Site Penalty After Changing Hosting Companies?
-
In one week's time, we've dropped from #3 on Page 1 of Google to Page 7 (similar on Bing). It looks like our traffic started to drop on 9/5 to 9/7 and has been a steady, rapid decline ever since. 1000s of pages are indexed, just suddenly ranking poorly -- even for branded terms.
History:
--In January, we switched to a web redesign & new domain
--In August, our hosting server was slow & kept crashing so we migrated our site to a new hosting company. We're not currently using the old hosting server. All domains, redirects, .htaccess files should now be correct and site speeds are improved.
--In early September, our NEW hosting company had a DNS issue causing more slow speeds and downtime for about 1 wk. Originally they thought it was htaccess so they changed our htaccess file - no luck - then discovered it was DNS. DNS issue was finally resolved on September 6th -- one day before the penalty/traffic issue seemed to begin.
-- According to GWMT, it looks like there were crawls completed around 9/4-9/5What we've tried:
--Webmaster Tools - Googlebot dropoff since 9/5 (see attached screenshot). Nothing flagged. No site health alerts. Fetch as Google works. No manual webspam actions found.
-- W3C link checker, screamingfrog SEO spider, Xenu Link Sleuth, OSE (found some 4xx errors so we've updated those links)
-- Majestic SEO - backlinks reviewed 9/3 to 9/8
-- spoke to two different Adwords salespeople; unable to help
-- Bing Webmaster Tools
-- not showing organic search traffic since 9/6
-- 15% fewer pages crawled this month
-- top keywords are very odd -- stuff like "mt1 google apis" and "aaremel"
-- there are 4xx crawl errors under Crawl Information. We've fixed those URLs but they still appear in Webmaster Tools
-- some missing h1's and meta's, and dup titles, which we're working to fix
-- spike in crawl errors 9/11-9/12 and again on 9/14-9/15It's been one thing after another this year, but all issues are now resolved with the exception of this newly-discovered penalty. We also have sites on a separate hosting server (with a different hosting company) that rank just fine.
-
D.D.
I had a feeling re the .htaccess piece, so glad to hear things improved. I can tell you that with both Rackspace and Firehost I have had very very good experiences and would recommend either heartily. I did find your company interesting and I wish you the very best going forward.
Robert -
Robert, thank you so much for your quick and thorough responses. We've been using the Moz software and lurking the forums for a few months, but this was our first time posting for some help, and this has truly been a wonderful first experience. Thank you!
Quick update... We're back on Page One of Google (even #1 on P1 for some terms) as of 11pm EST last night! Other than what was mentioned in the original post, the only additional change we made was we deleted all .htaccess changes that had been made by the new hosting company.
To answer your question, the htaccess changes were made without our knowledge while we were placed on hold during a call to the hosting provider during the DNS outage. They didn't realize it was DNS at first so they placed us on hold to "investigate" and when they came back, they informed us that they'd found & "fixed" some issues in the .htaccess file & that the site should be working properly again. Of course, .htaccess wasn't even the issue to begin with, and it seems their changes ended up creating more issues for us.
We've looked into Rackspace -- always heard good things! We will definitely be looking into them if we move hosting again.
Thank you for offering to have your team take a look into the server. I will keep an eye on things and let you know if we run into anymore issues -- and yes, please let us know if you ever find yourself craving some naturally colored cupcakes.
-
Great, now you need to go to Advanced on the same page and click on blocked by Robots and leave the Total indexed where it is (checked). This will show if someone did anything re robots.txt that caused your pages indexed to drop by over 500.
404's are not necessarily a problem, but if you fixed them, did you mark them as fixed in WMT? If not they will show. Mark them as fixed and then if they show up again you will know there is still a problem.
I ran the site in ahrefs and it looks like you did a considerable cleanup or change in linking back in March and I see no Penquin type problems. You don't say you dropped on or about late June as well.
Here is a question I do not want you to take the wrong way; I am curious is the reason for asking: Why is your hosting company touching your .htaccess file?
