Open site explorer, why are my social media metrics incorrect?
-
In open site explorer the Facebook and twitter stats are very low in correlation to what we think it should be.
Twitter - 129
Total tweets and retweets of this URL since March 2010, including tweets of the URL with unique parameters added.
We tweet our URL and people retweet our url several times a day, why is this figure so low?
Facebook - 268 shares, 133 likes.
Our Facebook page has 16,767 likes · 1,373 talking about this.
Surely this figure should be higher? Could it be that its not linked to our site properly some how? im unsure, can any one shed any light on this please?
-
Hi Reece,
Data for OSE is collected straight through the APIs of the various social services, so whatever they return is what we display.
As others have mentioned, metrics are URL specific. For Facebook, we display the activity of the URL you are examining, which is different than the activity around your Facebook page.
Hope this helps explain things a bit. Best of luck!
-
Couple of points of clarification here I feel:
For Facebook - it looks at the metrics of that particular URL itself, not the metrics of your Facebook page. So your 268 shares and 133 likes are from the webpage itself, not your Facebook page.
Twitter - I believe that RTs don't count and it is based on unique tweets from unique twitter handles, but I'd need clarification on that.
-
OpenSiteExplorer only returns the social sharing data for the specific URL you entered. If you entered your root domain (http://example.com) it will only return the number of shares for that specific URL - not the entire domain and all sub-pages.
Likes on a Facebook page will not show up in OSE, because the number of Facebook likes returned is the number of times people on Facebook liked the specific URL you entered into OSE.
So in short - the social sharing data that OSE is returning is accurate, it's just not what you are expecting to see. Hope that helps!
Got a burning SEO question?
Subscribe to Moz Pro to gain full access to Q&A, answer questions, and ask your own.
Browse Questions
Explore more categories
-
Moz Tools
Chat with the community about the Moz tools.
-
SEO Tactics
Discuss the SEO process with fellow marketers
-
Community
Discuss industry events, jobs, and news!
-
Digital Marketing
Chat about tactics outside of SEO
-
Research & Trends
Dive into research and trends in the search industry.
-
Support
Connect on product support and feature requests.
Related Questions
-
Fresh Web Explorer explorer doesnt seem to work properly
How do I get Fresh Web Explorer explorer to work properly. The feedback I’m getting shows that my brand, Health 2000 had over 4000 mentions on Monday the 13th of January. However when I check out the links that supposedly mention our brand, they bring up general terms related to Health and make no reference to our brand. How can I refine this?
Moz Pro | | Hardley1110 -
How do I find out which pages are being indexed on my site and which are not?
Hi, I doing my first technical audit on my site. I am learning how to do an audit as i go and am a lost. I know some page won't be indexed but how do I: 1. Check the site for all pages, both indexed and not indexed 2. Run a report to show indexed pages only (i am presuming i can do this via screaming Frog or webmaster tool) 3. I can do a comparison between the two list and work out which pages are not being indexed. I'll then need to figure out way. I'll cross this bridge once i get to it Thanks Ben
Moz Pro | | benjmoz0 -
Internal Links Data on OSE and poor ranking despite excellent metrics
Hi folks, I use OSE a lot for comparing where we stand against our competitors and I'm always surprised to see most of our competitors have loads more internal links than we do. For example, comparing 'www.kensyard.co.uk' with 'www.sterlingbuild.co.uk', we are better on every Root Domain Metric except for the Total Links metric and this is down to a much smaller number of internal links. They are ranking better than us in Google so I'm wondering if there is something wrong with the way our site is coded / structured that means Google and OSE are not picking up our internal link network properly? We have over nine times as many external root domains linking to our site than theirs, which is surely a far more valuable metric than internal links right? Or is there an issue with our internal link structure that is confusing Google and causing us to rank lower? Many thanks for any advice, Luke
Moz Pro | | LukeyB300 -
Open Site Explorer vs Webmaster Tools
Hi there. OSE is showing 53 linking domains and WMT is showing 161.
Moz Pro | | JeromeSavon
Why are so many missing from OSE. They are all links of a decent age. Thanks0 -
Is there any report / tool that gives me last cache date for each page on my site ?
my site has several hundred pages, and it is important for me to know last crawl date of each page as well as number of pages cralwed in a particualr period ( from / to date ). is there any report in seomoz that can help for this ? or any other suggestion ?
Moz Pro | | elegantmicroweb0 -
Indexed sites
Hello I´m a newbie here on seomoz. My question is just simple but i need to be sure about that:Refering to the report which you can create in the "crawl diagnostic summary". Does the CSV export lists all and ONLY the URLS which are in the google index?If not: does a report is available where all and ONLY the URLS are listed which are in google index?Many thanks! Henrik
Moz Pro | | drgoodcat0 -
How often is Open Site Explorer updated?
Or perhaps my question is actually how often does the seomoz bot crawl the web? I ran some benchmark link counts for a number of websites about this time last month and I noticed when I went to update them for this month the data is the same. Thanks.
Moz Pro | | WCR1 -
Domain Authority: Sites with lower numbers get higher ranking.
We had a question about your online tools for http://pro.seomoz.org/campaigns/30642 The Domain Authority for http://pucherinsurance.com/ is 67: Higher than most of our competitors such as <cite><cite>bluecross.ca which has a rank of 54. </cite> </cite> We show up lower in the actual search results. An example phrase would be Visitors to Canada health Insurance. We get an A grade for onsite reports and we are working on the duplicate content and titles. We appear to be doing everything right but still rank lower than expected. Any thoughts?
Moz Pro | | northerncs0
