to shut down the payment gateway and various other things those sites are using, and move to one consolidated system (aka www.tire-sensors.com) Would simply making each maker-specific URL (ie. fordtiresensors.com) 301 redirect to our main site (www.tire-sensors.com) give us to most benefit, rankings, traffic etc? Or would that be detrimental to what we're trying to do -- capturing the tire sensors market for all car manufacturers? Suggestions? Thanks a lot in advance! Jordan
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | JordanGodbey0