In SEO an idiom we try never to forget is correlation does not equal causation; understanding that, I still cannot help but think you have an issue resulting during the hosting change. You are using WP so there should not be a hurdle for your host to get over, but I do have a bias against registrars with hosting, etc. I prefer to use hosting firms like firehost, rackspace, etc. as the knowledge level is typically much higher on server side issues. I can't tell you that you need a dedicated per se, but that is a costly bias I have.
If you would like to PM me, I will be happy to have our server people take a peek for you and just tell you what they see. Typically, they can figure out the error quickly as we handle a lot of client sites on our servers. (I am in no way seeking your business, etc. I would just have them take a look as I am baffled at the problem you are having. And, hopefully it is obvious, but no charge at all. The next time I need colored cupcakes, you can hook me up
Best
Robert
-
Thanks for the quick response! We've not received any penalty notices -- just assuming a penalty based on what we've been seeing, having never been through this particular situation before. You are correct that Manual Actions in GWMT shows "No manual webspam actions found."
As requested, I'm attaching some screenshots of the index status and crawl stats from webmaster tools. Let me know if there's any additional information we could provide that might be helpful to you.
-
D.D.
First I made an assumption as to the site and am not going to mention since you have not. First, did you receive a penalty notice from Google or are you making an assumption?
Next, in GWMT, can you send a screenshot of the index status of the site? In case you don't know go to dashboard, 3rd or 4th item below is Google Index - click and the first one will be index status. This will show how many pages have been indexed over time. Also, in dashboard, above Google Index you will see Search Traffic - click that - and you will see Manual Actions - click that and you will see any penalties that need to be handled. (You state none so I am assuming you learned that in GWMT).
On the page where you grabbed the two screenshots, the first item is pages crawled; Can you show that as well? From the kilobytes downloaded, it appears your problem occurred toward the end of week one of September. Has the number of indexed pages dropped?
This would give a reasonable start to what the problem might be.
Thanks,
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Is there an advantage to using rel=canonical rather than noindex on pages on my mobile site (m.company.com)?
Is there an advantage to using link rel=alternate (as recommended by Google) rather than noindex on pages on my mobile site (m.company.com)? The content on the mobile pages is very similar to the content on the desktop site. I see Google recommends canonical and alternate tags, but what are the benefits of using those rather than noindex?
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | jennifer.new0 -
Penguin recovery, no manual action. Are our EMD sites killing our brand site?
Hi guys, Our brand site (http://urban3d.net) has been seeing steady decline due to algorithm updates for the past two years. Our previous SEO company engaged in some black-hat link building which has hurt us very badly. We have recently re-launched the site, with better design, better content, and completed a disavow of hundreds of bad links. The site is technically indexed, but is still nowhere in the SERPs after months of work to recover it by our internal marketing team. The last SEO company also told us to build EMD sites for our core services, which we did: http://3dvisualisation.co.uk/ http://propertybrochure.com/ http://kitchencgi.com/ My question is - could these EMD sites now hurting us even further and stopping our main brand site from ranking? Our plan is to rescue our brand site, with a view to retiring these outlier sites. However, with no progress on the brand site, we can't afford to remove these site (which are ranking). It seems a bit chicken and egg. Any advice would be very much appreciated. Aidan, Urban 3D
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | aidancass0 -
Site Not Ranking- No Reason Why
I have a client with a HUGE website who should be ranking for it's competitive keywords. No penalties, or bad links. Old domain. Not ranking for anything. Client has a huge AdWords spend and my theory is that it's not ranking organically because of the AdWords spend. I can't think of anything other reason. Anyone? Thanks. The keywords I'm trying to rank this client for aren't even competitive.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 01023450 -
Change domain whilst under a partial manual links penalty
