Importance of 301 Redirects
-
Hello,
I have been brought in at the last minute to consult for an e-commerce client who is about to relaunch their website. The site currently receives 8000 visits a month, 3100 of which are from organic search. They have a few thousand product pages. The web development firm they are using is changing all of the old product page urls and using 'search engine friendly' urls for the new site, which is expected to launch in a few weeks. However, they did not/are not planning on including 301 redirects from the old URLs.
Other than simply stating 'this will be bad for your SEO', what would be a correct way of explaining to the client how much of a problem it will be if their new site launches without 301s. For example, is this a big enough issue to delay the launch of the site / get in a contract dispute with the web developer?
-
Thanks for all the great responses so far. The site was registered in 1997 and the current site has been up for 6 years. Here's the link profile for the site:
Domain Authority - 32
Domain MozRank 4.08
Domain Moztrust 4.86
Esternal Followed Links 258
Total External Links 271
Total links 59,852
Followed Linking Root Domains 71
Total Linking Root Domains 76
Linking C-Blocks 46
-
you have a point, But if your page has no links, then it is likely search engines see it as poor quality been around so long yet no links, so for that reason the page age may be a bad signal, at least not one worth keeping
If in fact page age is even looked at.
It may also be that the age is not transferred, this link is all I know about age
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-pnpg00FWJY&feature=player_embedded
It talks about domain age not page age, but Matt talks about the first time they crawl a domain. If we adapt that to a page I would suggest that they will look at the first time the crawl a URL so changing a url will be enough to lose the age.
OK I don't have inside knowledge of google, but I do know how a 301 works and I can give a you a pretty good guess. A 301 tells a request to make a new request to a new url. I think that google follows it just like that, here is a new page, it has no relevance to the old page its just a new url. to imagine that they keep a record of all 301s where a page used to be for ever, I find hard to believe. When they crawl a external link, they get retuned a new url and the link juice is redirected again thought a second request(hence the second loss of link juice.) and finds the new page where the link juice lands.
Think of a page that has many 301s from many old pages, then it would have many ages, I would suggest google keeps it simple, they just follow the 301 to a new url and treat it as a new found page and distribute the link juice as they would any other page they and on.
For a bunch of pages that don't have links, I cant see any difference, but what I would worry about is page speed. reading a long set of 301 code then trying them can slow a site down (remember we are talking about a large number here). If you can simple do all your 301's with a few lines of code then that's not a problem, but if you start to get a long list then its going to a be a problem for every page in the site.
back to your point, I have also had thought about this, but for a slightly different reason, and that is original content, if your page was from 2001 and you were scraped in 2003 and will the 2003 scrape now get the original content credit. but then this may e the case anyhow even with a 301, and again, I don't think this is a big problem because sites that scrape are not likely to be given credit, they will have lots of scraped content and will be known as a scraping site and not be awarded credit.
-
I always wonder though, how much non-link data is lost on such a page that could have an effect on rankings... such as the age of the page?
-
Excellent response from Dana to which I can add only one thought:
What's their backlink profile like now? Do many of their product pages have links to them? Do any have a decent number of links?
If they 404 all those links it's going to hurt. You know that already.
Some stats of how their backlink profile is going to be affected might also help your case.
-
First do these pages have any external links?
if not then there is no gain from a 301, if some of them do, the redirect those pages
-
Hi Jason,
Having been in your situation before I can emphatically confirm that not doing any 301 redirects is a recipe for a disastrous relaunch. To answer your last question first, yes, it is absolutely something worth delaying the launch and yes, get in contact with the developer. He/She will be your best ally in trying to convince stakeholders that the 301s are crucial to the success of relaunching. While the developer most likely already understands why 301s are so important, putting all of that technical-SEO-babble into laymen's terms is harder.
Use pictures.
Make a screenshot of a 404 error page. Then, show with pictures, how much traffic the top 10 pages on the current site are getting and how many people link to them...again...use pictures, draw them if you have to.
Then, make a Screencast showing what's going to happen to any visitor who tries to visit the site via a bookmarked URL (choose a really ugly scary looking 404 page...for effect).
Then, manage expectations (just in case they don't listen to you an proceed without the 301 redirects)...Use more pictures...Show what you anticipate will happen to traffic when they go this route. Make it clear that they may never recover. Relaunching alone, even with 301 redirects in place, can leave a website gasping for air. Tell them to expect less traffic, even with the 301s, and that without them it will be even worse.
Look for some real world examples....I'm sure there are dozens of folks here who have lived through the pain of a relaunch and have stories to tell.
Good luck. May the force be with you!
Dana
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Forced Redirects/HTTP<>HTTPS 301 Question
Hi All, Sorry for what's about to be a long-ish question, but tl;dr: Has anyone else had experience with a 301 redirect at the server level between HTTP and HTTPS versions of a site in order to maintain accurate social media share counts? This is new to me and I'm wondering how common it is. I'm having issues with this forced redirect between HTTP/HTTPS as outlined below and am struggling to find any information that will help me to troubleshoot this or better understand the situation. If anyone has any recommendations for things to try or sources to read up on, I'd appreciate it. I'm especially concerned about any issues that this may be causing at the SEO level and the known-unknowns. A magazine I work for recently relaunched after switching platforms from Atavist to Newspack (which is run via WordPress). Since then, we've been having some issues with 301s, but they relate to new stories that are native to our new platform/CMS and have had zero URL changes. We've always used HTTPS. Basically, the preview for any post we make linking to the new site, including these new (non-migrated pages) on Facebook previews as a 301 in the title and with no image. This also overrides the social media metadata we set through Yoast Premium. I ran some of the links through the Facebook debugger and it appears that Facebook is reading these links to our site (using https) as redirects to http that then redirect to https. I was told by our tech support person on Newspack's team that this is intentional, so that Facebook will maintain accurate share counts versus separate share counts for http/https, however this forced redirect seems to be failing if we can't post our links with any metadata. (The only way to reliably fix is by adding a query parameter to each URL which, obviously, still gives us inaccurate share counts.) This is the first time I've encountered this intentional redirect thing and I've asked a few times for more information about how it's set up just for my own edification, but all I can get is that it’s something managed at the server level and is designed to prevent separate share counts for HTTP and HTTPS. Has anyone encountered this method before, and can anyone either explain it to me or point me in the direction of a resource where I can learn more about how it's configured as well as the pros and cons? I'm especially concerned about our SEO with this and how this may impact the way search engines read our site. So far, nothing's come up on scans, but I'd like to stay one step ahead of this. Thanks in advance!
Technical SEO | | ogiovetti0 -
Delete old blog posts after 301 redirects to new pages?
Hi Moz Community, I've recently created several new pages on my site using much of the same copy from blog posts on the same topics (we did this for design flexibility and a few other reasons). The blogs and pages aren't exactly identical, as the new pages have much more content, but I don't think there's a point to having both and I don't want to have duplicate content, so we've used 301 redirects from the old blog posts to the new pages of the same topic. My question is: can I go ahead and delete the old blog posts? (Or would there be any reasons I shouldn't delete them?) I'm guessing with the 301 redirects, all will be well in the world and I can just delete the old posts, but I wanted to triple check to make sure. Thanks so much for your feedback, I really appreciate it!
Technical SEO | | TaraLP1 -
301 Redirects in subfolders
Hi, we're making our site into a static site but I would like to transfer the Google juice. Most of the links and database exist on subfolders though. Could I simply do 301 redirects on the subfolders and retain the value or does it have to be on the full domain?
Technical SEO | | Therealmattyd0 -
Redirect a 301 Redirect
Does any link juice get passed from a permanent redirect to a new 301 redirect? If so, are there any studies which indicate an estimated percentage?
Technical SEO | | RedCaffeine0 -
301 redirects reverting to 302 redirects
We recently built a new website with a new site structure. To prevent there being a load of 404's I redirected the old pages to the new relevant pages with 301 redirects. A few days later the SEOmoz crawl report alerted me to a load of 302 redirects. When I looked into this for some reason all of the 301 redirects I set up are reverting to 302 redirects. I did a test by 301 redirecting a made up URL to an existing page and the same thing happens - it 302 redirects. I can't find any settings in WordPress to possibly explain why this is happening. Has anyone got any ideas why this could be?
Technical SEO | | Tone_Agency0 -
Moving articles to new site, can't 301 redirect because of panda
I have a site that is high quality, but was hit by penguin and perhaps panda. I want to remove some of the articles from my old site and put them on my new site. I know I can't 301 redirect them because I will be passing on the bad google vibes. So instead, I was thinking of redirecting the old articles to a page on the old site which explains that the article is moved over to the new site. I assume that's okay? I'm wondering how long I should wait between the time I take them down from the old site to the time I repost them on the new site. Do I need to wait for Google to de-index them in order to not be considered duplicate content/syndication? We'll probably reword them a bit, too - we really want to avoid panda. Thanks!
Technical SEO | | philray
Phil0 -
How do I 301 redirect a number of pages to one page
I want to redirect all pages in /folder_A /folder_B to /folder_A/index.php. Can I just write one or two lines of code to .htaccess to do that?
Technical SEO | | Heydarian0 -
301 redirect Issues
my clients site is www.greenbayharvest.co.uk When you enter that URL it redirects to www.greenbayharvest.co.uk/shop, dont ask why, thats the way they set it up and thats what im stuck with. So, how do i resolve the 301 issue here. we want all things to point to www.greenbayharvest.co.uk, in terms of SEO but does the fact that there is a redirect going to /shop make this an issue? we appear to have: www.greenbayharvest.co.uk/shop www.greenbayharvest.co.uk greenbayharvest.co.uk greenbayharvest.co.uk/shop all these URL's go to the same same page so what is the best way to correct this? thanks for any help on this Lee
Technical SEO | | IPIM0