Hi there We're currently under a manual penalty for some unnatural links to our domain and have been working on fixing that but had our first re-consideration request rejected so we're doing a second round of link removals The issue we have is that we were planning to change our domain before the SSL certificate expires in a couple of weeks and renew the certificate with the new domain but are unsure whether to stop working on the reconsideration request, change the domain and wait until the manual penalty moves to the new domain before continuing the link removal. Alternatively try and use the domain change to select which links are 301'd to the new site and leave behind the bad links in the hope that the manual penalty wouldn't be applied to the new domain Any thoughts or advice would be appreciated
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | Ham19790 -
301s from previous site
Hi! Got quite a tricky problem regarding a client, http://www.muchbetteradventures.com/ and their previous site, http://v1.muchbetteradventures.com/ Here's the background: We have approx 1500 'listing' pages like this: http://v1.muchbetteradventures.com/listing/view/1925/the-barre-des-ecrins-or-the-dome-des-ecrins-mountaineering-trip They bring in min 2k hits/month, and also add to the overall site authority I suspect. They will eventually all have a home on main domain. When they do, they will also each have been rewritten to be unique, so the value of them will increase (many are currently not). We also have landing pages like this: http://v1.muchbetteradventures.com/view/559/volunteering-holidays- which despite being hideous are ranked fairly well (page 1 for key terms). We cannot currently fulfil all these on main domain, but do not want to shut them down and lose positioning. Choices as I see it: Make a landing page e.g. muchbetteradventures.com/volunteering and a) redirect from old landing page, b) redirect all related 'listings' to this page. May help preserve rankings of main landing page (the most important), but not of any listings? Import all listings to have a home on main domain, (probably as children of a landing page, but not rewritten to be unique just yet). Make them not accessible from homepage, and change functionality of them so that new visitors from google are told we cannot currently help them with this trip. This is more work to complete so will take longer to do and is a distraction from our core focus so needs good justification! Stay running largely as we are, slowly redirecting 1 page at a time as we carry over more and more options to main domain. This will take over 12 months min.
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | neooptic0 -
Moving from a static HTML CSS site with .html files to a Wordpress Site while keeping link structure
Mozzers, Hope this finds you well. I need some advice. We have a site built with a dreamweaver template, and it is lacking in responsiveness, ease of updates, and a lot of the coding is behind traditional web standards (which I know will start to hurt our rank - if not the user experience). For SEO purposes, we would like to move the existing static based site to Wordpress so we can update it easily and keep content fresh. Our current site, thriveboston.com, has a lot of page extensions ending in .html. For the transition, it is extremely important for us to keep the link structure. We rank well in the SERPs for Boston Counseling, etc... I found and tested a plugin (offline) that can add a .html extension to Wordpress pages, which allows us to keep our current structure, but has anyone had any luck with this live? Has anyone had any luck moving from a static site - to a Wordpress site - while keeping the current link structure - without hurting any rank? We hope to move soon because if the site continues to grow, it will become even harder to migrate the site over. Also, does anyone have any hesitations? It this a bad move? Should we just stay on the current DWT template (the HTML and CSS) and not migrate? Any suggestions and advice will be heeded. Thanks Mozzers!
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | _Thriveworks0 -
PDF on financial site that duplicates ~50% of site content
I have a financial advisor client who has a downloadable PDF on his site that contains about 9 pages of good info. Problem is much of the content can also be found on individual pages of his site. Is it best to noindex/follow the pdf? It would be great to let the few pages of original content be crawlable, but I'm concerned about the duplicate content aspect. Thanks --
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | 540SEO0 -
Critique My Site For SEO
Hi Everyone, I was wondering if someone might critique my site and let me know what you think. I've done pretty much everything I know to do proper seo for my site. I'd love to hear some critiques about what I am doing wrong. I'm not sure if my titles are okay, being that they are similar amongst pages. The other thing is that for all the javascript buttons on the top I have no followed them since they don't have any anchor text. The way google will crawl my page is through the links in the footer. I was thinking of moving them throughout the body of the page since I hear google isn't giving as much weight to footer links. I also wanted to hear what you think about putting a blog on my site and updating with fresh content as opposed to creating a separate blog and then linking back to my website with anchor text. Thanks for all the help. And glad to be a member Bill
Intermediate & Advanced SEO | | wsh150